Assignment DST
Assignment DST
Assignment DST
INTRODUCTION
MAIN BODY
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
ORIGIN OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Development refers to the multi-dimensional process that involves major changes in social
structures, popular attitudes and national institutions.
In the third world, Development remains problematic with many of these countries making little
no progress towards improving the quality of life of the majority population. This is particularly
so in the case of Africa. The African continent remains an underdeveloped with its society still in
transition. The political process is still in transition with many countries abandoning the one-
party political system in favor of multi-party liberal democracy. The multi-party political system
shows little signs that it will lead to a stable political environment whereby the majority
population will have their say in key decisions. Democracy is still very much on the agenda.
Economically Africa has not faired better and in many respects there has been retrogression. In
spite of more than a decade of Structural Adjustment Programme {SAP}, the African economic
condition has remained critical. Per capital income has continued to fall, the export sector is
depressed and the burden of debt remains most excruciating. Population growth is still very high
and given the technological backwardness of the food and the agricultural sector, Africa is
becoming increasingly dependent on food aid and imports for the survival of its people.
Development is a term that often has different meaning for different people and hence different
theoretical perspectives. Goran Hyden (1994) correctly points out that “development is the
product of human efforts”. As a result, it has both its architects and auditors. Architects are the
people with a vision, wedded more or less explicitly to a given ideology. Depending on both
context and timing, ideas may not go are in shaping the development of a given society. The
principal auditors of development are academics. Their task is to assess, within a given
theoretical perspective, how successful the architects are in shaping the process of social change
according to their own modules.
Development can be easily defined and explained by using its major aspects. These include
Social, Economical and political aspects. Different scholars have explained the concept of
development by basing on these aspects of development. The following is how development has
been defined and explained by different scholars according to the major aspects of the
phenomenon;
ECONOMICAL ASPECT
View held by many economists and western liberal scholars is that “Economic growth is the key
indicator to economic development”. Their analysis is found on the works of classical
economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo. This perspective of development thus
considers rise in the per capita income, Gross Domestic Product {GDP}, increase in the level of
investment, markets etc as indicators of development. A developed economy is considered to be
the one that carries on production with a large amount of capital investment, a large amount of
machinery and using advanced techniques. The available human and other resources are
employed to the maximum; consequently, the production efficiency is high leading to high per
capita income. This is development.
POLITICAL ASPECT
SOCIAL ASPECT
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Scholars such as
Freeman and slave, Patrician and Plebeian, Lord and Serf, guild-master and the journeyman, in a
word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in a constant opposition to one another, carried on an
interrupted, now hidden, now open fight, in a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary
reconstruction of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending class (The communist
manifesto). Marxist theory founded by German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883) is one of
the leading theories that provide critical analysis of the development process. This theory is
directed at social change. Marxists want to analyze social relations in order to change them, in
order to alter what they see are the gross injustices and inequalities created by capitalists’
economic relations. Marx and many more were/are convinced that development takes place in
the contest of class struggle and that the exploiting class must be overthrown and a socialist
economy system must be established.
There are scholars who have tried to define development by incorporating in one definition,
more than one aspect of development.
Prof. Rostow in his book “The stages of Economic Growth” (1960) applies a stage approach to
the course of development. Rostow presents a political theory as well as a descriptive economic
study of the pattern of the growth and development of the nations. The essence of the Rostow
thesis is that it is logically and practically possible to identify stages of development and classify
societies according to those stages.
Todaro 1988-1989
Raising peoples’ living levels, i.e. incomes and consumption, levels of food, medical
services, education through relevant growth processes
Increasing peoples’ freedom to choose by enlarging the range of their choice variables,
e.g. varieties of goods and services
Chambers (1997)
Development is a “good change”. This implies the increase in standard of living, improvement
of health and well being for all. His focus was the achievement of whatever is regarded as
general good for the society at large.
In our point of view after the value judgment, we recommend the definition by Todaro (1988-
1989) to be the definition of development because Todaro has incorporated all the major aspects
of development in his single definition.
CONCLUSION