Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material Property Handbook PDF

Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material
Property Handbook
Effective December 6, 2006, this report has been made publicly available in
accordance with Section 734.3(b)(3) and published in accordance with
Section 734.7 of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations. As a result of
this publication, this report is subject to only copyright protection and does
not require any license agreement from EPRI. This notice supersedes the
N
SED WARNING: export control restrictions and any proprietary licensed material notices
A L
LICE
Please read the License Agreement embedded in the document prior to publication.
on the back cover before removing
R I
M AT E
the Wrapping Material.
Technical Report
11089116
11089116
Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy
Material Property Handbook
1004652
Topical Report, July 2001
EPRI Project Manager

R. Viswanathan
EPRI • 3412 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304 • PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303 • USA
800.313.3774 • 650.855.2121 • [email protected] • www.epri.com
11089116
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES
THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN
ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH
INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE
ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM:
(A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I)

WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR
SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR
INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S
CIRCUMSTANCE; OR
(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER

(INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE
HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR
SELECTION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD,
PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS DOCUMENT
Southwest Research Institute
ORDERING INFORMATION
Requests for copies of this report should be directed to EPRI Customer Fulfillment, 1355 Willow Way,
Suite 278, Concord, CA 94520, (800) 313-3774, press 2.
Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric Power
Research Institute, Inc. EPRI. ELECTRIFY THE WORLD is a service mark of the Electric Power
Research Institute, Inc.
Copyright © 2001 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
11089116
CITATIONS
This report was prepared by
Southwest Research Institute

6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78238
Principal Investigators
J. H. Feiger
V. P. Swaminathan
This report describes research sponsored by EPRI.
The report is a corporate document that should be cited in the literature in the following manner:
Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material Property Handbook, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2001.
1004652.
iii
11089116
11089116
REPORT SUMMARY
Published material property data on superalloy bucket (blade) materials used in land-based
combustion turbines is meager and widely scattered in literature. This handbook provides a
comprehensive resource of all available material property data for superalloys used in
combustion turbine buckets. Such data are critical for use in remaining life assessment
calculations, failure analysis, comparison of various alloys, and alloy selection. The material data
presented in this handbook were developed from experimental alloys and actual turbine
components.
Background
Under EPRI direction, Southwest Research Institute (SwRI™) created a material property
database for superalloys used in rotating blades of industrial gas turbines. SwRI consolidated the
material property data from many sources in a computerized relational database. In the early
1990s, dBase IV software was widely used for this purpose, and the subject database was
developed using this software. However, due to rapid changes in software architecture and
variability in computer operating systems, users found it difficult to take full advantage of the
database. EPRI initiated this project to compile and update in a single handbook all available
data for the nickel-base superalloys used in hot section blade applications in land-based gas
turbines.
Objective
To provide combustion turbine (CT) owners with a ready reference handbook of material
property data on superalloy bucket materials.
Approach
Included in the handbook are tables of raw data as well as several plots and tables from the
original database references. Users may scan plots using a digitizer for further processing and
comparative plotting. For each subject alloy, the handbook describes the alloy property
represented, and where available, lists codes for heat treatment, chemical composition,
refurbishment identification, and coating identification. The handbook provides separate tabs for
original database references, chemical composition, and heat treatment details. Rather than
relying on a computerized database, EPRI decided to present all available data in a loose-leaf
notebook format for ease of access, use, and update as new data becomes available.
Results
The superalloy material property handbook provides data for the following alloys—Inconel 700,
Inconel 939, Inconel X-750, Inconel 738, Inconel 738 LC, Inconel 792, MAR-M002, MAR-
11089116
M200, MAR-M247, Nimonic 115, Rene 80, Udimet 500, Udimet 520, Udimet 700, Udimet 710,
Udimet 720, GTD 111 DS, and GTD 111 EA. The handbook cites physical properties such as
density, dynamic and static moduli of elasticity, and coefficient of thermal expansion for each
alloy. It also presents mechanical properties—including tensile, stress rupture, creep, and
thermal-mechanical fatigue properties—as well as high-cycle fatigue, low-cycle fatigue, and
impact strength in graphical and tabular format. Limited data that became available following in-
service degradation of some of the base alloys are included in the handbook. Finally, where
possible, the handbook lists property variation as a function of temperature.
EPRI Perspective
CT owners must make informed decisions about reuse, repair, or replacement of hot section
components. Most often, original equipment manufacturer recommendations are conservative,
allowing valuable, unused remaining life of the components to go untapped due to premature
replacement. CT operators who wish to make remaining life assessments require material
property data. This handbook serves as a one-step ready reference for CT bucket material
properties and is expected to prove valuable in remaining life assessment calculations, alloy
comparisons, and materials selection. The ring binder format permits easy addition of new data,
as they become available. EPRI hopes that in future years, the handbook will be expanded to
include nozzle, combustor, transition piece, and other hot section components.
Keywords
Combustion turbines
Blades
Alloys
Material properties
11089116
EPRI Licensed Material
DISCUSSION OF HANDBOOK CONTENTS
In the current competitive and deregulated environment, turbine users are forced to explore ways
of reducing the cost of maintenance and operation of their engines. They need to make informed
decisions about reuse, repair, or replacement of the hot section components. Most often, the
recommendations of the original equipment manufacturers are conservative. Very valuable and
unused remaining life of the components may go untapped when the components are
prematurely replaced. The gas turbine operators with these alloy buckets have a need for the
material data to conduct condition and remaining life assessment of their buckets and to make
independent decisions about their gas turbine components.
Southwest Research Institute (SwRI™) created a material property database for EPRI under
project RP2775-6 for superalloys used in rotating blades of industrial gas turbines. Various
material properties were gathered from many sources and consolidated in a computerized
relational database. In the early 1990’s dBase IV software was widely used for this purpose and
the subject database was created using this software. However, due to rapid changes in the
software architecture and variability in the computer operating systems, users found it difficult to
take full advantage of this database. Thus, EPRI initiated this project to compile and update all
the available data for the nickel base superalloys used in hot section blading application in land-
based gas turbines. Instead of computer software, it was decided to present all of the available
data in a format similar to that used in the Aerospace Structural Metals Handbook for ease of
access and use. Updating of this manual with additional data will be more practical as new data
becomes available.
The database includes physical properties such as density, dynamic and static modulii of
elasticity, and coefficient of thermal expansion. Mechanical properties such as tensile properties,
stress rupture properties, creep properties, impact strength, high-cycle fatigue, low-cycle fatigue
and thermal mechanical fatigue properties are also presented in graphical and tabular format.
Limited data was also available after in-service degradation of some of the base alloys. Property
variation as a function of temperature is presented when available. This database was intended
to provide a good source of data that can be used in remaining life assessment calculations,
comparison of various alloys, and material selection. The material data presented in this
handbook were developed both from experimental alloys and actual turbine components.
The following alloys are included in this handbook:
Inconel 700, Inconel 939, Inconel X750, Inconel 738, Inconel 738 LC, Inconel 792,
MAR-M002, MAR-M200, MAR-M247, Nimonic 115, Rene 80, Udimet 500, Udimet
520, Udimet 700, Udimet 710, Udimet 720, GTD 111 DS, and GTD 111 EA.
vii
11089116
The data for this handbook was collected, collated and plotted to generate hard copy plots similar
to those published in the Aerospace Structural Metals Handbook. Tables of raw data gathered
whenever available are also printed and included in the manual. Several plots and tables were
directly scanned in from the original references and a new page was created to fit the format of
this handbook. If the user wishes, the plots can be scanned using a digitizer for further
processing and comparative plotting. Each page includes alloy identification, the property
represented, and whenever available, codes for heat treatment, chemical composition,
refurbishment identification, and coating identification. The units on the axes are shown in both
the English and SI units wherever possible. If the plots are directly scanned in from the source,
the units are the same as in the references since no further modifications were made to these
plots. At the end of the handbook, separate tabs are provided for original references, chemical
composition, and heat treatment details.
viii
11089116
CONTENTS
1 INCONEL 700...................................................................................................................... 1-1
2 INCONEL 939...................................................................................................................... 2-1
3 INCONEL X750 ................................................................................................................... 3-1
4 INCONEL 738...................................................................................................................... 4-1
5 INCONEL 738 LC ................................................................................................................ 5-1
6 INCONEL 792...................................................................................................................... 6-1
7 MAR-M002........................................................................................................................... 7-1
8 MAR-M200........................................................................................................................... 8-1
9 MAR-M247........................................................................................................................... 9-1
10 NIMONIC 115 .................................................................................................................. 10-1
11 RENE 80.......................................................................................................................... 11-1
12 UDIMET 500 .................................................................................................................... 12-1
13 UDIMET 520 .................................................................................................................... 13-1
14 UDIMET 700 .................................................................................................................... 14-1
15 UDIMET 710 .................................................................................................................... 15-1
16 UDIMET 720 .................................................................................................................... 16-1
17 GTD 111 DS .................................................................................................................... 17-1
ix
11089116
18 GTD 111 EA .................................................................................................................... 18-1
19 SOURCE REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 19-1
20 CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ............................................................................................ 20-1

Chemical Composition IDs ............................................................................................... 20-3
21 HEAT TREATMENT ........................................................................................................ 21-1

