Reflecting On Being A Designer: Marieke H SONNEVELD and Paul HEKKERT
Reflecting On Being A Designer: Marieke H SONNEVELD and Paul HEKKERT
Reflecting On Being A Designer: Marieke H SONNEVELD and Paul HEKKERT
ABSTRACT
By designing products and services for people and putting them in the world, designers
have a big impact on our environment, behaviour and well-being. Designing products is
not only a matter of finding the right solution for a specific design challenge, but also
about formulating a personal stance about ‘what is right’ in the context of this future
impact. Design Education should offer students a platform to be able to discuss and
develop this personal vision and design attitude [1]. This paper presents the results of
the course “Reflecting on designing”, developed at the Delft University of Technology,
to support and stimulate the students critical reflection on their societal role as designers
and on their own vision in designing.
EPDE08/156
ethical, philosophical and societal ideas about design, through several guest lectures by
designers and design researchers from different design fields, such as architects, graphic
designers, photographers and film directors. These lectures are presented from a
personal perspective: what were the designers’ personal motivations and beliefs while
designing? The assumption is that the development of such a personal design vision is
embedded in the personal development of the design student as a social being. It is
therefore best stimulated in contact with professional designers form different
disciplines, who show an authentic and personal vision on their design projects, based
on their personal beliefs and motivations.
To develop their reflections, students write an essay in which they explicate their
personal vision on themselves as designers. The purpose of the essay is to go beyond the
obvious clichés. To transform superficial statements such as “I want to make this world
a better place” and “I want to design products that fulfil people’s real needs” into
meaningful statements about what is a better world, and about what are real needs.
Possible questions that are addressed during the essays are:
- What are your values, your goals, your dreams?
- What is your role in society, what are your responsibilities towards people?
- Do you have a method, do you need one?
- What inspires you, how do you keep inspired?
- How are these ideas reflected in your design projects?
This essay can take any form deemed appropriate, such as a movie, a written essay
(with images), or a computer presentation, as long as the form relates to the content or
message.
EPDE08/156
3.2 Structure of the essays
The essays show a variety of form and structure. Next to plain text, we saw jigsaw
puzzles, gift wraps, memory games, computer animations and essays structured along
Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Philosophicus. But it is rare to encounter essays presented in a
form matching their content. A big pitfall of creative forms derives from the
inconsistency of the essay because of the inconsistency of form. Students tend to
generate statements on different themes that cover their personal vision (often structured
along the questions we proposed as starting points for the essays), without integrating
them into an overall coherent vision. At the start of this course, we encouraged students
to create mind-maps of their personal reflections, but these mind maps seem to
encourage fragmentation rather than providing building blocks for a coherent vision.
Throughout the years we therefore show the pitfall of a loose structure and emphasize
on the importance of coherence between form and content, to allow for the development
of more in-depth insights.
EPDE08/156
In any case, the use of a metaphor seems a strong mean to deepen one’s insights in
designing, and should be considered as a fruitful starting point.
Other students try to describe design through the emotional aspects of the design
experience: ‘to me, designing is the beauty of seeing all the possibilities, it is a way of
looking at the world: not only seeing it as it is, but seeing everything that could be
possible’ Or as one of the students simply stated ‘when I design I smile…’.
The pitfall of this uncertainty about what designing actually is, lays in the fact that
students tend to try to describe what designing is in general, trying to come up with a
definition covering the whole design discipline. This attempt drifts them away from the
development of their personal view on what designing means to them. We therefore try
to discourage attempts to define design in general in this exercise.
EPDE08/156
Some students are aware of this interplay between the development of cultural interests
and design personality, and see their personal development as a design responsibility:
‘As a design student I want to develop myself as a broad oriented person. I made a list
of movies I consider important to see, and I try to watch at least one movie every two
days. Besides, I try visit art exhibitions as often as possible’. Obviously, this pursuit for
cultural development reaches beyond the responsibility of the course Reflecting on
designing, and should be an overall mentality in Design Education.
3.8 Me, the user and the environment: responsibilities and ethical issues
User-centred design is one of the design directions our students are often confronted
with during their design education. It is often considered and promoted as a matter of
good practice in design. The underlying assumption is that design should address
people’s real needs and latent dreams. Therefore, not surprisingly, this motivation to
address real needs is one of the most reoccurring themes in the essays. ‘I don’t want to
develop the next superfluous product nobody is waiting for, but something people really
need, like products that contribute to the comfort of the world of disabled people’. But
most students fail to describe how they define what real needs are, and how they think
they could contribute to a better world. Within the domain of user centred design, one
still needs to take a personal stance in relation to the user: does the designer see himself
as the one who knows best (the paternalistic point of view), or does he take a servile
role in relation to the user? Who is responsible for the user’s well being, and what how
is does this well being defined? Some students are general about it: ‘I want to see
people smile’, and some have well defined aspirations: ‘ I want to make people
conscious of the fact that they are living, to contribute to a conscious life’.
The topic of ecological responsibilities in design is treated likewise. Most students do
not reflect beyond the statement that they want their designs to be environmentally
sound, but fail to give content to it.
Finally, some students are very clear about not having any other motivation or
aspirations in design than ‘to become rich and famous, as quick as possible’. And some
students provide us with a solid overview of how they plan to achieve this goal.
Although these statements may be valued for their honesty and soundness, they are
experienced as provocative and irresponsible by most students.
EPDE08/156
considered as a valuable process that should start right from the beginning of the design
education curriculum. And we couldn’t agree more.
REFERENCES
[1] Hekkert, P. and van Dijk, M. Designing from context: Foundations and Applications of the
ViP approach. In Lloyd P. and Cristiaans H., Eds. Designing in Context: Proceedings of
Design Thinking Research Symposium 5. (DUP Science, Delft, 2001).
[2] Dorst, K. Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies, 2008, 29, 4-11.
EPDE08/156