Acusación Federal
Acusación Federal
Acusación Federal
..
~--. I ...J
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUPERSEDING INDICTM.E NT
· - · 1'' • 1 ~!
j i...' ") 1 _ 1.,
v.
Wire Fraud
[1] JULIA BEATRICE KELEHER, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343
(Counts 1 to 24)
Wire Fraud Conspiracy
[2] ANGELA A VILA-MARRERO, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349
(Counts 72 to 90)
Aggravated Identity Theft
[3] ALBERTO VELAZQUEZ-PINOL, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A
(Counts 25 to 98)
Federal Program Bribery
[4] FERNANDO SCHERRER-CAILLET, Title 18, United States Code, Section 666
(Counts 25 to 71 and 82 to 84)
Aiding and Abetting
[7] Title 18, United States Code, Section 2
(Counts 85 to 98)
(98 COUNTS and
Defendants. FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS)
the Puerto Rico Department of Education ("PRDE"), an agency of the Commonwealth of Pue1to
Department of Health, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. In January 2017, AVILA
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 2 of 46
Superseding Indictment-Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
was Acting Executive Director of ASES. In February 2017, she became Executive Director of
ASES, after being appointed to the position by the Governor of Puerto Rico.
principal of Azur, LLC ("Azur"), a for-profit limited liability company organized under the laws
of Puerto Rico. Between 2017 and 2018, [3] VELAZQUEZ had numerous e-mail communications
with the Governor of Puerto Rico, including the following e-mail exchange on March 17, 2017.
managing partner of BDO Puerto Rico, P.S.C. ("BDO"), a for-profit professional services
corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Between 2017 and
2018, BDO paid Azur approximately $942,304.13 for its services to BDO.
5. Colon & Ponce, Inc. ("Colon & Ponce"), was a corporation organized under the
laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Mayra Ponce, not charged in this superseding
2
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 3 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
6. Glenda Ponce, not charged in this superseding indictment, was an assistant for
[l] KELEHER at PRDE between 2017 and 2018, and was the sister of Mayra Ponce.
9. Each of the e-mails described in the individual wire fraud counts in this superseding
I 0. All dates and times stated in this superseding indictment should be understood to
include the phrase "on or about" before the date and time stated.
11. Law No. I of June 3, 2012, also known as the Ley de Etica Gubernamental de
Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico Government Ethics Act, hereinafter the "Act"), was in force throughout
the period during which the events described in this superseding indictment occurred.
which personal or financial interests are or could be reasonably inconsistent with public interest."
(b) Section 1.2(s) of the Act, in relevant paii, defined "confidential document
or information" as: "that which is defined as confidential by the law." Section l.2(s) of the Act
further defined "confidential document or information" as "that which, if disclosed, could harm
the fundamental rights of third paiiies or the right to privacy and the private life of public servants;
the disclosure of which could constitute a violation of the executive privilege; when the document
or information is part of a deliberation process when drafting public policy and, if disclosed ... may
impair any business transactions or official efforts of the State in progress when requesting such
information. This term includes reports, memoranda or any written document drafted by a public
3
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 4 of 46
Superseding Indictment-Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
servant in discharging the duties of his/her office or job for his/her superior or in connection with
(c) Section 4.2(d) of the Act prohibited public servants from accepting or
soliciting "from a private person or business, whether directly or indirectly, benefits for him/herself
or a person, business, or entity in exchange for canying out actions that are biased to favor him/her
obtain, directly or indirectly, any benefit for him/herself or any other private person or business."
(e) In relevant part, Section 4.2(g) of the Act provided that "[n]o public servant
shall intervene, directly or indirectly, in any matter in which any member of his/her family unit,
relative, partner, or housemate has a conflict of interest that may result in benefit for any of the
abovementioned."
(f) Section 4.2(s) of the Act provided that "[n]o public servant shall carry out
any action that may call the impartiality of the government endeavor into question."