Heat Treatment IDs .......................................................................................................... 21-1
x
11089116
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature for Inconel 700. ............................ 1-3
Figure 1-2 Tensile Elongation as a Function of Temperature for Inconel 700. ......................... 1-4
Figure 1-3 Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 700........................................................................... 1-5
Figure 2-1 Tensile Strengths for Inconel 939 at Room Temperature. ...................................... 2-3
Figure 2-2 Tensile Elongation at Room Temperature for Inconel 939...................................... 2-4
Figure 2-3 Reduction in Area (Tensile) at Room Temperature for Inconel 939. ....................... 2-5
Figure 2-4 Tensile Properties of the Alloy as a Function of Temperature. ............................... 2-6
Figure 2-5 Room Temperature Impact Properties After Soakingat Elevated
Temperatures. ................................................................................................................. 2-7
Figure 2-6 Fatigue Crack Growth at R = 0.1 and 0.9 (Room Temperature). ............................ 2-8
Figure 2-7 Elevated Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth at R = 0.3. ....................................... 2-9
Figure 2-8 Elevated Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth at R = 0.1 and 0.3 (Vacuum). ........ 2-10
Figure 2-9 The Stress Rupture Properties at 850°C; Standard Heat Treatment. ................... 2-11
Figure 2-10 The Stress Rupture Properties with Two-Stage Heat Treatment. ....................... 2-12
Figure 2-11 Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 939....................................................................... 2-13
Figure 2-12 Stress to Rupture vs. Time at Elevated Temperatures. ...................................... 2-14
Figure 2-13 Strain to 1% Creep as a Function of Stress........................................................ 2-15
Figure 2-14 High Cycle Fatigue Properties at 750°C and 850°C. .......................................... 2-16
Figure 2-15 High Cycle Fatigue Properties at 600°C. Results from INCO Europe. ................ 2-17
Figure 2-16 Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of IN939 with Results for IN738LC for
Comparison................................................................................................................... 2-18
Figure 3-1 Specific Heat as a Function of Temperature for Inconel X750................................ 3-3
Figure 3-2 Thermal Conductivity as a Function of Temperature for Inconel X750. .................. 3-4
Figure 3-3 Thermal Expansion as a Function of Temperature................................................. 3-5
Figure 3-4 Yield and Tensile Strengths vs. Temperature for Inconel X750. ............................. 3-6
Figure 3-5 Tensile Elongation vs. Temperature....................................................................... 3-7
Figure 3-6 Dynamic Modulus as a Function of Temperature. .................................................. 3-8
Figure 3-7 100 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature. ........................................ 3-9
Figure 3-8 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 650°C and 540°C Under Air and Vacuum
Conditions. .................................................................................................................... 3-10
Figure 4-1 Specific Heat as a Function of Temperature. ......................................................... 4-3
Figure 4-2 Thermal Conductivity as a Function of Temperature. ............................................. 4-4
xi
11089116
Figure 4-3 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion as a Function of End Temperature. ................... 4-5
Figure 4-4 Yield and Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature. ................................... 4-6
Figure 4-5 Tensile Elongation as a Function of Temperature. ................................................. 4-7
Figure 4-6 Yield and Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature. ................................... 4-8
Figure 4-7 Dynamic Modulus as a Function of Temperature. .................................................. 4-9
Figure 4-8 Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Time............................................. 4-10
Figure 4-9 Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Temperature. ............................... 4-11
Figure 4-10 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at Room Temperature Under Vacuum
Conditions. (Low R). ..................................................................................................... 4-12
Figure 4-11 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0.1 and 0.85 (Room Temperature,
Air). ............................................................................................................................... 4-13
Figure 4-12 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 1562°F. ........................................................ 4-14
Figure 4-13 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate as a Function of ∆K in IN-738 at 927°C in Air
and in Vacuum. ............................................................................................................. 4-15
Figure 4-14 Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate for Three Alloys. ............................. 4-16
Figure 4-15 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Superalloys at 927°C in Vacuum. ....................... 4-17
Figure 4-16 100 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature. .................................... 4-18
Figure 4-17 1000 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature.................................... 4-19
Figure 4-18 Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 738....................................................................... 4-20
Figure 4-19 Stress vs. Rupture Time at Three Elevated Temperatures. ................................ 4-21
Figure 4-20 Stress vs. Strain-Rate at Three Temperatures Including Repeat Runs............... 4-22
Figure 4-21 Multiple Relaxation Runs at 850°C Showing Transient Effects for Low
Stresses. ....................................................................................................................... 4-23
Figure 4-22 Creep Data at 850°C for Various Initial Thermal Treatments.............................. 4-24
Figure 4-23 IN-738 VPS Coated Creep Test Results at 900°C/124 MPa............................... 4-25
Figure 4-24 IN-738 VPS Coated Creep Test Results at 982°C/69 MPa................................. 4-26
Figure 4-25 Strain Rate vs. Stress for IN738LC at 850°C in Tests Containing (i) pp and
pc and (ii) pp and cp. ..................................................................................................... 4-27
Figure 4-26 Influence of Environment on Creep Crack Growth Rate in IN-738 at 927°C
and Comparison with Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Converted to Time Domain. ............. 4-28
Figure 4-27 Total Strain Range vs. Life to Failure. ................................................................ 4-29
Figure 4-28 Total Strain Range vs. Life to Crack Initiation..................................................... 4-30
Figure 4-29 Elastic Strain Range vs. Life to Failure............................................................... 4-31
Figure 4-30 Elastic Strain Range vs. Life to Crack Initiation. ................................................. 4-32
Figure 4-31 Inelastic Strain Range vs. Life to Failure. ........................................................... 4-33
Figure 4-32 Inelastic Strain Range vs. Life to Crack Initiation................................................ 4-34
Figure 4-33 Typical Test Results and Partitioned Strain Ranges........................................... 4-35
Figure 4-34 (HTLCF) Results of IN 738 in the Standard and the Exposed Conditions,
Inelastic Strain Range (∆ε in %) vs. Number of Cycles to Failure (Nf)............................ 4-36
xii
11089116
Figure 4-35 (HTLCF) Results of IN 738 at 1123 K, for the Two Types of Specimens
Tested Under Continuous Strain Cycling and Cycling with Tensile Hold Times,
Inelastic Strain range (∆ε in %) vs. Number of Cycles to Failure (Nf). ............................ 4-37
Figure 4-36 Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 LC (a) pp
components only; 750°C and 850°C, (b) pp and pc components 850°C (c) pp and
cp components; 850°C. ................................................................................................. 4-38
Figure 4-37 Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 at 870°C. ............... 4-39
Figure 4-38 Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 at 870°C, pp and
cp components. ............................................................................................................. 4-40
Figure 4-39 Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 at 870°C, pp and
pc components. ............................................................................................................. 4-41
Figure 4-40 Low Cycle Fatigue at 1600°F with Three Hold Times Investigated (Total
Strain Range). ............................................................................................................... 4-42
Figure 5-1 Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature.................................................... 5-3
Figure 5-3 Reduction in Area (Tensile) as a Function of Temperature..................................... 5-5
Figure 5-4 Impact Resistance of IN-738 at Room Temperature and 900°C as a Function
of Aging Time at 950°C. .................................................................................................. 5-6
Figure 5-5 Loss of High Temperature Impact Resistance Correlation in Terms of a Time-
Temperature Parameter Analogous to that of Larson-Miller............................................. 5-7
Figure 5-6 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0 (Room Temperature, Lab Air
Conditions). ..................................................................................................................... 5-8
Figure 5-7 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 1382°F at R = 0.1 (Lab Air). ............................. 5-9
Figure 5-8 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 1562°F for R = 0.25 and 0.3 (Lab Air). ........... 5-10
Figure 5-9 Crack Growth for Nimocast 738 LC and 739 at Cyclic Frequencies Between
60 and 100 Hz and R = 0.1; δ is Crack Tip Opening Displacement................................ 5-11
Figure 5-10 Influence of Environment on Fatigue Crack Growth of Nimocast 738 LC and
739 at 850°C and Cyclic Frequencies Between 10 and 100 Hz and R = 0.1.................. 5-12
Figure 5-11 Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 738 LC. ................................................................ 5-13
Figure 5-12 Larson-Miller Plot at Two Test Temperatures (Light Oil Conditions)................... 5-14
Figure 5-13 Stress vs. Rupture Time at Two Elevated Temperatures (Light Oil
Conditions). ................................................................................................................... 5-15
Figure 5-14 Larson-Miller Plot (P = T (20 + log t f) x 10-3, where T is in K and tf in hr) of
Cast and Hipped IN-738LC Turbine Blades Showing Unexposed and Service
Exposed Creep-Rupture Properties............................................................................... 5-16
Figure 5-15 Dependence of the Time to Rupture on the Minimum Creep Rate, for IN-
738LC (Monkman-Grant Relationship). ......................................................................... 5-17
Figure 5-16 Dependence of Primary Plus Secondary, Creep Life on the Minimum Creep
Rate for Cast IN-738LC. ................................................................................................ 5-18
Figure 5-17 Time to Rupture Dependence on the Tertiary Life for Cast IN-738LC................. 5-19
Figure 5-18 Low Cycle Fatigue at 1699°F (Total Strain Range). ........................................... 5-20
Figure 5-19 Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior at Two Elevated Temperatures (Total Strain
Range). ......................................................................................................................... 5-21
xiii
11089116
Figure 5-20 Low Cycle Initiation and Failure at Four Elevated Temperatures........................ 5-22
Figure 5-21 Strain-Amplitude-Life Relations for IN738LC at 650°C as an Effect of
Casting Process. ........................................................................................................... 5-23
Casting Process. ........................................................................................................... 5-24
Figure 5-23 Stress vs. Reversals of IN738LC at 650°C (1202°F) as an Effect of Casting
Process. ........................................................................................................................ 5-25
Casting Process. ........................................................................................................... 5-26
Figure 5-25 Stress vs. Reversals of IN738LC at 850°C (1532°F) as an Effect of Casting
Process. ........................................................................................................................ 5-27
Casting Process. ........................................................................................................... 5-28
Figure 5-27 Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior for Inconel 738 LC................................................. 5-29
Figure 5-28 Thermal-Mechanical Fatigue Behavior of Inconel 738 LC. ................................. 5-30
Figure 6-1 Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature.................................................... 6-3
Figure 6-3 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate as a Function of ∆K in IN-792 at 927°C in Air and
in Vacuum. ...................................................................................................................... 6-5
Figure 6-4 Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Terms for Three Alloys.................... 6-6
Figure 6-5 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Superalloys at 927°C in Vacuum. ........................... 6-7
Figure 6-6 100 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature. ........................................ 6-8
Figure 6-7 1000 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature. ...................................... 6-9
Figure 6-8 Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 792......................................................................... 6-10
Figure 6-9 Influence of Environment on Creep Crack Growth Rate in IN-792 at 927°C
and Comparison with Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (Fatigue Crack Growth Rate
Given on a Time Basis). ................................................................................................ 6-11
Figure 7-1 Influence of R on Crack Growth in Directionally Solidified and Single Crystal
Materials at 950°C and a Frequency of 0.1 Hz. ............................................................... 7-3
Figure 7-2 Influence of Grain Structure and R on Crack Growth at 950°C and a
Frequency of 20 Hz. ........................................................................................................ 7-4
Figure 7-3 Effect of Frequency on Crack Growth in Directionally Solidified Alloy at 950°C
and R = 0.1...................................................................................................................... 7-5
Figure 7-4 Effect of Temperature on Crack Growth/Cycle in Directionally Solidified and
Single Crystal Materials at a Frequency of 0.1 Hz and R = 0.1. ....................................... 7-6
Figure 7-5 Effect of Prior Creep Damage on Crack Growth in Directionally Solidified and
Single Crystal Material at 950°C at a Frequency of 20 Hz and R = 0.7. ........................... 7-7
Figure 7-6 Effect of R on Crack Growth Per Cycle in the Threshold Region at 950°C. ............ 7-8
Figure 7-7 Effect of Prior Creep Damage on Crack Growth Per Cycle at 950°C for R =
0.9. .................................................................................................................................. 7-9
Figure 7-8 Crack Growth for MAR-M002 at Cyclic Frequency of 0.25 Hz and R = 0.1........... 7-10
xiv
11089116
Figure 7-9 Influence of R on Crack Growth Rate for MAR-M002 at 950°C and 20 Hz,
da/dN versus ∆K............................................................................................................ 7-11
Figure 7-10 Influence of R on Crack Growth Rate for MAR-M002 at 950°C and 20 Hz,
da/dt versus Kmax. ........................................................................................................... 7-12
Figure 7-11 Influence of Grain Structure and Temperature on Creep Crack Growth Rate. .... 7-13
Figure 7-12 Effect of Prior Creep Damage on Creep Crack Growth Rate at 950°C in
Directionally Solidified Material...................................................................................... 7-14
Figure 7-13 Accumulation of Creep Strain at 950°C and a Stress of 256 MPa in
Directionally Solidified and Single Crystal Material. ....................................................... 7-15
Figure 8-1 Comparison of Crack Growth Rates of MAR-M200 Single Crystals at 25 and
982°C. (∆Keff is a Function of Three Nodes of Cracking.) ................................................ 8-3
Figure 8-2 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Results of MAR-M200 Single Crystals Under
Uniaxially Applied Cyclic Loading at 982°C. (∆Keff is a Function of Three Nodes of
Cracking.)........................................................................................................................ 8-4
Figure 8-3 Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Thermal Fatigue Lives of MAR
M200 and MAR M200DS Double Wedges (0.6 and 1.0 mm Radius Edge, Heating
and Cooling in Fluidized Beds at 320 and 1090°C).......................................................... 8-5
Figure 9-1 Prediction of Isothermal Fatigue Data at 500°C...................................................... 9-3
Figure 9-2 Prediction of 871°C Isothermal Fatigue Test Results. ............................................ 9-4
Figure 9-3 Prediction of Out-of-Phase TMF (500°C–871°C) Test Results. .............................. 9-5
Figure 9-4 Prediction of In-Phase TMF (500°C–871°C) Test Results. ..................................... 9-6
Figure 9-5 Prediction of Diamond Shape (Nonproportional) Strain-Temperature History......... 9-7
Figure 9-6 Mechanical Strain Range Versus Life for Out-of-Phase and In-Phase TMF
Experiments, = 5 x 10-5 s-1 .............................................................................................. 9-8
Figure 10-1 Thermal Conductivity as a Function of Temperature. ......................................... 10-3
Figure 10-2 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion as a Function of Temperature. ...................... 10-4
Figure 10-3 Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature................................................ 10-5
Figure 10-4 Tensile Elongation as a Function of Temperature. ............................................. 10-6
Figure 10-5 Dynamic Modulus as a Function of Temperature. .............................................. 10-7
Figure 10-8 Partial Larson-Miller Plot for Nimonic 115. ....................................................... 10-10
Figure 11-1 Temperature Dependence of Yield Strength (σy) of Unused and Used
Coatings and Substrates in Comparison with Tensile Test Data of Unused
Substrate....................................................................................................................... 11-3
Figure 11-2 Temperature Dependence of Ductility (ε f) Obtained from SP Tests on
Unused and Used Coatings and Substrates, Compared with Tensile Test Data of
Unused Substrate.......................................................................................................... 11-4
Figure 11-3 Temperature Dependence of Strength and Ductility of the Rene 80 Alloy
Specimens. ................................................................................................................... 11-5
Figure 11-4 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate as a Function of ∆K in Rene 80 at 927°C in Air
and in Vacuum. ............................................................................................................. 11-6
xv
11089116
Figure 11-5 Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate for Three Alloys. ............................. 11-7
Figure 11-6 Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Superalloys at 927°C in Vacuum. ....................... 11-8
Figure 11-7 Influence of Environment on Creep Crack Growth Rate in Rene 80 at 927°C
and Comparison with Fatigue Crack Growth Rate. (Fatigue Crack Growth Rate
Give on a Time Basis.) .................................................................................................. 11-9
Figure 11-8 A Larson Miller Plot Comparing the GTD111 Alloy Test Points with Rene 80
Data from the Literature and the GTD111 Larson Miller Curve Published by General
Electric. ....................................................................................................................... 11-10
Figure 12-2 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion as a Function of Final Temperature............... 12-4
Figure 12-8 Larson-Miller Plot for Udimet 500. .................................................................... 12-10
Figure 13-5 Larson-Miller Plot for Udimet 520. ...................................................................... 13-7
Figure 14-1 Specific Heat as a Function of Temperature....................................................... 14-3
Figure 14-7 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0, 0.05, 0.24, and 0.53 (Lab Air,
Room Temperature). ..................................................................................................... 14-9
Figure 14-8 Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior Under Vacuum Conditions (Room
Temperature)............................................................................................................... 14-10
Figure 14-9 Elevated Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0. ..................... 14-11
Figure 14-10 Elevated Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior Under Vacuum Conditions............. 14-12
Figure 14-11 Crack Growth for Udimet 700 at 850°C, R = 0.05, and Cyclic Frequency of
0.17 Hz........................................................................................................................ 14-13
Figure 14-12 The Effect of the Environment on the Creep Crack Growth in Udimet 700 at
Ì
850°C: o , 14.2 kN, vacuum, batch 2; , 16.0 kN, vacuum, batch 2; —— air, batch
1; ——, air, batch 2. .................................................................................................... 14-14
Figure 14-13 100 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature.................................. 14-15
Figure 14-14 1000 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature................................ 14-16
xvi
11089116
Figure 14-15 Larson-Miller Plot for Udimet 700. .................................................................. 14-17

Figure 14-16 Low-Cycle Fatigue at 1400°F (Total Strain Range). ....................................... 14-18
Figure 14-17 High-Cycle Fatigue Behavior at 1500°F (Fully Reversed Loading). ................ 14-19
Figure 15-6 Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Time........................................... 15-8
Figure 15-7 Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Temperature. ............................. 15-9
Figure 15-8 100 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature. .................................. 15-10
Figure 15-9 1000 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature.................................. 15-11
Figure 15-11 Effect of Mean Stress on the Fatigue Strength of Udimet 710. ( A =
σALTERNATING / σMEAN ). ........................................................................................................ 15-13
Figure 16-4 Crack Growth Rates in Air and in Vacuum for Single Crystal U720. ................... 16-6
Figure 16-5 Crack Growth Rates in Air and in Vacuum for Polycrystalline U720. .................. 16-7
Figure 16-6 Graph of da/dN Data for SENB Specimens in Vacuum at 20, 300 and
600°C. ........................................................................................................................... 16-8
Figure 16-7 Showing da/dN Data at R = 0.5 in Air and Vacuum. ........................................... 16-9
Figure 16-10 1000 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature................................ 16-12
Figure 16-12 High Cycle Fatigue Behavior at 1600°F in Saline and Air Environments. ....... 16-14
Figure 16-13 Effects of Environment and Frequency of Cycling on HCF Strength of
Udimet 720 at 1300°F (704°C) and R = 0.2 to 0.3. ...................................................... 16-15
Figure 16-14 HCF Strength of Udimet 720 in Salt Environment at 1300°F (704°C) for R =
-1.0 and 0.6. ................................................................................................................ 16-16
Figure 16-15 Effect of Salt Environment and Low Alternating Stress on Stress Rupture of
Udimet 710 and 720 Alloys at 1300°F (704°C). ........................................................... 16-17
Figure 16-16 Effect of Environment on Creep/Fatigue Strength of Udimet 720 at 1300°F
(704°C) and Constant Maximum Stress....................................................................... 16-18
Figure 16-17 Creep/Fatigue Strength of Udimet 720 in Air and Salt Under Constant
Mean Stress at 1300°F (704°C)................................................................................... 16-19
xvii
11089116
Figure 16-18 Relationship Between Strain Range and Number of Cycles to Failure
Obtained During the Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of Udimet 710 and Coated and
Uncoated Udimet 720 at 1350°F (732°C) at 1 cpm...................................................... 16-20
Figure 16-19 Relationship Between the Strain Range Components and Number of
Cycles to Failure Obtained During the Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of Udimet 720 at
1350°F (732°C) as a Function of Hold Time and Test Environment............................. 16-21
Figure 16-20 Relationship Between the Strain Range Components and Number of
Cycles to Failure Obtained During the Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of RT-22 Coated
Udimet 720 at 1350°F (732°C) at 1 cpm as a Function of Hold Time and Test
Environment. ............................................................................................................... 16-22
Figure 16-21 Low-Cycle Fatigue Results for Udimet 720 at 1350°F (732°C) and 1 cpm...... 16-23
Figure 16-22 Low-Cycle Fatigue Results for RT-22 Coated Udimet 720 Tested at 1350°F
(732°C) and 1 cpm. ..................................................................................................... 16-24
Figure 17-1 Tensile Properties and Hardness in the Service Aged Condition........................ 17-3
Figure 17-2 Tensile and Hardness Properties after Refurbishment. ...................................... 17-4
Figure 17-3 Bucket to Bucket Variation of Yield and Tensile Strengths of GTD-111 DS
(Undegraded). ............................................................................................................... 17-5
Figure 17-4 Bucket to Bucket Variation of Percent Elongation and Reduction of Area
(Undegraded). ............................................................................................................... 17-6
Figure 17-5 Variation of Yield Strength of the Longitudinal and Transverse Specimens........ 17-7
Figure 17-6 Variation of Tensile Strength for the Longitudinal and Transverse
Specimens. ................................................................................................................... 17-8
Figure 17-7 Variation of Tensile Ductility of Longitudinal and Transverse Specimens as a
Function of Temperature. .............................................................................................. 17-9
Figure 17-8 Airfoil Stress Rupture Data for IN-738, GTD-111EA and GTD-111DS Alloys
Before and After Rejuvenation..................................................................................... 17-10
Figure 17-9 Iso-Stress Creep Rupture Data of Longitudinal Specimens Machined from
the Shank Section (Unaged)........................................................................................ 17-11
Figure 17-10 Iso-Stress Creep Rupture Data of Transverse Specimens Machined from
the Shank Section. ...................................................................................................... 17-12
Figure 17-11 LMP Plot of GTD-111 DS and IN-738 LC Creep Data. ................................... 17-13
Figure 17-12 Larson-Miller Plot of Longitudinal Shank (Undegraded) Creep Data............... 17-14
Figure 17-13 LMP Plot of Transverse Specimen Data from Undegraded Shank Location. .. 17-15
Figure 17-14 Influence of Specimen Orientation on Creep Rupture Strength of Unaged
(Shank) Material. ......................................................................................................... 17-16
Figure 18-1 Tensile Properties and Hardness in the Service Aged Condition........................ 18-3
Figure 18-2 Tensile and Hardness Properties after Refurbishment. ...................................... 18-4
Figure 18-5 Tensile Properties for Root and Airfoil Material at 70°F and 1600°F................... 18-7
Figure 18-6 Tensile Properties for Root and Airfoil Material at 70°F and 1600°F................... 18-8
xviii
11089116
Figure 18-8 Tensile Elongation and Reduction in Area as a Function of Temperature. ....... 18-10
Figure 18-9 Stress vs. Rupture Time for Two Material Conditions....................................... 18-11
Figure 18-10 Stress-Rupture Results for Root and Airfoil Material. ..................................... 18-12
Figure 18-11 Stress-Rupture Data for GTD-111 EA and DS Compared to IN-738............... 18-13
Figure 18-12 Stress-Rupture Results for Root and Airfoil Material. ..................................... 18-14
Figure 18-13 Larson-Miller Plot of GTD-111 EA (Standard Heat Treat and Thermally
Exposed). .................................................................................................................... 18-15
Figure 18-14 Larson-Miller Plot for GTD-111 EA................................................................. 18-16
Figure 18-15 Larson-Miller Plot for GTD-111 for Different Exposure Conditions.................. 18-17
Figure 18-16 Larson-Miller Plot for GTD-111 EA................................................................. 18-18
Figure 18-17 A Larson Miller Plot Comparing the GTD111 Alloy Test Points with Rene
80 Data from the Literature and the GTD111 Larson Miller Curve Published by
General Electric........................................................................................................... 18-19
Figure 18-18 A Least Squares Regression Model (Y = β 0 + β 1 X + e ) Fitted to the
GTD111 Creep Rupture Data Illustrating the Fit. The 95% Confidence Intervals
About the Mean and the 95% Prediction Interval for an Individual Observation. Test
Data from the Thermally Exposed GTD111 Material and Select Service Exposed
GTD111 Data Points are Plotted. ................................................................................ 18-20
Figure 18-19 A Plot of Percent Creep Deformation (Strain) Versus Time for the Creep
Rupture Samples in the Standard Heat Treated Condition and After Thermal
Exposures at 816°C and 899°C................................................................................... 18-21
xix
11089116
11089116
1
INCONEL 700
1-1
11089116
Inconel 700
1-2
11089116
Inconel 700
material: Inconel 700 property: tensile

