Classical Poetry
Classical Poetry
Classical Poetry
A group of people assembled to sing together
.OR
A large organized group of singers. One that performs together with an orchestra
or opera company
.OR
A Chorus is produced when several musicians are playing simultaneously, but
inevitably with small changes in the amplitudes and timings between each
individual sound.
In music the word "chorus" has three meanings: a group of performers, music for
a group of singers and the part of a song that is repeated after a verse.
Explanation of chorus:
The Chorus is a group of actors that together speak, sing, and dance in one body.
The Chorus is part ritual part thematic device that play a much larger role in Greek
Tragedy than in the other genres.
A classic Greek chorus consisted of a number of identically dressed men who
served as
Observers and commentators during the course of a play. They fulfilled several
vital functions which helped influence the development of Greek drama.A Greek
chorus could number as many as 50 people, but Sophocles set its number at
15.Therewere originally 12 chorus members all male but Sophocles added 3 more
to make it 15. One of the primary functions of the chorus is to provide
atmosphere and, in some ways, underscore the tragic action. When the hero is
treading upon major conflict or leading us into the rising action of the plot, the
chorus, in a way, is heralders of inevitable disaster and instill a sense of fear or
suspense in the audience. In some ways the Chorus can represent the audience's
ideal response to the play. Chorus, and its chants and songs, helped the audience
better connect with the character, revealing the essence of the tragedy. Greek
choruses served to provide the viewers with plot exposition, essentially acting as
narrators for many parts of the drama.
What are the functions of chorus in 'Oedipus Rex'?
1) To entertain the audience.
2) To enhance the workings of the plot.
3) To explain the characters and events.
These are the functions of chorus in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles
Detail about chorus:
Like most all ancient Greek tragedians, Sophocles divides his choral odes into
strophe and antistrophe. Both sections had the same number of lines and
metrical pattern. In Greek, strophe means "turn," and antistrophe means "turn
back." This makes sense when you consider the fact that, during the strophe
choruses danced from right to left and during the antistrophethey did the
opposite. Sophocles may have split them into two groups, so that it was as if one
part of the Chorus was conversing with the other. Perhaps the dualities created
by strophe and antistrophe, represent the endless, irresolvable debates for which
Greek tragedy is famous. Specifically, the chorus in a Greek play is made up of
dancers and singers. These dancers and singers represent a chorus of Theban
elders. As dancers and singers, they signal the end of one
episode or scene and the beginning of another. That signaled interlude between
episodes or scenes is called the stasimon.
Contribution of chorus to Oedipus Rex:
The contribution of the Chorus in Oedipus Rex is considerable. They link the play
with common humanity. In some sense they are often in the position of the ideal
spectator. They fill in the gaps in the action when no other character is there
on the stage. They add to it the element of melody which must have been one of
the attractions of Greek tragedy. They provide an appropriate shift between the
titanic, heroic figure of Oedipus and the mass of common humanity represented
by the two shepherds in Oedipus Res. The tragedy of Oedipus and its relevance to
common life is very well stressed by the Chorus in its exit ode or exode .The
Chorus takes part in the dialogues also. When Oedipus consults them about
ending the plague in the city, they express disappointment that the oracle had
not guided them about the
identity of Laius’ murderer. They also tell him what they know about the murder
of their
previous king and its circumstances. When Creon, learning that the king has
accused him of treason, comes on the stage he talks to the Chorus,
who tell him that the king’s accusation was
probably made in the heat of anger. Creon asked if the king looked absolutely
serious while making the charge and they rightly say that it is not for them to look
into the eyes of his master when he speaks. When Oedipus has almost passed a
sentence upon Creon, Jocasta arrives onthe scene and first talks to the Chorus.
They request her to settle the difference between the two men. They are worried
when they see Jocasta going into the palace in a very dejected mood, and
they give expression to their apprehension. Oedipus asks them about the
shepherd who gave the infant to the Corinthian, they answer that his queen
would be able to answer the question better. They sympathize with Oedipus
when they see him after he has blinded himself .It is clear, thus, that the Chorus
never takes a direct hand in the action. It does not consist only of spectators but
influences the action in various subtle ways.
Chorus with reference to OEDIPUS REX:
Sophocles also uses the Chorus at the beginning of the play to help tell
the audience the given circumstances of the play. We hear all about the terrible
havoc that the plague is wreaking on Thebes. By describing the devastation in
such gruesome detail, Sophocles raises the stakes for his protagonist, Oedipus.