(g) Section 4.3(e) of the Act provided that "[n]o public servant shall approve or
authorize a contract with a private person or business knowing that such person or business is
representing cases or matters which involve a conflict of interest between the contracting agency
and the personal interests said private person or business is representing. To such effects, a
contractual clause shall be included in which such private person or business certifies that it is not
any official action that is contrary to the prohibitions established by Sections 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4 shall
report it to the Office [of Government Ethics] before taking such action. In his/her statement, the
public servant may request to be relieved from intervening in the matter or participating in the
4
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 5 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-43 l (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 1 to8
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (Wire Fraud)
[DEPRIVATION OF CONFIDENTIAL PRDE INFORMATION]
12. Paragraphs 1, 9 and 10, 11, ll(b), and 1 l(d) of the General Allegations are hereby re-
Professional Services with the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority
("F AFAA") to restructure all curricular and administrative areas of the PRDE. The Ninth Clause
"The Consultant acknowledges the proprietary and confidential nature of all internal, non-
public, information systems, financial, and business information relating to the Authority,
its subsidiaty corporations and affiliates, as well as to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
its agencies, corporations or municipalities now or hereafter provided to the Consultant in
connection with the Consultant's engagement by the Authority under this Agreement." ***
"The Consultant shall not make public or disclose, nor copy, reproduce or distribute at any
time the Materials to third parties without the Authority's previous written consent."
14. Individual A was a close friend of [1] KELEHER, and the president of Company
A, a corporation authorized to conduct business under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico. It was known to []] KELEHER that Individual A, for pay and profit, was seeking contracts
for Company A with FAFAA and other entities in relation to proposed services to PRDE.
15. On February 10, 2017, at around 5:51am, [1] KELEHER sent an e-mail to two
5
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 6 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-43 I (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
16. On February 10, 2017, at 5:55am, [!] KELEHER sent an e-mail to a PRDE
17. On February 10, 2017, at 1:41pm and at I :43pm, the PRDE employee referenced
in paragraph 15 sent in two separate e-mails to[!] KELEHER's PRDE e-mail account, the files
18. On the dates listed in Counts I through 8, neither Individual A nor Company A
had any contract or non-disclosure agreement with PRDE that would allow them access to PRDE
confidential information.
[I] KELEHER and others not charged in this superseding indictment schemed to defraud and
deprive PRDE of the right to the exclusive use of its confidential information through deceptive
means, in that [I] KELEHER used her position as Secretary of PRDE for the purpose of obtaining,
disclosing, and converting PRDE confidential information for the use of a third party, Individual
A, causing the transmission of interstate electronic mail communications for the purpose of
6
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 7 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
20. On each of the dates set forth below, in the District of Puerto Rico and elsewhere,
the defendant,
aided and abetted by others not charged in this superseding indictment, willfully and knowingly,
having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money and property
by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, transmitted
and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate
and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing
such scheme:
7
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 8 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
8
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 9 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. I 9-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT9
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A
(Aggravated Identity Theft)
21. Paragraphs 1, 9 and 10 of the General Allegations and the description of the e-mail
set forth in Count 3 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
22. On or about February 11, 2017, at 2:55pm, in the District of Puerto Rico and
did knowingly transfer, without lawful authority, a means of identification of other persons,
namely, the names and PRDE position numbers of approximately 7,331 individuals employed by
during and in relation to a felony violation enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section
1028A(c), to wit, wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, knowing
that the means of identification contained in the spreadsheet described above belonged to at least
another actual person, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A(a)(l).
9
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 10 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT 10
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A
(Aggravated Identity Theft)
23. Paragraphs 1, 9 and 10 of the General Allegations and the description of the e-mail
set forth in Count 4 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
24. On or about February 11, 2017, at 3:12pm, in the District of Puerto Rico and
did knowingly transfer, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person, that
is, the names and PRDE position numbers of approximately 6,087 individuals employed by PRDE,
during and in relation to a felony violation enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section
1028A(c), to wit, wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, knowing
that the means of identification contained in the spreadsheets described above belonged to at least
another actual person, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A(a)(l).
10
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 11 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTll
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A
(Aggravated Identity Theft)
25. Paragraphs 1, 9 and 10 of the General Allegations and the description of the e-mail
set forth in Count 8 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
26. On or about February 20, 2017, in the District of Puerto Rico and elsewhere, the
defendant,
did knowingly transfer, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person, that
is, the names and PRDE position numbers of approximately 108 individuals employed by PRDE,
during and in relation to a felony violation enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section
1028A(c), to wit, wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, knowing
that the means of identification contained in the spreadsheets described above belonged to at least
another actual person, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A(a)(l).
