Project N.SURENJANATH 2.0-Surenjanath

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 40

ABSTRACT

PROJECT N
Surenjanath singh
Applied Mathematics IA
Probability
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
1|Page

Contents
Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Statement of Task: ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Purpose of study ........................................................................................................................................... 4
Variables ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
Apparatus: ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
Apparatus ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 7
Raw Data ....................................................................................................................................................... 7
Raw Data ....................................................................................................................................................... 8
Raw Data ....................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table For Standard Deviation ..................................................................................................................... 14
Statistical Knowledge .................................................................................................................................. 15
CALCULATION 1.3 : COMPARING BOTH COEFFICIENT VARIATION VARIABLES OF THE SD ........................................ 15
Chi Square for Dropping Height of ball ....................................................................................................... 17
Working 1.0: ................................................................................................................................................ 19
To find the z value ................................................................................................................................... 20
Working 1.2: ............................................................................................................................................ 21
Working 1.3: ............................................................................................................................................ 22
Frequency Calculations 1 ............................................................................................................................ 23
CHI - SQU ( 𝜒2 ) CALCULATION: ...................................................................................................................... 24
To Find the chi square number ............................................................................................................... 25
Chi Square for the rebound of a cricket ball ............................................................................................... 28
Working 2.0: ................................................................................................................................................ 29
Working 2.1 ............................................................................................................................................. 30
Working 2.2 ............................................................................................................................................. 31
Working 2.3 ............................................................................................................................................. 31
Working 2.4 ............................................................................................................................................. 32
Working 2.5 ............................................................................................................................................. 33
Working 2.6 ............................................................................................................................................. 34
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
2|Page

Working 2.7 ............................................................................................................................................. 34


Frequency Calculations 2 ............................................................................................................................ 35
CHI - SQU ( 𝜒2 ) CALCULATION 2: ................................................................................................................... 36
Limitations .................................................................................................................................................. 38
Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 38
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................ 39
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
3|Page

Introduction
At some point in our lives, we have bounced a cricket ball against the floor and observed its
motion. Normally we really don't think about the physics of bouncing balls as it's fairly obvious what is
happening — the ball basically
rebounds off a surface at a speed
proportional to how fast it is thrown.
According to physics the ball height is
proportional to its rebound, so if we
bounce a ball at height x it should
rebound to height x neglecting
resistance. We would like to see if the
rebound of a ball will fit into a normal
distribution using these facts.

A normal distribution is a probability that


shows the expectations of almost every.
We humans approximate every day
without realizing it. The most accurate
measurement is still approximate by the
smallest increment. There’s nothing that is
exact... The word itself is a lie.

A normal distribution in a variate with mean and variance is a statistic distribution with probability density
function

Statement of Task:
To determine whether or not the rebound of a cricket ball fits a normal distribution.
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
4|Page

Purpose of study
The purpose of doing this study is to help me, as the researcher, to gain more knowledge on whether or
not a rebound of a ball manipulates into a normal curve

Variables
Controlled: Height of the ball ( dropping )
Responding: Rebounded of the ball
Manipulated: Accurate measuring the ball
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
5|Page

Apparatus:

Stopper

X
WALL

Ball

Ball Path

Ruler

Ground
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
6|Page

Apparatus

Stopper

H𝑑
WALL

H𝑟

Ground
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
7|Page

Results
Raw Data will be categorized into the table below

No. of bounces 200 - 190 190 - 180 180 - 170 170 - 160 160 - 150
h
x
y

Raw Data

Dropping Height
Feet Inches Rebound height (inches) Η𝑑 (𝑐𝑚) Η𝑟 (𝑐𝑚) No. of Bounces
6 11 39 210.82 99.06 8
6 4 40 193.04 101.6 6
6 2 39 187.96 99.06 6
6 3 38 190.5 96.52 5
6 1 38 185.42 96.52 6
6 0 37 182.88 93.98 6
5 11 37.5 180.34 95.25 5
5 10 38 177.8 96.52 5
5 9 38 175.26 96.52 5
5 8 34 172.72 86.36 6
5 7 36 170.18 91.44 6
5 6 32 167.64 81.28 5
5 5 35 165.1 88.9 6
5 4 32 162.56 81.28 5
5 3 32 160.02 81.28 5
5 2 32 157.48 81.28 6
5 1 34 154.94 86.36 5
5 0 33 152.4 83.82 5
4 11 32 149.86 81.28 6
4 10 32 147.32 81.28 5
4 9 32 144.78 81.28 5
4 8 33 142.24 83.82 4
4 7 31 139.7 78.74 5
4 6 30 137.16 76.2 4
4 5 29 134.62 73.66 4

Table 1.0 - This table shows the exact data collected from the experiment.
Both the rebound of the ball (Η𝑟 ) and the height at which it was dropped (Η𝑑 ).
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
8|Page