Condition/HT ID: 15 Reference ID(s): 9999899
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 20
test temperature (°C)

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220 1500
0.2% offset yield strength
200 1400
ultimate strength
1300
180
1200
160 1100
1000
strength (MPa)
140
strength (ksi)
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
40 300
200
20 Inconel 700 100
test environment: air
0 0
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
test temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 3
Figure 1-1
Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature for Inconel 700.
1-3
11089116
Inconel 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 20

0 200 400 600 800 1000
45
Inconel 700
40
35
30
% elongation
25
20
15
10
0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 2 of 3
Figure 1-2
Tensile Elongation as a Function of Temperature for Inconel 700.
1-4
11089116
Inconel 700
material: Inconel 700 property: creep

Condition/HT ID: 15 Reference ID(s): 878122, 9999999
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 20
1000
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
1000
100
Inconel 700 100

10
39 40 41 42 43 44
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log t)
Page 3 of 3
Figure 1-3
Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 700.
1-5
11089116
11089116
2
INCONEL 939
2-1
11089116
Inconel 939
2-2
11089116
Inconel 939

Condition/HT ID: 19-27, 29-32, 34-43 Reference ID(s): 732604, 1514140
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 57, 63

10 15 20 25 30 35
220
0.2% yield strength
200 ultimate strength 1400
180
1200
160
1000
strength (MPa)
140
strength (ksi)
120
800
100
600
80
60 400
40
200
20 Inconel 939
0 0
50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 1 of 16
Figure 2-1
Tensile Strengths for Inconel 939 at Room Temperature.
2-3
11089116
Inconel 939

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 57, 63

10 15 20 25 30 35
15.0
Inconel 939
12.5
10.0
% elongation
7.5
5.0
2.5
0.0
50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 2 of 16
Figure 2-2
Tensile Elongation at Room Temperature for Inconel 939.
2-4
11089116
Inconel 939

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 57, 63

10 15 20 25 30 35
25
Inconel 939
20
reduction in area (%)
15
10
0
50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 3 of 16
Figure 2-3
Reduction in Area (Tensile) at Room Temperature for Inconel 939.
2-5
11089116
Inconel 939

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 4 of 16
Figure 2-4
Tensile Properties of the Alloy as a Function of Temperature.
2-6
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: charpy impact

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 5 of 16
Figure 2-5
Room Temperature Impact Properties After Soakingat Elevated Temperatures.
2-7
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: fatigue crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 33
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-4
Inconel 939
test temperature: 75°F (24°C) 10-3
10-5
10-4
10-6
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
10-9
R= 0.1 10-8
R= 0.9
10-10
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 6 of 16
Figure 2-6
Fatigue Crack Growth at R = 0.1 and 0.9 (Room Temperature).
2-8
11089116
Inconel 939

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 33
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-3
Inconel 939
10-4
10-3
10-5
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
R= 0.3
10-9
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 7 of 16
Figure 2-7
Elevated Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth at R = 0.3.
2-9
11089116
Inconel 939

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 33
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-3
Inconel 939
test environment: vacuum
10-4
10-3
da/dN (mm/cycle)
10-5
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
R= 0.1 10-7
R= 0.3
10-9
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 8 of 16
Figure 2-8
Elevated Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth at R = 0.1 and 0.3 (Vacuum).
2-10
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: stress rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 9 of 16
Figure 2-9
The Stress Rupture Properties at 850°C; Standard Heat Treatment.
2-11
11089116
Inconel 939

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 10 of 16
Figure 2-10
The Stress Rupture Properties with Two-Stage Heat Treatment.
2-12
11089116
Inconel 939

Condition/HT ID: 19-43 Reference ID(s): 732604, 859757, 988149
Refurbish ID: N/A 1514140
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 57, 56, 60, 63
LMP (K-hr)
(T(K))(C + log tr)
20 22 24 26 28
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
Inconel 939
36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C + log tr)
Page 11 of 16
Figure 2-11
2-13
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: stress to rupture

Condition/HT ID: 19-43 Reference ID(s): 732604, 859757, 988149
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 57, 56, 60, 63
1000
1292 °F (700 °C) 6500
900 1400 °F (760 °C)
1500 °F (816 °C) 6000
1600 °F (870 °C)
800 5500
1650 °F (900 °C)
1700 °F (927 °C) 5000
700
4500
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
600
4000
500 3500
3000
400
2500
300 2000
1500
200
1000
100
Inconel 939 500
0 0
101 102 103 104
rupture time (hr)
Page 12 of 16
Figure 2-12
Stress to Rupture vs. Time at Elevated Temperatures.
2-14
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: creep-strain

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 13 of 16
Figure 2-13
Strain to 1% Creep as a Function of Stress.
2-15
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: high-cycle fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 14 of 16
Figure 2-14
High Cycle Fatigue Properties at 750°C and 850°C.
2-16
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: high-cycle fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 15 of 16
Figure 2-15
High Cycle Fatigue Properties at 600°C. Results from INCO Europe.
2-17
11089116
Inconel 939
material: Inconel 939 property: low-cycle fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 58
Page 16 of 16
Figure 2-16
Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of IN939 with Results for IN738LC for Comparison.
2-18
11089116
3
INCONEL X750
3-1
11089116
Inconel X750
3-2
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: specific heat

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0.20
Inconel X750
product form: wrought 0.80
0.18 0.75
specific heat (btu/lb/°F)
0.70
specific heat (kJ/kg/K)

0.16
0.65
0.60
0.14
0.55
0.12 0.50
0.45
0.10
0.40
0.35
0.08
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 8
Figure 3-1
Specific Heat as a Function of Temperature for Inconel X750.
3-3
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: specific heat

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
Inconel X750
product form: wrought 30
200
thermal conductivity (btu/ft /in/hr/°F)
thermal conductivity (W/m/K)

180
25
2
160
140 20
120
15
100
80
10
60
40
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 2 of 8
Figure 3-2
Thermal Conductivity as a Function of Temperature for Inconel X750.
3-4
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: thermal expansion

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
12.0
11.5
Inconel X750
product form: wrought
21 a
α [×10 ], 70°F to temperature (in/in/°F)
[×10 ], 21°C to temperature (cm/cm/°C)

20
11.0
-6
10.5 19
10.0 18
9.5 17
9.0
16
8.5
15
8.0
14
7.5
-6
13
7.0
12
6.5
11
6.0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 3 of 8
Figure 3-3
Thermal Expansion as a Function of Temperature.
3-5
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
200
0.2% offset yield strength 1300
180 ultimate strength
1200
160 1100
1000
140
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
Inconel X750
test environment: air 200
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 4 of 8
Figure 3-4
Yield and Tensile Strengths vs. Temperature for Inconel X750.
3-6
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14
34 Inconel X750
32
30
28
26
% elongation
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 5 of 8
Figure 3-5
Tensile Elongation vs. Temperature.
3-7
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: dynamic modulus

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
34
Inconel X750 230
32 220
210
30
dynamic modulus (10 ksi)
dynamic modulus (GPa)

200
3
28
190
26 180
170
24
160
22 150
140
20
130
18
120
16
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 6 of 8
Figure 3-6
Dynamic Modulus as a Function of Temperature.
3-8
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: 100 hr rupt. strength

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 14

600 700 800 900 1000
100
Inconel X750
90
600
80
100 hr rupture strength (MPa)

100 hr rupture strength (ksi)
500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 7 of 8
Figure 3-7
100 hr Rupture Strength as a Function of Temperature.
3-9
11089116
Inconel X750
material: Inconel X750 property: fatigue crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 68
Page 8 of 8
Figure 3-8
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 650°C and 540°C Under Air and Vacuum Conditions.
3-10
11089116
4
INCONEL 738
4-1
11089116
Inconel 738
4-2
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: specific heat

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0.20
Inconel 738
product form: cast 0.80
0.18 0.75
specific heat (Btu/lb/°F)
specific heat (KJ/kg/K)

0.70
0.16
0.65
0.60
0.14
0.55
0.12 0.50
0.45
0.10
0.40
0.35
0.08
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 40
Figure 4-1
Specific Heat as a Function of Temperature.
4-3
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: thermal conductivity

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
Inconel 738
product form: cast 30.0
200
thermal conductivity (Btu/ft /in/hr/°F)
27.5

180
25.0
2
160
22.5
140 20.0
120 17.5
15.0
100
12.5
80
10.0
60
7.5
40
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 2 of 40
Figure 4-2
Thermal Conductivity as a Function of Temperature.
4-4
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: thermal expansion

Condition/HT ID: N/A Reference ID(s): 9999904
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
10.0 18
Inconel 738
product form: cast
α [×10-6], 21°C to temperature (cm/cm/°C)

9.5 17
α [×10-6], 70°F to temperature (in/in/°F)
9.0
16
8.5
15
8.0
14
7.5
13
7.0
12
6.5
11
6.0
5.5 10
5.0 9
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 3 of 40
Figure 4-3
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion as a Function of End Temperature.
4-5
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: tensile properties

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
200
1200
160 1100
1000
140
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
Inconel 738
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 4 of 40
Figure 4-4
Yield and Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature.
4-6
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
16
Inconel 738
14
12
10
% elongation
0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 5 of 40
Figure 4-5
Tensile Elongation as a Function of Temperature.
4-7
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 6 of 40
Figure 4-6
Yield and Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature.
4-8
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: dynamic modulus

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
34
Inconel 738
product form: cast
32 220
30

200
3
28
26 180
24
160
22
140
20
18
120
16
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 7 of 40
Figure 4-7
4-9
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 44
12
16
Inconel 738
test temperature: 1652°F (900°C)
11 environment: air 15
14
10
13
energy absorbed (N-m)

energy absorbed (ft-lb)
9
12
8 11
10
7
9
6 8
7
5
6
4
5
3
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
aging time (hr)
Page 8 of 40
Figure 4-8
Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Time.
4-10
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 44
aging temperature (°C)

0 150 300 450 600 750 900
10
Inconel 738 13
environment: air
9
12
11

10
7
9
6 8
7
5
6
4
5
3
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
aging temperature (°F)
Page 9 of 40
Figure 4-9
Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Temperature.
4-11
11089116
Inconel 738

Condition/HT ID: 10, 3 Reference ID(s): 479113, 818660
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 44, 43
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-2
Inconel 738 10-1
environment: vacuum
10-3
10-2
10-4
10-3
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
10-9
R= 0 (479113)
10-8
R= 0.1 (818660)
10-10
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 10 of 40
Figure 4-10
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at Room Temperature Under Vacuum Conditions. (Low R).
4-12
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 43
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-3
Inconel 738 10-2
10-4 environment: air
10-3
10-5
10-4
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
10-9
10-8
10-10
R= 0.1 (C= 7e-14 in/cycle, n= 5.29) 10-9
R= 0.85 (C= 4.9e-12 in/cycle, n= 5.79)
10-11
1 10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 11 of 40
Figure 4-11
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0.1 and 0.85 (Room Temperature, Air).
4-13
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 43
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-2
Inconel 738 10-1
test temperature:1562°F (850°C)
10-3 environment: vacuum
10-2
10-4
10-3
10-5
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
10-9
10-8
R= 0.1
10-10 R= 0.3 (C= 2.4e-10 in/cycle, n= 3.62)
R= 0.9 10-9
10-11
1 10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 12 of 40
Figure 4-12
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 1562°F.
4-14
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 65
Page 13 of 40
Figure 4-13
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate as a Function of •K in IN-738 at 927°C in Air and in Vacuum.
4-15
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 65
FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATE - (mm/cycle)
√ ∆ J • E OR ∆K
Page 14 of 40
Figure 4-14
Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate for Three Alloys.
4-16
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 65
Page 15 of 40
Figure 4-15
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Superalloys at 927°C in Vacuum.
4-17
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: 100 hr rupt. strength

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45

700 800 900 1000
100
Inconel 738
product form: cast
90
600
80

500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 16 of 40
Figure 4-16
4-18
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 45

700 800 900 1000
100
Inconel 738
product form: cast
90
600

80
500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 17 of 40
Figure 4-17
4-19
11089116
Inconel 738

Condition/HT ID: 10 Reference ID(s): 557939, 1514140,
Refurbish ID: N/A 919398, 9999908,
Coating ID: N/A 9999999
Chem. Comp: 44, 46, 44, 44, 44
3
LMP (K-hr)×10
(T(K))(C+log tr)
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
log(s)= -0.55+1.657(LMP)-2.6(LMP2) 100
Inconel 738
10
36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
3
LMP (°R-hr)×10
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 18 of 40
Figure 4-18
4-20
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: 2 (1514140)
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 44, 46
1000
Inconel 738
100 test environment: air
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
10
1562°F (850°C) (1514140) 100

1598°F (870°C) (1514140)
1800°F (980°C) (557939)
1
100 101 102 103 104 105 106
rupture time (hr)
Page 19 of 40
Figure 4-19
Stress vs. Rupture Time at Three Elevated Temperatures.
4-21
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 20 of 40
Figure 4-20
Stress vs. Strain-Rate at Three Temperatures Including Repeat Runs.
4-22
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A)
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Test temperature: 850°C
Page 21 of 40
Figure 4-21
Multiple Relaxation Runs at 850°C Showing Transient Effects for Low Stresses.
4-23
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 22 of 40
Figure 4-22
Creep Data at 850°C for Various Initial Thermal Treatments.
4-24
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: VPS
Chem. Comp: 44
900°C
124 MPa
Page 23 of 40
Figure 4-23
IN-738 VPS Coated Creep Test Results at 900°C/124 MPa.
4-25
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: VPS
Chem. Comp: 44
982°C
69 MPa
Page 24 of 40
Figure 4-24
IN-738 VPS Coated Creep Test Results at 982°C/69 MPa.
4-26
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Temperature: 850°C
Page 25 of 40
Figure 4-25
Strain Rate vs. Stress for IN738LC at 850°C in Tests Containing (i) pp and pc and (ii) pp
and cp.
4-27
11089116
Inconel 738
material: Inconel 738 property: creep crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 65
Page 26 of 40
Figure 4-26
Influence of Environment on Creep Crack Growth Rate in IN-738 at 927°C and Comparison
with Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Converted to Time Domain.
4-28
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 27 of 40
Figure 4-27
Total Strain Range vs. Life to Failure.
4-29
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 28 of 40
Figure 4-28
Total Strain Range vs. Life to Crack Initiation.
4-30
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 29 of 40
Figure 4-29
Elastic Strain Range vs. Life to Failure.
4-31
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 30 of 40
Figure 4-30
Elastic Strain Range vs. Life to Crack Initiation.
4-32
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 31 of 40
Figure 4-31
Inelastic Strain Range vs. Life to Failure.
4-33
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 32 of 40
Figure 4-32
Inelastic Strain Range vs. Life to Crack Initiation.
4-34
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 33 of 40
Figure 4-33
Typical Test Results and Partitioned Strain Ranges.
4-35
11089116
Inconel 738

Condition/HT ID: fully heat-treated Reference ID(s): 29
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
* exposed condition: sulfur containing environment
Page 34 of 40
Figure 4-34
(HTLCF) Results of IN 738 in the Standard and the Exposed Conditions, Inelastic Strain
Range (∆ε in %) vs. Number of Cycles to Failure (Nf).
4-36
11089116
Inconel 738

Condition/HT ID: fully heat-treated Reference ID(s): 19
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 64
Page 35 of 40
Figure 4-35
(HTLCF) Results of IN 738 at 1123 K, for the Two Types of Specimens Tested Under
Continuous Strain Cycling and Cycling with Tensile Hold Times, Inelastic Strain range (∆ε
in %) vs. Number of Cycles to Failure (Nf).
4-37
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 36 of 40
Figure 4-36
Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 LC (a) pp components only;
750°C and 850°C, (b) pp and pc components 850°C (c) pp and cp components; 850°C.
4-38
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 37 of 40
Figure 4-37
Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 at 870°C.
4-39
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 38 of 40
Figure 4-38
Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 at 870°C, pp and cp
components.
4-40
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 39 of 40
Figure 4-39
Inelastic Strain Range vs. Cycles to Failure for Cast IN 738 at 870°C, pp and pc
components.
4-41
11089116
Inconel 738

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 44
1.2
Inconel 738
1.1 test temperature: 1600°F (871°C)
environment: air
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
∆εt
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
hold time: 0
hold time: 120 sec
0.1
hold time: 600 sec
0.0
101 102 103 104 105 106
Nf (cycles)
Page 40 of 40
Figure 4-40
Low Cycle Fatigue at 1600°F with Three Hold Times Investigated (Total Strain Range).
4-42
11089116
5
INCONEL 738 LC
5-1
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
5-2
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: tensile

