1 Dr. R.U. Singh Memorial National Online Judgement Writing Competition
1 Dr. R.U. Singh Memorial National Online Judgement Writing Competition
SINGH MEMORIAL
NATIONAL ONLINE JUDGEMENT
WRITING COMPETITION
Organised by
FACULTY of LAW,
UNIVERSITY of LUCKNOW
LUCKNOW
OUR PATRONS
2. The State of Maha has the highest suicide rate in the Union of Scindia
especially among the youth. Maha is also Scindia’s entertainment center,
as many Reality TV shows and movies are shot in the State of Maha. One
of the most famous film industries in Scindia was Mollywood. The
industry had a wide audience spanning across the whole of Scindia.
6. On Sunday, Maha Police as well as the crime branch officials visited his
rented flat, but nothing suspicious was found. The police said that the
actor had spoken to his sister on the telephone around 9 am on Sunday.
An hour later, he had glass of juice. On Sunday, Maha Police as well as
the crime branch visited his rented flat but nothing suspicious was found.
An hour later, he had a glass of juice and took his tablets. The police
added that the cook knocked several times on his door around 11:30 am to
confirm the menu. When the cook and the actor’s two friend who were
staying with him in the house got no response, they called a key maker
who helped open the door. The friends then rang up his sister and police.
Police also stated that all the CCTV cameras were off.
7. The police have taken statement of his closed ones in her brief statement,
his sister, told the Maha Police that financial issues could not be the
reason for his death. Reports say that his psychiatrist Dr. Sharma revealed
that Dushyant was in depression for the past one year and he could not
sleep at night. He used to have strange thoughts. Late actors close friend
Mr. Chabbra stated about professional rivalry. In his statement his father
stated about the late actor’s mental state, that he was perturbed by
whatever happening within film industry. Dushyant’s co actor on his
social media handle quoted that “It was a systematic dismantling of a
fragile mind”. Late actor’s ex girlfriend stated that Dushyant was unable
to handle the disrespect and insults that came his way every day.
10. As the waves of protest against those personalities risen up a lawyer and
few group of people on Wednesday moved a criminal complaint against 8
persons, including Balman Khan, Dharm Johar, Mudit Chopra, Wajid
Nadiadwala, Sanjeev Leela Bhansali, Krishan Kumar, Drishti Kapoor, in
Jevadi Police Station district Datna.
11. The lawyer Mr. Abhijeet claimed that the people named conspired against
the actor, thus forcing him to take his life which, he pleaded, amounted to
murder .The FIR has been lodged under sec 306, sec 120 (B) and sec 499
of Scindia Penal Code respectively for abetment to suicide, conspiracy
and defamation.
12. The police, led by Inspector Virat Singh, had carried out investigation.
The Police filed a charge sheet in the Sessions Court and the magistrate
concluded the case for trial. On the basis of fact, decide the matter and
give your judgement.
NOTE: All the laws of Union of Scindia are in pari materia with that of Union of
India.
List of Witness
Cook
Two Friends
Dushyant’s Father
Dushyant’s Sister
Dushyant’s ex-Girlfriend
Balman Khan
Dharm Johar
Mudit Chopra
Wajid Nadiadwala
Krishna Kumar
Drishti Kapoor
(Note- There are two independent witness which can be used either by prosecution and
defendant.
The authors can use witness from their convenience while writing the judgement)
EXHIBITS
5 diaries
Juice Glass
Medicine
Mobile Phone
Curtain
Laptop
RULES & REGULATIONS
The objective of this Competition is for the students to approach a factual matrix from
the point of view of a judge, apply the law and render a judgment. The student shall be
expected to think like a judge and reach a well-reasoned conclusion. The detailed rules
and Regulations of the Competition are produced below:
Eligibility:
The Competition shall be open for the students currently pursuing
their Bachelor’s Degree in law i.e. 3-Year LL.B. course or 5-Year
LL.B. & LL.M. course from any recognized university/school in
India.
Individual participation as
well as participation in a team of two i.e.
co-authorship is allowed.
There is norestriction on the number of entries from any college or
university.
The participants shall be provided with a factual matrix
and would
be required to write a judgment based on the same.
The participants
shall write a single opinion. Multiple opinions are
not allowed.
Content:
The Judgment should inter alia include: (in no particular order, except the Operative
Part which must come last)
Jurisdiction
Determination of Facts Admissibility/Maintainability Issues for
Determination
Framing Specific Questions for Determination
Relevant Legislations
The arguments of the Prosecution/Defendant
The arguments of the Defendant
Reasoning of the court
Reference to Authorities & Precedents
Decisions/Outcomes on Issues
The participants may fill in necessary particulars/fillers to the judgment (i.e. name of
advocates, judges etc.).
Such fillers should not reveal the identity of the participants. Such a revelation would
lead to immediate disqualification.
Formatting:
The language of the Judgment should be in English.
The word limit is 3500 words (not including foot notes).
The file must be a Microsoft Word file.
The font used in all parts of the judgments must be Times New Roman, Size 12,
with 1.5 line spacing. The judgment must be justified.
The font used in the footnotes must be Times New Roman, Size 10, with single
line spacing. The citation in the footnotes should be Bluebook 20th edition.
Page numbers must be at the bottom center
Penalties
S. No. Description Range
1. Incorrect line spacing in the manuscript or footnotes 0.25 marks (per instance);
Up to 1 marks.
2. Incorrect font style or size in the manuscript or 0.5 marks (per instance);
Footnotes Up to 2 marks.
3. Incorrect or inconsistency in citation 0.25 marks (per instance);
Up to 1 marks.
4. Absence of page numbers in the footer 2 marks.
5. Text not justified 0.5 marks (per instance);
Up to 2 marks.
6. Failure to remove tracked changes, highlights or 0.25 marks (per instance);
comments from the manuscript Up to 1 marks
7. Incorrect naming of the Manuscript file submitted in 2 marks.
soft-copy
8. Missing parts/blank page in the manuscript 0.5 marks (per instance).
9. Exceeding Word Limit 0.5 marks for every 500
words.
10. Plagiarism 1 marks (per instance);
Up to 10 marks
11. Improper submission of soft copy (MS Word format) 2 marks.
Assessment:
The submissions shall be assessed on the following parameters:
Happy Competing!!
ORGANIZERS:
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW
Urmika Pandey
Student Convenor
Aishwarya Bhatt
Student Co-Convenor