0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views68 pages

Biomimicry in The Built Environment

This document summarizes biomimicry in architecture and structural engineering through examples of structures that take inspiration from nature. It discusses several landmark projects that employ biomimetic design principles including vaulted structures inspired by plant cells, tensile structures based on spider webs and insect wings, and lightweight shell structures drawing from seashells and bone. The document also outlines mathematical formulations for analyzing forces in curved geometries and the conditions required for structures to allow deformation while maintaining their shape, as seen in natural materials.

Uploaded by

Thillu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views68 pages

Biomimicry in The Built Environment

This document summarizes biomimicry in architecture and structural engineering through examples of structures that take inspiration from nature. It discusses several landmark projects that employ biomimetic design principles including vaulted structures inspired by plant cells, tensile structures based on spider webs and insect wings, and lightweight shell structures drawing from seashells and bone. The document also outlines mathematical formulations for analyzing forces in curved geometries and the conditions required for structures to allow deformation while maintaining their shape, as seen in natural materials.

Uploaded by

Thillu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 68

Biomimicry in the built environment

Chris Williams
Department of Architecture & Civil Engineering
University of Bath

http://people.bath.ac.uk/abscjkw/
German Pavilion, Expo '67, Montreal: Rolf Gutbrod, Frei Otto, Leonhardt + Andrä
Munich Olympic Stadium 1972: Günther Behnisch, Frei Otto, Leonhardt + Andrä, Jörg Schlaich
Millenium Dome (The O2 Arena) 2000: Richard Rogers, Buro Happold
Photographs: Mark Power
Olympic Velodrome London 2012: Hopkins Architects, Expedition Engineering
Cripta de la Colònia Güell 1918: Antoni Gaudí
Funicular polygons Nouvelle mécanique, ou Statique, Tome 1,
Pierre Varignon, 1725
Ponte del Diavolo, Torcello
Henri Cartier-Bresson
Maidenhead Railway Bridge, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, 1839
Mannheim Multihalle 1975: Carlfried Mutschler + Partners, Frei Otto,
Ove Arup & Partners (Ted Happold, Ian Liddell)
Ernst Haeckel: Kunstformen der Natur (Art Forms of Nature)
Montreal Biosphère 1967: Richard Buckminster Fuller
Eden Project 2000: Grimshaw, Anthony Hunt and Associates (now SKM Anthony Hunts)
ETFE Cushions: Vector Foiltec
Cabot Circus 2008: Chapman Taylor Architects,
Schlaich Bergermann und Partner, SKM Anthony Hunts
Downland Gridshell 2002: Edward Cullinan Architects,
Buro Happold (Richard Harris), Green Oak Carpentry Company
Savill Building 2006: Glenn Howells Architects, Buro Happold (Richard Harris), Green Oak Carpentry Company
British Museum Great Court Roof 2000: Foster + Partners, Buro Happold, Waagner Biro
National Maritime Museum, Amsterdam 2011: Ney + Partners
Gardens by the Bay Singapore 2012:
Wilkinson Eyre Architects, Grant Associates, Atelier One, Atelier Ten
Palazzetto dello Sport, Pier Luigi Nervi , 1957
Félix Candela, Chapel Lomas de Cuernavaca
Sydney Opera House 1973:
Jørn Utzon,
Ove Arup & Partners
Photographs: David Moore
Dome: Dome with hole:
positive Gaussian curvature, positive Gaussian curvature,
statically determinate, a mechanism,
inextensional deformation inextensional deformation
not possible possible

Cooling tower:
negative Gaussian curvature,
statically determinate,
inextensional deformation
not possible
Plane coordinates and the Airy stress function

∂σ x ∂τ yx
+ =0
∂x ∂y
∂τ xy ∂σ y
+ =0
∂x ∂y
τ xy = τ yx
∂ 2φ
σx = 2
∂y
∂ 2φ
σy = 2
∂x
∂ 2φ
τ xy = −
∂x∂y
w = load per unit plan area
∂ 2φ ∂ 2 z ∂ 2φ ∂ 2 z ∂ 2φ ∂ 2 z
= 2 2 −2 + 2 2
∂y ∂x ∂x∂y ∂x∂y ∂x ∂y
Coefficients of the first Strain and bending rates ∂K 1 ∂g
=− K + ε im ε jn βij bmn
fundamental form ∂r ∂t 2g ∂t
v= = v j g j + vn
gij = g i • g j ∂t 1 ∂g 1 ∂g ij
= χ ij bij − K+ c bij

Coefficients of the second


( ) ( )
v ,i = ∇i v j − vbij g j + v j bij + v,i n 2g ∂t 2g ∂t
1 ∂g
1 ∂gij = χ ij bij +
= ( ∇ v + ∇ v ) − vb
1 K
fundamental form γ ij = 2g ∂t
2 ∂t
i j j i ij
2
bij = g i, j • n
cij = ε im ε jnbij
1
(
ε ijω = ∇i v j − ∇ j vi
2
) Inextensional deformation
χ ij bij = 0
v ,i • g j = γ ij + ε ijω = ∇i v j − vbij
Peterson-Mainardi-Codazzi
∂n
Equations gi •
∂t
(
= −v ,i • n = − v j bij + v,i = ω i ) At fixed edge
dθ k
ij
(
∇i c = ∇i ε ε bmn = ε ε ∇i bmn = 0
im jn
) im jn

( )
v ,ij • n = ( ∇i vk − vbik ) b jk + vk bik + v,i , j ε ik χ
ij
=0,
du
Gauss's Theorema Egregium 1 ∂bij 1 ⎛ ∂n ⎞ but since χ ij bij = 0 , we must have χ ij = 0
βij = = ⎜ v ,ij • n + g i, j • ⎟
K=
1 im jn 1
ε ε bij bmn = cij bij 2 ∂t 2⎝ ∂t ⎠ dθ i dθ j
2 2 unless bij =0.
1
( (
= ( ∇i vk − vbik ) b jk + ∇ j vk bik + v,i
2
)) du du
If this is not the case, since γ ik = 0 and
Equilibrium
( gσ ij g j )
,i
(
+ g p j g j + pn = 0 )
1
(
= (γ ik + ε ikω ) b jk − ∇ jω i
2
) ω = 0 , it follows that ∇ jω i = 0 at the

∇iσ ij + p j = 0 1 ∂cij 1 ∂g ij boundary. Thus ∇ j ∇i v = v,ij − v, k Γ ijk = 0 at


χ ij = =− c + ε im ε jn βij
σ ij bij + p = 0 2 ∂t 2g ∂t the boundary. Hence ∇i v = v,i = 0 at the

σ ij = σ ji boundary.
Compatibility of velocities
At free edge ∇i χ ij = 0
dθ k ∇i ε im ε jn β mn = 0
ε ikσ ij
=0
du
Shibam Hadhramaut,Yemen

You might also like