Stubble Burning
Stubble Burning
Stubble Burning
insightsonindia.com/2019/08/14/stubble-burning
Topics Covered:
Stubble burning
What to study?
For Prelims and Mains: Crop burning- why, concerns, effects on environment and
health, their regulation and the need for a comprehensive policy on this.
Context: Through the various efforts under the Central Sector Scheme on ‘ Promotion
of Agricultural Mechanization for In-Situ Management of Crop Residue in
the State of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh & NCT of Delhi’ the paddy
residue burning events have reduced by 15% and 41% in 2018 as compared to that in
2017 and 2016, respectively in all these States as per the satellite data.
More than 4500 villages in Punjab and Haryana have been declared as Zero Stubble
Burning Villages during 2018 as not a single crop burning incident was reported
from these villages during the year.
Stubble burning is a common practice followed by farmers to prepare fields for sowing
of wheat in November as there is little time left between the harvesting of paddy and
sowing of wheat.
1/3
1. Even though farmers are aware that the burning of straw is harmful to
health, they do not have alternatives for utilising them effectively.
2. The farmers are ill-equipped to deal with waste because they cannot afford the
new technologythat is available to handle the waste material.
3. Experts say that with less income due to crop damage, farmers are likely to be
inclined to light up their fields to cut costs and not spend on scientific ways of
stubble management.
Stubble burning is adversely affecting environment and public health. The problem has
not been fully tackled and the adverse impacts on the air quality and consequent
impacts on the citizens’ health and lives are undisputed.
States needs to make alternative arrangements for consumption of paddy straw into the
soil as per the directions of the NGT.
2/3
What needs to be done- Supreme Court’s observations?
1. The problem is required to be resolved by taking all such measures as are possible
in the interest of public health and environment protection.
2. Incentives could be provided to those who are not burning the stubble and
disincentives for those who continue the practice.
3. The existing Minimum Support Price (MSP) Scheme must be so interpreted as to
enable the States concerned to wholly or partly deny the benefit of MSP to those
who continue to burn the crop residue.
4. Secretary, Union Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare has also been
directed to be present to “find a lasting solution.”
5. The Central government should convene a meeting with the States.
3/3