0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views7 pages

Optimum Performance of Turmeric Extraction Firms: An Input-Output Analysis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 7

OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF TURMERIC EXTRACTION FIRMS: An Input-Output Analysis

ABSTRACT

This paper analyses Technical Efficiency of 14 Turmeric Oleoresin extraction firms located across South-India using DEA. The
results suggests that out of 14 firms the operations of one firm is inefficient (efficiency < 60%) and three firms are moderate and
four firms have very good efficiency. technical efficiency is 100% for another four firms. The optimum targeted input and output
values have been predicted for an efficient production. It is observed that, DEA is an appropriate technique to analyze chemical
manufacturing firms with multiple input/output variables.

Key words: Data Envelopment Analysis, Technical Efficiency, Turmeric Oleoresin Extraction Industry.

INTRODUCTION

Decision making in current competitive economy is the foremost requirement of any manufacturing industry or Decision Making Units
(DMUs), for improving performance and efficiency. In this work, the performance of Turmeric Oleoresin Extraction Units belonging to the
SME sector with similar process of manufacturing were chosen and compared for their technical efficiency (TE). Extraction firms
manufacture turmeric oleoresin extract which is an anti-cancer drug and has many of medicinal values. This product is used in food
industry as a natural coloring agent. This turmeric raw material is cultivated many states across south-India. Major contributors are Erode,
Coimbatore districts in Tamil Nadu, Alappey in Kerala, Mysore district in Karnataka and some parts of Andra Pradesh. Technical efficiency
provides the information on how the firms perform and can compare their optimum performance. This enhance the decision making
process as it depends on the performance and efficiency of the manufacturing DMUs.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Literature shows studies were done for various manufacturing like garment, cement, pharmaceutical industries and Agro based industries
like horticulture and poultry and also in banking, etc. Simanti Banerjee (2007) studied the impact of environment regulation on TE of
Indian Cement Industry and found TE score is higher for firms with effective regulation scenario. Putu Mahardika Adi Saptura (2011)
examined TE level of Indonesian Manufacturing industries during the period from 1990 to 2011. Results obtained from DEA technique
proved that basic industry performs better than other high technology firms. Mainak Mazumdar (2009) examines the competitiveness of
Indian Pharmaceutical firms by computing their TE using non-parametric approach of DEA, results shows that R&D, Export Expenditure
and imported technology does not contribute to improve TE. Dlamini (2010) studied small scale sugarcane farmers in Swaziland,
investigated using stochastic frontier function of the Cobb-Douglas model of DEA, results revealed that TE decrease with increase in farm
size. Niringiye Aggrey (2010) studied the relationship between the firm size and TE using DEA technique, found that there is a negative
association between TE and Firm size. Belen Iraizo (2003) studied the Horticultural production to estimate TE using both Non-parametric
and Parametric approach to a frontier production function. Studies show that TE was positively related with the Partial Productivity
Indices. Sunil Kumar (2008) using DEA measures the extent of technical, pure technical and scale efficiency of 27 public sector banks.
Vincent Mok (2010) studied 287 cloth manufacturing firms to estimate relation between TE and export orientation, studies show that high
level of TE for the firms concentrating on either local market or overseas market and TE is Low for firms trying to conquer both the local
and overseas market.

Based on the literature review, DEA technique has not been used in Turmeric Extraction firms of to find the technical efficiency. This paper
is designed to measure and compare the technical efficiency of Turmeric Oleoresin extraction firms in south India. The paper is structured
as follows. Research Methodology is explained in section III, Analysis - Variable selection is explained in Section IV, concepts of DEA models
are explained in Section V, Results and Discussion in Section VI. Summary of Findings are explained in Section VII followed by conclusion in
Section VIII.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE:

This study aims at estimating the technical efficiency of 14 DMUs of Turmeric Oleoresin Extraction industry located across south India. The
DMUs will be ranked according to their Technical Efficiency. This study also provides a optimum inputs and output for the not so efficient
DMUs to achieve an efficiency similar to the top ranking DMUs.

RESEARCH DESIGN:

Experimental Research design has been used. This paper takes the manufacturing firms namely Turmeric Oleoresin extraction
firms. These firms are located across the south – Indian peninsula where the raw material Turmeric mother rhizome is available in nearby
areas. Primary Data is collected for a month. Several input information for the manufacture of TOE was obtained. The firms are SMEs,
whose output product is the Turmeric oleoresin produced which is used mainly for medicinal purposes.

