Inventory Managemnt
Inventory Managemnt
Inventory Management • Stock – all the goods and materials that are stored by an organization
until they are needed
• Inventory – is a list of the items held in stock (often taken as being the
stock itself)
Multi-Period Inventory Systems
• Consumables – stocks of materials needed to support operations, but
which do not form part of the final product, such as oil, paper, cleaners,
etc.
• Item – a single article that is kept in stock – it is one entry in the
Sushil Kumar, PhD inventory
IIM Lucknow • Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) – an alternative name for item
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/2
• Spare parts – items held in stock as replacements to keep machinery, • Safety stock – a reserve of materials that is not normally needed, but is
equipment, etc working properly held to cover unexpected circumstances
• Item coding – an arrangement for giving every package of material • Service level – a measure of the proportion of customer demand met from
moved an identifying tag, usually a bar code or magnetic strip stock (or some equivalent measure) (Fill Rate)
• Purchasing – part of procurement responsible for actually buying
• Unit – the standard size or quantity of a stock item
materials (and often used to mean the same as procurement)
• Unit cost – cost of buying (or acquiring) each unit of an item • Procurement –the function responsible for acquiring all the materials
• Unitization – putting materials into standard packages (typically on needed by an organization
pallets or in containers) to ease movement • Procurement cycle – sequence of activities needed to acquire materials
• Vendor-managed inventory – has suppliers managing both their own • Replenishment – putting materials into stock to replace units that have
stocks and those held further down the supply chain been used
• Stocktaking – periodic checks to find differences between recorded and
actual stock levels
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/3 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/4
IIM Lucknow 1
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
• Newsboy problem – a standard problem of finding the best order size for
• Destock – reduce the amount of stock held a single stock cycle, with uncertain demand
• Cycle-counting – where stock is checked at regular intervals, with a • Electronic data interchange (EDI) – a method of transferring data
small proportion of items typically checked every week directly between remote computers
• Dependent demand methods – assume the demand for an item is • Electronic fund transfer (EFT) – a method of automatically debiting a
directly related to the demand for other items, with this relationship used customer’s bank account and crediting the money to a supplier’s account
to control stocks
• Electronic point of sales (EPOS) – a system that records transactions at
• Lost sales – when customer demand cannot be met, and the customer
withdraws their demand a cash register and transfers the information to stock control and other
• MRP – material requirements planning functions
• Order – a message from an organization to a supplier requesting a
• MRP II – manufacturing resource planning
delivery of materials
• Lot sizing – combining several small orders into larger ones
http://www.inventoryops.com/dictionary.htm
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/5 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/6
O
In-process U
In- process T
Input Inventory P
Inventory U
T
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/7 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/8
IIM Lucknow 2
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/9 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/10
Types of Inventory
Types of Inventories
• Seasonal Inventory: Seasonality in demand is absorbed
using inventory
Manufacturing facility • Decoupling Inventory: Complexity of production control is
reduced by splitting manufacturing into stages and
Supplier Step 1 Step 2 Customer maintaining inventory between these stages
`
• Cyclic Inventory: Periodic replenishment causes cyclic
inventory
In-Transit Raw Finished • Pipeline Inventory: Exists due to lead time
WIP
Material Goods • Safety Stock: Used to absorb fluctuations in demand due to
` ` ` ` uncertainty
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/11 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/12
IIM Lucknow 3
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Cyclic, Pipeline and Safety Stocks
A graphical illustration Types of Inventories
Cyclic inventory, pipeline inventory and safety stocks are critically • M R O ( Maintenance/Repairs/Operating supplies)
linked to “how much” and “when” decisions in inventory planning
• Goods-in-transit to warehouses or customers
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/13 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/14
IIM Lucknow 4
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Inventory Management:
Objectives of Inventory Control
Overall Objective
• Inadequate control of inventories can result in both
under- and overstocking of items... Achieve satisfactory levels of customer
service while keeping inventory costs
• Understocking results in missed deliveries, lost sales, within reasonable bounds.
dissatisfied customers, and production delays.
• Overstocking ties up funds that might be more This means, the manager tries to achieve a balance in stocking.
productive elsewhere.