Condition/HT ID: 3, 4, 54, 10, 55 Reference ID(s): 839977, 9999907
Refurbish ID: 2 (ref 838977)
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 46, 25, 26, 35, 30-33, 36-38,
41, 42, 47-50

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
0.2% yield strength
180
1200
160
1000
strength (MPa)
140
strength (ksi)
120
800
100
600
80
60 400
40
200
20 Inconel 738 LC
0 0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 1 of 28
Figure 5-1
Tensile Strengths as a Function of Temperature.
5-3
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 46, 25, 26, 35, 30-33, 36-38,
41, 42, 47-50

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
40
Inconel 738 LC
35
30
25
% elongation
20
15
10
0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 2 of 28
Figure 5-2
5-4
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 46, 25, 26, 35, 30-33, 36-38,
41, 42, 47-50
60
Inconel 738 LC
50
45
reduction in area (%)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 3 of 28
Figure 5-3
Reduction in Area (Tensile) as a Function of Temperature.
5-5
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: impact resistance

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 4 of 28
Figure 5-4
Impact Resistance of IN-738 at Room Temperature and 900°C as a Function of Aging Time
at 950°C.
5-6
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: impact resistance

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 5 of 28
Figure 5-5
Loss of High Temperature Impact Resistance Correlation in Terms of a Time-Temperature
Parameter Analogous to that of Larson-Miller.
5-7
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: fatigue crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 29
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-2
Inconel 738 LC 10-1
10-3 test environment: air
10-2
10-4
10-3
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
10-9
R= 0.33 (C= 2.9e-12 in/cycle, n= 3.96) 10-8
10-10
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 6 of 28
Figure 5-6
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0 (Room Temperature, Lab Air Conditions).
5-8
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 29
∆K (MPa√m)
10-4
Inconel 738 LC
10-3
10-5
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-4
10-6
10-5
R= 0.1 (C= 3.16e-11in/cycle, n= 3.86)

-7
10
10
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 7 of 28
Figure 5-7
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 1382°F at R = 0.1 (Lab Air).
5-9
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 29, 46
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-2
Inconel 738 LC 10-1
test temperature:1562°F (850°C)
air
10-3
10-2
10-4
da/dN (mm/cycle)
10-3
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
R= 0.25 (C=2.7e-14 in/cycle, n= 6.1) 10-7
R= 0.3 (C= 1.6e-10 in/cycle, n= 3.74)
10-9
1 10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 8 of 28
Figure 5-8
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at 1562°F for R = 0.25 and 0.3 (Lab Air).
5-10
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 9 of 28
Figure 5-9
Crack Growth for Nimocast 738 LC and 739 at Cyclic Frequencies Between 60 and 100 Hz
and R = 0.1; δ is Crack Tip Opening Displacement.
5-11
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 10 of 28
Figure 5-10
Influence of Environment on Fatigue Crack Growth of Nimocast 738 LC and 739 at 850°C
and Cyclic Frequencies Between 10 and 100 Hz and R = 0.1.
5-12
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: stress rupture

Condition/HT ID: 6, 10 Reference ID(s): 760821, 777613, 792216
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 27, 46
3
LMP (K-hr)×10
(T(K))(C+tr)
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
Inconel 738 LC
36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56
3
LMP (°R-hr)×10
(460+°F)(C + log tr)
Page 11 of 28
Figure 5-11
Larson-Miller Plot for Inconel 738 LC.
5-13
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 46
LMP (K-hr)×103
(T(K))(C+log tr)
21 22 23 24
Inconel 738 LC
test environment: light oil (ASTM grade #2)
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
test temperature
100
1292°F (700°C)
1562°F (850°C)
10
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
3
LMP (°R-hr)×10
(460+°F)(C + log tr)
Page 12 of 28
Figure 5-12
Larson-Miller Plot at Two Test Temperatures (Light Oil Conditions).
5-14
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 46
120
test temperature 800
1292°F (700°C)
1562°F (850°C)
100 700
600
80
stress (MPa)
500
stress (ksi)
60 400
300
40
200
20
100
Inconel 738 LC
test environment: light oil (ASTM grade #2)
0 0
100 1000 10000
tr (hr)
Page 13 of 28
Figure 5-13
Stress vs. Rupture Time at Two Elevated Temperatures (Light Oil Conditions).
5-15
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: creep

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 69
Page 14 of 28
Figure 5-14
-3
Larson-Miller Plot (P = T (20 + log t f) x 10 , where T is in K and tf in hr) of Cast and Hipped
IN-738LC Turbine Blades Showing Unexposed and Service Exposed Creep-Rupture
Properties.
5-16
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: rupture - creep rate

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 69
Page 15 of 28
Figure 5-15
Dependence of the Time to Rupture on the Minimum Creep Rate, for IN-738LC (Monkman-
Grant Relationship).
5-17
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: minimum creep rate

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 69
tp + ts , s
MINIMUM CREEP RATE (e& s ), s-1)
Page 16 of 28
Figure 5-16
Dependence of Primary Plus Secondary, Creep Life on the Minimum Creep Rate for Cast
IN-738LC.
5-18
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: time to rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 69
TERTIARY TIME ( t t ) , s
TIME TO RUPTURE ( t r ) , s
Page 17 of 28
Figure 5-17
Time to Rupture Dependence on the Tertiary Life for Cast IN-738LC.
5-19
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: low-cycle fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 39
10
Inconel 738 LC failure
test temperature: 1699 °F
∆εt
0.1
101 102 103 104 105
Nf (cycles)
Page 18 of 28
Figure 5-18
Low Cycle Fatigue at 1699°F (Total Strain Range).
5-20
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 46
10
Inconel 738 LC
test environment: air 1112°F
1382°F
∆εt
0.1
102 103 104 105
Nf (cycles)
Page 19 of 28
Figure 5-19
Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior at Two Elevated Temperatures (Total Strain Range).
5-21
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 35
10
800°F- initiation
800°F- failure
1400°F- initiation
1400°F- failure
1600°F- initiation
1600°F- failure
1800°F- initiation
1800°F- failure
∆εt
Inconel 738 LC
0.1
102 103 104 105
N (cycles)
Page 20 of 28
Figure 5-20
Low Cycle Initiation and Failure at Four Elevated Temperatures.
5-22
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Condition/HT ID: standard, two-step Reference ID(s): 1
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 21 of 28
Figure 5-21
Strain-Amplitude-Life Relations for IN738LC at 650°C as an Effect of Casting Process.
5-23
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 22 of 28
Figure 5-22
5-24
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 23 of 28
Figure 5-23
Stress vs. Reversals of IN738LC at 650°C (1202°F) as an Effect of Casting Process.
5-25
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 24 of 28
Figure 5-24
5-26
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 25 of 28
Figure 5-25
Stress vs. Reversals of IN738LC at 850°C (1532°F) as an Effect of Casting Process.
5-27
11089116
Inconel 738 LC

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 26 of 28
Figure 5-26
5-28
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: TMF

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 35
0.9
Inconel 738 LC
initiation
failure
0.8
0.7
0.6
∆εt
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
101 102 103 104 105 106
N (cycles)
Page 27 of 28
Figure 5-27
Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior for Inconel 738 LC.
5-29
11089116
Inconel 738 LC
material: Inconel 738 LC property: TMF

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 35
120
800
initiation
failure
100 700
max stress (MPa)

600
max stress (ksi)
80
500
60
400
300
40
Inconel 738 LC
200
max temperature: 1600°F
20
101 102 103 104 105 106
N (cycles)
Page 28 of 28
Figure 5-28
Thermal-Mechanical Fatigue Behavior of Inconel 738 LC.
5-30
11089116
6
INCONEL 792
6-1
11089116
Inconel 792
6-2
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
200
1200
160 1100
1000
140
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
Inconel 792
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 1 of 9
Figure 6-1
6-3
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
16
Inconel 792
14
12
10
% elongation
0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 2 of 9
Figure 6-2
6-4
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15
Page 3 of 9
Figure 6-3
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate as a Function of ∆K in IN-792 at 927°C in Air and in Vacuum.
6-5
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15
Page 4 of 9
Figure 6-4
Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Terms for Three Alloys.
6-6
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15
Page 5 of 9
Figure 6-5
6-7
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15

700 800 900 1000
120
Inconel 792 800
110 product form: cast
100 700

90
600
80
500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 6 of 9
Figure 6-6
6-8
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15

700 800 900 1000
100
Inconel792
product form: cast
90 test environment: air 600

80
500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 7 of 9
Figure 6-7
6-9
11089116
Inconel 792

Refurbish ID: 9
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15
3
LMP (K-hr)×10
(T(K))(C+log tr)
30.00 29.75 29.50 29.25 29.00 28.75
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
Inconel 792
10
38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
3
LMP (°R-hr)×10
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 8 of 9
Figure 6-8
6-10
11089116
Inconel 792
material: Inconel 792 property: creep crack growth

Refurbish ID: 9
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 15
Page 9 of 9
Figure 6-9
Influence of Environment on Creep Crack Growth Rate in IN-792 at 927°C and Comparison
with Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Given on a Time Basis).
6-11
11089116
11089116
7
MAR-M002
7-1
11089116
MAR-M002
7-2
11089116
MAR-M002
material: MAR-M002 property: fatigue crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77

Frequency: 0.1 Hz
Page 1 of 13
Figure 7-1
Influence of R on Crack Growth in Directionally Solidified and Single Crystal Materials at
950°C and a Frequency of 0.1 Hz.
7-3
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77

Frequency: 20 Hz
Page 2 of 13
Figure 7-2
Influence of Grain Structure and R on Crack Growth at 950°C and a Frequency of 20 Hz.
7-4
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77

Frequency: 20 Hz
Page 3 of 13
Figure 7-3
Effect of Frequency on Crack Growth in Directionally Solidified Alloy at 950°C and R = 0.1.
7-5
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77
Page 4 of 13
Figure 7-4
Effect of Temperature on Crack Growth/Cycle in Directionally Solidified and Single Crystal
Materials at a Frequency of 0.1 Hz and R = 0.1.
7-6
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77

Frequency: 20 Hz
R= 0.7
Page 5 of 13
Figure 7-5
Effect of Prior Creep Damage on Crack Growth in Directionally Solidified and Single
Crystal Material at 950°C at a Frequency of 20 Hz and R = 0.7.
7-7
11089116
MAR-M002

Condition/HT ID: typical Reference ID(s): 8
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 78
Page 6 of 13
Figure 7-6
Effect of R on Crack Growth Per Cycle in the Threshold Region at 950°C.
7-8
11089116
MAR-M002

Condition/HT ID: typical Reference ID(s): 8
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 78

R= 0.9
Page 7 of 13
Figure 7-7
Effect of Prior Creep Damage on Crack Growth Per Cycle at 950°C for R = 0.9.
7-9
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
R = 0.1
frequency: 20 Hz
Page 8 of 13
Figure 7-8
Crack Growth for MAR-M002 at Cyclic Frequency of 0.25 Hz and R = 0.1.
7-10
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 9 of 13
Figure 7-9
Influence of R on Crack Growth Rate for MAR-M002 at 950°C and 20 Hz, da/dN versus ∆K.
7-11
11089116
MAR-M002

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 10 of 13
Figure 7-10
Influence of R on Crack Growth Rate for MAR-M002 at 950°C and 20 Hz, da/dt versus Kmax.
7-12
11089116
MAR-M002
material: MAR-M002 property: creep crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77
Page 11 of 13
Figure 7-11
Influence of Grain Structure and Temperature on Creep Crack Growth Rate.
7-13
11089116
MAR-M002
material: MAR-M002 property: creep crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77
Temperature: 950°C
Page 12 of 13
Figure 7-12
Effect of Prior Creep Damage on Creep Crack Growth Rate at 950°C in Directionally
Solidified Material.
7-14
11089116
MAR-M002
material: MAR-M002 property: creep strain

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 77

Stress: 256 MPa
Page 13 of 13
Figure 7-13
Accumulation of Creep Strain at 950°C and a Stress of 256 MPa in Directionally Solidified
and Single Crystal Material.
7-15
11089116
11089116
8
MAR-M200
8-1
11089116
MAR-M200
8-2
11089116
MAR-M200

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 79
Page 1 of 3
Figure 8-1
Comparison of Crack Growth Rates of MAR-M200 Single Crystals at 25 and 982°C. (∆Keff is
a Function of Three Nodes of Cracking.)
8-3
11089116
MAR-M200

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 79
Page 2 of 3
Figure 8-2
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Results of MAR-M200 Single Crystals Under Uniaxially Applied
Cyclic Loading at 982°C. (∆Keff is a Function of Three Nodes of Cracking.)
8-4
11089116
MAR-M200
material: MAR-M200 property: TMF

Condition/HT ID: Reference ID(s): 25
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp:
Heating and cooling in fluidized beads at 320°C and 1090°C
Page 3 of 3
Figure 8-3
Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Thermal Fatigue Lives of MAR M200 and
MAR M200DS Double Wedges (0.6 and 1.0 mm Radius Edge, Heating and Cooling in
Fluidized Beds at 320 and 1090°C).
8-5
11089116
11089116
9
MAR-M247
9-1
11089116
MAR-M247
9-2
11089116
MAR-M247
material: MAR-M247 property: isothermal fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 80
Page 1 of 6
Figure 9-1
Prediction of Isothermal Fatigue Data at 500°C.
9-3
11089116
MAR-M247
material: MAR-M247 property: isothermal fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 80
Page 2 of 6
Figure 9-2
Prediction of 871°C Isothermal Fatigue Test Results.
9-4
11089116
MAR-M247

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 80
Page 3 of 6
Figure 9-3
Prediction of Out-of-Phase TMF (500°C–871°C) Test Results.
9-5
11089116
MAR-M247

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 80
Page 4 of 6
Figure 9-4
Prediction of In-Phase TMF (500°C–871°C) Test Results.
9-6
11089116
MAR-M247

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 80
Page 5 of 6
Figure 9-5
Prediction of Diamond Shape (Nonproportional) Strain-Temperature History.
9-7
11089116
MAR-M247

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 80
Page 6 of 6
Figure 9-6
Mechanical Strain Range Versus Life for Out-of-Phase and In-Phase TMF Experiments,
ε = 5 x 10-5 s-1
9-8
11089116
10
NIMONIC 115
10-1
11089116
Nimonic 115
10-2
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: thermal conductivity

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
Nimonic 115
200
28
26

180
24
2
160
22
140 20
18
120
16
100
14
12
80
10
60
8
40 6
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 8
Figure 10-1
10-3
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: thermal expansion

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
11
Nimonic 115

10 18
17
9
16
15
8
14
-6
13
7
12
11
6
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 2 of 8
Figure 10-2
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion as a Function of Temperature.
10-4
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
200
1200
160 1100
1000
140
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
Nimonic 115
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 3 of 8
Figure 10-3
10-5
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
30
Nimonic 115
28
26
24
% elongation
22
20
18
16
14
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 4 of 8
Figure 10-4
10-6
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: dynamic modulus

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
36
Nimonic 115
34
230
32 220

3
210
30
200
28
190
26 180
170
24
160
22 150
140
20
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 5 of 8
Figure 10-5
10-7
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: 100 hr rupt. strength

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10

700 800 900 1000
100
Nimonic 115
90
600
80

500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 6 of 8
Figure 10-6
10-8
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: 1000 hr rupt. strength

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10

700 800 900 1000
100
Nimonic 115
90
600
80

500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 7 of 8
Figure 10-7
10-9
11089116
Nimonic 115
material: Nimonic 115 property: stress rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 10
LMP (K-hr)
(T(K))(C+log tr)
21.5 22.0 22.5 23.0 23.5 24.0 24.5
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
Nimonic 115
10
39 40 41 42 43 44 45
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 8 of 8
Figure 10-8
Partial Larson-Miller Plot for Nimonic 115.
10-10
11089116
11
RENE 80
11-1
11089116
Rene 80
11-2
11089116
lEPRI Licensed Material
Rene 80
material: Rene 80 property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: CoNiCrAlY
Chem. Comp: 74
Page 1 of 8
Figure 11-1
Temperature Dependence of Yield Strength (σy) of Unused and Used Coatings and
Substrates in Comparison with Tensile Test Data of Unused Substrate.
11-3
11089116
Rene 80

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: CoNiCrAlY
Chem. Comp: 74
Page 2 of 8
Figure 11-2
Temperature Dependence of Ductility (ε f) Obtained from SP Tests on Unused and Used
Coatings and Substrates, Compared with Tensile Test Data of Unused Substrate.
11-4
11089116
Rene 80