1
DATA TYPE:

We use primary data for the study collected from the Turmeric Oleoresin extraction firms. The data is collected from the firms willing to
share their data. Data is collected through observation at the production plant and interviews conducted with production mangers of the
firms, which was used in the analysis.

RESEARCH METHODS:

In this paper we are using non-parametric DEA technique, Constant Returns to Scale Model (CRS) for calculating the Technical
Efficiency of the firms studied. For this study, the performance Analysis is done by analyzing kilograms of turmeric oleoresin produced per
batch per day. Performance analysis in practice uses one or more inputs to produce one or more outputs. Inputs for this turmeric
extraction process are raw material, electricity, number of extractors, number of operators and numbers of batches are used. Data
Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used in this work to measure efficiency and productivity as it takes into account many inputs and outputs.

DEA TECHNIQUE

MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE:

In any DMU, measures of performance help in evaluating the productivity and efficiency of the firm. Productivity refers to total factor
productivity (involving all factors of production).Assume that a DMU uses a single input X to produce a single Output Q, Productivity is the
Ratio of output (s) to input(s).

Productivity = ------

Technical Efficiency (TE) reflects the ability of a firm to obtain maximum possible output from a given set of inputs and technology.

Actual output

TE = --------------------------------------------------------------

Potential output (or) maximum possible output

MEASURING TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY

The two principal methods of measuring technical efficiency:

(i) Mathematical Programming based on non-parametric DEA

(ii) Econometric methods i.e., Stochastic frontiers.

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a linear programming methodology to measure the efficiency of multiple decision making units
(DMUs) when the production process presents a structure of multiple inputs and outputs.

DEA EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT CONCEPTS:

DEA technique was first formulated by Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (1978) , who proposed a model which had an input orientation and
assumed constant returns to scale(CRS). Banker, Charnes and Cooper (1984) who proposed a variable returns to scale (VRS) model.

THE CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE MODEL (CRS)

Assume there are data on K inputs and M outputs on each of the firms or DMUs. For the i-th DMU these are represented by the vectors X i
and Yi respectively. The KxN input matrix, X, and the MxN output matrix, Y, represent the data of all N DMUs. The purpose of DEA
technique is to construct a non-parametric envelopment frontier over the data points such that all observed points lie on or below the
production frontier. For the simple example of an industry where one output is produced using two inputs, it can be visualized as a
number of intersecting planes forming a tight fitting cover over a scatter of plots in three dimensional spaces.

2
Figure 1- PIECEWISE LINEAR CONVEX ISOQUANT

Given the CRS assumption, this can also be represented by a unit isoquant in input/input space (refer Figure-1).

The best way to introduce DEA is via the ratio form. For each DMU we would like to obtain a measure of the ratio of all the outputs over
all inputs. Such as u’yi / v’xi where u is an Mx1 vector of output weights and v is an Kx1 vector of output weights. To select optimal
weights we specify the mathematical programming problem

Maxu,v (u'yi / v'xi),

st u'yi / v'xi ≤1, j=1, 2,….,N,

u, v ≥ 0.

This involves finding values for U and V, such that the efficiency measure of the i-th DMU is maximized, subject to the constraint that all
efficiency measures must be less than or equal to one. One problem with this particular ration formulation is that it has an infinite number
of solutions. To avoid this one can impose the constraint r'xi = 1, which provides,

Maxµ,r(µ'yi ),

st r'xi = 1,

µ'yi - r'xj ≤ 0, j=1, 2,….,N,

µ, r ≥ 0

Where the notation changes from U and V to µ and r reflects the transformation. This form of the linear programming problem using the
duality in linear programming, one can derive an equivalent envelopment form of this problem:

minθ,λ θ,

st -yi + Yλ ≥ 0,

θxi – Xλ ≥ 0,

λ ≥ 0,

Where θ is a scalar and λ is a Nx1 vector of constants. This envelopment form involves fewer constraints than the multiplier form (K+M < N
+ 1), and hence is generally the preferred form to solve. The value of θ obtained will be the efficiency score for the i-th DMU. It will satisfy
θ < 1, with a value of 1 indicating a point on the frontier and hence a technically efficient DMU, according to the Farrell (1957) definition.

3
Note that the linear programming problem must be solved N times, once for each DMU in the sample. A value of θ is then obtained for
each DMU.

ANALYSIS

VARIABLE SELECTION

Data is collected from extraction firms spread across South-India on monthly basics for the current year. The analysis was conducted using
DEA technique. For the analysis input variables taken into consideration are number of operators, number of extractors used,
consumption of electricity, number of batches and raw material. Number of operators is measured by total number of operators,
consumption of electricity is measured in units, and number of extractors used is measured in numbers and number of batches in
numbers. Raw material (mother rhizome turmeric) is measured in kilograms. Output is the Turmeric Oleoresin produced measured in
kilograms.