The people of Thebes are in serious trouble; Oedipus has to figure out who killed
Laius fast, or he won't have any subjects left to rule.Unlike his contemporary
Euripides, Sophocles was known to integrate his choruses into the action of the
play. In Oedipus the King we see the Chorus constantly advising Oedipus to keep
his mind cool. Most of the time in ancient tragedies choruses do a lot of
lamenting of terrible events,but do little to stop them. Amazingly, though, the
Chorus in Oedipus the King manages to convince Oedipus not to banish or
execute Creon. Just imagine how much worse Oedipus would have felt if
he'd killed his uncle/brother-in-law on top of his other atrocities.The Chorus in
Oedipus the King goes through a distinct character arc. They begin by being
supportive of Oedipus, believing, based on his past successes, that he's the right
man to fix their woes. As Oedipus's behavior becomes more erratic, they become
uncertain and question his motives. The fact Oedipus doesn't start lopping off
heads at this point is pretty good evidence that he's not a tyrant. In the end,
the Chorus is on Oedipus's side again and laments his horrific fate.During their
interludes, the dancers and singers move and sing through their parts. But that
does not mean that chorus members lack regular, non-singing parts. In fact, the
chorus has a designated choir leader who additionally has spoken interactions
with other characters in the play. Through the sung parts of the entire chorus and
the spoken parts of the chorus leader, the chorus carries out an additional
responsibility to the reading and viewing audience. They comment on characters
and situations as these characters appear and as these situations develop in the
play.
Conclusion:
The functions of the Chorus are very well performed in Oedipus Rex. In the very
first ode the Chorus depicts the horror of the plague and expresses
an apprehension about the message from the oracle of Delphi. Other odes
comment on the action that has taken place after the last ode and build an
atmosphere appropriate to that stage of the play. It plays the role of a peace-
maker between the king and Creon and succeeds in getting the king’s pardon for
the latter.
After the exit of Teiresias it comments on the terrible predictions which Teiresias
has made but shows determination to support the king. Its most significant
response is when Oedipus and Jocasta have expressed irreverent thoughts against
the oracles. At many other times also they reflect the dominant mood and help to
deepen it. When Oedipus imagines that he is the son of the goodness of luck, the
Chorus, immediately sing that their master, Oedipus, might be the sonof Apollo.
So all in all, chorus has an important role in drama and it has importance like soul
in body.
Chaucer: Realism
Literature is the mirror of its age. Supreme literary artist is one who becomes a
mouthpiece and provides a real picture of his age with its minute details. Chaucer
is a perfect representative of his age. He is in true sense a social chronicler of
England. His poetry reflects the 14th century not in fragment but as a complete
whole.
Realism of Chaucer in “The Canterbury Tales” not gives us the impression that
whatever has been described is real in the ordinary sense of the word. Realism is
not reality; it is a collective term for the devices that give the effect of reality.
Chaucer's principle object of writing poetry was to portray men and women
truthfully without any exaggeration and to present an exact picture of average
humanity. He painted life as he saw it, and he saw it with so observant eye that it
seems that he was viewing all the events as well as characters through a
kaleidoscope. Because of his this quality his epoch, “The Prologue of the
Canterbury Tales” has become one of the vivid epoch of history. Moreover he is a
man of the world so he mixes with all types of mankind and he observes the
minute peculiarities of human nature. “The Canterbury Tales” is not only a long
poetical piece but a social history of England. He exposes almost all the aspects of
his age as well as of the people along with the detail of their appearance, sex
profession, attire and conduct.
Chaucer shed off the influence of the French and Italian models based on
fantasies and dreams, upon which he had worked for so long and entered the
abundance of his own real self. He worked like a true interpreter or chronicler,
relating in a most realistic manner, the stories he had heard, without change of
wording or tone.
The setting of “The Canterbury Tales” is highly realistic. A pilgrimage was one of
the most common sights in the fourteenth century England. To relate the stories
of these pilgrims, Chaucer gives the illusion, not of an imaginary world, but of real
one. The more real the world of his setting is, the more his tales by contrast
seems like tales, even though some to them deal with real everyday life. Unlike
Boccaccio, who in his tales quickly slips back into frank artificiality, Chaucer held
consistently to realism throughout “The Canterbury Tales”.
Gifted with an acute power of observation Chaucer sees things as they are, and he
possesses the art of printing them as he sees them. He does not project the tint of
his likes and dislikes, views and prejudices on what he paints.
In “The Canterbury Tales” Chaucer has blended laughter and tears, the comic and
tragic as is found in life with such case and grace, that his story-telling seems like
a veracious picture of real life. Though his pilgrimage is remote form our
experience, yet we feel that this is what we might see if we could turn the clock
back few centuries.