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 75
Page 3 of 8
Figure 11-3
Temperature Dependence of Strength and Ductility of the Rene 80 Alloy Specimens.
11-5
11089116
Rene 80
material: Rene 80 property: fatigue crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 76
Page 4 of 8
Figure 11-4
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate as a Function of ∆K in Rene 80 at 927°C in Air and in Vacuum.
11-6
11089116
Rene 80

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 76
FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATE - (mm/cycle)
√ ∆ J • E OR ∆K
Page 5 of 8
Figure 11-5
Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate for Three Alloys.
11-7
11089116
Rene 80

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 76
Page 6 of 8
Figure 11-6
11-8
11089116
Rene 80

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 76
Page 7 of 8
Figure 11-7
Influence of Environment on Creep Crack Growth Rate in Rene 80 at 927°C and
Comparison with Fatigue Crack Growth Rate. (Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Give on a Time
Basis.)
11-9
11089116
Rene 80
material: Rene 80 property: creep

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 8 of 8
Figure 11-8
A Larson Miller Plot Comparing the GTD111 Alloy Test Points with Rene 80 Data from the
Literature and the GTD111 Larson Miller Curve Published by General Electric.
11-10
11089116
12
UDIMET 500
12-1
11089116
Udimet 500
12-2
11089116
Udimet 500
material: Udimet 500 property: thermal conductivity

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
Udimet 500
200
28

180 26
24
2
160
22
140 20
18
120
16
100 14
12
80
10
60
8
40 6
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 8
Figure 12-1
12-3
11089116
Udimet 500
material: Udimet 500 property: thermal expansion

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
10.0 18
Udimet 500
α [×10 ], 21°C to temperature (cm/cm/°C)

9.5 product form: wrought
17
9.0
-6
16
8.5
15
8.0
14
7.5
13
7.0
12
6.5
-6
11
6.0
5.5 10
5.0 9
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 2 of 8
Figure 12-2
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion as a Function of Final Temperature.
12-4
11089116
Udimet 500
material: Udimet 500 property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220 1500
1300
180
1200
160 1100
strength (MPa)
1000
strength (ksi)
140
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
Udimet 500
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 3 of 8
Figure 12-3
12-5
11089116
Udimet 500

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

0 200 400 600 800 1000
45
Udimet 500
40
35
% elongation
30
25
20
15
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 4 of 8
Figure 12-4
12-6
11089116
Udimet 500
material: Udimet 500 property: dynamic modulus

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
36 Udimet 500
240
34
32
220

3
30
200
28
26 180
24
160
22
20 140
18
120
16
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 5 of 8
Figure 12-5
12-7
11089116
Udimet 500
material: Udimet 500 property: 100 hr rupt. strength

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

600 700 800 900 1000
150
Udimet 500 1000
140 product form: wrought
130 900
120

800
110
100 700
90
600
80
500
70
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 6 of 8
Figure 12-6
12-8
11089116
Udimet 500

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1

600 700 800 900 1000
130
Udimet 500
800
110

100 700
90
600
80
500
70
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 7 of 8
Figure 12-7
12-9
11089116
Udimet 500
material: Udimet 500 property: stress rupture

Condition/HT ID: 16 Reference ID(s): 9999903, 557939, 9999999
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 1, 53
LMP (K-hr)
(T(K))(C+log tr)
18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
Udimet 500
10
1
32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 8 of 8
Figure 12-8
Larson-Miller Plot for Udimet 500.
12-10
11089116
13
UDIMET 520
13-1
11089116
Udimet 520
13-2
11089116
Udimet 520

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 9

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220 1500
1300
180
1200
160 1100
strength (MPa)
1000
strength (ksi)
140
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
Udimet 520
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 1 of 5
Figure 13-1
13-3
11089116
Udimet 520

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 9

0 200 400 600 800 1000
35
Udimet 520
30
25
% elongation
20
15
10
0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 2 of 5
Figure 13-2
13-4
11089116
Udimet 520

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 9

600 700 800 900 1000
150
Udimet 520 1000
130 900
120

800
110
100 700
90
600
80
500
70
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 3 of 5
Figure 13-3
13-5
11089116
Udimet 520

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 9

600 700 800 900 1000
130
Udimet 520
800
110

100 700
90
600
80
500
70
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 4 of 5
Figure 13-4
13-6
11089116
Udimet 520
material: Udimet 520 property: creep

Condition/HT ID: 18 Reference ID(s): 9999908, 876779, 9999999
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 9, 55
LMP (K-hr)
(T(K))(C+log tr)
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
Udimet 520
10
1
38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 5 of 5
Figure 13-5
13-7
11089116
11089116
14
UDIMET 700
14-1
11089116
Udimet 700
14-2
11089116
Udimet 700
material: Udimet 700 property: specific heat

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0.20
Udimet 700
product form: wrought 0.80
0.18 0.75
specific heat (Btu/lb/°F)
0.70
specific heat (kJ/kg/K)

0.16
0.65
0.60
0.14
0.55
0.12 0.50
0.45
0.10
0.40
0.35
0.08
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 17
Figure 14-1
Specific Heat as a Function of Temperature.
14-3
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
260
Udimet 700
240
34

220 32
2
30
200
28
180 26
24
160
22
140 20
18
120
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 2 of 17
Figure 14-2
14-4
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
10.0 18.0
Udimet 700

17.5
α [×10-6], 70°F to temperature (in/in/°F)
9.5
17.0
16.5
9.0
16.0
15.5
8.5
15.0
14.5
8.0
14.0
7.5 13.5
13.0
7.0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 3 of 17
Figure 14-3
14-5
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
240
1600
200 1400
180
1200
strength (MPa)
160
strength (ksi)
1000
140
120
800
100
600
80
60 400
40 Udimet 700
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 4 of 17
Figure 14-4
14-6
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
34
Udimet 700
30
28
% elongation
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 5 of 17
Figure 14-5
14-7
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
36
Udimet 700 240
34
230
32 220

3
210
30
200
28
190
26 180
170
24
160
22 150
140
20
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 6 of 17
Figure 14-6
14-8
11089116
Udimet 700
material: Udimet 700 property: fatigue crack growth

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 16, 2
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-2
Udimet 700 10-1
10-3 air
10-2
10-4
10-3
da/dN (mm/cycle)
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
10-7
10-6
10-8
10-7
R= 0 (C= 9.12e-16 in/cycle, n= 6.3)
10-9 R= 0.05 (C= 2.1e-11 in/cycle, n= 0.65)
R= 0.24 (C= 1.4e-12 in/cycle, n= 4.21)
10-8
R= 0.53 (C= 3.7e-12 in/cycle, n= 3.5)
10-10
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 7 of 17
Figure 14-7
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0, 0.05, 0.24, and 0.53 (Lab Air, Room Temperature).
14-9
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2
∆K (MPa√m)
100
10-1
Udimet 700
test temperature: 75°F (24°C) 100
vacuum
10-2
10-1
da/dN (mm/cycle)
10-3
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-2
10-4
10-3
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
R= 0 (C= 2e-18 in/cycle, n= 7.7)
10-7
100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 8 of 17
Figure 14-8
Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior Under Vacuum Conditions (Room Temperature).
14-10
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 21
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-1
Udimet 700
air
10-2
10-1
da/dN (mm/cycle)
10-3
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-2
10-4
10-3
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
R= 0 (C= 6.3e-13 in/cycle, n= 5.4)
10-7
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 9 of 17
Figure 14-9
Elevated Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior at R = 0.
14-11
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2
∆K (MPa√m)
10 100
10-1
Udimet 700
vacuum
10-2
10-1
da/dN (mm/cycle)
10-3
da/dN (in/cycle)
10-2
10-4
10-3
10-5
10-4
10-6
10-5
R= 0 (C= 1.1e-9 in/cycle, n= 3.02)
10-7
10 100
∆K (ksi√in)
Page 10 of 17
Figure 14-10
Elevated Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior Under Vacuum Conditions.
14-12
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: N/A

R= 0.05
Frequency: 0.17 Hz
Page 11 of 17
Figure 14-11
Crack Growth for Udimet 700 at 850°C, R = 0.05, and Cyclic Frequency of 0.17 Hz.
14-13
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 67
Temperature: 850°C
Page 12 of 17
Figure 14-12
The Effect of the Environment on the Creep Crack Growth in Udimet 700 at 850°C: o , 14.2
Ì
kN, vacuum, batch 2; , 16.0 kN, vacuum, batch 2; —— air, batch 1; ——, air, batch 2.
14-14
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2

700 800 900 1000
120
Udimet 700 800
100 700

90
600
80
500
70
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 13 of 17
Figure 14-13
14-15
11089116
Udimet 700

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2

600 700 800 900 1000
130
Udimet 700
800
110

100 700
90
600
80
500
70
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 14 of 17
Figure 14-14
14-16
11089116
Udimet 700

Condition/HT ID: 50, 45, 22 Reference ID(s): 14935, 212046, 408031
Refurbish ID: N/A 719687, 805217
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 24, 19, 51
LMP (K-hr)
(T(K))(C+log tr)
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
Udimet 700
38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 15 of 17
Figure 14-15
14-17
11089116
Udimet 700
material: Udimet 700 property: low-cycle fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 17, 23
10
Udimet 700
∆εt
0.1
101 102 103 104
Nf (cycles)
Page 16 of 17
Figure 14-16
Low-Cycle Fatigue at 1400°F (Total Strain Range).
14-18
11089116
Udimet 700
material: Udimet 700 property: high-cycle fatigue

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 2
480
Udimet 700
64 440
420
60
400
∆σ (MPa)
∆σ (ksi)
56
380
52 360
340
48
320
44
300
R= -1 (rotating bend specimen)

280
40
104 105 106 107 108
Nf (cycles)
Page 17 of 17
Figure 14-17
High-Cycle Fatigue Behavior at 1500°F (Fully Reversed Loading).
14-19
11089116
11089116
15
UDIMET 710
15-1
11089116
Udimet 710
15-2
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
Udimet 710
30
cast -or- wrought
200
28

180 26
24
2
160
22
140 20
18
120
16
100 14
12
80
10
60
8
40 6
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 11
Figure 15-1
15-3
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
10.0
Udimet 710
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
-6
6.0
5.5
5.0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 2 of 11
Figure 15-2
15-4
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 8

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
200
0.2% yield strength
1200
160
1000
140
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
120
800
100
600
80
60 400
40
Udimet 710
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 3 of 11
Figure 15-3
15-5
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
35
Udimet 710
30
25
% elongation
20
15
10
5
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 4 of 11
Figure 15-4
15-6
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
36
Udimet 710
34
32
30
3
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 5 of 11
Figure 15-5
15-7
11089116
Udimet 710
material: Udimet 710 property: charpy impact

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8
16
Udimet 710
14 environment: air
18
12 16

14
10
12
8
10
6 8
6
4
4
2
2
0 0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
aging time (hr)
Page 6 of 11
Figure 15-6
Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Time.
15-8
11089116
Udimet 710
material: Udimet 710 property: charpy impact

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8
aging temperature (°C)

0 150 300 450 600 750 900
10
Udimet 710 13
environment: air 12
8 11
10

9
6 8
6
4
5
3
2
2
0 0
1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700
aging temperature (°F)
Page 7 of 11
Figure 15-7
Charpy Impact Energy as a Function of Aging Temperature.
15-9
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8

600 700 800 900 1000
160 1100
Udimet 710
1000
140
900

120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
200
20
cast 100
wrought
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 8 of 11
Figure 15-8
15-10
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 8

600 700 800 900 1000
160 1100
150 Udimet 710
1000
140
130 900

120
800
110
100 700
90
600
80
70 500
60 400
50
300
40
30 200
20
cast 100
10 wrought
0 0
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 9 of 11
Figure 15-9
15-11
11089116
Udimet 710

Condition/HT ID: 52, 5, 50 Reference ID(s): 557939, 876773, 99999
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 8
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
Udimet 710
36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log t)
Page 10 of 11
Figure 15-10
15-12
11089116
Udimet 710

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: N/A
Page 11 of 11
Figure 15-11
Effect of Mean Stress on the Fatigue Strength of Udimet 710. ( A = σALTERNATING / σMEAN ).
15-13
11089116
11089116
16
UDIMET 720
16-1
11089116
Udimet 720
16-2
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 6
temperature (°C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
10.0
Udimet 720
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
-6
6.0
5.5
5.0
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
temperature (°F)
Page 1 of 22
Figure 16-1
16-3
11089116
Udimet 720

Condition/HT ID: 47,48 Reference ID(s): 928584, 9999905
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 7,6

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
220
1500
ultimate strength
1400
200
1300
180
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
1200
160 1100
1000
140
900
120
800
Udimet 720
100 700
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 2 of 22
Figure 16-2
16-4
11089116
Udimet 720

Condition/HT ID: 47,48 Reference ID(s): 928584, 9999905
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 7,6

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
26
Udimet 720
22
20
18
% elongation
16
14
12
10
4
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Page 3 of 22
Figure 16-3
16-5
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: NA
Page 4 of 22
Figure 16-4
Crack Growth Rates in Air and in Vacuum for Single Crystal U720.
16-6
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: NA
Page 5 of 22
Figure 16-5
Crack Growth Rates in Air and in Vacuum for Polycrystalline U720.
16-7
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: NA
Page 6 of 22
Figure 16-6
Graph of da/dN Data for SENB Specimens in Vacuum at 20, 300 and 600°C.
16-8
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: NA
Page 7 of 22
Figure 16-7
Showing da/dN Data at R = 0.5 in Air and Vacuum.
16-9
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 6

700 800 900 1000
100
Udimet 720
90
600
80

500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 8 of 22
Figure 16-8
16-10
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 6

700 800 900 1000
100
Udimet 720
90
600
80

500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 9 of 22
Figure 16-9
16-11
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 6

700 800 900 1000
100
Udimet 720
90
600
80

500
70
60
400
50
300
40
30 200
20
100
10
0 0
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Page 10 of 22
Figure 16-10
16-12
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 6
100
Udimet 720
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
100
10
40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LMP (°R-hr)
(460+°F)(C+log t)
Page 11 of 22
Figure 16-11
16-13
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 7
60
Udimet 720 120
pretemperature aging: 0
test temperature: 1600 °F (870°C)
50
100
40
90
∆σ (MPa)
∆σ (ksi)
80
30
70
20 60
50
10
40
saline
air
30
0
103 104 105 106 107 108 109 1010
Nf (cycles)
Page 12 of 22
Figure 16-12
High Cycle Fatigue Behavior at 1600°F in Saline and Air Environments.
16-14
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 66
Page 13 of 22
Figure 16-13
Effects of Environment and Frequency of Cycling on HCF Strength of Udimet 720 at 1300°F
(704°C) and R = 0.2 to 0.3.
16-15
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 66
Page 14 of 22
Figure 16-14
HCF Strength of Udimet 720 in Salt Environment at 1300°F (704°C) for R = -1.0 and 0.6.
16-16
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 66
Temperature: 1300°F
Page 15 of 22
Figure 16-15
Effect of Salt Environment and Low Alternating Stress on Stress Rupture of Udimet 710
and 720 Alloys at 1300°F (704°C).
16-17
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 66
Page 16 of 22
Figure 16-16
Effect of Environment on Creep/Fatigue Strength of Udimet 720 at 1300°F (704°C) and
Constant Maximum Stress.
16-18
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A)
Chem. Comp: 66
Page 17 of 22
Figure 16-17
Creep/Fatigue Strength of Udimet 720 in Air and Salt Under Constant Mean Stress at
1300°F (704°C).
16-19
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: 6 (RT-22)
Chem. Comp: 4
Page 18 of 22
Figure 16-18
Relationship Between Strain Range and Number of Cycles to Failure Obtained During the
Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of Udimet 710 and Coated and Uncoated Udimet 720 at 1350°F
(732°C) at 1 cpm.
16-20
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 4
Page 19 of 22
Figure 16-19
Relationship Between the Strain Range Components and Number of Cycles to Failure
Obtained During the Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of Udimet 720 at 1350°F (732°C) as a
Function of Hold Time and Test Environment.
16-21
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 4
Page 20 of 22
Figure 16-20
Relationship Between the Strain Range Components and Number of Cycles to Failure
Obtained During the Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of RT-22 Coated Udimet 720 at 1350°F
(732°C) at 1 cpm as a Function of Hold Time and Test Environment.
16-22
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 4
Page 21 of 22
Figure 16-21
Low-Cycle Fatigue Results for Udimet 720 at 1350°F (732°C) and 1 cpm.
16-23
11089116
Udimet 720