Two fundamental decisions are to be made:
• Timing of the order
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/17 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/18
• A classification system
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/19 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/20
IIM Lucknow 5
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Costs in Inventory Planning Computation of Carrying Cost
Carrying Cost
An Illustration
• Interest for short-term borrowals for working capital
• Cost of stores and warehousing
• Administrative costs related to maintaining and accounting
for inventory
• Insurance costs, cost of obsolescence, pilferage, damages
and wastage
• All these costs are directly related to the level of inventory
*The percentage for obsolescence and damages and so on are estimates based on
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/21 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/22 historical data
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/23 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/24
IIM Lucknow 6
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Costs in Inventory Planning Independent vs. Dependent Demand
Shortage Cost
Inventory: a stock or store of goods
• Costs arising out of pushing the order back and Independent Demand
rescheduling the production system to accommodate these
changes
A Dependent Demand
• Rush purchases, uneven utilisation of available resources Dependent Demand
and lower capacity utilisation (Derived demand
items for component
B(4) C(2)
• Missed delivery schedules leading to customer parts,
subassemblies,
dissatisfaction and loss of good will raw materials, etc)
• The effects of shortage are vastly intangible, it is indeed D(2) E(1) D(3) F(2)
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/27 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/28
IIM Lucknow 7
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
What factors influence
Three Levels of Inventory Decisions inventory replenishment models?
• Supply Chain Decisions (strategic)
• What are the potential alternatives to inventory?
• How should the product be designed?
• Deployment Decisions (strategic)
• What items should be carried as inventory?
• In what form should they be maintained?
• How much of each should be held and where?
• Replenishment Decisions (tactical/operational)
• How often should inventory status be determined?
• When should a replenishment decision be made?
• How large should the replenishment be?
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/29 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/30
These systems ensure the material availability on ongoing basis • Fixed-order quantity models are Event Triggered when
throughout the year.
inventory drops to a certain level (R)
• Items are ordered multiple times throughout the year
• Occur at any time depending on the demand rate
• System logic dictates:
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/31 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/32
IIM Lucknow 8
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Multi-Period Inventory Systems:
Multi-Period Inventory Systems Some Differences
Multi-Period Inventory Models • Fixed-time period model has a larger average inventory
• Fixed-Order Quantity Models
• Fixed-order quantity model favours more expensive items
• Event triggered (Example: running out of stock)
• Fixed-order quantity model more appropriate for important items
• Economic Order Quantity (EOQ Model)
• Q-Model • Fixed-order quantity model require more time to maintain: each
• Fixed-Time Period Models activity is logged
• Time triggered (Example: Monthly sales call by sales
representative)
• Periodic system
• Periodic review system
• Fixed order interval system
• P-Model
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/33 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/34
Type of items A, V, X, H
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/35 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/36
IIM Lucknow 9
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Fixed-Time Period Reordering System Fixed-Order Quantity Model:
Model Assumptions
Idle state • Demand for the product is constant and uniform throughout the
Waiting for demand Demand occurs period
Units withdrawn
from inventory
No
or backordered • Lead time (time from ordering to receipt) is constant
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/37 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/38
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/39 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/40
IIM Lucknow 10
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
• The sum of the two costs is the total stocking cost (TSC) By adding the item, holding, and ordering costs together, we
• When plotted against order quantity, the TSC decreases to a determine the total cost curve, which in turn is used to find the
Qopt inventory order point that minimizes total costs
minimum cost and then increases
• This cost behavior is the basis for answering the first Total Cost
COST
fundamental question: how much to order
Holding
• It is known as the economic order quantity (EOQ) Costs
Annual Cost of
Items (DC)
Ordering Costs
QOPT
Order Quantity (Q)
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/43 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/44
IIM Lucknow 11
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Basic Fixed-Order Quantity (EOQ)
Model Formula Deriving the EOQ
2DS
EOQ =
H
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/45 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/46
IIM Lucknow 12
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/49 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/50
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/51 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/52
IIM Lucknow 13
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/53 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/54
• Number of Orders Per Year • A trading company buys 6000 units of an item every
= D/Q
year with an unit cost of Rs.300/-. It costs
= 5,750,000/27,573.135
= 208.5 orders/year Rs.1,250/- to process an order and arrange delivery,
while interest and storage costs amount to Rs.60/- a
• Time Between Orders year for each unit held. What is the best ordering
= Q/D Note: This is the inverse policy for the item?
= 1/208.5 of the formula above.