Raw Data

Dropping Height
Feet Inches Rebound height (inches) Η𝑑 (𝑐𝑚) Η𝑟 (𝑐𝑚) No. of Bounces
4 4 29.5 132.08 74.93 4
4 3 28 129.54 71.12 5
4 2 28 127 71.12 4
4 1 29 124.46 73.66 4
4 0 27 121.92 68.58 4
3 11 25 119.38 63.5 3
3 10 26 116.84 66.04 4
3 9 26.5 114.3 67.31 6
3 8 26 111.76 66.04 7
3 7 24 109.22 60.96 8
3 6 24 106.68 60.96 7
3 5 23 104.14 58.42 5
3 4 22 101.6 55.88 7
3 3 22 99.06 55.88 6
3 2 24 96.52 60.96 6
3 1 22 93.98 55.88 6
3 0 21 91.44 53.34 4
2 11 21 88.9 53.34 5
2 10 20 86.36 50.8 5
2 9 19 83.82 48.26 4
2 8 20 81.28 50.8 6
2 7 18 78.74 45.72 5
2 6 18 76.2 45.72 6
2 5 17 73.66 43.18 6
2 4 16.5 71.12 41.91 6
2 3 16 68.58 40.64 4
2 2 17 66.04 43.18 4
2 1 15 63.5 38.1 6
2 0 15 60.96 38.1 4
1 11 15 58.42 38.1 4
1 10 14 55.88 35.56 5
1 9 13 53.34 33.02 5
1 8 13 50.8 33.02 6
1 7 12 48.26 30.48 5
1 6 11 45.72 27.94 5
1 5 11 43.18 27.94 5
1 4 11 40.64 27.94 5
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
9|Page

Table 1.1 - This table shows the exact data collected from the experiment.
Both the rebound of the ball (Η𝑟 ) and the height at which it was dropped (Η𝑑 ).

Raw Data
Table 1.3 - This table shows the exact data collected from the experiment.
Both the rebound of the ball (Η𝑟 ) and the height at which it was dropped (Η𝑑 ).

Dropping Height
Feet Inches Rebound height (inches) Η𝑑 (𝑐𝑚) Η𝑟 (𝑐𝑚) No. of Bounces
1 3 10 38.1 25.4 4
1 2 8 35.56 20.32 3
1 1 9 33.02 22.86 4
1 0 8.5 30.48 21.59 5
5 5 36 165.1 91.44 6
4 7 28 139.7 71.12 7
6 2 40 187.96 101.6 7
4 3 30 129.54 76.2 6
5 5 35 165.1 88.9 6
3 7 24 109.22 60.96 6
5 9 38 175.26 96.52 7
6 4 41 193.04 104.14 7
5 0 30 152.4 76.2 7
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
10 | P a g e

Table 1.4 - This table shows the exact data collected from the experiment.
Both the rebound of the ball (Η𝑟 ) and the height at which it was dropped (Η𝑑 ).

Raw Data in centimetre

𝚮𝒅 (𝒄𝒎) 𝚮𝒓 (𝒄𝒎) No. of Bounces 𝚮𝒅 (𝒄𝒎) 𝚮𝒓 (𝒄𝒎) No. of Bounces


1 210.82 99.06 8 39 99.06 55.88 6
2 193.04 101.6 6 40 96.52 60.96 6
3 187.96 99.06 6 41 93.98 55.88 6
4 190.5 96.52 5 42 91.44 53.34 4
5 185.42 96.52 6 43 88.9 53.34 5
6 182.88 93.98 6 44 86.36 50.8 5
7 180.34 95.25 5 45 83.82 48.26 4
8 177.8 96.52 5 46 81.28 50.8 6
9 175.26 96.52 5 47 78.74 45.72 5
10 172.72 86.36 6 48 76.2 45.72 6
11 170.18 91.44 6 49 73.66 43.18 6
12 167.64 81.28 5 50 71.12 41.91 6
13 165.1 88.9 6 51 68.58 40.64 4
14 162.56 81.28 5 52 66.04 43.18 4
15 160.02 81.28 5 53 63.5 38.1 6
16 157.48 81.28 6 54 60.96 38.1 4
17 154.94 86.36 5 55 58.42 38.1 4
18 152.4 83.82 5 56 55.88 35.56 5
19 149.86 81.28 6 57 53.34 33.02 5
20 147.32 81.28 5 58 50.8 33.02 6
21 144.78 81.28 5 59 48.26 30.48 5
22 142.24 83.82 4 60 45.72 27.94 5
23 139.7 78.74 5 61 43.18 27.94 5
24 137.16 76.2 4 62 40.64 27.94 5
25 134.62 73.66 4 63 38.1 25.4 4
26 132.08 74.93 4 64 35.56 20.32 3
27 129.54 71.12 5 65 33.02 22.86 4
28 127 71.12 4 66 30.48 21.59 5
29 124.46 73.66 4 67 165.1 91.44 6
30 121.92 68.58 4 68 139.7 71.12 7
31 119.38 63.5 3 69 187.96 101.6 7
32 116.84 66.04 4 70 129.54 76.2 6
33 114.3 67.31 6 71 165.1 88.9 6
34 111.76 66.04 7 72 109.22 60.96 6
35 109.22 60.96 8 73 175.26 96.52 7
36 106.68 60.96 7 74 193.04 104.14 7
37 104.14 58.42 5 75 152.4 76.2 7
38 101.6 55.88 7
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
11 | P a g e

Table 1.5 - This table shows the data collected sorted to the height dropped; from highest to lowest
Both the rebound of the ball (Η𝑟 ) and the height at which it was dropped (Η𝑑 ).

