1 Running Head: Literature Review
1 Running Head: Literature Review
1 Running Head: Literature Review
Literature Review
Ashlee S. Ceraulo
the third stage of labor would more efficiently prevent postpartum hemorrhage within the first 24
hours of birth in women who have just delivered a neonate vaginally. There are multiple studies
done to show the comparative nature of the two drugs, measuring each ability to control the
duration of labor, amount of bleeding and clots, and the amount of side effects as a result
(Sabitha, Sirisha, & Mohan, 2017). Misoprostol has been shown to have stronger uterotonic
effects therefore reducing the time of labor and decreasing chances of hemorrhage in the third
stage of labor. Whereas, in the women who are given oxytocin still are able to experience
successful births but are more likely to have a longer labor and more side effects such as
shivering and pyrexia (Sabitha, Sirisha, & Mohan, 2017). Misoprostol is also considered to be
more affordable as well as easier to administer sublingually as compared to oxytocin. One of the
most common causes of postpartum hemorrhage is uterine atony in the unsuccessful timing or
drug chosen and its ability and strength to adequately contract the uterus, and throughout the
comparative studies misoprostol is the drug of choice to more effectively control the third stage
of labor. The exact methods of the averaged studies were to administer each drug into separated
groups of women, (group A and group B), in a randomized method to receive one dose of either
600 mcg rectal misoprostol or 10 units of intramuscular oxytocin (Narrey, Mahajan, Vij, Sharma,
& Chaudhary, 2015). The blood loss, duration of third stage labor, incidence of side effects, and
complications were then documented after the drugs were administered throughout labor
(Narrey, Mahajan, Vij, Sharma, & Chaudhary, 2015). This paper will effectively elaborate the
theory, “In women who have just delivered a neonate vaginally, would administration of
misoprostol or oxytocin in the third stage of labor more efficiently prevent postpartum
3
LITERATURE REVIEW
hemorrhage within the first 24 hours after birth?”, through a series of research articles exhausting
Methods
The methods and criteria for these articles to be effective in this research paper are rather
extensive. Each article needed to within the five-year requirements, to ensure the relevancy and
freshness of the material. The articles also needed to be peer reviewed, to help with the assurance
of truthfulness and accuracy of the research. Also, I had to ensure that all articles had the two
drugs of choice, oxytocin and misoprostol in the quantitative studies, and the assumption of
better pharmacology in the qualitative. Lastly, I needed to ensure all articles were looking for the
same complications and guidelines with the use of the drugs, such as; monitoring postpartum
hemorrhaging, side effects, and duration of the third stage of labor all within 24 hours.
Synthesis of Literature
they conduct a study where two groups of 100 women are to receive sublingual misoprostol and
intramuscular oxytocin in the third stage of labor and the blood loss, side effects, and
complications were monitored (Sabitha, Sirisha, & Mohan, 2017). They ultimately were able to
find that misoprostol produced the least amount of blood loss (113mL), with the shortest
duration, yet shared side effects with the other drugs of increased blood pressure, shivering, and
pyrexia (Sabitha, Sirisha, & Mohan, 2017). Both drugs were however proved “effective” in the
initiation of labor, yet misoprostol is more efficient and cost effective, with less incidence of
complication.
4
LITERATURE REVIEW
The next article, Rectal Misoprostol Versus Intramuscular Oxytocin for Prevention of
Post-Partum Hemorrhage, randomized women into a group A and a group B, where group A
was to receive rectal misoprostol and group B intramuscular oxytocin. The study was closely
monitoring the amount of blood loss, duration of the third stage of labor, side effects, pre and
post-delivery hemoglobin, and additional use of uterotonics (Narrey, Mahajan, Vij, Sharma, &
Chaudhary, 2015). The study showed that misoprostol was able to contract the uterus within only
oxytocin was also found effective in inducing labor efficiently yet produced fevers more often,
with still trailing consistently with the results if misoprostol regarding pre and post hemoglobin
and duration.
The third article, being the only qualitative one, Labor Pain Experiences and
different perspective on the different labor option, coming directly from the mothers themselves.
This article demonstrated women whom have experienced a vaginal birth with different methods
of pain control. These women relate to my PICOT question through begging for a, “reduction of
severe pain”, and are simply lacking the properly educated healthcare professionals to bring in
the most statistically effective uterotonic medications, such as misoprostol and oxytocin, in order
to control this (Aziato, 2017). There were 14 post-partum women included in an optional study
of questions that led the scientists to these results, being that there are better pharmological
When discussing the current articles, it is made clear that misoprostol is able to use a
stronger force to contract the uterus, therefore decreasing the amount of blood loss and chances
of postpartum hemorrhage (Sabitha, Sirisha, & Mohan, 2017). Misoprostol is also confirmed to
be the most affordable option compared to oxytocin. The unknown is currently whether or not
there are certain groups of people with abnormal medical circumstances that would react
differently to each drug, for example, it is unknown if patients with something like an HPV
infection in the cervix, would be safer with a drug such as oxytocin, rather than the stronger
uterotonic, misoprostol. This unknown can carry to virtually any medical disorder even
nonrelated to the reproductive system. As far as what needs to be studied further, is the exact
cause of the side effects caused by both oxytocin and misoprostol, and why these are happening
in each and if there are any co-relations to them unrelated to the drug itself.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it was able to be found in all three articles that have been discussed that in
women who have just delivered a neonate vaginally, administration of misoprostol or oxytocin in
the third stage of labor both efficiently prevent postpartum hemorrhage within the first 24 hours
after birth, however decreased incidences of complication and increased uterine strength award
to misoprostol. The studies showed that misoprostol is superior in three ways, “reduction of
cesarean rate, induction to delivery time is shorter, and induction to active phase duration is also
shorter in misoprostol induced labor.” (Sabitha, Sirisha, & Mohan, 2017). This information in
total supports the PICOT stance through adequately testing both drugs in the same population of
woman delivering vaginally in the same stage of labor, all within the first 24 hours carefully
6
LITERATURE REVIEW
monitored for hemorrhaging or complications. The PICOT can officially be declared as
answered, with misoprostol being the superior drug of choice for the induction of vaginal labor.
7
LITERATURE REVIEW
References
Aziato, L., Acheampong, A. K., & Umoar, K. L. (2017). Labour pain experiences and
Narrey, N., Mahajan, N., Vij, A., Sharma, R., & Chaudhary, U. K. (2015). Rectal Misoprostol
10.14260/jemds/2015/1387
Sabitha, M., Sirisha, K., & Mohan, M. S. (2017). A Comparative Study of Oxytocin &