DESCRIPTION OF DATA:

Primary data collected at 14 various DMUs, consists of five inputs and an output. Table-1 shows the data collected for all the firms. The
technical efficiency of the turmeric oleoresin extraction firms can be measured in terms of input and output variables. The technical
efficiency means efficiency of turmeric extraction firms in utilizing input to generate output. The strength of the firms can be judged in
terms of oleoresin produced by the firms. Therefore production got is taken as output variable. the production is achieved using raw
material, extractors to process it, needed power, batches and employees the input variables taken for the study are number of operators,
number of extractors, electricity consumption, raw materials(mother rhizome turmeric) and number of batches. The technical efficiency is
measured by taking in to account of all firms in total.

Output Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Input 4 Input 5


Firm production No. of No. of Electricity Raw No. of
kg operators Extractors Consumption Material(Kg) Batches
1 3612.6 900 90 50000 90 60
2 1500 450 30 20000 30 15
3 1128.6 450 60 50000 45 30
4 5100 750 120 75000 120 75
5 2840.4 750 120 65000 90 75
6 2145 510 90 60000 75 60
7 3690 600 90 60000 90 60
8 5737.5 1500 150 100000 135 90
9 4050 900 120 65000 90 75
10 7308 1800 270 120000 210 180
11 3600 540 90 50000 90 60
12 10800 1350 240 175000 240 180
13 988.2 540 30 50000 30 15
14 4050 900 90 125000 90 60

Table-1: Data for 14 Turmeric Oleoresin extraction firms of South-India

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY SUMMARY

Firm Technical Efficiency Rank


1 0.978 5
2 1 1
3 0.53 14
4 1 1
5 0.68 11

4
6 0.627 13
7 0.932 8
8 0.887 9
9 0.951 6
10 0.833 10
11 1 1
12 1 1
13 0.659 12
14 0.951 6
   
  Average 0.859  

Table 2: Technical Efficiency Summary

Around 14 firms are taken for study. The technical efficiency is measured by using DEA method. Table 2 contains technical efficiency score
for turmeric extraction firms. The rank for the firms is derived based on efficiency score. Four firms, firm 2, 3 and 4 shows 100% efficiency.
Another four firms shows maximum efficiency above 90%, two firms i.e firm 8 and 10 has efficiency greater than 80%. Three firms i.e firm
5,6,13 are moderately efficient i.e., less than 75%. The lowest efficiency is less than 60% for the firm 3.

OPTIMUM SETTING FOR INEFFICIENT FIRMS:

Firm
Firm Input
output Input 1 Input 2 Input 4 Input 5
# 3
3692.30
1 900 80.769 50000 80.769 46.154
8
2 1500 450 30 20000 30 15
3 2130 450 45 31500 45 28.5
4 5100 750 120 75000 120 75
5 4180 750 90 64000 90 61
6 3422 510 75 54100 75 53.9
3958.33
7 600 90 60000 90 59.583
3
8 6470 1500 135 93500 135 81.5
9 4260 900 90 63000 90 57
8769.23 203.07 12000 203.07 124.61
10 1800
1 7 0 7 5
11 3600 540 90 50000 90 60
17500
12 10800 1350 240 240 180
0
13 1500 450 30 20000 30 15
14 4260 900 90 63000 90 57

Table 3: optimum value of inputs and Outputs

The inefficient firms can become relatively efficient by achieving the target set by DEA. The results of DEA show that the inefficient firms
can become efficient firms by achieving the target input and maximizing the output. Table 3 provide the input and output values for the
turmeric oleoresin extraction firms to achieve efficiency.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

This paper analyses Technical Efficiency of 14 Turmeric Oleoresin extraction firms located across South-India using DEA. The results
suggests that out of 14 firms Four firms, firm 2, 3 and 4 show 100% efficiency. Another four firms show maximum efficiency above 90%.
Two firms, firm 8 and 10 has efficiency greater than 80%. Three firms, firm 5,6,13 are moderately efficient i.e., less than 75%. The lowest

5
efficiency is less than 60% for the firm 3. Also by using this DEA technique, the targeted input and output values were predicted for an
efficient production. So it can be concluded that, DEA is an appropriate technique to analyses chemical manufacturing firms with multiple
input/output variables.