11
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 12 of 46
Superseding Indictment-Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 12 to 14
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[SHAM SELECTION PROCESS SCHEME]
27. Paragraphs 1, 5, 6, 9 and 10, 11, 1l(a), ll(e), ll(t), ll(g), and l l(h) are hereby re-
28. In January 2017, Glenda Ponce began to work as an assistant at the office of the
Secretary of PRDE. At the time, she was neither an employee of, nor did she have a contract with
PRDE.
29. On March 28, 2017, Glenda Ponce signed a contracting services agreement with
PRDE. Under the terms of this contract, which [I] KELEHER signed on behalf of PRDE, Glenda
30. Glenda Ponce was the sister of Mayra Ponce, one of the two pmtners of Colon &
Ponce, a company that had no employees on its payroll and used contractors to staff its projects.
[I] KELEHER was aware that Glenda and Mayra Ponce were sisters, and that Mayra Ponce was a
31. The Guide for the Selection of Professional Services Paid for with Federal Funds
(Gufa para la Selecci6n de Servicios Profesionales Suji-agados con Fondos Federales) (hereafter,
the "Guide") governed the procedures by which the PRDE could award federally funded contracts.
In relevant pmt, the Guide established that certain federally funded professional services contracts
could be executed only after the ~ompletion of a competitive selection process known as a Request
for Quote ("RFQ"). The Guide also provided that "[a]ll state laws related to standm·ds of conduct
of public servants and contractors and conflicts of interest shall be applicable hereto, including
laws that entail fines, penalties, or any other disciplinary action for offenses of this kind."
32. On April 11, 2017, Glenda Ponce forwarded a professional services proposal from
Colon & Ponce to [1] KELEHER, even though PRDE had not issued a RFQ to entities competing
to perform such services. Shmtly afterwards, that same day, [1] KELEHER sought to award a
professional services contract to Colon & Ponce without any RFQ taking place.
12
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 13 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
33. Notwithstanding the above, a RFQ process was initiated on May 16, 2017 by which
various entities, including Colon & Ponce, were invited to submit proposals to PRDE.
34. On May 17, 2017, [I] KELEHER instructed Glenda Ponce to go to the office of a
PRDE official conducting the RFQ's proposal evaluations, to ask about the status of the process.
Glenda Ponce informed the PRDE official that [I] KELEHER already had her services proposal.
35. On May 24, 2017, [I] KELEHER signed Colon & Ponce's proposal. She did not
initial any other proposal in relation to the abovementioned RFQ. At the time, no PRDE
memorandum had been issued recommending the selection of any of the participants in the RFQ.
36. On May 25, 2017, a PRDE memorandum recommending Colon & Ponce's
selection in the RFQ was signed by two of three PRDE officials participating in the process. The
PRDE official conducting the evaluation of the RFQ did not sign the memorandum.
37. [I] KELEHER never reported the existence of any conflict of interest to the Office
of Government Ethics in relation to the awarding of a PRDE contract to Colon & Ponce.
38. On May 25, 2017, [I] KELEHER signed a request from PRDE to senior Puerto
Rico government officials requesting authorization to award a contract to Colon & Ponce, thereby
causing PRDE to falsely certify that its request was in compliance with all laws, orders, rules,
circular letters and other regulations applicable to the government's fiscal policy.
39. On June 8, 2017, [1] KELEHER caused PRDE to enter into a professional services
40. From in or about March 2017 to in or about June 2017, defendant [I] KELEHER,
together with Mayra Ponce and Glenda Ponce, schemed to defraud and deprive PRDE of moneys
in connection with a PRDE contract paid with federal funds by causing PRDE to award a contract
13
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 14 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
to Colon & Ponce under the guise of a sham competitive RFQ process, causing PRDE officials to
misrepresent to senior Puerto Rico government officials that PRDE had complied with all laws,
orders, rules and applicable regulations in the selection of Colon & Ponce, when in truth and in
fact, and as [1] KELEHER well knew, [1] KELEHER had selected Colon & Ponce for the contract
without regard for the RFQ process, the Guide and the Act.
