Design Methodology For Mechatronic Systems Based On Shape Memory Technology
Design Methodology For Mechatronic Systems Based On Shape Memory Technology
net/publication/301290831
CITATIONS READS
0 533
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Christian Rathmann on 14 April 2016.
Abstract:
A lot of technical applications are realizable with SMA actuators. Nevertheless industry use of SMA is limited
only to a few actuator applications, because companies are overwhelmed with the complexity of this technology.
This paper fills this gap by presenting a design methodology for mechatronic systems of SMA actuators, which
guides users through the developing process from system concept to assurance of properties. To take into
account the SMA specific aspects during actuator development the SMA design methodology considers the
mechanical solution concept, thermo-mechanical treatment of SMA material and design of actuator. The
presented design methodology helps especially engineers to develop proper SMA actuators and reduces the
complexity regarding SMA specific influences and interactions.
Keywords: shape memory alloys, shape memory actuators, guideline, product development
Introduction
Shape memory alloys (SMA) are smart materials considers mechanical solution concept, thermo-
with the ability to remember a previous imprinted mechanical treatment of SMA material and design of
shape after plastic deformation [1]. The shape actuator. It is divided into the phases: “pre
memory actuator effect is induced by thermal energy. assessment”, “system concept”, “discipline specific
Since the late sixties SMA are well known in design”, “system integration” and “assurance of
research and industry. A lot of technical applications properties” (Fig. 1).
are realizable with SMA actuators, for example in
automotive sector [2]. Nevertheless industry use of
pre SMA-actuator-
SMA is limited only to a few actuator applications in assessment system
small scale. Despite the fact that most technical
challenges are solved, companies are overwhelmed assurance of properties
with the complexity of this technology. Reasons for of complete system
this are namely lack of norms for material
composition, guidelines for the development process
and experience with this technology. of subsystems
This paper contributes by presenting a design
methodology for mechatronic systems of SMA-
actuators. The methodology guides users through the of components
assessment
transformation temperatures. For example start and situation
finish temperatures for actuator movement. On the • identification of requirements with
pre
other hand, the “discipline specific design” focuses reference to SMA actuator system
• identification of features applicable
on the mechanical design of the SMA actuator, his SMA material
bias element and its mechanical connection to the • comparison of requirements with
case. To design proper SMA actuators technical and SMA features and assessing
environmental parameters which influence the
assessment sheet
actuator will be also covered in this phase. The
phase “system integration” concerns the integration quality gate 1
of all components and sub systems to the complete
system. The aim of the phase “assurance of quality gate 1
properties” is the validation of components, sub iteration break
systems and complete SMA actuator system. The
stepwise validation of product properties gives early continuation
identification of problems and failures in the system.
Fig. 2: Tasks and result of phase “pre assessment”
Each phase of the design methodology contains
milestones for the development process, tasks, which Second phase “system concept”
needs to be done, and results. By evaluation of the
results in quality gates the project status will be The phase “system concept” supports the finding of
checked. After the assessment the actual project solution concepts for the actuator system (Fig. 3).
phase can be repeated (step iteration), closed (step
continuation) or stopped (step break).
integration
solutions to form sub systems or the
Third phase “discipline specific design”
system complete system
The aim of the phase “discipline specific design” is • identifying the incompatibilities
between components or sub systems
the technical specification of the system components. • eliminating incompatibilities
Usually the components of a technical system are • Finding the optimum solution for the
relatable to different technical disciplines like complete system
mechanics, materials engineering, electrical
discipline specific
engineering or information technology. This paper
components
focuses on the discipline “smart material quality gate 3
engineering”, because it is a novel and less
researched discipline (Fig. 4).
engineering integration”
break
components
solution concept
(actuator, return
element,
Typical investigations are the identification of
transformation) stroke/ force-activation energy (e.g. thermal or
iteration
Example of use
Fig. 4: Tasks and result of phase “smart material The applicability of presented methodology will be
engineering” illustrated on an example of use. The results of the
development process of a SMA based assembling
tool will be demonstrated in this chapter.
Starting with the solution concept for SMA specific
sub system the SMA material will be specified and The function of this assembling tool is the supply of
the actuation components, like SMA actuator, return a mechanical force (100N) and a stroke (20mm) on
(3)
(2) (1)
(4) Fig. 7: Detailed system design of the assembling
(5) machine