Refurbish ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 4
Page 22 of 22
Figure 16-22
Low-Cycle Fatigue Results for RT-22 Coated Udimet 720 Tested at 1350°F (732°C) and 1
cpm.
16-24
11089116
17
GTD 111 DS
17-1
11089116
GTD 111 DS
17-2
11089116
GTD 111 DS
material: GTD 111 EA and DS property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 71, 72
Page 1 of 14
Figure 17-1
Tensile Properties and Hardness in the Service Aged Condition.
17-3
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: HIPPED, coated, re-heattreat
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 71, 72
Page 2 of 14
Figure 17-2
Tensile and Hardness Properties after Refurbishment.
17-4
11089116
GTD 111 DS
material: GTD 111 DS property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 3 of 14
Figure 17-3
Bucket to Bucket Variation of Yield and Tensile Strengths of GTD-111 DS (Undegraded).
17-5
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 4 of 14
Figure 17-4
Bucket to Bucket Variation of Percent Elongation and Reduction of Area (Undegraded).
17-6
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
160
140
Longitudinal
120
0.2% Offset Yield Strength
Transverse
100
80
60
Longitudinal (BIRM01665 &000963)

40 Transverse (bucket BIUW 000039)
20
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Temperature, F
Page 5 of 14
Figure 17-5
Variation of Yield Strength of the Longitudinal and Transverse Specimens.
17-7
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
200
180
Longitudinal
160
Ultimate Tensile Strength, ksi
140
120 Transverse
100
80
Longitudinal(BIRM001665&000963)
60 Transverse (BIUW000039)
40
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Temperature, F
Page 6 of 14
Figure 17-6
Variation of Tensile Strength for the Longitudinal and Transverse Specimens.
17-8
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Condition/HT ID: Reference ID(s):33
Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
60
Longitudinal-(%EL)
Longitudinal (%RA) Longitudinal (%RA)
50 Transverse (%EL)
Transverse (%RA)
% Elongation or Reduction of Area
40
Longitudinal
(%EL)
30
20
Transverse (%RA)
10
Transverse
(%EL)
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Temperature, F
Page 7 of 14
Figure 17-7
Variation of Tensile Ductility of Longitudinal and Transverse Specimens as a Function of
Temperature.
17-9
11089116
GTD 111 DS
material: GTD 111 EA and DS property: stress rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 71, 72
Page 8 of 14
Figure 17-8
Airfoil Stress Rupture Data for IN-738, GTD-111EA and GTD-111DS Alloys Before and After
Rejuvenation.
17-10
11089116
GTD 111 DS
material: GTD 111 DS property: isostress creep rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 73
1850
15 ksi
20 ksi
1800
Temperature, T (°F)
1750
1700
1650
15 ksi
log(tr) = 24.398333 - 0.0118 * T
1600 20 ksi
log(tr) = 21.411507 - 0.010506 * T
1550
101 102 103 104 105
Rupture Time, t r (hours)
Page 9 of 14
Figure 17-9
Iso-Stress Creep Rupture Data of Longitudinal Specimens Machined from the Shank
Section (Unaged).
17-11
11089116
GTD 111 DS
material: GTD 111 DS property: isostress creep rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 73
1850
15 ksi
1800 20 ksi
Temperature, T (°F)
1750
1700
1650
15 ksi
log(tr) = 25.1640775356 - 0.01262814 * T
1600 20 ksi
log(tr) = 21.3610045428 - 0.0108205737 * T
1550
101 102 103 104 105
Rupture Time, tr (hours)
Page 10 of 14
Figure 17-10
Iso-Stress Creep Rupture Data of Transverse Specimens Machined from the Shank
Section.
17-12
11089116
GTD 111 DS
material: GTD 111 DS property: stress rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 73
100
90
GTD-111DS
80 2
LMP = 53803.23 + 7674.009 * Log(σ) - 7572.44 * Log(σ)
70
60
50
45
40
Stress, ksi
35
30
25
20
15
IN738LC (∆)
2
LMP = 53146.069 + 4823.3177 * Log(σ) - 5985.901 * Log(σ)
10
38000 40000 42000 44000 46000 48000 50000 52000 54000 56000
T(20 + log(tr)), R-hr
Page 11 of 14
Figure 17-11
LMP Plot of GTD-111 DS and IN-738 LC Creep Data.
17-13
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
100
90
80
70
60
50
45
40
Stress, ksi
35
30
25
20
15
LMP = 53803.23 + 7674.009 * Log(σ) - 7572.44 * Log(σ)2

10
42000 44000 46000 48000 50000 52000 54000 56000
Page 12 of 14
Figure 17-12
Larson-Miller Plot of Longitudinal Shank (Undegraded) Creep Data.
17-14
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
100
90
80
70
60
2
50 LMP = 54601.11 + 3568.483 * Log(σ) - 5733.02 * Log(σ)
45
40
Stress, ksi
35
30
25
20
15
10
42000 44000 46000 48000 50000 52000 54000 56000
Page 13 of 14
Figure 17-13
LMP Plot of Transverse Specimen Data from Undegraded Shank Location.
17-15
11089116
GTD 111 DS

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
100
90
80
70
Longitudinal
60
LMP = 53803.23 + 7674.009 * Log(σ) - 7572.44 * Log(σ)2
50
45
40
Stress, ksi
35
30
25
20
15
Transverse
2
LMP = 54601.11 + 3568.483 * Log(σ) - 5733.02 * Log(σ)
10
40000 42000 44000 46000 48000 50000 52000 54000 56000
Page 14 of 14
Figure 17-14
Influence of Specimen Orientation on Creep Rupture Strength of Unaged (Shank) Material.
17-16
11089116
18
GTD 111 EA
18-1
11089116
GTD 111 EA
18-2
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 71, 72
Page 1 of 23
Figure 18-1
Tensile Properties and Hardness in the Service Aged Condition.
18-3
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: HIPPED, coated, re-heattreat
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 71, 72
Page 2 of 23
Figure 18-2
Tensile and Hardness Properties after Refurbishment.
18-4
11089116
GTD 111 EA
material: GTD 111 EA property: tensile

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
200
0.2% yield strength 1300
ultimate strength
180
1200
160 1100
1000
140
strength (MPa)
strength (ksi)
900
120
800
100 700
600
80
500
60 400
300
40
GTD 111
20
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100
Page 3 of 23
Figure 18-3
18-5
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 4 of 23
Figure 18-4
18-6
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 5 of 23
Figure 18-5
Tensile Properties for Root and Airfoil Material at 70°F and 1600°F.
18-7
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 6 of 23
Figure 18-6
Tensile Properties for Root and Airfoil Material at 70°F and 1600°F.
18-8
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70

0 200 400 600 800 1000
34 GTD 111
30
28
26
24
% elongation
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Page 7 of 23
Figure 18-7
18-9
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 8 of 23
Figure 18-8
Tensile Elongation and Reduction in Area as a Function of Temperature.
18-10
11089116
GTD 111 EA
material: GTD 111 EA property: stress rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
1000
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
10
GTD 111
1500 °F (815 °C) standard heat-treat

1600 °F (872 °C)
100
1500 °F (815 °C) 5,000 hr thermal
1650 °F (900 °C) exposure
1
100 101 102 103 104
rupture time (hr)
Page 9 of 23
Figure 18-9
Stress vs. Rupture Time for Two Material Conditions.
18-11
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 10 of 23
Figure 18-10
Stress-Rupture Results for Root and Airfoil Material.
18-12
11089116
GTD 111 EA
material: GTD 111 EA and DS property: stress rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 71, 72
Page 11 of 23
Figure 18-11
Stress-Rupture Data for GTD-111 EA and DS Compared to IN-738.
18-13
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 12 of 23
Figure 18-12
Stress-Rupture Results for Root and Airfoil Material.
18-14
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
3
LMP (K-hr)×10
(T(K))(C+log tr)
22 23 24 25 26 27
100
stress (MPa)
stress (ksi)
GTD 111
100
standard heat treat

after 5,000 hrs thermal exposure
10
38 40 42 44 46 48 50
3
LMP (°R-hr)×10
(460+°F)(C+log tr)
Page 13 of 23
Figure 18-13
Larson-Miller Plot of GTD-111 EA (Standard Heat Treat and Thermally Exposed).
18-15
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 14 of 23
Figure 18-14
Larson-Miller Plot for GTD-111 EA.
18-16
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 15 of 23
Figure 18-15
Larson-Miller Plot for GTD-111 for Different Exposure Conditions.
18-17
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 16 of 23
Figure 18-16
Larson-Miller Plot for GTD-111 EA.
18-18
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 17 of 23
Figure 18-17
A Larson Miller Plot Comparing the GTD111 Alloy Test Points with Rene 80 Data from the
Literature and the GTD111 Larson Miller Curve Published by General Electric.
18-19
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 18 of 23
Figure 18-18
A Least Squares Regression Model (Y = β 0 + β 1 X + e ) Fitted to the GTD111 Creep Rupture
Data Illustrating the Fit. The 95% Confidence Intervals About the Mean and the 95%
Prediction Interval for an Individual Observation. Test Data from the Thermally Exposed
GTD111 Material and Select Service Exposed GTD111 Data Points are Plotted.
18-20
11089116
GTD 111 EA
material: GTD 111 EA property: creep rupture

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 19 of 23
Figure 18-19
A Plot of Percent Creep Deformation (Strain) Versus Time for the Creep Rupture Samples
in the Standard Heat Treated Condition and After Thermal Exposures at 816°C and 899°C.
18-21
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 20 of 23
Figure 18-20
18-22
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 21 of 23
Figure 18-21
18-23
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 22 of 23
Figure 18-22
18-24
11089116
GTD 111 EA

Refurbish ID: N/A
Coating ID: N/A
Chem. Comp: 70
Page 23 of 23
Figure 18-23
18-25
11089116
11089116
19
SOURCE REFERENCES
1. M. A. Burke, C. G. Beck, and E. A. Crombie, “The Influence of Materials Processing on the

High Temperature Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of the Cast Alloy IN-738LC,” Scientific
Paper 84-1D7-MATCO-P1, Westinghouse R&D Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15235, Presented at
4th International Conference on Superalloys, Seven Springs, PA, 1984.
2. Y. Sugita, M. Ito, N. Isobe, S. Sakurai, C. R. Gold, T. E. Bloomer, and J. Kameda,

“Degradation Characteristics of Intermetallic Coating on Nickel Base Superalloy Substrate in
Gas Turbine Blade,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1995, pp. 987-
1005.
3. D. A. Woodford, D. R. Van Steele, K. Amberge, and D. Stiles, “Creep Strength Evaluation

for IN 738 Based on Stress Relaxation,” Superalloys 1992, edited by S. D. Antolovich, R. W.
Stusrud, R. A. MacKay, D. L. Anton, T. Khan, R. D. Kissinger, D. L. Klarstrom, The
Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1992, pp. 657-664.
4. Fax communication from Jim Allen, Consulting Engineer-Gas Turbines, to Vis Viswanathan,
EPRI, Subject IN-792 DS and EA LCF Curves, June 30, 2000.
5. R. Yang and G. A. Webster, “Creep/Fatigue Crack Growth in a Gas Turbine Blade Nickel
Base Superalloy,” presented at the Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, Dallas, TX, November 25-30, 1990, pp. 31-36.
6. N. Taylor and P. Bontempi, “Impact Resistance of Superalloys at Gas Turbine Operating

Temperatures,” Structural Integrity: Experiments, Models and Applications: Proceedings of
the 10th Biennial European Conference on Fracture – ECF 10, Berlin, Federal Republic of
Germany, September 20-23, 1994, pp. 315-320.
7. G. T. Embley and V. V. Kallianpur, “Long-Term Creep Response of Gas Turbine Bucket

Alloys,” presented at Minnowbrook Conference on Life Prediction for High-Temperature
Gas Turbine Materials, Blue Mountain Lake, NY, August 27-30, 1985.
8. D. W. Dean, M. C. Woodhall, A. C. Pickard, and G. A. Webster, “Interaction of Creep and

Fatigue Damage in Gas Turbine Blade Material,” Mechanical Engineering Publications,
Suffolk, UK, 1987, pp. 25-36.
9. H. Sehitoglu and D. A. Boismier, “Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue of Mar-M247: Part 2 – Life

Prediction,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME,
Vol. 112, January 1990, pp. 80-89.
19-1
11089116
Source References
10. D. A. Boismier and H. Sehitoglu, “Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue of Mar-M247: Part 1 –

Experiments,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the
ASME, Vol. 112, January 1990, pp. 68-79.
11. D. M. Moon and G. P. Sabol, “Effect of Mean Stress on the High-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of
Udimet 710 at 1000 F,” STP 520, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,
PA, 1973, pp. 438-450.
12. K. S. Chan and G. R. Leverant, “Elevated-Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of

MAR-M200 Single Crystals,” Metallurgical Transactions A, Vol. 18A, April 1987, pp. 593-
602.
13. M. Y. Nazmy, “The Applicability of Strain-Range Partitioning to High Temperature Low

Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction of ‘IN 738’ Alloy,” Fatigue of Engineering Materials and
Structures, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1981, pp. 253-261.
14. D. A. Woodford, “Creep Design Analysis for Superalloys Based on Stress Relaxation
Testing,” Sixth International Conference on Creep and Fatigue: Design and Life Assessment
at High Temperature, April 15-17, 1996, C494/090/96, ImechE Conference Transactions,
1996, pp. 61-69.
15. G. A. Webster, “High Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth in Superalloy Blade Materials,”
Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 3, September 1987, pp. 716-725.
16. N. Czech, F. Staif, V. S. Savchenko, and K. A. Yushchenko, “Evaluation of the Weldability

of the Gas Turbine Blade Materials In738LC and Rene 80,” Proceedings from Materials
Solutions ’97 on Joining and Repair of Gas Turbine Components, Indianapolis, IN,
September 15-18, 1997, pp. 7-10.
17. N. S. Cheruvu, “Development of a Corrosion Resistant Directionally Solidified Material for

Land Based Turbine Blades,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,
Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 120, October 1998, pp. 744-750.
18. J. A. Daleo and J. R. Wilson, “GTD111 Alloy Material Study,” 96-GT-520, The American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1996, presented at the International Gas Turbine and
Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, Birmingham, UK, June 10-13, 1996.
19. M. Y. Nazmy, “Effect of Multiple Crack Propagation on the High Temperature Low Cycle
Fatigue of a Cast Nickel-Base Alloy,” Scripta METALLURGICA, Vol. 17, 1983, pp. 491-
494.
20. A. K. Koul, R. Castillo, and K. Willett, “Creep Life Predictions in Nickel-Based

Superalloys,” Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 66, 1984, pp. 213-226.
21. R. Castillo, A. K. Koul, and E. H. Toscano, “Lifetime Prediction Under Constant Load Creep
Conditions for a Cast Ni-Base Superalloy,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and
Power, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 109, January 1987, pp. 99-106.
19-2
11089116
Source References
22. G. A. Whitlow, R. L. Johnson, W. H. Pridemore, and J. M. Allen, “Intermediate

Temperature, Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Coated and Uncoated Nickel Base Superalloys
in Air and Corrosive Sulfate Environments,” Journal of Engineering Materials and
Technology, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 106, January 1984, pp. 43-49.
23. J. M. Allen and G. A. Whitlow, “Observations on the Interaction of High Mean Stress and
Type II Hot Corrosion on the Fatigue Behavior of a Nickel Base Superalloy,” Journal of
Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 107, January
1985, pp. 220-224.
24. M. A. Burke, C. G. Beck, Jr., and E. A. Crombie, “The Influence of Materials Processing on
the High Temperature Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of the Cast Alloy IN-738LC,”
Superalloys 1984, edited by M. Gell, C. S. Kortovich, R. H. Bricknell, W. B. Kent, and J. F.
Radavich, 1984, pp. 63-71.
25. D. A. Spera, “Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Thermal Fatigue Lives for Five
Nickel-Base Alloys,” STP 520, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,
PA, 1973, pp. 648-656.
26. P. Shahinian and K. Sadananda, “Creep and Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Some Cast
Nickel-base Alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. A108, 1989, pp. 131-140.
27. K. Sadananda and P. Shahinian, “The Effect of Environment on the Creep Crack Growth
Behavior of Several Structural Alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 43, 1980,
pp. 159-168.
28. M. Y. Nazmy, “High Temperature Low Cycle Fatigue of IN 738 and Application of Strain
Range Partitioning,” Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 14A, March 1983, pp. 449-461.
29. M. Y. Nazmy, “The Effect of Sulfur Containing Environment on the High Temperature Low
Cycle Fatigue of a Cast Ni-Base Alloy,” Scripta METALLURGICA, Vol. 16, 1982, pp. 1329-
1332.
30. N. S. Cheruvu, “Development of a Corrosion Resistant Directionally Solidified Material for

Land Based Turbine Blades,” 97-GT-425, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
1997, presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition,
Orlando, FL, June 2-5, 1997.
31. V. P. Swaminathan, N. S. Cheruvu, J. M. Klein, and W. M. Robinson, “Microstructure and