CONCLUSION

The purpose of the paper is to find the technical efficiency of Turmeric Oleoresin extraction firms located across South-India. Analyses
started by identifying the firms. As these firms measure their performance based on the output production, the technique chosen is non-
parametric DEA with output oriented methodology. We have about five inputs, which is used to maximize the output. After selection of
input and output variables, data is collected for these 14 DMUs and technical efficiency of these firms were calculated. The results show
the most efficient firms and the least efficient firms. Some firms are operating under moderate conditions.

Based on the output and input, we also find the targeted output and input parameters so that all the inefficient firms can improve on their
performance and become efficient if they achieve the targeted output and input quantities. So in conclusion similar manufacturing firms
can use this non-parametric DEA technique to study the efficiency of the output production with optimum performance.

REFERENCES

Belen Iraizo, Manuel Rapun and Idoia Zabaleta, (2003), "Assessing the Technical Efficiency of horticultural production in Navarra, Spain",
Elsevier - Agricultural Systems, Vol. 78, pp. 387-403.

Bhandari, Anup Kumar and Ray,Subhash C, (2007), "Technical Efficiency in the Indian Textiles Industry: A Nonparametric Analysis of Firm-
Level Data", University of Connecticut, Department of Economics Working paper Series, Paper 200749.

Dlamini.S, Rugambisa.J.I, Masuku.M.B. and Belete.A, (2010), "Technical Efficiency of the Small scale sugarcane farmers in Swaziland: A
case study of Vuvulane and Bigbend farmers", African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 935-940.

García Sánchez.M, (2009), "Technical and Scale Efficiency in Spanish Urban Transport: Estimating with Data Envelopment Analysis",
Advances in Operations Research, Volume 2009, Article ID 721279, 15 pages.

Hasan A.Faruq and David T. Yi, (2010), "The Determinants of Technical Efficiency Manufacturing Firms in Ghana", Global Economy Journal,
Vol. 10, No. 3, Article 7.

IzahMohdTahir and Ku Naraini Ku Yusof, (2011), "Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiency of Malayasian Public Lisited Companies: A Non
Parametric Approach", Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, Vol. 1, No.7, pp. 1-7.

Joshi. R.N. and Singh S.P., (2010),"Estimation of total factor productivity in the Indian garment industry", Emerald Group Publishing
Limited, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 14, Iss: 1, pp.145 – 160.

Ku Naraini Che Ku Yusof, Ahmad Rizal Razali and Izah Mohd Tahir, (2010), “An Evaluation of Company Operation Performance Using Data
Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach: A Study on Malaysian Public Listed Companies”, International Business Management, Vol. 4, No. 2,
pp. 47-52.

Mainak Mazumdar, Meenakshi Rajeev and Subhash C Ray, (2009), "Output and Input efficiency of manufacturing firms in India: A Case of
Indian Pharmaceutical Sector", Institute for social and Economic Change, Working paper 219.

Minwir Al-Shammari, (1999), "A multi-criteria Data Envelopment Analysis model for measuring the productive efficiency of hospitals",
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 879-890.

Mohammad Jaforullah and Erandi Premachandra, (2003), "Sensitivity of Technical Efficiency estimates to estimation approaches: An
Investigation using New Zealand dairy industry data", University of Otago, Economics Discussion Papers, Working paper 0306.

Mohamed Saad Mohamed Abokaresh and Badrul Hisham Kamaruddin, (2011),” Performance Rating of Privatized and Non-Privatized Firms
Using Data Envelopment Analysis Technique”, Journal of Information Engineering and Applications, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1-8.

Niringiye Aggrey, Luvanda Eliab and Shitundu Joseph, (2010), "Firm Size and Technical Efficiency in East African Manufacturing Firms",
Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 69-75.

Putu Mahardika Adi Saptura, (2011), "Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Indonesian manufacturing Industries: An Application of DEA",
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 66, pp. 107-116.

Rohita Kumar Mishra and Gokulananda Patel, (2010), "Supplier Development Strategies : A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach",
Business Intelligence Journal, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 99-110.

6
Sunil Kumar and Rachita Gulati, (2008), "An Examination of Technical, Pure Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Indian Public Sector Banks
using Data Envelopment Analysis ", Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 33-69.

Vincent Mok, Godfrey, Zhaozhou Han and Zongzhang Li, (2010), "Export Orientation and Technical Efficency: Clothing Firms in China",
Manegerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 453-463.

Yusuf. S.A. and Malomo. O., (2007), "Technical Efficiency of Poultry Egg Production in Ogun State: A A Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)
Approach", International Journal of poultry science, Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 622-629.

You might also like