Raw Data in centimetre ( Sorted (𝚮𝒅 ) Highest to Lowest )


(𝚮𝒅 ) (𝚮𝒓 ) Bounces (𝚮𝒅 ) (𝚮𝒓 ) Bounces
1 210.82 99.06 8 39 119.38 63.5 3
2 193.04 101.6 6 40 116.84 66.04 4
3 193.04 104.14 7 41 114.3 67.31 6
4 190.5 96.52 5 42 111.76 66.04 7
5 187.96 99.06 6 43 109.22 60.96 8
6 187.96 101.6 7 44 109.22 60.96 6
7 185.42 96.52 6 45 106.68 60.96 7
8 182.88 93.98 6 46 104.14 58.42 5
9 180.34 95.25 5 47 101.6 55.88 7
10 177.8 96.52 5 48 99.06 55.88 6
11 175.26 96.52 5 49 96.52 60.96 6
12 175.26 96.52 7 50 93.98 55.88 6
13 172.72 86.36 6 51 91.44 53.34 4
14 170.18 91.44 6 52 88.9 53.34 5
15 167.64 81.28 5 53 86.36 50.8 5
16 165.1 88.9 6 54 83.82 48.26 4
17 165.1 91.44 6 55 81.28 50.8 6
18 165.1 88.9 6 56 78.74 45.72 5
19 162.56 81.28 5 57 76.2 45.72 6
20 160.02 81.28 5 58 73.66 43.18 6
21 157.48 81.28 6 59 71.12 41.91 6
22 154.94 86.36 5 60 68.58 40.64 4
23 152.4 83.82 5 61 66.04 43.18 4
24 152.4 76.2 7 62 63.5 38.1 6
25 149.86 81.28 6 63 60.96 38.1 4
26 147.32 81.28 5 64 58.42 38.1 4
27 144.78 81.28 5 65 55.88 35.56 5
28 142.24 83.82 4 66 53.34 33.02 5
29 139.7 78.74 5 67 50.8 33.02 6
30 139.7 71.12 7 68 48.26 30.48 5
31 137.16 76.2 4 69 45.72 27.94 5
32 134.62 73.66 4 70 43.18 27.94 5
33 132.08 74.93 4 71 40.64 27.94 5
34 129.54 71.12 5 72 38.1 25.4 4
35 129.54 76.2 6 73 35.56 20.32 3
36 127 71.12 4 74 33.02 22.86 4
37 124.46 73.66 4 75 30.48 21.59 5
38 121.92 68.58 4
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
12 | P a g e

Table 1.6 - This table shows the data collected sorted to the height rebound; from highest to lowest
Both the rebound of the ball (Η𝑟 ) and the height at which it was dropped (Η𝑑 ).

Raw Data in centimetre ( Sorted (𝚮𝒓 ) Highest to Lowest )

(𝚮𝒅 ) (𝚮𝒓 ) Bounces (𝚮𝒅 ) (𝚮𝒓 ) Bounces


193.04 104.14 7 39 114.3 67.31 6
193.04 101.6 6 40 116.84 66.04 4
187.96 101.6 7 41 111.76 66.04 7
210.82 99.06 8 42 119.38 63.5 3
187.96 99.06 6 43 109.22 60.96 8
190.5 96.52 5 44 109.22 60.96 6
185.42 96.52 6 45 106.68 60.96 7
177.8 96.52 5 46 96.52 60.96 6
175.26 96.52 5 47 104.14 58.42 5
175.26 96.52 7 48 101.6 55.88 7
180.34 95.25 5 49 99.06 55.88 6
182.88 93.98 6 50 93.98 55.88 6
170.18 91.44 6 51 91.44 53.34 4
165.1 91.44 6 52 88.9 53.34 5
165.1 88.9 6 53 86.36 50.8 5
165.1 88.9 6 54 81.28 50.8 6
172.72 86.36 6 55 83.82 48.26 4
154.94 86.36 5 56 78.74 45.72 5
152.4 83.82 5 57 76.2 45.72 6
142.24 83.82 4 58 73.66 43.18 6
167.64 81.28 5 59 66.04 43.18 4
162.56 81.28 5 60 71.12 41.91 6
160.02 81.28 5 61 68.58 40.64 4
157.48 81.28 6 62 63.5 38.1 6
149.86 81.28 6 63 60.96 38.1 4
147.32 81.28 5 64 58.42 38.1 4
144.78 81.28 5 65 55.88 35.56 5
139.7 78.74 5 66 53.34 33.02 5
152.4 76.2 7 67 50.8 33.02 6
137.16 76.2 4 68 48.26 30.48 5
129.54 76.2 6 69 45.72 27.94 5
132.08 74.93 4 70 43.18 27.94 5
134.62 73.66 4 71 40.64 27.94 5
124.46 73.66 4 72 38.1 25.4 4
139.7 71.12 7 73 33.02 22.86 4
129.54 71.12 5 74 30.48 21.59 5
127 71.12 4 75 35.56 20.32 3
121.92 68.58 4
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
13 | P a g e