41. On or about each of the dates set forth below, in the District of Pue1to Rico, the
defendant,
aided and abetted by Mayra Ponce and Glenda Ponce, not charged in this superseding indictment,
willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and for
obtaining money and prope1ty by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations and promises, transmitted and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radio,
and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals,
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
14
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 15 of 46
Superseding Indictment-Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTIS
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
[SHAM SELECTION PROCESS SCHEME]
43. From in or about March 2017 through in or about June 2017, in the District of
together with Mayra Ponce and Glenda Ponce, not charged in this superseding indictment,
knowingly and willfully conspired with each other to commit an offense against the United States,
that is, wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; all in violation of
15
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 16 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-43 l (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 16 to 22
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[INDIVIDUAL C SUB-CONTRACTING SCHEME)
44. Paragraphs 1, 7, 9 and 10 of the General Allegations are hereby re-alleged and
45. On June 8, 2017, PRDE entered into a professional services contract (2017-
AF0220) with Colon and Ponce (referred to as the "Second Party" in the contract), to provide
certain services. The contract allowed Colon & Ponce to invoice a total of $43,500.00 and had a
duration of up to December 31, 2017. It contained the following provision at paragraph 24:
46. Individual B had been a gubernatorial candidate in the Puerto Rico General
Elections of 2016, and Individual C was Individual B's campaign manager. Individual B was an
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on November 15, 2017. In 2018, defendant [1] KELEHER sought
an increase in her annual salary as Secretary of PRDE, from $200,000.00 to $450,000.00, payable
by Company D.
47. On July 5, 2017, Individual Be-mailed [1] KELEHER and recommended that she
hire Individual C to work at PRDE. In August 2017, Individual C began working at PRDE
48. Sometime before October 25, 2017, [1] KELEHER informed Individual C that
Individual C would be working through Colon & Ponce, a company of which Individual C had
never heard.
16
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 17 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
49. On October 25, 2017, PRDE entered into an amended contract with Colon & Ponce.
The amended contract increased the maximum value of the contract, from $43,550.00, to
$93,550.00, with a duration until December 31, 2017. The amended contract left unaffected
Clause 24 of the original contract, which prohibited Colon & Ponce from subcontracting services
50. On October 25, 2017, after PRDE and Colon & Ponce signed the abovementioned
contract amendment, Individual C signed a contractor agreement with Colon & Ponce under which
Individual C would provide services to Colon & Ponce at a rate of $40.00 per hour.
51. After October 25, 2017, Colon & Ponce submitted invoices to PRDE for services
performed under its contract with PRDE. The invoices included subcontractor services performed
52. Sometime in December 2017, Individual C was informed by [1] KELEHER that
BDO would pay for her professional services from January 2018 onwards.
with BDO, at a rate of $40 per hour and with a starting date of January 2, 2018.
54. From January 2018 to July 2018, BDO submitted invoices to PRDE for services
performed under its contract with PRDE, including subcontractor services performed by Individual
55. From in or about October 2017 to in or about July 2018, defendant [1] KELEHER
and others not charged in this superseding indictment, schemed to defraud and deprive PRDE of
its moneys in connection with PRDE contracts for professional services with Colon & Ponce and
BDO, in that [1] KELEHER, knowing that said contracts prohibited these entities from
17
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 18 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
subcontracting its services, caused Colon & Ponce and BDO to subcontract such services to
Individual C, while concealing this fact in their invoices to PRDE, causing PRDE to pay for said
services.