Chaucer as a realist presents before us in The Canterbury Tales the pulsating life
of the common people. Chaucer’s pilgrims talk of “their purse, their love affairs or
their private fends”. Their vision is confirmed to the occurrences within their
parish. This is the typical vision of the common people which is realistically
presented by Chaucer in the Canterbury Tales.
Chaucer’s depiction of the Shipman represents the salient features of the trade.
The Merchant is another important figure who signifies the changed conditions of
Chaucerian society.
“There is not artificial, pompous display, but a strict parsimony of the poet’s
material like the rude simplicity of the age in which he lived.”
It would be quite justifiable to call Chaucer as a realist of high rank because his
principle object has been to portray men and women trustfully without an acute
power of observation. He sees things as they are and describes them as he really
sees them.
Chaucer: Ecclesiastical Characters
Chaucer has given a very true and realistic picture of the ecclesiastical characters
of his age. He satirizes the corrupt and worldly minded clergies and on the other
hand he appreciates the good characters and presents a model picture of him.
Though in Chaucer’s age, religion had a control over the minds and soul of the
people, yet regrettably, its influence was corrupt. The monasteries were
promoting corruption, exploiting the innocent folk and were earning money
under the disguise of religion. Moralities and ethics were fading. The ecclesiastics
had become notorious for their avarice, corruption and dishonesty. They had
forgotten their sacred duties and had become degenerated.
In “The Prologue”, Chaucer has drawn some portraits of the clergies of the 14th
century England, free from any personal prejudice. These are not exaggerated
sketches and they realistically refer to the corruption, and religious and moral
degradation that had crept into the ecclesiastical order of the day.
His ironic portraits reveal that Chaucer had some idea of a code of conduct for
clergies to follow but he is impartial and realistic and paints both the sides of
picture. Through the portraits of pleasure-loving Monk, the wanton Friar, the
corrupt Pardoner, he exposes the humour of the typical Church dignitaries. He
also gives the portrait of a good Parson. Chaucer admires him because the
persons like him were becoming rare in his age.
She wears fashionable dress with a golden broach, engraved with the words:
She truly signifies high-class religious-minded ladies of the 14th century. She is
not an ideal Nun and typifies the traits of the contemporary prioress.
He is fat like a lord, for he leads a relaxed life and passes his time in eating,
drinking and merry-making. He is entirely misfit to his profession. He is fond of
fine dresses. He wears fur-lined sleeves, gold pins and love-knot.
He does not like to study the strict rules and discipline of the cloister. He likes
hunting and has fine horses and hounds in his stable.
3. The Friar is a wanton, greedy and corrupt fellow who neglects his duties and
does not bother about religion. He is fond of singing, merry-making, drinking and
visiting inns and public places. He builds relations with the rich Franklin and
worthy women. He is a rogue, seducer of women and scoundrel. He encourages
sins by setting an easy solution of apology, misuses his authority and exploits
others in terms of their sin. He was also very expert in the art of begging.
He loves garlic, red wine and onion. He is a hypocrite who allows people to carry
on their sins and forgives them for a small donation to him. He knows the secret
of young women and men and exploits them to his own interest.
He deceives the simple folk. He sings merrily, sweetly and attracts the people in
this way. Chaucer has a poor opinion of him and ironically calls him “a noble
ecclesiastical”.
He does not run after showiness and worldly grandeur. He is a miser and poor. He
is quick and meaningful in his talk. He is glad to learn and glad to teach. He is the
picture of the poet’s learning.
We can conclude that all the above mentioned details prove Chaucer’s realistic
attitude towards religion. He knows that religion lies in the spirit rather than in
the observance of form and ceremonies. Undoubtedly, his ecclesiastical character
typifies the various degenerated aspects of the Church of the day.
“The Seeing Eye, the retentive memory, the judgment to select and the ability to expound.”
His keen analysis of the minutest detail of his characters, their dresses, looks and manners
enable him to present his characters lifelike and not mere bloodless abstractions.
His poetical piece, “The Prologue to the Canterbury Tales” is a real picture gallery in which
thirty portraits are hanging on the wall with all of their details and peculiarities. Rather it is a
grand procession with all the life and movement, the colour and sound. Indeed,
“His characters represent English society, morally and socially, in the real and recognizable
types”.
And still more representative of humanity in general. So, the characters in Chaucer's “The
Prologue” are for all ages and for all lands.
Chaucer is the first great painter of character in English literature. Infact, next to Shakespeare
he is the greatest in this field. In “The Prologue to the Canterbury Tales” the thirty portraits
traced by Chaucer give us an excellent idea of the society at that time. Except for royalty and
aristocracy, on one hand and the robbers or out casts on the other, he has painted in brief
practically the whole English nation.