Table 2.0 - This table shows (Η𝑑 ) placed into a Frequency Table
Total test : 75

Range (cm) Frequency Cumulative frequency


210 - 200 1 1
200 - 190 3 4
190 - 180 5 9
180 - 170 5 14
170 - 160 6 20
160 - 150 4 24
150 - 140 4 28
140 - 130 5 33
130 - 120 5 38
120 - 110 4 42
110 - 100 5 47
100 - 90 4 51
90 - 80 4 55
80 - 70 4 59
70 - 60 4 63
60 - 50 4 67
50 - 40 4 71
40 - 30 4 75

Table 2.1 - This table shows (Η𝑟 ) placed into a Frequency Table
Total test : 75

Range Frequency Cumulative frequency


110 - 100 3 3
100 - 90 11 14
90 - 80 13 27
80 - 70 10 37
70 - 60 9 46
60 - 50 8 54
50 - 40 7 61
40 - 30 7 68
30 - 20 7 75
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
14 | P a g e

Table For Standard Deviation

Table 3.0 Calculations for the Standard Deviation of Dropping Height of the ball (cm):

Midpoints
Height Dropped cm Frequency (𝑓)(𝑥) (𝑥 − 𝑥̄ ) 𝑓(𝑥 − x̄ )2
(x)
210 - 200 205 1 205 86.53 7488.018
200 - 190 195 3 585 76.53 17572.053
190 - 180 185 5 925 66.53 22133.422
180 - 170 175 5 875 56.53 15980.089
170 - 160 165 6 990 46.53 12992.107
160 - 150 155 4 620 36.53 5338.738
150 - 140 145 4 580 26.53 2816.071
140 - 130 135 5 675 16.53 1366.756
130 - 120 125 5 625 6.53 213.422
120 - 110 115 4 460 -3.47 48.071
110 - 100 105 5 525 -13.47 906.756
100 - 90 95 4 380 -23.47 2202.738
90 - 80 85 4 340 -33.47 4480.071
80 - 70 75 4 300 -43.47 7557.404
70 - 60 65 4 260 -53.47 11434.738
60 - 50 55 4 220 -63.47 16112.071
50 - 40 45 4 180 -73.47 21589.404
40 - 30 35 4 140 -83.47 27866.738
mean ( μ ) height = 118.47
∑ 𝑓 (𝑥 − 𝑥̄ )2 = 178098.6667

Table 3.1 Calculations for the Standard Deviation of Height Rebound of the ball (cm):

Midpoints
Height Rebound (cm) Frequency (𝑓)(𝑥) (𝑥 − 𝑥̄ ) 𝑓(𝑥 − x̄ )2
(x)
110 - 100 105 3 315 38.67 4485.33
100 - 90 95 11 1045 28.67 9039.56
90 - 80 85 13 1105 18.67 4529.78
80 - 70 75 10 750 8.67 751.11
70 - 60 65 9 585 -1.33 16.00
60 - 50 55 8 440 -11.33 1027.56
50 - 40 45 7 315 -21.33 3185.78
40 - 30 35 7 245 -31.33 6872.44
30 - 20 25 7 175 -41.33 11959.11
mean ( μ ) height = 66.3
∑ 𝑓 (𝑥 − 𝑥̄ )2 = 41866.67
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
15 | P a g e

Statistical Knowledge

CALCULATION 1.1 : TABLE 3.0 ON PAGE 13

∑ 𝑓(𝑥 − 𝑥̄ )2
𝑆𝑛 = √
𝑛−1

178098.6667.
𝑆𝑛 = √
75 − 1

H𝑑 = ± 49.059 cm

CALCULATION 1.2 : TABLE 3.1 ON PAGE 13

√∑ 𝑓(𝑥 − 𝑥̄ )2
𝑆𝑛 =
𝑛−1

41866.67
𝑆𝑛 = √
75 − 1

H𝑟 = 23.786 cm

CALCULATION 1.3 : COMPARING BOTH COEFFICIENT VARIATION VARIABLES OF THE SD

Dropping Height of each Test Rebound Height of each Test

𝑠
𝑠 𝑣= ∗ 100%
𝑣= ∗ 100% 𝑥̄̄
𝑥̄̄

23.786
49.059 𝑣= ∗ 100%
𝑣= ∗ 100% 66.3
118.47
𝑣 = 35.87 %
𝑣 = 41.41 %
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
16 | P a g e

Chi Square
Checking whether the dropping height of a ball can
fit into a normal distribution

Surenjanath Singh

Applied Mathematics IA

Presentation College, San Fernando

Mr. David Akalloo


Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
17 | P a g e

Chi Square for Dropping Height of ball

To calculate the chi square we must first standardize each of the categories for each table.