56. On or about each of the dates set forth below, in the District of Puerto Rico,
the defendant herein, aided and abetted by others not charged in this superseding indictment,
willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and for
obtaining money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations and promises, transmitted and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radio,
and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals,
pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme, as follows:
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
18
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 19 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. I 9-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT23
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
[INDIVIDUAL C SUB-CONTRACTING SCHEME]
58. From in or about October 2017 through in or about July 2018, in the District of
the defendant herein, and Mayra Ponce and persons associated with BOO, knowingly and willfully
conspired with each other to commit an offense against the United States, that is, wire fraud, in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; all in violation of Title 18, United States
19
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 20 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-43 I (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT24
Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(l)(B)
(Bribery by Agent of Organization Receiving Federal Funds)
51 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
60. PRDE was an agency of the government of the Commonwealth of Pue1to Rico,
which received benefits of more than $10,000 under a Federal program involving a grant, contract,
subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, and other form of Federal assistance during the twelve months
preceding October 25, 2017, and the twelve months following October 25, 2017. Defendant [1]
61. On or about October 25, 2017, in the District of Puerto Rico, and elsewhere,
the defendant herein, did corruptly solicit and demand for the benefit of any person, a thing of
value from a person, intending to be influenced and rewarded in connection with a transaction and
defendant did corruptly solicit and demand for the benefit of Individual C, that Colon and Ponce
award a contract to Individual C to perform subcontractor services under Colon & Ponce's contract
with PRDE, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, despite said contract expressly
prohibiting Colon & Ponce from subcontracting any of its services, and [1] KELEHER did this
intending to be influenced in connection with a contract amendment between PRDE and Colon &
Ponce; said contract amendment was authorized by [ 1] KELEHER, allowing Colon & Ponce to
increase its earnings under the original contract by $50,000.00; all in violation of Title 18, United
20
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 21 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 25 to 48
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[BDO LOBBYING SERVICES FEE SCHEME]
62. Paragraphs 3, 4, 7, 9 and 10 of the General Allegations are hereby re-alleged and
63. At all times stated in this Superseding Indictment, Puerto Rico Act 103 of May 25,
64. On the dates listed below, BDO entered into contracts (shown in boldface in the
table below) and amendments to contracts (denoted by an asterisk (*) in the table below) with
PRDE, signed by the BDO officials named below, for professional services specified in the
contracts and for the maximum amounts and durations listed below:
65. All original contracts between BDO and PRDE specifically stated that BDO
certified that the funds assigned to BDO under the contract would not be used for the payment of
any lobbying services, regardless of their purpose. The amended contracts incorporated by
21
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 22 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
reference all unmodified clauses of the original contracts, including the certification mentioned
66. On the dates listed below, BDO entered into contracts with ASES, signed by the
BDO officials stated below, for professional services specified in the contracts and for the
67. On January 25, 2017, [4) SCHERRER sent an e-mail to [3) VELAZQUEZ,
68. Between January 2017 and February 2017, [3) VELAZQUEZ exchanged numerous
e-mail communications with the Secretary of PRDE and with the Director of ASES.
69. On March 9, 2017, [4) SCHERRER sent an e-mail to a BDO employee, stating:
70. On April 11, 2017, [3) VELAZQUEZ sent an e-mail to [4) SCHERRER, titled
"Invoice Azur," in which [3) VELAZQUEZ stated: "Attached please find Azur's invoice for
business development. Direct hours on the client will be billed separately. Thank you. Alberto."
71. On April 18, 2017, at 2:06 pm, a Human Resource Manager at BDO stated the
22
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 23 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
confidentiality agreement with this person (company). We will also need his certificate of
registry for accounting pmposes. I understand his billing rate will be $150."
72. On April 18, 2017, at 3:28 pm, [4] SCHERRER responded to the Resource
73. On April 19, 2017, [4] SCHERRER, representing BOO, signed an amendment to
contract 2017-AF0159 with PROE that increased the value of the contract by $589,000.00, for a
total of$1,079,580.00; the amendment left in effect all unmodified clauses of the original contract,
74. On April 19, 2017, at 4:42 pm, the BOO Human Resource Manager referenced
"Here is a draft of the contract for your revision. Once I receive your ok, I will then contact
Alberto. Thank you."
75. On April 19, 2017, at 5:03pm, UCC responded to the Human Resource Manager's
23
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 24 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-43 I (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
2. La fecha de comienzo debe ser el 14 de marzo 2. The starting date should be March 14,
de 2017. 2017.
3. Lajecha de lajirma de/ contrato debe ser en o 3. The date of the signing of the contract
antes de/ 14 de marzo de 2017." should be on or before March 14, 2017."