The thirty pilgrims, including the host, belong to the most varied professions. The Knight and
the Squire presents the warlike element of the society. The learned and liberal vocations are
signified by the Man of Law, the Doctor, the Oxford Clerk and the Poet himself. The Merchant
and the Shipman stand for the higher commercial community while the Wife of Bath, an expert
Cloth maker represents the traders and manufacturers. Agriculture is represented by the
Ploughman, the Miller and the Franklin. The upper servants like Manciple and the Reeve and
the lower servant like Yeoman and the Cook represent the town and Country between them.
The Monk from his monastery, the Prioress from her convent, her attendant priests, the village
Parson, the roaming Friar, the Pardoner and the Summoner sufficiently cover the casual
categories of the religious order in those days.
To preserve the distinctions among these typical characters, Chaucer has indicated the
differences in their clothes, manner of speech, habits and tendencies representing the common
traits and the average characteristics of each profession. These personages, therefore, are not
mere phantasms of the brain but real human begins.
These characters represent various types of contemporary society. They are no longer mere
dummies or types but owing to their various peculiarities, their arguments and agreement and
their likes and dislikes we recognize them as real living beings, true to the mould in which all
human nature is cast.
His world is almost freak-free and his characters are perfectly lifelike. Some of them are so
modern that they seem to be living today. The old Knight is an example of the chivalrous
character which is found in every generation. The Squire is just the typical man of any day.
The Merchant has all the vanity which comes from the growing of wealth, while the Man of Law
like lawyers of all times, is pilling up fees and buying land. We recognize in him the typical
lawyer of our own day:
There are characters like the Prioress, the Monk, the Franklin, the Reeve, the Summoner, the
Pardoner, and the Wife of Bath whom we do not identify at first. But none of them is really
extinct. They have changed their name and profession but their chief part is an element of
humanity. That is why when we accompany the Pilgrims on their way we feel quite at home and
have no feeling of being among aliens.
Chaucer’s art of characterization is superb. He looks at his characters objectively and delineates
each of the men and women sharply and caressingly. His impression of casualness, economy,
significance and variety of every detail are examples of that supreme art which conceals art.
Infact, there is a different method of almost every pilgrim. He varies his presentation from the
full length portrait to the thumb-nail sketch, but even in the brief sketches, Chaucer conveys a
strong sense of individuality and depth of portraiture.
Chaucer: A Humorist
Humour is an essential ingredient of Chaucer's poetry and the back-bone of “The Prologue and
The Canterbury Tales”. All the characters in The Prologue have been humorously described.
Humour, infact, makes Chaucer’s characterization distinct. A humorist is one who is quick to
perceive the funny side of the things and who has the capacity to laugh and makes other laugh
at what is absurd or ridiculous or incongruous.
Chaucer is called the first humorist of English literature. No English literary work before him
reveals humour in the modern sense. And Chaucer is a greater humorist than Boccaccio.
Chaucer’s humour is consistent all pervasive and intense as we find in Shakespeare’s plays. He
paints all the characters in “The Prologue” in a humorous manner. The Knight is as gentle as a
maid; the Squire is too sentimental in his love to sleep at night; the Friar has relations with the
bar-maids instead of the poor; the Parson is too innocent and Clerk is too studious. Chaucer
even does not spare himself and says:
His humour has refined and sophisticated touches and it does not offend anybody. For
example, when he tells us that Prioress is so amiable and pleasant in her manners that she
takes paints to imitate the manners of the court we cannot know whether he is praising her or
laughing at her affection:
But his humour is of the finest type. It is pleasant and sympathetic because he is a man of
pleasant temperament. He knows that every human being has one type of defect or others. He
pinpoints the defect in a light manner with a view to cure them, not for degrading the victim.
His attitude is positive. So, when he says that the Friar lisps a little out of affection and when he
plays on a harp, his eyes twinkles in his head like sparkling stars on the frosty night, we do not
hate him or his affection, rather we just laugh at him at this weakness.
Chaucer’s humour is also tinged with pity. It makes us thoughtful of the weakness of his victim
and we start pitying him. For example, when he tells us that the Monk is more interested in
riding, hunting and other worldly pursuits than in religious activities we pity him and wish him
better. It means that his humour carries a sound message.
Chaucer’s humour is, of course, satirical but it is sugar coated. Hs purpose is to awake the
people against realities of life. His age is of romantic idealism and people are blind to the
realities of life. His satire is not corrosive but gentle and mild. Secondly, he is not a zealous
reformer. He satirizes only these characters that cannot be reformed at any cost, e.g. the
Summoner, and the Pardoner who are extremely corrupt. Here he openly passes remarks about
their dishonesty and corruption.
