Scribd
Upload
645 views4 pages

Go-Global Comparison With Citrix

Go Global runs multiple sessions with single instance of Windows OS. For every 15 users you save 1 GB RAM in case of Go Global. Citrix + WTS + Windows Server Cals requires additional investment for Windows 2003 server as in case of Citrix.

Uploaded by

gaurav_saggi1237
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
645 views4 pages

Go-Global Comparison With Citrix

Go Global runs multiple sessions with single instance of Windows OS. For every 15 users you save 1 GB RAM in case of Go Global. Citrix + WTS + Windows Server Cals requires additional investment for Windows 2003 server as in case of Citrix.

Uploaded by

gaurav_saggi1237
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Go-Global

(Remote Access Application)

Comparison Chart

Cost benefit analysis


Citrix v/s Go-Global

Feature Go Global Citrix Advantage Benefit of Go-Global

Translates into cost saving. If each session of


Server Runs multiple
Runs separate Lower RAM and CPU Windows OS requires 64 MB of RAM and CPU
Requirement sessions with
instance of Windows utilization in case of Go usage, then in case of Go Global this is saved.
and single instance of
OS for each session Global That is for every 15 users you save 1 GB RAM.
Operations OS
Hence better Hardware resource utilization
Protocol Transmits Display Transmits Screen
Go Global works faster Cost saved for bandwidth
Efficiency instructions Bitmaps
Publishes Publishes only You do not require additional Windows server in
Application
Windows, Linux, Windows and Some Platform independent case of Go Global to publish Linux applications,
Publishing
Unix Applications Unix Applications like in case of Citrix
Go Global + Go Global does not require
Licenses Citrix + WTS +
Windows Server Windows Terminal Services Saves Rs. 3500 per user
Required Windows Server Cals
Cals CALS
Runs on
Smaller (upto) 10 users can Additional investment for Windows 2003 server
Windows XP,
Yes No use Windows XP as Go as in case of Citrix. A very big advantage in case
Vista,
Global server of SME and small users
Windows7
With the increase in the
Available in Available in the
Load number of users you do not
Standard Go higher version of Lower TCO
Balancing have to change the
Global product Citrix
Publishing software version
Not easy to
Go Global does not require Cost of maintenance in case of Go Global is
Maintenance Easy to maintain implement and
specialized skills much lower resulting in lower TCO
maintain,
Cost benefit analysis ( Go-Global v/s Citrix )

Citrix®
Particulars GO-Global®
MetaFrame®

Cost per concurrent user 10000 13000


Cost of Windows Terminal Server per
user 0 3500
Maintenance cost per user after one
year 1000 2500

Comparison in monetary terms: ( TCO over 5 years)


Citrix®
Particulars GO-Global® MetaFrame®
Initial year 10000 16500
Second year 1000 2500
Third year 1000 2500
Fourth year 1000 2500
Fifth year 1000 2500
Rupees 14000 26500
Apparent result is that Go Global lowers down your Total Cost Of
Ownership by 50%

( All prices in Indian Rupee)


Contact Us

Promoted and distributed in India by


Adapt Software IAP India Pvt. Ltd.
544E, Pace City II, Sector-37
Gurgaon-122001.
Telephone : 91-124 - 3007770 / 3027760 ~ 61,
For more details please visit www.adapt-india.com

[email protected]

[email protected]

You might also like