This will be done using excel

𝑋~𝑁( 𝜇, 𝜎 2 )
Where; 𝜇 = 118.47 cm

𝜎 = 49.059 cm

𝑋~𝑁( 118.47, (49.059)2 )


To standardize, we use the standardize formula

𝑧~𝑁(0,1)
(𝑋−𝜇)
Where 𝑧=
𝜎
Height of ball Freq. Standardize Value of Z
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) E Freq.
𝑋2 𝑋1 𝑍2 𝑍1
210 200 1 1.876 1.652 0.9697 0.9507 0.0190 1.42
200 190 3 1.672 1.448 0.9528 0.9262 0.0266 1.99
Working shown in Cal. 1.0

190 180 5 1.468 1.244 0.9290 0.8933 0.0357 2.68


180 170 5 1.264 1.040 0.8970 0.8509 0.0461 3.46
170 160 6 1.061 0.836 0.8556 0.7985 0.0570 4.28
160 150 4 0.857 0.633 0.8042 0.7365 0.0677 5.08
150 140 4 0.653 0.429 0.7431 0.6659 0.0772 5.79
140 130 5 0.449 0.225 0.6733 0.5890 0.0844 6.33
130 120 5 0.245 0.021 0.5969 0.5084 0.0885 6.64
120 110 4 0.041 -0.183 0.5165 0.4275 0.0890 6.68
110 100 5 -0.162 -0.387 0.4355 0.3495 0.0860 6.45
100 90 4 -0.366 -0.590 0.3571 0.2774 0.0797 5.97
90 80 4 -0.570 -0.794 0.2843 0.2135 0.0708 5.31
80 70 4 -0.774 -0.998 0.2195 0.1591 0.0604 4.53
70 60 4 -0.978 -1.202 0.1641 0.1147 0.0494 3.71
60 50 4 -1.182 -1.406 0.1187 0.0799 0.0388 2.91
50 40 4 -1.385 -1.610 0.0830 0.0537 0.0292 2.19
40 30 4 -1.589 -1.813 0.0560 0.0349 0.0211 1.58
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
18 | P a g e

Ok the table above is simply 𝑧2

𝑧1
𝑋1
𝑋2

Graph of Normal Distribution

𝑋1 𝑋2
𝜇

Graph of Standardize Normal Distribution

𝑧1 𝑧2
0

1
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
19 | P a g e

Working 1.0:

Calculating the standardize with no X values

( 210 – 200 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(200 < 𝑋 < 210)
𝑃(199.5 < 𝑋 < 210.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
199.5 − 118.467 210.5 − 118.467
𝑃( <𝑍< )
49.059 49.059
𝑃(1.652 < 𝑍 < 1.876) = 𝑃(𝑍 < 1.876) − 𝑃(𝑍 < 1.652)
𝑃(1.652 < 𝑍 < 1.876) = 0.9697 − 0.9507
𝑃(1.652 < 𝑍 < 1.876) = 0.019

𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍1 )

𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 )

𝑧1 𝑧2

𝑍
𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍2 )
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
20 | P a g e

To find the z value


We look for the corresponding numbers e.g. 0.93

Calculations like this is done for all the positive z score values till the negatives.
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
21 | P a g e

Working 1.2:
Calculating the standardize Z with negative values.

( 110 – 120 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(110 < 𝑋 < 120)
𝑃(109.5 < 𝑋 < 120.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
109.5 − 118.467 120.5 − 118.467
𝑃( <𝑍< )
49.059 49.059
𝑃(−0.183 < 𝑍 < 0.0414) = Φ(0.041) − Φ(−0.183)
Taking it at 2 dp
𝑃(−0.091 < 𝑍 < 0.020) = Φ(0.041) − (1 − Φ(0.183))
𝑃(−0.091 < 𝑍 < 0.020) = 0.5164 − (1 − 0.5726)
(−0.091 < 𝑍 < 0.020) = 0.089
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
22 | P a g e

Working 1.3:

Calculating the standardize Z with negative values.