Most of the time, Chaucer’s humour takes the form of irony because it relieves the bitterness of
satire. For example, the use of the world “Worthy” for the most unworthy characters brings a
tickling irony except for the “Worthy” Knight. Chaucer employs different sorts of irony. He has
made an ample use of irony by contract in “The Prologue”. For example, after talking about the
bravery, skill, experience and grandeur of the Knight, he tells us that in his behaviour he is as
gentle as a maid and cannot harm anyone.
He also employs irony be exaggeration when he says the Prioress has all the manners of eating
because she knows how to carry a morsel and how to keep. She does not let any morsel fall
from her mouth and she does not dip her fingers deep in the sauce. This is all exaggeration
because these things do not account for manner and everyone knows them well.
He creates irony by situation too. For example, he describes those qualities of the Monk, which
are not worth of his religious rank i.e. he is a good rider and brave man.
In this way, he creates an ironical situation, which makes us think since he is a Monk, he should
not do this. His actions are set in contrast with is situation as a Monk.
Chaucer’s humour is wide in range. It covers all kinds of humour from downright jokes to good-
natured strokes when he paints the physical appearances of characters. For example, he
describes Reeve:
Then, he says, that the Doctor of Physic is the greatest physician because he has the knowledge
of astronomy.
In the description of the Shipman, he creates humour by incongruity when he says that he is a
good fellow because he steals wine and has no prick of conscience.
In conclusion, we can say that critics may be divided in opinion as to Chaucer’s right to be called
the father of the English poetry, but there can be no question that he is the first great English
humorist.
As it is shown in Paradise Lost Book-I that the character of Satan is a blend of the noble and the
ignoble, the exalted and the mean, the great and the low, therefore, it becomes difficult to
declare him either a hero or a wholly villain.
In Paradise Lost Book-I we can hardly doubt his heroic qualities because this book fully exhibits
his exemplary will-power, unsurpassable determination, unshakable confidence and
unbelievable courage. However, the encyclopedia of religion removes some of the confusion
from our minds regarding Satan’s character in the following words:
“Satan means the arch-enemy of men, the adversary of God and of Christianity, a rebel
against God, a lost arch-angle.”
Milton also confirms the remarks and tells us that Satan is an archangel. When God declares the
Holy Christ his viceroy, Satan refuses to accept God’s order because he himself is a confident for
it, his false strength and pride leads him to revolt against God for the fulfillment of his lust for
power but he and his army suffers a heavy defeat and throw headlong into the pit of hell.
Milton’s description of Satan’s huge physical dimension, the heavy arms he carries, his tower
like personality and his gesture make him every inch a hero. In his first speech, Satan tells
Beelzebub that he does not repent of what he did and that defeat has brought no change in
him at all. He utters memorable lines:
“What though the field be lost?
All is not lost – the unconquerable will,
And study of revenge, immortal hate,
And courage never to submit or yield.”
Actually he is not ready to bow before the will of God and is determined to wade and eternal
war by force and will never compromise. He proudly calls himself the new possessor of the
profoundest hell and foolishly claims to have a mind never to be changed by force or time. As
he says:
Although Satan undergoes perpetual mental and physical torture in hell yet he is fully satisfied
because he is at liberty to do whatever he likes, without any restriction. The following line
clearly indicates his concept of freedom.
It can be said without any doubt that Satan gives an evidence of great leadership qualities
which are certainly worthy of an epic hero and Beelzebub appreciates him for his undaunted
virtues as the commander of undaunted virtue as the commander of fallen angels. His speech
to the fallen angels is a sole roof of his great leadership because it infuses a new spirit in the
defeated angels who come out of the pit of hill with their swords and are ready to face any
danger regardless of their crushing and humiliating defeat at the hands of God. We fully laud
Satan’s views on the themes of honour, revenge and freedom, but we cannot help
sympathizing him because he embodies evil. He is the embodiment of disobedience to God.
As the poem proceeds, the character of Satan degenerates and he fails to produce any
impression to true heroism because he is morally a degraded figure. When we closely examine
his addressed to his followers, we find that it is full of contradictions and absurdities, because
he tries to throw dust into the eyes of his comrades. In fact, on the one hand, he says that they
will provoke war against God and on the other hand, he wants peace which is only possible
through submission. Then, on reaching the earth, he enters into a serpent and is completely
degrades. Pride is the cause of his fall from Heaven – Pride that has ‘raised’ him to contend with
the mightiest. But where is that pride when the Archangel enters into the mouth of a sleeping
serpent and hides himself in its “Mazy folds”. Here from the grand figure that he is in the
beginning, he degenerates into a man and cunning fellow, and then he tries to tempt Eve by
guile. So, Satan degenerates from the role of a brave hero to that of a cunning villain as C. S.