76. On April 19, 2017, at around 6:13pm, [4] SCHERRER sent an e-mail to a BDO
77. On April 21, 2017, the BDO Human Resource Manager referenced above sent an
e-mail to [4] SCHERRER with the subject matter: "Contrato de Azur" ("Azur Contract", in
Contractor Contract," in English), between BDO, the "First Party," and Azur, represented by
[3] VELAZQUEZ, the "Second Party," with a starting and a signature date of March 14, 2017,
78. From 2017 to 2019, [3] VELAZQUEZ used interstate electronic e-mail
communications to submit Azur's invoices for its lobbying services to BDO. On May 16, 2019,
BDO was served with a grand jury subpoena to produce any and all contracts and agreements
between BDO and [3] VELAZQUEZ. That same date, a BDO Managing Pmtner wrote a letter to
24
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 25 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
[3] VELAZQUEZ notifying the immediate cancelation of the existing business relationship
[3] VELAZQUEZ and [4] SCHERRER, and others not charged in this superseding indictment,
schemed to deprive PRDE and ASES of its moneys in connection with PRDE and ASES contracts
for professional services with BDO, in that [4] SCHERRER, [3] VELAZQUEZ and others not
charged in this superseding indictment, caused BDO to pay Azur for [3] VELAZQUEZ's lobbying
services in exchange for VELAZQUEZ obtaining PRDE and ASES contracts for BDO, causing
that public funds disbursed by PRDE and ASES be used to pay for said lobbying services, in
violation of Act 103 of May 25, 2006, while concealing said payments for lobbying services in
80. On or about each of the dates set forth below, in the District of Puerto Rico, the
defendants,
aided and abetted by others not charged in this superseding indictment, willfully and knowingly,
having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money and property
by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, transmitted
and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate
and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing
25
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 26 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-43 I (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
26
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 27 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
27
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 28 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT49
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
[LOBBYING SERVICES FEE SCHEME]
fully set forth herein. From in or about February 2017 through in or about January 2019, in the
and others not charged in this superseding indictment, knowingly and willfully conspired with
each other to commit an offense against the United States, that is, wire fraud, in violation of Title
18, United States Code, Section 1343; all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1349.
28
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 29 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 50 to 70
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[BDO SUB-CONTRACTING SCHEME]
83. All PRDE contracts listed in paragraph 64 prohibited BDO from subcontracting
services under the contracts. All amended PRDE contracts incorporated by reference all
84. All ASES contracts listed in paragraph 66 prohibited BDO from subcontracting
services under the contract without the written approval of ASES. In addition, BDO never
obtained any approvals from ASES to subcontract portions of services for work performed under
85. From March 2017 through January 2019, BDO made monthly payments to Azur
equal to ten percent (10%), and at times, five percent (5%) of the monthly gross revenues it
obtained from its contracts for professional services with PRDE and ASES.
86. From 2017 to 2019, BDO subcontracted services under its contracts with PRDE
and ASES to other individuals in addition to [3] VELAZQUEZ and Azur. BDO paid these
contractors only a fraction of the amounts invoiced to PRDE and ASES for their services, which
served to offset BDO's lobbying services payments to Azur. In its monthly invoices to PRDE and
ASES, BDO commingled the names and hours worked by its employees with those of its
contractors, creating a false appearance that said contractors were BDO employees.
87. From 2017 to 2019, [3] VELAZQUEZ used interstate electronic mail
communications to submit Azur invoices for [3] VELAZQUEZ's subcontractor services provided
29
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 30 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
88. During 2017, BDO invoiced PRDE for the subcontractor services of
[3] VELAZQUEZ, as if [3] VELAZQUEZ were a BDO Manager or Senior. From 2017 to 2019,
BDO invoiced ASES for the subcontractor services of [3] VELAZQUEZ, as if Azur or
[3] VELAZQUEZ and [4] SCHERRER, together with others not charged in this superseding
indictment, for pay and profit, schemed to defraud and deprive PRDE and ASES of moneys in
connection with their contracts for professional services with BDO, by causing BDO to invoice
PRDE and ASES for subcontractor services, knowing that said contracts expressly prohibited BDO
from subcontracting its services, causing BDO to misrepresent [3] VELAZQUEZ as a BDO
Manager and Senior in its invoices to PRDE, and as a BDO Principal in its invoices to ASES, and
causing PRDE and ASES to use public money to pay for said subcontractor services.
90. On or about each of the dates set forth below, in the District of Puerto Rico and
aiding and abetting each other and others not charged in this superseding indictment, willfully and
knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money
and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises,
transmitted and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication
in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose
30
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 31 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
31
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 32 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT71
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
[BOO SUB-CONTRACTING SCHEME]
92. From in or about February 2017 through in or about January 2019, in the District
together with others not charged in this superseding indictment, knowingly and willfully conspired
with each other to commit an offense against the United States, that is, Wire Fraud, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; all in violation ofTitle 18, United States Code, Section
1349.
