Organization-Behaviour AAA
Organization-Behaviour AAA
Organization-Behaviour AAA
Thaibaunt and Kelly put forward their theory of group formation, stating the outcome of
interaction as the basis of group formation. According to them, the outcome of interaction
should result in attraction and affiliation, also called rewards, among the persons of a
group. In case, the interaction incurs anxiety or frustration or embarrassment or fatigue to
the members of a group, it is, then, called cost for the members rather than a reward. In
exchange theory, affiliation, interaction and common attitude play an important role.
Balance Theory: This theory was propounded by Newcomb. According to this theory,
groups are formed on the basis of attractions of people towards each other having similar
attitudes and values. Rao and Barman form relationship because of their common attitudes
and values. They try to maintain a symmetrical relationship between the attraction and
common attitudes and values. As and when, their relationship becomes unbalanced, both
try to restore balance. However, if balance cannot be restored, then their relationship gets
dissolved. Thus, one will appreciate that both attraction and interaction play a significant
role in balance theory.
1. Short notes on:
(A) Neo Classical Theory
Ans: Neoclassical theorists recognized the importance of individual or group behaviour and
emphasized human relations. Based on the Hawthorne experiments, the neoclassical approach
emphasized social or human relationships among the operators, researchers and supervisors
(Roethlisberger and Dickson, 1943). It was argued that these considerations were more
consequential in determining productivity than mere changes in working conditions. Productivity
increases were achieved as a result of high morale, which was influenced by the amount of
individual, personal and intimate attention workers received.
Principles of the neoclassical approach
The classical approach stressed the formal organization. It was mechanistic and ignored major
aspects of human nature. In contrast, the neoclassical approach introduced an informal
organization structure and emphasized the following principles:
The individual An individual is not a mechanical tool but a distinct social being, with
aspirations beyond mere fulfilment of a few economic and security works. Individuals differ
from each other in pursuing these desires. Thus, an individual should be recognized as
interacting with social and economic factors.
The work group The neoclassical approach highlighted the social facets of work groups or
informal organizations that operate within a formal organization. The concept of 'group' and its
synergistic benefits were considered important.