Lewis remarks:
“From hero to general, from general to politician, from politician to secret service agent, and
thence to a thing that peers in at bed-room or bath-room window and thence toad, and
finally to a snake – such is the progress of Satan.”
So, it can easily be said in the light of above mentioned facts that Satan is out and pouter hero
in Book-I of Paradise Lost, but in Book-IX he appears before us every inch a villain because of his
evil design and he himself says that his chief pleasure lies in the destruction of mankind which
lowers him in our estimation as a hero.
Adam and Eve are the very first human couple and the parents of the whole human race and
the masterpiece of God’s art of creation, primarily lived in Edenliberty to
enjoyeverything available there, with only one restriction that they were not to eat the
forbidden fruit there, but they could not act upon this curb, therefore, God punished them for
their disobedience and expelled them from Paradise.
When we make a careful and critical analysis of “Paradise Lost” Book IX, we discover that in
spite of having many common features of character and personality both Adam and Eve havea
world of difference between them as well. Both of them are made of clay which is an
indescribable beautiful garden in Heaven. God had given them the , have steadfast faith in
God and equally love each other yet at the same time they are divided in opinion about
their work, passionfear of an enemy.
As far as Eve is concerned, she possesses female charm and attraction,
a suggestive and justifying mind, a rational and convincing manner of conversation, but at the
same time she is highly confident, short sighted, jealous and deluded about her powers.
Adam, on the other hand, is an embodimentof
sagacity, moderation, contentment, foresightedness, knowledge, mankind, passionatelove a
nd sacrifice.
When Eve rationally suggests that they should work separately because when they are
together, they waste most of their time in petty things. Adam foresightedly objects the idea and
reminds her of the danger of her being seduced by Satan. At this, she pounces upon him
for suspecting her faithfulness. She also under-estimates their enemy. Adam tries his best
to convince her that they should not separate from each other but she remains unmoved. At
last, he retreats and reluctantly allows her to work after her own heart and, thus, they part
from each other for the very first time and this very alienation, in fact, leads to their expulsion
from Heaven.
Milton achieved eminent success in making Paradise Lost as classical epic. In spite of certain
drawbacks and defects, Milton’s epic is entitled to take its rightful place among half a dozen
classical epics in the world. The first essential feature of the epic is its theme. The theme of an
epic must have a national importance or significance; that is, the epic must be a true and
faithful mirror of the life and of a nation. Homer represented the national life, thought and
culture of ht Greeks in the Iliad, and Virgil gave expression to the hopes and aspirations of the
Romans in the Aeneid. The Fall of Man is the theme of the epic.
The action of Paradise Lost is one and there is a unity of action. The central action is the Fall of
Man, and everything in the epic as, the battle of angels, the creation of the world, is
subordinated to this central action. There are digressions at the beginning of the third and
seventh books, but they do not affect the unity and central action of the poem. The whole
action of Paradise Lost is single and compact. In the second place, its action is entire which
means that it has a beginning, middle and an end. The action in Paradise Lost is contrived in
hell, executed upon earth, and punished by heaven. In the third place the action ought to be
great, by greatness of the action, Aristotle means that it should not only be great in its nature
but also in its duration. The entire action of Paradise Lost has a stamp of grandeur and
greatness about it. Milton’s subject is greater than Homer’s Iliad and Virgil’s Aeneid. It does not
determine the fate of one single person or nation; but of the whole human race.
Milton plunges into the middle of the action. Milton, in imitation of the great poets, opens his
Paradise Lost, with an infernal council plotting the fall of man.
The characters of the epic must have dignity and variety. In Paradise Lost, we have a wide
variety of characters marked with qualities. In Paradise Lost, we have human as well as
superhuman characters. Adams and Eve are human characters, whereas God, Christ and Satan
are superhuman characters.
An epic must have a hero with great qualities. Identification of the hero is different in Paradise
Lost. Adam can be called the hero of the epic. He is not a warrior or a conqueror but a noble
figure.
An epic is a serious poem embodying sublime and nobler thoughts. Milton’s Paradise Lost is a
sublime and noble poem characterized by loftiness of thought and sentiment.
An epic is not without a moral. Moral forms an integral and intrinsic part in Milton’s poem. It
seeks to “vindicate the ways of God to man, to show the reasonableness of religion and the
necessity of obedience to the Divine Law”.