Property Assessment of Conventionally Cast and Directionally Solidified Buckets
Refurbished After Long-Term Service,” 98-GT-510, The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, 1998, presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress &
Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2-5, 1998.
32. V. P. Swaminathan and N. Sastry Cheruvu, “Bucket Alloy Definition and Experience,”
Southwest Research Institute Final Task Report, “Durability and Life Assessment of GTD-
111 Buckets,” August 1997.
19-3
11089116
Source References
33. N. S. Cheruvu and V. P. Swaminathan, “Physical and Mechanical Properties of GTD-111 DS

Bucket Material,” Southwest Research Institute Draft Final Task Report, SwRI Project 18-
7297, April 1999.
34. X. D. Wu and P. A. S. Reed, “Mode I and Mixed Mode I/II Fatigue of Ni-Base Single
Crystal Udimet 720 in Air and in Vacuum,” Fatigue ’96, Vol. II, pp. 855-860.
35. M. Loo Morrey and P. A. S. Reed, “Elevated Temperature Behaviour of Udimet 720 – A
Study of Tear Drop Cracking,” Fatigue 96, Vol. II, pp. 867-872.
36. T. B. Gibbons and R. Stickler, “IN939: Metallurgy, Properties and Performance,” COST 50
Report, 1982, pp. 369-393.
19-4
11089116
Source References
9999999. Internal data, Liburdi Engineering Ltd.
9999908. Material Property-Microstructural Correlations, taken from EPRI Report RP2775-2

(IITRI).
9999907. Cincotta, G, Final Report from General Electric Co. to EPRI on Contract RP 2421-2,
Feb. 1988.
9999906. High Temperature, High Strength Nickel Base Alloys, The International Nickel Co.
Inc. July 1977.
9999905. Data booklet, Special Metals Corp. 1988.
9999903. u500.
9999902. Kellogg, L, Monthly Report from Rockwell International to EPRI on Contract

RP2775-1, dated 14 Oct. 1987.
9999899. High Temperature, High Strength Nickel Base Alloys, The International Nickel Co.
Inc. July 1964.
1541028. Pieraggi, B, Effect of Creep or Low Cycle Fatigue on the Oxidation or Hot Corrosion
Behaviour of Nickel-Base Superalloys, First International Symposium on High
Temperature Corrosion of Materials and Coatings for Energy Systems and
Turboengines. II, Marseille, France, 7-11 July 1986, Mater. Sci. Eng. 88, (1-2), 199-
204, Apr. 1987.
1540280. Grunling, W H; Schneider, K; Singheiser, L, Mechanical Properties of Coated

Specimens, First International Symposium on High Temperature Corrosion of
Materials and Coatings for Energy Systems and Turboengines. II, Marseille, France,
7-11 July 1986 Mater. Sci. Eng. 88, (1-2), 177-189, Apr., 1987.
1514140. Delargy, K M; Shaw, S W K; Smith, G D W, Effects of Heat Treatment on

Mechanical Properties of High-Chromium Nickel-Base Superalloy IN 939, Mater.
Sci. Technol. 2, (10), 1031-1037, Oct. 1986.
988149. Basso, S; Lupinc, V, Particle Coursening and Long Duration Tertiary Creep Nickel-
Base Superalloy IN-939, Strength of Metals and Alloys, vol. 1, Montreal, Canada 12-
16 Aug. 1985 Publ: Pergamon Press Ltd., Headington Hill Hall, Oxford OX3 OBW,
UK, 1985 719-724.
950683. McLean, M; Peck, M S, Comparison of Property Regeneration Techniques and Life

Prediction Procedures Applied to Laboratory Tested and Service Exposed Ni--Cr
Alloys, National Physical Laboratory Pp 54, 1984, Report No.: PB85-164804/wms.
936020. Day, M F; Thomas, G B, Analysis of the Low-Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Two Ni--
Cr-Base Alloys, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 8, (1), 33-48, 1985.
19-5
11089116
Source References
928584. Allen, J M; Whitlow, G A, Observations on the Interaction of High Mean Stress and
Type II Hot Corrosion on the Fatigue Behavior of a Nickel Base Superalloy, J. Eng.
Gas Turbines Power (Trans. ASME) 107, (1), 220-224, Jan. 1985.
919398. Hancock, P; Nicholls, J R, The Industrial Challenge to High-Temperature Alloys,

Physical Chemistry of the Solid State: Applications to Metals and Their Compounds,
Paris, France, 19-23 Sept. 1983 Publ: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 1 Molenwerf,
P.O. Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984 581-598.
878122. Floyd, P H; Wallace, W; Immarigeon, J -P A, Rejuvenation of Properties in Turbine

Engine Hot Section Components by Hot Isostatic Pressing, Heat Treatment '81,
Birmingham, England, 15-16 Sept, 1981 Publ: The Metals Society, 1 Carlton House
Terrace, London SW1Y 5DB, England, 1983 97-102.
876779. Castillo, R; Willettt, K, The Effect of Protective Coatings on the High-Temperature

Properties of a Gamma Prime-Strengthened Nickel-Base Superalloy, Metall. Trans. A
15A, (1), 229-236, Jan. 1984.
876773. Whitlow, G A; Beck, C G; Viswanathan, R; Crombie, E A, The Effects of a Liquid

Sulfate/Chloride Environment on Superalloy Stress Rupture Properties at 704 deg C,
Metall. Trans. A 15A, (1), 23-28 Jan. 1984.
876647. Nazmy, M Y; Wuthrich, C, Creep Crack Growth in IN 738 and IN 939 Nickel-Base
Superalloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. 61, (2), 119-125, Nov. 1983.
863746. Grunling, H W; Keienburg, K H; Schweitzer, K K, The Interaction of High

Temperature Corrosion and Mechanical Properties of Alloys, High Temperature
Alloys for Gas Turbines 1982, Liege, Belgium, 4-6 Oct. 1982 Publ: D. Reidel
Publishing Co., P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982, 507-543.
863150. Schneider, K; Gnirss, G, High Cycle Fatigue Properties of Cast Nickel Base
Superalloys IN 738 LC and IN 939, High Temperature Alloys for Gas Turbines 1982,
Liege, Belgium, 4-6 Oct. 1982 Publ: D. Reidel Publishing Co., P.O. Box 17, 3300
AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982, 319-344.
859757. Osgerby, S; Gibbons, T B, Creep Cavitation in a Cast Ni--Cr Base Alloy, Mater. Sci.
Eng., 59, (2), L11-L14, June 1983.
845161. Nazmy, M Y, High-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue of IN 738 and Application of

Strain Range Partitioning, Metall. Trans A 14A, (3), 449-461, Mar. 1983.
839977. Jahnke, B, High-Temperature Electron Beam Welding of the Nickel-Base Superalloy

IN-738 LC, Weld. J. 61, (11), 343s-347s, Nov. 1982.
838332. Nazmy, M Y, The Effect of Sulfur-Containing Environment on the High-Temperature

Low-Cycle Fatigue of a Cast Nickel-Base Alloy, Scr. Metall. 16, (12), 1329-1332,
Dec. 1982.
19-6
11089116
Source References
835155. Schmidt, H; Hoffelner, W, High-Cycle Fatigue and Creep of the Cast Nickel-Base
Superalloy IN738LC at 850 deg C, Fracture and the Role of Microstructure, Vol. 2.
Fatigue, Leoben, Austria, 22-24 Sept. 1982 Publ: Engineering Materials Advisory
Services Ltd., 339, Halesowen Rd., Cradley Heath, Warley, West Midlands B64 6PH,
U.K., 1982 701-708.
831755. Nazmy, M Y, The Effect of Environment on the High-Temperature Low-Cycle

Fatigue Behavior of Cast Nickel-Base IN-738 Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. 55, (2), 231-
237, Sept. 1982.
828491. Schneider, K; vonArnim, H; Grunling, H W, Influence of Coatings and Hot Corrosion

on the Fatigue Behaviour of Nickel-Based Superalloys, Thin Solid Films 84, (1), 29-
36, 2 Oct. 1981.
818660. Hoffelner, W, High-Cycle Fatigue Life of the Cast Nickel-Base-Superalloys IN 738

LC and IN 939, Metall. Trans A 13A, (7), 1245-1255, July 1982.
805217. An Alloy for Stationary Gas Turbines, Diesel Gas Turb. Worldwide 14, (1), 42, Jan.-
Feb. 1982.
797981. Stevens, R A; Flewitt, P E J, Intermediate Regenerative Heat Treatments for

Extending the Creep Life of the Superalloy IN-738, Mater. Sci. Eng. 50, (2), 271-284,
Oct. 1981.
792216. Hartnagel, W; Bauer, R; Grunling, H W, Constant Strain Rate Creep Tests With Gas
Turbine Blade Materials Under Hot Corrosion Environmental Conditions, Corrosion
and Mechanical Stress at High Temperatures, Petten, The Netherlands, May 1980,
Publ: Applied Science Publishers, Ltd., Ripple Rd., Barking, Essex, England, 1981,
257-273.
792212. Galsworthy, J C, The Effects of Seasalt on the High-Temperature Creep Properties of

a Nickel-Base Gas Turbine Blade Alloy, Corrosion and Mechanical Stress at High
Temperatures, Petten, The Netherlands, May 1980, Publ: Applied Science Publishers,
Ltd., Ripple Rd., Barking, Essex, England, 1981, 197-206.
777613. Stevens, R A; Flewitt, P E J, The Dependence of Creep Rate on Microstructure in a

Gamma Prime Strengthened Superalloy, Acta Metall. 29, (5), 867-882, May 1981.
760821. Woodford, D A, Environmental Damage of a Cast Nickel-Base Superalloy, Metall.

Trans. A 12A, (2), 299-308, Feb. 1981.
760820. Sadananda, K; Shahinian, P, Analysis of Crystallographic High-Temperature Fatigue

Crack Growth in a Nickel-Base Alloy, Metall. Trans. A 12A, (2), 343-351, Feb. 1981.
732604. Cutler, C P; Shaw, S W K, The Interrelationship of Gamma Prime Size, Grain Size
and Mechanical Properties in IN-939, a Cast Nickel-Base Superalloy, Strength of
Metals and Alloys, Vol. 2. Fifth International Conference, Aachen, W. Germany, 27-
19-7
11089116
Source References
31 Aug. 1979 Publ: Pergamon Press Ltd., Headington Hill Hall, Oxford OX3 OBW,
England, 1980 1357-1362.
719687. Aning, K; Tien, J K, Creep and Stress Rupture Behavior of a Wrought Nickel-Base
Superalloy in Air and Vacuum, Mater. Sci. Eng. 43, (1), 23-33, Mar. 1980.
710478. Chambers, W L; Ostergren, W J; Wood, J H, Creep Failure Criteria for High-

Temperature Alloys, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. (Trans. ASME) 101, (4), 374-379, Oct.
1979.
667215. Shaw, S W K, Datasheet: Properties and Characteristics of IN 939, Met. Prog. 115,
(3), 66-67, Mar. 1979.
661095. Sadananda, K; Shahinian, P, Hold-Time Effects on High Temperature Fatigue Crack

Growth in Udimet 700, J. Mater. Sci. 13, (11), 2347-2357, Nov. 1978.
623540. Bacon, M C; Smart, R F, Dynamic Fracture Toughness of IN 738, Metallurgia Feb.

1978, 45, (2), 68-72.
608459. Woodford, D A, Effect of Prior Temperature Cycling on Rupture Life of Superalloys,

Proc Conf on Fracture 1977, 2, 803-812.
570402. Ostergren, W J, Correlation of Hold Time Effects in Elevated Temperature Low

Cycle Fatigue Using a Frequency Modified Damage Function, Creep-Fatigue
Interaction ASME, New York, 1976, 179-202.
557939. Watanabe, Rikizo; Kuno, Tsuneo, Alloy Design of Ni-Base Precipitation-Hardened

Superalloys, Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn 1976, 16, (8), 437-446.
479113. Speidel, Markus O, Fatigue-Crack Growth at High Temperatures, Symposium on

High-Temperature Materials in Gas Turbines Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.,
London, New York and Amsterdam. 1974, 207-255.
465312. Weiss, I; Rosen, A; Brandon, D G, Creep of Udimet 500 During Thermal Cycling. Pt.
2. Time to Failure, Metall Trans A Apr. 1975, 6A, (4), 767-772.
453252. Nakamura, Yoshikazu, Some Metallographic Observations on the 1500 F (815 C)

Fatigue Fracture Surface of Wrought Udimet 700, Metall Trans, Dec. 1974, 5, (12),
2605-2607.
408031. Chaku, P N; McMahon Jr, C J, Effect of an Air Environment on the Creep and
Rupture Behavior of a Ni-Base High-Temperature Alloy, Metall Trans, Feb. 1974, 5,
(2), 441-450.
304709. Coffin Jr, L F, Effect of Frequency on the Cyclic Strain and Low Cycle Fatigue
Behavior of Cast Udimet 500 at Elevated Temperature, Metall Trans, Nov. 1971, 2,
3105-3113.
19-8
11089116
Source References
212046. Wells, C H; Sullivan, C P, Interactions Between Creep and Low-Cycle Fatigue in

Udimet 700 at 1400 f, Paper From Fatigue at High Temperature ASTM, Philadelphia,
Pa. 1969, 59-74.
109860. Wells, C H; Sullivan, C P, Low-Cycle Fatigue of Udimet 700 at 1700 f, ASM Trans
Quart mar. 1968, 61, 149-155.
14935. Smith, W E; Donachie Jr, M J; Johnson, J L, Relationship of Prior Creep Exposure to

Strength of Wrought Udimet 700 Nickel-Base Alloy, J Basic Eng V 88, No 1, Mar.
1966, p 4-6.
3886. Wells, C H; Sullivan, C P, Low-Cycle Fatigue Damage of Udimet 700 at 1400 f,

ASM Trans V 58, No 3, 1965, p 391-402.
9999904. Properties of Superalloys, American Society for Metals, ASM Metals Handbook
Ninth Edition, p 242-268.
19-9
11089116
11089116
20
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
20-1
11089116
Chemical Composition
20-2
11089116
Chemical Composition IDs