= .004796 years/order
= .004796(365 days/year) = 1.75 days/order
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/55 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/56
IIM Lucknow 14
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
When batch set-up costs are high, EOQ suggests very • EOQ suggests fractional value
large batches. • Suppliers unwilling to split standard package sizes
• Complicates production scheduling • Deliveries by vehicles with fixed capacities
• Give longer lead times to customers
• More convenient to round order size
• Needs excess inventory storage
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/57 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/58
D = 6000 C = 30 S = 125 H=7 Impact on cost with changes in order quantity near EOQ
2 x 125 x 6000 The Total-Cost Curve is U-Shaped
EOQ = Qo = = 462.91
7 Q D
TC = H+ S
Annual Cost
VCo = H x Q = 3,240.37 2 Q
For 450 Batch 2.8% below optimal Cost 0.04% High Ordering Costs
For 500 Batch 8% above optimal Cost 0.3% High
QO (optimal order quantity) Order Quantity (Q)
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/59 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/60
IIM Lucknow 15
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Mae Chow Min works in her bakery for 6 days a week for 49 weeks a • Assumption was demand in known
year. Flour is delivered directly with a charge of $7.5 for each
delivery. Chow Min uses an average of 10 sacks of whole-grain flour • Suppose we have erred by E percent
a day, for which she pays $12 a sack. She has an overdraft at the bank • Then demand would be D(1+E)
which costs 12 per cent a year, with spillage, storage, loss and
insurance costing 6.75 per cent a year.
2 S D (1 + E)
A. What size of delivery should Chow Min use Q=
H
and what are the resulting costs?
B. How much should she order if the flour has a
shelf life of 2 weeks? VC/VCo = ½ [Qo/Q + Q/Qo]
C. How much should she order if the bank
imposes a maximum order value of $1,500?
VC 1 1 1+ E
D. If the mill only delivers on Mondays, how = × +
much she order and how often? VCo 2 1+ E 1
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/61 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/62
• Assumption was costs are known • If uncertain of cost for an item which is already being ordered
regularly.
• Ordering cost and holding cost
• Work backwards to compute ordering cost using EOQ
• Suppose we have taken extra E1 and E2 respectively • Suppose prices are going to go up
• Calculations would then have been for • Marketing promos would increase demand
• Ordering Cost = S(1+E1) • Get EOQs and then increase the order
• Raise EOQ automatically by a factor K
• Holding Cost = H(1+E2)
• Surrogate costs:
• Artificially low holding cost, or
VC/VCo = ½ [Qo/Q + Q/Qo] • High reorder costs
VC 1 1+ E2 1+E1
= × +
VCo 2 1+ E1 1+E2
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/63 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/64
IIM Lucknow 16
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Quantity Discounts:
Procedure to Find Best Order Size An Example for Constant Holding Cost
• The maintenance department of a hospital uses about 816
Start 1 Take the next 2 Find the lowest
lowest unit cost point using Qo cases of liquid cleanser annually. Ordering costs are $12,
holding costs are $4 per case a year, and the new price
schedule indicates that orders are less than 50 cases will
Calculate the cost at Is this cost $20 per case, 50 to 79 cases will cost $18 per case, 80
4 the break point on the No
3 point
left of the valid range valid? to 99 cases will cost $17 per case, and larger orders will
cost $16 per case. Determine the optimal order quantity and
Yes the total cost.
Find the lowest cost Compare the costs Calculate the cost
7 and corresponding 6 of all the points 5 at this valid
order size considered minimum
Finish
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/65 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/66
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/67 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/68
IIM Lucknow 17
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Production
Production
& Usage
& Usage
demand rate Usage Usage
• Assumptions of EPQ are similar to EOQ except orders
are received incrementally during production
In
ve
n to
ry
Le
ve
l
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/69 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/70
• Only one item is involved • A toy manufacturer uses 48000 rubber-wheels per year
• Annual demand is known for its popular dump truck series. The firm makes its own
wheels, which it can produce at a rate of 800 per day.
• Usage rate is constant The toy trucks are assembled uniformly over the entire
• Usage occurs continually year. Holding cost is $1 per wheel a year. Setup cost for
• Production rate is constant a production run of wheels is $45. the firm operates 240
days per year. Determine the
• Lead time does not vary Economic Run Size a. Optimal run size
• No quantity discounts b. Minimum total annual cost for carrying and setup
c. Cycle time for the optimal run size
2 DS p
Q0 =
d. Run time
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/71
H p −d SK/SCM2011/L3-5/72
IIM Lucknow 18
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Expected demand
during lead time
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/75 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/76
IIM Lucknow 19
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/77 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/78
IIM Lucknow 20
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Example for Setting Reorder Point Example for Setting Reorder Point
One of Sharp Retailer’s inventory items is now being Construct a Cumulative DDLT Distribution
analyzed to determine an appropriate level of safety stock.