32
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 33 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 72 to 81
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[DEPRIVATION OF CONFIDENTIAL ASES INFORMATION SCHEME]
93. Paragraphs 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, ll(b), and l l(d) of the General Allegations are hereby
94. On February 18, 1997, defendant [2] AVILA, then working in ASES's Finance
Department, signed a document titled, in Spanish, Compromiso con Puerto Rico and ASES
(Commitment with Puerto Rico and ASES, in English), where, among other things she indicated:
95. On January 10, 2017, at around 1:59pm, [3] VELAZQUEZ memorialized in his
96. On January 25, 2017, [2] A VILA attended a meeting of ASES 's Board of Directors,
where she stated the following in relation the new service providers for ASES, among them, BDO:
1
Origina1Spanish.fang11cage English translation
"Y que gozan de la confianza de ... de nuestra "And they have the trust of ... of our
administracion. " administration."
33
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 34 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-43 l (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
Rico, and had been awarded contracts with ASES in 2016, after submitting their respective
98. From in or about January 2017, to in or about February 2017, defendants [2]
AVILA and [3] VELAZQUEZ schemed to defraud and deprive ASES of the right to the exclusive
use of its confidential information through deceptive means, in that [2] A VILA used her position
as Director of ASES for the purpose of obtaining, disclosing and conve1ting ASES confidential
information for the use of a third patty, [3] VELAZQUEZ, causing the transmission of interstate
electronic mail communications for the purpose of disclosing said confidential information.
99. On or about each of the dates set forth below, in the District of Puerto Rico and
aiding and abetting each other, willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a
scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money and prope1ty by means of materially false and
means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings,
signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme:
34
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 35 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
35
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 36 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 82 and 83
18 u.s.c. § 1343
(Wire Fraud)
[DEPRIVATION OF CONFIDENTIAL ASES INFORMATION]
100. Paragraphs 94 to 100 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as though
102. Company B had been awarded a contract with ASES in 2016, after submitting its
Professional Service Contract proposal to ASES. The contract specified the services that Company
B was to provide to ASES, and specified that Company B could invoice ASES a maximum of
$2,300,000.00 with a contract duration from July I, 2016 until June 30, 2017.
103. On January 16, 2017 at 3: I Opm, [2] AVILA sent an e-mail from her ASES address
to her Yahoo! address, with confidential ASES information, such as Company B's professional
104. On January 16, 2017, at 3:42pm, [2] AVILA sent an e-mail from her Yahoo!
address to [3] VELAZQUEZ, with confidential ASES information, such as Company B's
105. On January 20 and January 23, 2017, [3] VELAZQUEZ and [4] SCHERRER had
telephonic conversations.
[2] AVILA, [3] VELAZQUEZ and [4] SCHERRER schemed to defraud and deprive ASES of the
right to the exclusive use of its confidential information through deceptive means, in that
[2] AVILA used her position as Director of ASES for the purpose of obtaining, disclosing and
conve1ting ASES confidential information for the use of third parties, [3] VELAZQUEZ and [4]
36
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 37 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
SCHERRER, causing the transmission of interstate electronic mail communications for the
107. On or about each of the dates set fmth below, in the District of Pue1to Rico, and
aiding and abetting each other, willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a
scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money and prope1ty by means of materially false and
means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings,
signs, signals, pictures, and·sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme:
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
37
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 38 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT84
18 u.s.c. § 1349
(Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
108. Paragraphs 101 to 107 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as
109. From in or about January 2017, through in or about February 2017, in the District
and others not charged in this superseding indictment, knowingly and willfully conspired to
commit an offense against the United States, that is, wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1343; all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
38
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 39 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 85 to 89
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[DEPRIVATION OF ASES CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION]
110. Paragraphs 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 1l(b), and 1 l(d) of the General Allegations are hereby
Rico.