( 30 – 40 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(30 < 𝑋 < 40)
𝑃(29.5 < 𝑋 < 40.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
29.5 − 118.467 40.5 − 118.467
𝑃( <𝑍< )
49.059 49.059
𝑃(−1.813 < 𝑍 < −1.589) = Φ|−1.813| − Φ|−1.589|
Taking it at 4 dp
𝑃(−1.813 < 𝑍 < −1.589) = 0.9651 − 0.9440
𝑃(−1.813 < 𝑍 < −1.589) = 0.0211

𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍2 )
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 )

𝑃(𝑍2 > 𝑍 > 𝑍1 )

𝑃(𝑍 > 𝑍2 )

𝑧1 𝑧2 𝑧2 𝑧1
𝑃(𝑍 > 𝑍1 𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍1 )
> 𝑍2 )

𝑍 𝑍
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
23 | P a g e

Frequency Calculations 1
After Standardizing each boundary, we found the expected Frequency by multiply the class probability
by the total amount.
we put the Observe frequency and the expected frequency onto a table

Classes for Frequencies


Observed Freq. Expected Freq.
1 1.42
3 1.99
5 2.68
5 3.46
6 4.28
4 5.08
4 5.79
5 6.33
5 6.64
4 6.68
This data was organized in such a manner so
5 6.45 that we can easily find the Chi-Squared
4 5.97 afterwards. A table was created to sort out the
4 5.31 data into intervals of both Expected Frequency
4 4.53 and the Observed Frequency. It also included
4 3.71 the calculations.
4 2.91
4 2.19
4 1.58

Observed Freq. Expected Freq. (O-E) (O-E)^2 (O-E)^2/E

9 6.09 2.91 8.468 1.39049261

11 7.74 3.26 10.628 1.37307494

9 10.87 -1.87 3.497 0.32170193

5 6.33 -1.33 1.760 0.2782109


5 6.64 -1.64 2.676 0.40329895
9 13.13 -4.13 17.057 1.29907845

8 11.28 -3.28 10.758 0.95375887

8 8.24 -0.24 0.058 0.00699029

12 6.69 5.31 28.243 4.22450025


Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
24 | P a g e

Lastly, with the collected data, the Chi-Square Test is used to determine if there is a significant difference
between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies.
By using this test, we will be able to determine whether the height of the ball dropped can be fit to a
normal distribution.

Let X be the “change in ball dropped”


Hypothesis:

( Ho ) null Hypothesis: X is N( 118.467, 49.0592 )


( HI ) alternative hypothesis: X is not N( 118.467, 49.0592 )
.

CHI - SQU ( 𝜒 2 ) CALCULATION:

Calculating the Test Statistic

2 ( 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒−𝑒𝑥̄𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑)
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 =∑
𝑒𝑥̄𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑛
2 (O𝑖 −𝐸𝑖 )2
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 =∑
𝑖=1 𝐸𝑖

2 (9−6.09)2 (11−7.74)2 (9−10.87)2 (5−6.33)2 (5−6.64)2


𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 =( + + + + +
6.09 7.74 10.87 6.33 6.64
(9−13.13)2 (8−11.28)2 (8−8.24)2 (12−6.69)2
+ + +
13.13 11.28 8.24 6.69

2
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 = 1.39 + 1.373 + 0.3217 + 0.2782 + 0.4033 + 1.29907 + 0.95376 +
0.00699 + 4.2245
2
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 = 10.25052
2 2
We test 𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 against 𝜒𝛼% (𝑣) at 5 % level of significance
2 2
𝜒𝛼% (𝑣) = 𝜒5% (4)
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
25 | P a g e

Calculating degrees of freedom or 𝑣: 𝑑𝑓 = 𝑛 − 3


𝑑𝑓 = 7 − 3
𝑑𝑓 = 4

but we had to estimate mean and variance so hence why it is 4

2
𝜒5% (4) = 9.488

To Find the chi square number


Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
26 | P a g e

Degrees of freedom = 9
2 (4)
𝜒𝛼%
Critical Region at 5 % level of significance

𝛼 = 5%

𝜒 2 = 9. .488
𝜒 2 = 10.25052

At a 5% significance level, the critical value is 9.488

Since the calculations of 10.25052 is greater than the critical value of 9.488,

We must reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis that
X is not N ( 118.467, 49.059^2)
With the results, the dropping of a cricket ball cannot be fitted to a normal distribution.
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
27 | P a g e

Chi Square
Checking whether the rebound height of a ball can
fit into a normal distribution

Surenjanath Singh

Applied Mathematics IA

Presentation College, San Fernando

Mr. David Akalloo


Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
28 | P a g e

Chi Square for the rebound of a cricket ball


To calculate the chi square we must first standardize each of the categories for each class as done
before.

This will be done using excel

𝑋~𝑁( 𝜇, 𝜎 2 )
Where; 𝜇 = 66.3 cm

𝜎 = 23.786 cm

𝑋~𝑁( 66.3, (23.786)2 )


To standardize, we use the standardize formula

𝑧~𝑁(0,1)
(𝑋−𝜇)
Where 𝑧=
𝜎

Height of ball Freq. Standardize Value of Z


𝑋2 𝑋1 𝑍2 𝑍1
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) E Freq.