ELEMENT (% by weight)
ID MATERIAL NI CR CO MO TI AL C W TA CB ZR B HF V
1 Udimet 500 52.3 18.560 18.480 3.940 3.210 3.110 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 Udimet 700 53.0 15.000 18.500 5.200 3.500 4.300 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.030 0.000 0.000
3 Udimet 500 53.6 18.000 18.500 4.000 2.900 2.900 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.006 0.000 0.000
4 Udimet 720 54.9 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.030 1.500 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.035 0.000 0.000
5 Udimet 710 54.9 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.070 1.500 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.020 0.000 0.000
6 Udimet 720 55.0 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.035 1.250 0.000 0.000 0.035 0.035 0.000 0.000
7 Udimet 720 55.0 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.035 1.400 0.000 0.000 0.035 0.035 0.000 0.000
8 Udimet 710 55.0 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.070 1.500 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.020 0.000 0.000
9 Udimet 520 57.0 19.000 12.000 6.000 3.000 2.000 0.050 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.000
10 Nimonic115 60.0 14.300 13.200 3.300 3.700 4.900 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.160 0.000 0.000
12 IN 738 LC 61.6 15.760 8.350 1.840 3.460 3.400 0.120 2.600 1.550 0.940 0.053 0.010 0.160 0.050
13 IN 738 LC 61.8 15.900 8.300 1.600 3.300 3.400 0.120 2.500 1.720 0.960 0.070 0.009 0.160 0.000
14 IN X750 73.0 15.500 0.000 0.000 2.500 0.700 0.040 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
15 IN 792 bal 12.400 9.000 1.900 4.500 3.100 0.120 3.800 3.900 0.000 0.100 0.020 0.000 0.000
16 Udimet 700 bal 15.000 19.000 5.000 3.000 4.000 0.150 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
17 Udimet 700 bal 15.000 19.500 5.050 3.450 4.420 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.000 0.000
18 Udimet 700 bal 15.000 19.500 5.050 3.450 4.420 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.031 0.000 0.000
19 Udimet 700 bal 15.000 19.500 5.100 3.500 4.400 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.030 0.000 0.000
20 IN 700 bal 15.000 28.500 3.700 2.200 3.000 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
21 Udimet 700 bal 15.100 16.600 4.950 3.480 4.150 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.025 0.000 0.000
22 Udimet 700 bal 15.100 17.500 4.900 3.250 4.150 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.029 0.000 0.000
23 Udimet 700 bal 15.200 18.400 4.950 3.430 4.420 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.000 0.000
24 Udimet 700 bal 15.000 18.500 4.820 3.330 4.320 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.030 0.000 0.000
25 IN 738 LC bal 15.720 8.290 1.710 3.340 3.470 0.090 2.620 1.580 0.760 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
26 IN 738 LC bal 15.760 8.240 1.570 3.340 3.550 0.100 2.510 1.800 0.860 0.030 0.008 0.000 0.000
27 IN 738 LC bal 15.780 8.300 1.740 3.490 3.430 0.100 2.600 1.690 0.810 0.060 0.011 0.000 0.000
28 IN 738 LC bal 15.800 8.200 1.700 3.400 3.430 0.115 2.460 1.640 0.860 0.045 0.010 0.000 0.000
29 IN 738 LC bal 15.800 8.200 1.700 3.470 3.400 0.114 2.500 1.910 0.860 0.050 0.010 0.000 0.000
30 IN 738 LC bal 15.800 8.230 1.610 3.340 3.490 0.100 2.520 1.780 0.910 0.045 0.011 0.000 0.000
31 IN 738 LC bal 15.800 8.390 1.660 3.350 3.450 0.110 2.430 1.580 0.770 0.030 0.011 0.000 0.000
32 IN 738 LC bal 15.810 8.570 1.720 3.340 3.560 0.110 2.640 1.610 0.750 0.030 0.011 0.000 0.000
33 IN 738 LC bal 15.820 8.150 1.620 3.290 3.440 0.110 2.470 1.790 0.860 0.040 0.010 0.000 0.000
34 IN 738 LC bal 15.840 8.420 1.820 3.540 3.380 0.100 2.600 1.780 0.860 0.050 0.011 0.000 0.000
35 IN 738 LC bal 15.890 8.340 1.680 3.300 3.460 0.090 2.640 1.570 0.730 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
36 IN 738 LC bal 15.900 8.360 1.660 3.450 3.490 0.100 2.620 1.740 0.740 0.030 0.011 0.000 0.000
37 IN 738 LC bal 15.920 8.310 1.540 3.300 3.500 0.100 2.500 1.810 0.830 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
38 IN 738 LC bal 15.940 8.420 1.700 3.340 3.500 0.090 2.610 1.540 0.730 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
39 IN 738 LC bal 15.950 8.250 1.620 3.450 3.500 0.090 2.480 1.600 0.700 0.500 0.011 0.000 0.000
40 IN 738 LC bal 15.950 8.250 1.620 3.450 3.500 0.090 2.480 1.600 0.700 0.050 0.011 0.000 0.000
41 IN 738 LC bal 15.970 8.410 1.660 3.340 3.320 0.100 2.580 1.540 0.730 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
42 IN 738 LC bal 16.000 8.200 1.900 3.400 3.440 0.090 2.600 1.600 0.700 0.030 0.009 0.000 0.000
43 IN 738 bal 16.000 8.500 1.700 3.400 3.400 0.170 2.600 1.700 0.900 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000
44 IN 738 bal 16.000 8.500 1.700 3.400 3.400 0.170 2.600 1.700 0.900 0.100 0.010 0.000 0.000
45 IN 738 bal 16.000 8.500 1.700 3.400 3.400 0.170 2.600 1.700 0.900 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000
46 IN 738 LC bal 16.000 8.500 1.750 3.400 3.400 0.110 2.600 1.750 0.900 0.050 0.010 0.000 0.000
47 IN 738 LC bal 16.000 8.640 1.710 3.450 3.570 0.090 2.670 1.660 0.700 0.030 0.011 0.000 0.000
48 IN 738 LC bal 16.020 8.320 1.720 3.250 3.420 0.090 2.640 1.630 0.760 0.030 0.011 0.000 0.000
49 IN 738 LC bal 16.150 8.200 1.600 3.300 3.450 0.110 2.580 1.670 0.700 0.030 0.011 0.000 0.000
50 IN 738 LC bal 16.200 8.690 1.630 3.380 3.570 0.090 2.540 1.500 0.690 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
51 IN 738 bal 16.300 8.350 1.760 3.380 3.340 0.170 2.620 1.780 0.870 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
52 Udimet 710 bal 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.070 1.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000
53 Udimet 500 bal 18.000 18.500 4.000 2.900 2.900 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.006 0.000 0.000
54 Udimet 500 bal 18.560 18.710 4.530 3.010 3.040 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.000
55 Udimet 520 bal 19.010 12.440 6.320 3.070 1.960 0.047 1.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.000
56 IN 939 bal 22.400 19.000 0.000 3.700 1.900 0.150 2.000 1.400 1.000 0.100 0.009 0.000 0.000
57 IN 939 bal 22.500 19.000 0.000 3.700 1.900 0.150 2.000 1.400 1.000 0.100 0.009 0.000 0.000
58 IN 939 bal 22.500 19.000 0.000 3.700 1.900 0.150 2.000 1.400 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.000 0.000
59 IN 939 bal 22.600 19.100 0.000 3.700 1.900 0.150 2.000 1.000 1.000 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000
60 IN 939 bal 22.600 19.500 0.050 3.580 1.940 0.140 2.080 1.370 0.950 0.095 0.000 0.000 2.000
62 IN 738 LC bal 15.800 8.300 1.720 3.440 3.460 0.120 2.580 1.770 0.830 0.055 0.010 0.000 0.000
63 IN 939 bal 22.530 19.100 0.000 3.720 1.930 0.155 2.140 1.400 1.000 0.108 0.009 0.000 0.000
64 IN 738 bal 15.800 8.300 1.800 3.600 3.540 0.130 2.650 2.300 0.090 0.007 0.000 0.000
65 IN 738 bal 15.950 8.250 1.620 3.450 3.500 0.090 2.480 1.600 0.700 0.500 0.011 0.000 0.000
66 Udimet 720 bal 18.000 15.000 3.000 5.000 2.500 0.035 1.400 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.035 0.000 0.000
67 Udimet 700 bal 15.100 16.600 4.950 3.480 4.150 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
68 IN X750 73.0 15.500 0.000 0.000 2.500 0.900 0.040 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
69 IN 738 LC bal 16.000 8.300 1.700 3.390 3.400 0.090 2.500 1.700 0.700 0.030 0.010 0.000 0.000
70 GTD 111 bal 14.000 9.500 1.500 4.900 3.000 0.100 3.800 2.800 0.000 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.000
71 GTD 111EA bal 14.000 8.900 1.720 4.900 3.040 0.090 3.740 2.860 <0.01 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000
72 GTD 111DS bal 13.600 9.140 1.600 4.900 2.970 0.090 3.440 2.870 <0.01 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000
73 GTD 111 bal 16.000 8.000 0.600 3.400 4.000 0.100 2.600 2.700 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
74 Rene 80 60 13.900 9.200 4.000 4.900 3.020 0.150 4.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.000
20-3
11089116
ELEMENT (% by weight)
ID MATERIAL NI CR CO MO TI AL C W TA CB ZR B HF V
75 Rene 80 bal 13.800 9.300 3.900 5.000 3.000 0.160 4.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
76 Rene 80 bal 13.800 9.400 3.900 5.000 3.150 0.160 3.800 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.017 0.000 0.000
77 MAR-M002 bal 9.000 10.000 0.250 1.500 5.500 0.150 10.000 2.500 0.000 0.055 0.015 1.250 0.050
78 MAR-M002 bal 9.000 10.000 0.250 1.500 5.500 0.150 10.000 2.500 0.000 0.055 0.015 1.500 0.050
79 MAR-M200 bal 9.000 10.000 0.000 1.700 4.700 <50 ppm12.500 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
80 MAR-M247 bal 8.400 10.000 0.650 1.050 5.500 0.130 10.000 3.050 0.000 0.055 0.015 1.400 0.000
20-4
11089116
21
HEAT TREATMENT
Heat Treatment IDs

ID HEAT TREAT SCHEDULE
1 1.5h,1190c ac+6h,1100c ac
2 2H,1120c ac+24h,840c ac
3 2h,1120c ac+24h,845c ac
4 2h,1120c ac+24h,845c ac+2h,1120c ac
5 2h,1120c ac+24h,850c ac
6 2h,1120c vac+24h,840c vac
7 2h,1120c vacuum ac+10000h,850c ac
10 2h,1120c+16h,843c
11 2h,1120c ac+24h,845c ac
12 2h,1130c in hydrogen, cooled to RT, 24h,840c in argon
13 2h,1150c ac+24h,840c ac+20h,705c ac
14 2h,1175c+4H,1075 ac+24h,840c+16h,755c ac in vacuum
15 2h,2160f ac+4h,1600f ac
16 4h,1080c ac+24h,843c ac+16h,760c ac
17 4h,1105c ac+24h,840c ac+16h,760c ac
18 4h,1121c ac+24h,843c ac+16h,760c ac
19 4h,1150c+24h,900c+16h,700c
20 4h,1150c+6h,1000c+16h,700c
21 4h,1150c+6h,1000c+24h,900c
22 4h,1150c+6h,1000c+24h,900c+16h,700c
23 4h,1150c+6h,850c
24 4h,1150c+6h1000c
25 4h,1160c ac+24h,900c ac+16h,700c ac
26 4h,1160c ac+6h,1000c ac+24h,900c ac
27 4h,1160c ac+6h,1000c ac+24h,900c ac+16h,700c ac
28 4h,1160c ac+6h,1000c ac+24h,900c ac+16h,700c ac+10000h,850c
33 4h,1160c fac+6h,1000c fac+24h,900c ac+16h,700c ac
34 4h,1160c sc+6h,1000c sc+24h,900c sc+16h,700c sc
35 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+.5h,800c
36 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+16h,700c
37 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+16h,800c
38 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+16h,845c
39 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+16h,850c
40 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+1h,800c
41 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+2h,800c
42 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+4h,800c
43 4h,1160c+6h,1000c+8h,800c
44 4h,1160c+6h1000c
46 4h,1163c+4h,1080c+16h,760c vacuum heat gas quench
21-1
11089116
Heat Treatment

52 4h,1180c ac+4h,1080c ac+24h,845c furc+16h,760c furc
53 4h,2125f fac+4h,1975f fac+4h,1550f fac+16h,1400f fac
54 as cast
55 HIP 2h,2050f cool to 1000f @>=75f/min+heat up 24h,1550f vacuum or argon gas cool
58 2h,1120c vac+24h,850c vac
59 2h, 2050f + 24h, 1550f
60 2h, 1204c + Ar cool; 4h, 1903c + Ar cool; 4h, 1052c + control cool; 16h, 843c + Ar cool
61 1h, 1190c + inert gas cool; 1hr, 1100h + furnace cool; 16h, 870c + air cool
62 4h, 1232c; 32h, 871c
63 4h, 1220c; 4h, 1100c; 24h, 650c; 16h, 760c
64 4h, 1080c; 24h, 650c; 16h, 760c
21-2
11089116
11089116
Strategic Science and Technology Program SINGLE USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH
INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY BEFORE REMOVINGTHE WRAPPING MATERIAL.
BY OPENINGTHIS SEALED PACKAGEYOU ARE AGREEINGTOTHETERMS OFTHIS AGREEMENT. IFYOU DO NOT AGREETO
THETERMS OFTHISAGREEMENT,PROMPTLY RETURNTHE UNOPENED PACKAGETO EPRIANDTHE PURCHASE PRICEWILL
BE REFUNDED.
1. GRANT OF LICENSE
EPRI grants you the nonexclusive and nontransferable right during the term of this agreement to use this package only for your own
benefit and the benefit of your organization.This means that the following may use this package: (I) your company (at any site owned
or operated by your company); (II) its subsidiaries or other related entities; and (III) a consultant to your company or related entities,
if the consultant has entered into a contract agreeing not to disclose the package outside of its organization or to use the package for
its own benefit or the benefit of any party other than your company.
This shrink-wrap license agreement is subordinate to the terms of the Master Utility License Agreement between most U.S. EPRI
member utilities and EPRI.Any EPRI member utility that does not have a Master Utility License Agreement may get one on request.
2. COPYRIGHT
About EPRI This package, including the information contained in it, is either licensed to EPRI or owned by EPRI and is protected by United States
and international copyright laws. You may not, without the prior written permission of EPRI, reproduce, translate or modify this
EPRI creates science and technology solutions for package, in any form, in whole or in part, or prepare any derivative work based on this package.
the global energy and energy services industry. U.S. 3. RESTRICTIONS
electric utilities established the Electric Power You may not rent, lease, license, disclose or give this package to any person or organization, or use the information contained in this
package, for the benefit of any third party or for any purpose other than as specified above unless such use is with the prior written
Research Institute in 1973 as a nonprofit research permission of EPRI.You agree to take all reasonable steps to prevent unauthorized disclosure or use of this package.Except as specified
consortium for the benefit of utility members, their above, this agreement does not grant you any right to patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trade names, trademarks or any other
intellectual property, rights or licenses in respect of this package.
customers, and society. Now known simply as EPRI,
4.TERM ANDTERMINATION
the company provides a wide range of innovative This license and this agreement are effective until terminated.You may terminate them at any time by destroying this package. EPRI has
products and services to more than 1000 energy- the right to terminate the license and this agreement immediately if you fail to comply with any term or condition of this agreement.
Upon any termination you may destroy this package, but all obligations of nondisclosure will remain in effect.
related organizations in 40 countries. EPRI’s
5. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES
multidisciplinary team of scientists and engineers
NEITHER EPRI,ANY MEMBER OF EPRI,ANY COSPONSOR, NOR ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ACTING ON BEHALF
draws on a worldwide network of technical and OF ANY OF THEM:
business expertise to help solve today’s toughest (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE
OF ANY INFORMATION,APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS PACKAGE, INCLUDING
energy and environmental problems.
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR
EPRI. Electrify the World INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY’S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS
PACKAGE IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER’S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR
(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROMYOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS PACKAGE OR ANY INFORMATION,APPARATUS,
METHOD, PROCESS OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS PACKAGE.
6. EXPORT
The laws and regulations of the United States restrict the export and re-export of any portion of this package, and you agree not to
export or re-export this package or any related technical data in any form without the appropriate United States and foreign
government approvals.
7. CHOICE OF LAW
This agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California as applied to transactions taking place entirely in California
between California residents.
8. INTEGRATION
You have read and understand this agreement, and acknowledge that it is the final, complete and exclusive agreement between you
and EPRI concerning its subject matter, superseding any prior related understanding or agreement. No waiver, variation or different
terms of this agreement will be enforceable against EPRI unless EPRI gives its prior written consent, signed by an officer of EPRI.
© 2001 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Inc. All rights

reserved. Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered
service marks of the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.
EPRI. ELECTRIFY THE WORLD is a service mark of the Electric
Power Research Institute, Inc.
Printed on recycled paper in the United States of America
1004652
EPRI • 3412 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304 • PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303 • USA
800.313.3774 • 650.855.2121 • [email protected] • www.epri.com
11089116

Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material Property Handbook PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material Property Handbook PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material Property Handbook PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gas Turbine Blade Superalloy Material

Topical Report, July 2001

EPRI Project Manager

(A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I)

(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER

ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS DOCUMENT

Southwest Research Institute

This report was prepared by

Southwest Research Institute

This report describes research sponsored by EPRI.

DISCUSSION OF HANDBOOK CONTENTS

The following alloys are included in this handbook:

1 INCONEL 700...................................................................................................................... 1-1

2 INCONEL 939...................................................................................................................... 2-1

3 INCONEL X750 ................................................................................................................... 3-1

4 INCONEL 738...................................................................................................................... 4-1

5 INCONEL 738 LC ................................................................................................................ 5-1

6 INCONEL 792...................................................................................................................... 6-1

10 NIMONIC 115 .................................................................................................................. 10-1

11 RENE 80.......................................................................................................................... 11-1

12 UDIMET 500 .................................................................................................................... 12-1

13 UDIMET 520 .................................................................................................................... 13-1

14 UDIMET 700 .................................................................................................................... 14-1

15 UDIMET 710 .................................................................................................................... 15-1

16 UDIMET 720 .................................................................................................................... 16-1

17 GTD 111 DS .................................................................................................................... 17-1

18 GTD 111 EA .................................................................................................................... 18-1

19 SOURCE REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 19-1

20 CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ............................................................................................ 20-1

21 HEAT TREATMENT ........................................................................................................ 21-1

Figure 14-15 Larson-Miller Plot for Udimet 700. .................................................................. 14-17

material: Inconel 700 property: tensile

test temperature (°C)

test temperature (°F)

material: Inconel 700 property: tensile

test temperature (°C)

test temperature (°F)

material: Inconel 700 property: creep

Inconel 700 100

material: Inconel 939 property: tensile

test temperature (°C)

test temperature (°F)

material: Inconel 939 property: tensile

test temperature (°C)

test temperature (°F)

material: Inconel 939 property: tensile

test temperature (°C)

test temperature (°F)

material: Inconel 939 property: tensile

material: Inconel 939 property: charpy impact

material: Inconel 939 property: fatigue crack growth

material: Inconel 939 property: fatigue crack growth

material: Inconel 939 property: fatigue crack growth

material: Inconel 939 property: stress rupture

material: Inconel 939 property: stress rupture

material: Inconel 939 property: stress rupture

material: Inconel 939 property: stress to rupture

rupture time (hr)

material: Inconel 939 property: creep-strain