112. In 2016, Companies A, B and C, were each awarded a contract to perform services
for ASES after they submitted their respective contract proposals to ASES. The contracts had a
113. From on or about January 16, 2017 to on or about January 23, 2017, defendants
[2] AVILA, [3] VELAZQUEZ and [7] schemed to defraud and deprive ASES of the right
to the exclusive use of its confidential information through deceptive means, in that [2] AVILA
used her position as Director of ASES for the purpose of obtaining, disclosing and converting
ASES confidential information for the use of third parties, [3] VELAZQUEZ and [7]
causing the use of interstate electronic mail communications for the purpose of disclosing said
confidential information.
114. On or about each of the dates set fo1th below, in the District of Pue110 Rico and
aiding and abetting each other, willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a
scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money and prope11y by means of materially false and
39
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 40 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings,
signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme:
)
89 /2017 E-mail from [3] VELAZQUEZ to [2] AVILA, copying [7]
in which [3] VELAZQUEZ states, in Spanish: "Angie: Adjunto la
propuesta revisada segun conversaramos." (English translation:
"Angie: Attached here is the proposal as per our conversation.")
Attached to the e-mail was a file ( Proposal 2017.docx).
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
40
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 41 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT90
18 u.s.c. § 1349
(Wire Fraud Conspiracy)
[DEPRIVATION OF ASES CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION]
115. Paragraphs 111 to 114 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as
116. From on or about January 16, 2017, through on or about January 23, 2017, in the
and others not charged in this superseding indictment, knowingly and willfully conspired to
commit an offense against the United States, that is, wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1343; all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
41
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 42 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNTS 91 to 97
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Wire Fraud)
[ SUBCONTRACTING SCHEME]
117. Paragraphs 3, 8, 9 and 10 of the General Allegations are hereby re-alleged and
118. On the dates listed below, entered into the following professional services
contracts with ASES, for the maximum amounts and the durations listed below:
"Neither this Agreement, nor the services to be provided hereunder, may be assigned or
subcontracted without the written approval of ASES. The request to contract a third party
must specify the matters in which he/she will intervene and must be submitted in writing."
120. During 2017 and 2018, never obtained written approval from ASES to
independent contractor
122. Sometime around March 2017, [3] VELAZQUEZ and [7] agreed that
[3] VELAZQUEZ, through Azur, would invoice for [3] VELAZQUEZ's services in
[3] VELAZQUEZ and [7] schemed to defraud and deprive ASES of its moneys in
connection with its contracts for professional services with in that defendants caused to
42
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 43 of 46
Superseding Indictment - Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
invoice ASES for services subcontracted by to [3] VELAZQUEZ and others, while
124. On or about the dates listed below, in the District of Puerto Rico, the defendants,
aiding and abetting each other and others not charged in this superseding indictment, willfully and
knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and for obtaining money
and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises,
transmitted and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radi9, and television communication
in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose
Each e-mail communication so transmitted constituting a separate and distinct violation of Title
43
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 44 of 46
Superseding Indictment- Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
COUNT98
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud)
[ ASES SUBCONTRACTING SCHEME]
125. Paragraphs 117 through 124 are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference as
126. From in or about March 2017 through in or about July 2017, in the District of Puerto
and others not charged in this superseding indictment, knowingly and willfully conspired to
commit an offense against the United States, that is, wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1343; all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
44
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 45 of 46
Superseding Indictment-Crim. No. 19-431 (PAD)
United States v. Julia Beatrice Keleher, et al.
FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS
127. The allegations contained in each of the Counts listed below for each of the
defendants so listed are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference for the purpose of alleging
forfeitures pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C) and Title 21, United
128. Upon conviction ofan offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
666, 1343, or 1349, set forth in the Counts listed below for each defendant,
said defendant shall forfeit to the United States of America, pursuant to Title 18, United States
Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 246l(c), any property, real
129. If any of the properties described above, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendants (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence, (b) have been transferred or
sold to, or deposited with a third party, ( c) have been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court,
(d) have been substantially diminished in value, or (e) have been commingled with other property
which cannot be divided without difficulty, the United States of America shall be entitled to
forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p ), as
45
Case 3:19-cr-00431-PAD-MDM Document 368 Filed 08/10/20 Page 46 of 46
TRUE BILL
W. STEPHEN MULDROW
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
~
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Chief, Fin nc'al rimes Unit
antiago
ssistant U.S . Attorney
46