110 100 1 1.858 1.396 0.9684 0.9187 0.0497 3.73


100 90 3 1.438 0.975 0.9248 0.8353 0.0894 6.71
Working shown in Below

90 80 5 1.017 0.555 0.8455 0.7105 0.1350 10.12


80 70 5 0.597 0.135 0.7247 0.5535 0.1712 12.84
70 60 6 0.177 -0.286 0.5701 0.3875 0.1826 13.69
60 50 4 -0.244 -0.706 0.4037 0.2400 0.1637 12.28
50 40 4 -0.664 -1.127 0.2533 0.1299 0.1233 9.25
40 30 5 -1.085 -1.547 0.1390 0.0609 0.0781 5.86
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
29 | P a g e

Working 2.0:

Calculating the standardize with no X values

( 110 – 100)

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(100 < 𝑋 < 110) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(99.5 < 𝑋 < 110.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
99.5 − 66.3 110.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(1.396 < 𝑍 < 1.858) = Φ(1.858) − Φ(1.396)
𝑃(1.396 < 𝑍 < 1.858) = 0.9684 − 0.9187
𝑃(1.396 < 𝑍 < 1.858) = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟒𝟗𝟕

𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍1 )

𝑧2

𝑧1
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 )
𝑍 𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍2 )
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
30 | P a g e

Working 2.1
Calculating the standardize with no X values

( 90 – 100)

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(90 < 𝑋 < 100) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(89.5 < 𝑋 < 100.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
89.5 − 66.3 100.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(0.975 < 𝑍 < 1.438) = Φ(1.438) − Φ(0.975)
𝑃(0.975 < 𝑍 < 1.438) = 0.9262 − 0.8353
𝑃(0.975 < 𝑍 < 1.438) = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟗𝟎𝟗
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
31 | P a g e

Working 2.2

( 80 – 90)

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(80 < 𝑋 < 90) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(79.5 < 𝑋 < 90.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
79.5 − 66.3 90.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(0.555 < 𝑍 < 1.017) = Φ(1.017) − Φ(0.555)
𝑃(0.555 < 𝑍 < 1.017) = 0.8454 − 0.7105
𝑃(0.555 < 𝑍 < 1.017) = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟑𝟒𝟗

Working 2.3

( 70 – 80 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(70 < 𝑋 < 80) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(69.5 < 𝑋 < 80.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
69.5 − 66.3 80.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(0.135 < 𝑍 < 0.597) = Φ(0.597) − Φ(0.135)
𝑃(0.135 < 𝑍 < 0.597) = 0.7248 − 0.5537
𝑃(0.135 < 𝑍 < 0.597) = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟕𝟏𝟏
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
32 | P a g e

Working 2.4

( 60 – 70 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(60 < 𝑋 < 70) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(59.5 < 𝑋 < 70.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
59.5 − 66.3 70.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = Φ(0.177) − Φ(−0.286)
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = Φ(0.177) − (1 − Φ(0.286))
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = 0.5703 − (1 − 0.6126) 𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 )
0
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟖𝟐𝟗

𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍2 )

𝑃(𝑍 > 𝑍1 )

𝑍1 𝑍2
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
33 | P a g e

Working 2.5

( 50 – 60 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(50 < 𝑋 < 60) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(49.5 < 𝑋 < 60.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
49.5 − 66.3 60.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(−0.706 < 𝑍 < −0.244) = Φ|(−0.706)| − Φ|(−0.244)|
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = Φ(0.706) − Φ(0.244)
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = 0.7598 − 0.5963
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟔𝟑𝟓

𝑍1 𝑍2

𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍2 )

𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 )

𝑍2 𝑍1
𝑃(𝑍 < 𝑍1 )
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
34 | P a g e

Working 2.6

( 40 – 50 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(40 < 𝑋 < 50) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(39.5 < 𝑋 < 50.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
39.5 − 66.3 50.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(−1.127 < 𝑍 < −0.664) = Φ|(−1.127)| − Φ|(−0.664)|
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = Φ(1.127) − Φ(0.664)
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = 0.87 − 0.7467
𝑃(−0.286 < 𝑍 < 0.177) = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟐𝟑𝟑

Working 2.7

( 30 – 40 )

𝑃(𝑋1 < 𝑋 < 𝑋2 )


𝑃(30 < 𝑋 < 40) Applying Central limit theorem
𝑃(29.5 < 𝑋 < 40.5)
𝑃(𝑍1 < 𝑍 < 𝑍2 ) = Φ|𝑍2 | − Φ|𝑍1 |
𝑋1 − 𝜇 𝑋2 − 𝜇
𝑃( <𝑍< ) Standardizing X to Z
𝜎 𝜎
29.5 − 66.3 40.5 − 66.3
𝑃( <𝑍< )
23.786 23.786
𝑃(−1.547 < 𝑍 < −1.085) = Φ|(−1.547)| − Φ|(−1.085)|
𝑃(−1.547 < 𝑍 < −1.085) = Φ(1.547) − Φ(1.085)
𝑃(−1.547 < 𝑍 < −1.085) = 0.939 − 0.8611
𝑃(−1.547 < 𝑍 < −1.085) = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟕𝟕𝟗
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
35 | P a g e