The manager wants an 80% service level during lead time. Probability Probability of
The item’s historical DDLT is:
DDLT (cases) of DDLT DDLT or Less
DDLT (cases) Occurrences
2 0 0
3 8 3 .4 .4
4 6 4 .3 .7
5 4 .8
5 .2 .9
6 2 6 .1 1.0
R = EDDLT + SS
SS = R - EDDLT
EDDLT = .4(3) + .3(4) + .2(5) + .1(6) = 4.0
SS =5–4= 1
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/83 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/84
IIM Lucknow 21
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Reorder Point for a
Continuous DDLT Distribution Continuous DDLT Distribution
Z Percentage Cycle
of Cycles service
with shortages Level d = average demand during lead time
(%)
0.00 50.0 50.0
0.84 20.0 80.0 σ d = standard deviation of demand during lead time
1.00 15.9 84.1
1.04 15.0 85.0
1.28 10.0 90.0
1.48 7.0 93.0
1.64 5.0 95.0
1.88 3.0 97.0 Safety Stock = SS = Z σ d
2.00 2.3 97.7
2.33 1.0 99.0
Reorder point = R = d L + Zσ d
2.58 0.5 99.5
3.00 0.1 99.9
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/85 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/86
_
R = d L + z L (σ d ) 2
Standard deviation of a series of independent occurrences is
equal to the square root of the sum of the variances
σ S = σ 12 + σ 22 + .... + σ i2
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/87 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/88
IIM Lucknow 22
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Example for Setting Reorder Point Example for Setting Reorder Point
• EDDLT = 15 units
Auto Zone sells auto parts and supplies including a popular
multi-grade motor oil. When the stock of this oil drops to 20 units, • σDDLT = 6 units
a replenishment order is placed. The store manager is concerned R = EDDLT + Z(σDDLT )
that sales are being lost due to stockouts while waiting for an order. 20 = 15 + Z(6) Standard Normal Distribution
It has been determined that lead time demand is normally 5 = Z(6)
distributed with a mean of 15 units and a standard deviation of 6
Z = 5/6
units. Area = .2967
Z = .833
The manager would like to know the probability of a stockout
during lead time.
Area = .2033
Area = .5 z
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/89 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/90 0 .833
Example for Setting Reorder Point Rules of Thumb in Setting Reorder Point
• The Standard Normal table shows an area of .2967 for the • Set safety stock level at a percentage of EDDLT
region between the z = 0 line and the z = .833 line. The where j is a factor between 0 and 3.
shaded tail area is .5 - .2967 = .2033. Class Description j
OP = EDDLT + j (EDDLT)
1 Uncritical 0.1
2 Uncertain-uncritical 0.2
• The probability of a stockout during lead time is .2033 3 Critical 0.3
4 Uncertain-critical 0.5
5 Supercritical 1.0
6 Uncertain-supercritical 3.0
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/91 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/92
IIM Lucknow 23
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
• Risk of stockout
Fixed Time Period Disadvantages
• Requires a larger safety stock
• Increases holding/carrying cost
• Costs of periodic reviews
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/93 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/94
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/95 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/96
IIM Lucknow 24
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Fixed-Time Period Model:
Determining Quantity in Fixed period Model Determining the Value of σT+L
• Using an approach similar to that used to derive EOQ, the
∑ (σ )
optimal value of the fixed time between orders is derived to T+L
be σ T+L = di
2
i =1
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/97 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/98
Average daily demand for a product is 20 units. The review The value for “z” is found by using the Excel
period is 30 days, and lead time is 10 days. Management NORMSINV function.
has set a policy of satisfying 96 percent of demand from
items in stock. At the beginning of the review period there
are 200 units in inventory. The daily demand standard
deviation is 4 units. For a probability 0.96, z = 1.75
SK/SCM2011/L3-5/99 SK/SCM2011/L3-5/100
IIM Lucknow 25
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Example of the Fixed-Time Period Model:
Solution (Part 2) Hybrid Inventory Models
IIM Lucknow 26
L03-05: Multi Period Inventory Systems SCM 2011
Hybrid Inventory Models: Hybrid Inventory Models:
Single Bin System Two-Bin System
IIM Lucknow 27