Milton, in conformity with the epic practice, begins Paradise Lost by invoking the Muse to help
him in his great task. But since Milton seeks the aid of the Heavenly Muse, the Holy spirit,
He requests:
“- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -: what in me is dark
Illumine, what is low raise and support,”
In and epic poem the poet narrates very little in his person. The characters themselves carry
forward the mission of the poet.
Lastly the language of an epic must be sublime and rose above the language of common
parlance.
Aristotle observes that a sublime style can be formed by three methods --- by the use of
metaphors, by making use of the idioms and by lengthening of the phrase by the addition of
words. Milton employs all these three methods to give the air of grandeur to his epic. His
similes and metaphors are epical. Latin words are frequently introduced. The style of Paradise
Lost is the truest example of grand style. On one place, Satan says:
Milton’s Paradise Lost is a successful classical epic. Paradise lost has thus many excellences as
an epic but the defects in it also not be forgotten. The introduction of allegorical persons like sin
and death, the frequent allusions to heathen mythological fables, the intervention of grotesque
incidents, the frequent indulgence in puns and useless display of learning and the unnecessary
use of technical terms as in the description of Pandemonium are some blemishes in the style of
the poem.
One other point must also be noted. An epic is an objective poem, and personal reflections are
out of place in it. But the most sublime parts of Paradise Lost reflect the individuality of the
poet. However this has added to the interest of the work as a poem though it is not, strictly
speaking, permissible in an epic.
The Rape of the Lock is a "page torn from the petty pleasure-
seeking life of a fashionable beauty." Discuss.
The Rape of the Lock has rightly been described as a representation of the
petty pleasure-seeking life of a fashionable beauty. The poem is a satire on
beautiful aristocratic women of the eighteenth century whose lives centred
round petty interests and the quest of shallow pleasures. The principal
target of attack is Belinda, a fashionable beautiful lady of the upper classes
of the eighteenth-century English society. There can be no doubt about the
beauty of this lady. Early in the poem, she is compared to the sun. The
sun-comparison appears again at the beginning of Canto II.
She wears a sparkling cross which even Jews and infidels would like to
kiss. If she has any faults," they would be hidden by her graceful ease and
her sweetness of temper. Her care-free disposition is expressed thus:
"Belinda smiled, and all the world was gay." She nourishes two locks of hair
which greatly enhance the already irresistible charm of this lady. Indeed,
the poet invests her almost with the character of a divinity. At one point the
praise of her attractions may be a mere mask for Pope's satiric attack on
her personality as a coquette; at another it is praise which no irony can fully
undermine. Nor can there be any doubt that she belongs to the fashionable
world.
But, although Belinda is a woman of superb beauty and charm, the poet
fully reveals to us her petty, pleasure-seeking nature. She suffers from all
the vanities, follies, and lack of moral scruple of the aristocratic ladies of the
time. Although she deserves our homage and adoration by virtue of her
physical charms, she is treated as an object of mockery, ridicule, and even
condemnation because of her s^.llnwness, superficiality, and the lack of
any intellectual interests or moral elevation in her life. She is a lazy woman
who continues to sleep till the hour of twelve in the day and who, on waking
up at that hour, falls asleep again, to be wakened subsequently by the
licking tongue of her pet dog, Shock. When she does ultimately get up from
bed, she goes ithrough a love-letter which is waiting for her and which
makes her forget the dream that she has seen. Next, she gets ready for her
toilet. Thus we see that her day begins at noon, and -that too when she is
awakened by her lap-dog's Sicking her face. And her first thoughts on
waking up are about the love-letter which has been addressed to her and
about self-decoration. Keeping pets, encouraging and receiving love-
letters, and self-embellishment were some of the principal interests of
Belinda and the whole class of the society to which she belonged.
Wearing a white robe, the beautiful Belinda now addresses a prayer to the
'.'cosmetic powers". Then she looks at her heavenly reflection in the mirror,
and naturally feels pleased by her beauty. By her side stands Betty to
assist her in the sacred ceremony of toilet. Numerous caskets are opened
and they reveal their precious contents brought from different countries of
the world. From each casket, Betty skilfully selects some bright and
precious article to decorate Belinda. From one casket she takes out the
brilliant pearls and diamonds of India, while from another she chooses the
perfumes of Arabia. Speckled combs made of tortoise-shell and milk-white
combs of ivory lie on the dressing table, along with shining pins, puffs,
powders, patches, bibles, and billet-doux. The beauty of Belinda is greatly
enhanced by cosmetics and by ornaments. Her smiles become more
winning. The lightnings in her eyes become keener. This description fully
exposes Belinda's vanity and her love of fashion. But, of course, these
were the characteristics of all aristocratic ladies of the eighteenth century.