Frequency Calculations 2

After Standardizing each boundary, we found the expected Frequency by multiply the class probability
by the total amount.
we put the Observe frequency and the expected frequency onto a table

Classes for Frequencies


Observed Freq. Expected Freq.
3 3.73 This data was organized in such a manner so
11 6.71
that we can easily find the Chi-Squared
13 10.12
afterwards. A table was created to sort out the
10 12.84
9 13.69 data into intervals of both Expected Frequency
8 12.28 and the Observed Frequency. It also included
7 9.25 the calculations.
7 5.86

Observed Freq. Expected Freq. (O-E) (O-E)^2 (O-E)^2/E


14 10.44 3.56 12.67 1.21

13 10.12 2.88 8.27 0.82


10 12.84 -2.84 8.08 0.63
9 13.69 -4.69 22.04 1.61
8 12.28 -4.28 18.28 1.49
7 9.25 -2.25 5.06 0.55
7 5.86 1.14 1.30 0.22

Lastly, with the collected data, the Chi-Square Test is used to determine if there is a significant difference
between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies.
By using this test, we will be able to determine whether the rebound height of a ball can be fit to a
normal distribution.

Let X be the “change in rebound height of the ball”


Hypothesis:

( Ho ) null Hypothesis: X is N( 66.3, 23.7862 )


( HI ) alternative hypothesis: X is not N( 66.3, 23.7862)
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
36 | P a g e

CHI - SQU ( 𝜒 2 ) CALCULATION 2:

Calculating the Test Statistic

2 ( 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒−𝑒𝑥̄𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑)
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 =∑
𝑒𝑥̄𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑛
2 (O𝑖 −𝐸𝑖 )2
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 =∑
𝑖=1 𝐸𝑖

2 (14−10.44)2 (13−10.12)2 (10−12.84)2 (9−13.69)2 (8−12.28)2


𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 =( + + + + +
10.44 10.12 12.84 13.69 12.28
(7−9.25)2 (7−5.86)2
+
9.25 5.86

2
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 = 1.21 + 0.82 + 0.63 + 1.61 + 1.49 + 0.55 + 0.22
2
𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 = 6.53
2 2
We test 𝜒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 against 𝜒𝛼% (𝑣) at 5 % level of significance
2 2
𝜒𝛼% (𝑣) = 𝜒5% (4)

Calculating degrees of freedom or 𝑣: 𝑑𝑓 = 𝑛 − 3


𝑑𝑓 = 7 − 3
𝑑𝑓 = 4

but we had to estimate mean and variance so hence why it is 4

2
𝜒5% (4) = 9.488
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
37 | P a g e

Critical Region at 5 % level of significance

𝛼 = 5%

𝜒 2 = 9. .488

𝜒 2 = 6.53

At a 5% significance level, the critical value is 9.488


Since the calculations of observe statistical value is 6.53 which is lesser than the critical value of 9.488,
We must accept the null hypothesis and reject the alternate hypothesis that
X is N ( 66.3, 23.786^2)
With the results, the rebound height of a cricket ball can be fitted to a normal distribution.
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
38 | P a g e

Limitations

Throughout the investigation of searching whether or not the rebound height of a cricket ball
can be fitted to a normal distribution, various limitations may have affected the outcome of the results.

• One limitation of the data collected could be that the floor may/may not been
smoothed enough to get a straight rebound height
• Another limitation could be that not every recorded height isn’t accurate enough.
The data can be proved insufficient and inaccurate for those reasons.
• There can be parallax errors while taking the height of the ball when it is rebound.
• Lastly, there may be many other factors taking place when collecting the data. Especially
due to surroundings; external forces.

Those are the possible Limitations that can affect the outcome of the result and the validity of the
experiment.

Recommendations
In this Research. It is recommended that

1. Collecting data of a falling and rebounding of a ball should be done in a vacuum room with
sensors.
2. This Research to be done several times to get a more accurate answer.

Conclusion
This Research was successful in fitting the rebound of a Cricket ball into a Normal Distribution but it fail
to do so for the Dropping Height of a Cricket ball
Applied Mathematics Surenjanath Singh
39 | P a g e

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Internet Sources:

1. Weisstein, Eric W. "Normal Distribution." Retrieved on January 23rd, 2016 from MathWorld--A
Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalDistribution.html
2. David M. “Introduction to Normal Distributions” Retrieved on January, 25th, 2015 from Online
Statbook website: http://onlinestatbook.com/2/normal_distribution/intro.html
3. Balasubramanian Narasimhan “The Normal Distribution”. Retrieved on February, 25th, 2016 from
Statweb stanford website:
http://statweb.stanford.edu/~naras/jsm/NormalDensity/NormalDensity.html
4. Wikipedia, (2016). Normal distribution. Retrieved on February, 1st , 2016 from the Wikipedia
website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist_criminology
Book Sources:

1. A Level Mathematics by Duncan Graham, Christine Graham and Allan Whitcombe


2. Notes from Class
Programs Used:

• Microsoft Office 2016

You might also like