Art 7
Art 7
Key words: plasticity index, liquidity index, – dynamic, based on the Atterberg’s
varved clays, postglacial ablation tills, cone pe- concept, refined and standardised
netrometer, Casagrande apparatus by Casagrande in 1932, consisting
in placing a sample of soil in a brass
cup, cutting it with a grooving tool
Introduction and observing the closing of the
groove while hitting the cup with
The plasticity and liquidity indexes a rubber base (the so-called impact
are the basic geotechnical parameters of method);
cohesive soils. The liquidity index (IL) – static, based on the cone penetrome-
determines the consistency and physical ter method proposed by the Geotech-
state of soil. The plasticity index refers nical Commission of the Swedish
to the type of soil, its degree of cohesion. State Railways (GCSSR) between
Both show clear and important correla- 1914 and 1922 (Leroueil & Le Bi-
tions with the strength parameters of the han, 1996), originally used to deter-
substrate (Niedzielski, Tschuschke & mine shear strength in soil (Hansbo,
Wierzbicki, 2006) and are used in the 1957) and adapted for determination
process of designing the construction of the liquid limit (Karlsson, 1981);
foundations. In order to calculate the in this approach, the depth of immer-
value of the liquidity and plasticity in- sion of a cone-shaped weight applied
dex, laboratory methods may be used. In to the surface of soil defines the wL
that case, it is necessary to determine the value.
liquidity limit (wL). Based on both these approaches,
There are two laboratory approach- various methods for determining the li-
es to marking this value (Suchnicka, quid limit have developed and have been
1999):
FIGURE 1. Relationship between the values of the liquidity index (IL) calculated on the basis of two
laboratory methods
FIGURE 3. Relationship between the values of the liquidity index (IL) calculated on the basis of two
laboratory methods in the IL range of 0.25–0.50
ity index determined on the basis of the of the soil state towards a more plastic
test results from the cone penetrometer one. This trend is confirmed in the Polish
is usually higher than calculated on the literature (Jaśkiewicz & Wszędyrówny-
basis of the wL value determined in the -Nast, 2013). However, the value of the
Casagrande apparatus (the table). This plasticity index is underestimated when
may cause a change in the description the results of the penetrometer test are
used for calculations (the table). This can erential Casagrande method) when de-
change the soil type to less cohesive. termining the liquid limit (wL) in a cone
penetrometer in accordance with the
Conclusions recommendations of Eurocode 7. De-
termining the wL value by means of the
For cohesive soils of the North Polish Casagrande apparatus, considered the
glaciation occurring in the vicinity of classical method in Poland and strongly
Poznań, the value of leading parameter rooted in the engineering practice, leads
(IL) is usually overstated (related to ref-