Nor have aristocratic women shed these characteristics in our times.
Belinda's emergence from her house is compared to the rising of the sun.
The poet then describes her journey over the river Thames, in the company
of beautiful ladies and well-dressed young gentlemen. The eyes of
everyone are fixed on her because of her superior charm. She gives her
smiles to everybody but shows no special favour to anyone. Men who look
at her are captured by her locks of hair with their bright ringlets which
embellish her ivory-white neck. The adventurous Baron, Lord Petre, is
prepared to use force or fraud to rob her of these locks. The whole of this
description shows Belinda as the leading light of the fashionable world and
as a woman whose chief desire is to win admiration. The manner in which
Ariel describes the nature of the calamity which might befall Belinda also
shows her superficial nature and her lack of moral scruple. It is not known,
says Ariel, whether she will allow her chastity to be violated, or some
delicate China-jar will crack; whether she will stain her honour, or her new
brocade; whether she will forget her prayers, or miss a masked ball;
whether she will lose her heart or her necklace; or whether Heaven has
decreed that Shock must fall.
The coach carrying Belinda and her party takes them to Hampton Court. To
this palace the gallant young men and the beautiful young ladies come to
enjoy the pleasures of the royal court. Their conversation covers a wide
range of trivialities, much of it attacking the moral character of various
persons: "At every word a reputation dies." They talk about who arranged
the dance party or who paid the last visit to the Queen. One speaks about
the beauty of a Japanese screen, and another interprets motions, locks and
eyes. The brief intervals in the conversation are filled up with a gentleman's
taking snuff, or a lady's fluttering her fan, or amorous staring. We form a
rather low opinion about this high society of which Belinda is an integral
part. We next become acquainted with Belinda's thirst for fame which leads
her to engage herself in an encounter with two adventurous Knights at the
game of ombre. Her breast expands with the pleasure of an anticipated
victory in this contest. Having won, she feels jubilant and her exultant
shouting fills the sky. She undoubtedly shows a splendid skill in playing the
game of ombre, but the manner in which she gloats over her victory shows
not only her vanity but superficiality of mind. After the game of ombre,
Belinda participates in the ceremony of coffee-drinking. Toilet, gossip,
ombre, and coffee drinking— these occupy much of Belinda's time in the
day. She does not seem to have any intellectual interests whatever.
For all her professed purity, Belinda is found to be secretly in love with the
Baron. When Ariel finds "an earthly lover lurking at her heart", he feels
amazed and retires from the scene with a sigh. Ariel realises that he can no
longer protect her, because Spirits like him can protect only maidens who
have pure minds and who have no room in their hearts for earthly lovers.
The Baron then cuts off a lock of Belinda's hair. And now we see another
side of Belinda's personality. She grows furious. Lightning seems to flash
from her eyes, and her screams of horror rend the skies. When a woman
loses her husband or her lap-dog, she does not utter such loud cries as
Belinda utters on this occasion. Belinda's rage and despair are forcefully
described by the poet. While lamenting the loss of her lock, she deplores
the fact that she was so attracted by the pleasures of the court-life. It would
have been better, she says, if she had stayed and said her prayers at home
instead of roaming with youthful lords. She recalls the omens which she
witnessed in the morning and which she ignored. Thrice from her trembling
hand the patch-box fell; the China-vessels shook without wind; Poll sat
mute, and Shock was most unkind. Not only is the cause of Belinda's
lament trivial, but the very lament is hypocritical. She would not have felt so
hurt if, instead of the curl which lent such glory to her head, some other hair
had been stolen by the Baron. Belinda's shallowness, the superficiality of
her mind, and her vanity could not have been more effectively or skilfully
exposed than in this part of the poem.
• There is much more in the poem than a satire on the love of pleasure and
fashion of a lady. The young gallants of the time have not been ignored.
One of the most amusing passages in the poem is the one in which the
Baron is described as building an altar of twelve vast French romances with
three garters, half a dozen pair of gloves, and all the trophies of his former
loves, and setting fire to it-with his amorous sighs and with tender love
letters. The Baron's worship of Love is comparable to Belinda's prayer to
the cosmetic powers. The poet ridicules Sir Plume's pride in his amber
snuff-box and his spotted cane, besides laughing at his "unthinking face"
and his habit of excessive but ineffective swearing. The poet also pokes fun
at Dapper wit and at Sir Fopling: "One died in metaphor and one in song."
In spite of the accessory elements pointed out above, the fact remains that
the poem is chiefly and largely the picture of the life of a petty-minded,
pleasure seeking fashionable beauty.
QUESTION NO. 1
Answer the following questions.