Data Structure
Data Structure
Search algorithms are one of the most important areas of Artificial Intelligence. This topic will explain all about
the search algorithms in AI.
Problem-solving agents:
In Artificial Intelligence, Search techniques are universal problem-solving methods. Rational agents or Problem-
solving agents in AI mostly used these search strategies or algorithms to solve a specific problem and provide
the best result. Problem-solving agents are the goal-based agents and use atomic representation. In this topic,
we will learn various problem-solving search algorithms.
Completeness: A search algorithm is said to be complete if it guarantees to return a solution if at least any
solution exists for any random input.
Optimality: If a solution found for an algorithm is guaranteed to be the best solution (lowest path cost) among
all other solutions, then such a solution for is said to be an optimal solution.
Time Complexity: Time complexity is a measure of time for an algorithm to complete its task.
Space Complexity: It is the maximum storage space required at any point during the search, as the complexity
of the problem.
• Breadth-first search
• Uniform cost search
• Depth-first search
• Iterative deepening depth-first search
• Bidirectional Search
Informed Search
Informed search algorithms use domain knowledge. In an informed search, problem information is available
which can guide the search. Informed search strategies can find a solution more efficiently than an uninformed
search strategy. Informed search is also called a Heuristic search.
A heuristic is a way which might not always be guaranteed for best solutions but guaranteed to find a good
solution in reasonable time.
Informed search can solve much complex problem which could not be solved in another way.
An example of informed search algorithms is a traveling salesman problem.
• Greedy Search
• A* Search
• Breadth-first Search
• Depth-first Search
• Depth-limited Search
• Iterative deepening depth-first search
• Uniform cost search
• Bidirectional Search
1. Breadth-first Search:
• Breadth-first search is the most common search strategy for traversing a tree or graph. This algorithm
searches breadthwise in a tree or graph, so it is called breadth-first search.
• BFS algorithm starts searching from the root node of the tree and expands all successor node at the
current level before moving to nodes of next level.
• The breadth-first search algorithm is an example of a general-graph search algorithm.
• Breadth-first search implemented using FIFO queue data structure.
Advantages:
• It requires lots of memory since each level of the tree must be saved into memory to expand the next
level.
• BFS needs lots of time if the solution is far away from the root node.
Example:
In the below tree structure, we have shown the traversing of the tree using BFS algorithm from the root node S
to goal node K. BFS search algorithm traverse in layers, so it will follow the path which is shown by the dotted
arrow, and the traversed path will be:
S---> A--->B---->C--->D---->G--->H--->E---->F---->I---->K
Time Complexity: Time Complexity of BFS algorithm can be obtained by the number of nodes traversed in BFS
until the shallowest Node. Where the d= depth of shallowest solution and b is a node at every state.
Space Complexity: Space complexity of BFS algorithm is given by the Memory size of frontier which is O(b d).
Completeness: BFS is complete, which means if the shallowest goal node is at some finite depth, then BFS will
find a solution.
Optimality: BFS is optimal if path cost is a non-decreasing function of the depth of the node.
2. Depth-first Search
• Depth-first search isa recursive algorithm for traversing a tree or graph data structure.
• It is called the depth-first search because it starts from the root node and follows each path to its greatest
depth node before moving to the next path.
• DFS uses a stack data structure for its implementation.
• The process of the DFS algorithm is similar to the BFS algorithm.
“Backtracking is an algorithm technique for finding all possible solutions using recursion.”
Advantage:
• DFS requires very less memory as it only needs to store a stack of the nodes on the path from root node
to the current node.
• It takes less time to reach to the goal node than BFS algorithm (if it traverses in the right path).
Disadvantage:
• There is the possibility that many states keep re-occurring, and there is no guarantee of finding the
solution.
• DFS algorithm goes for deep down searching and sometime it may go to the infinite loop.
Example:
In the below search tree, we have shown the flow of depth-first search, and it will follow the order as:
It will start searching from root node S, and traverse A, then B, then D and E, after traversing E, it will backtrack
the tree as E has no other successor and still goal node is not found. After backtracking it will traverse node C
and then G, and here it will terminate as it found goal node.
Completeness: DFS search algorithm is complete within finite state space as it will expand every node within a
limited search tree.
Time Complexity: Time complexity of DFS will be equivalent to the node traversed by the algorithm. It is given
by:
Where, m= maximum depth of any node and this can be much larger than d (Shallowest solution depth)
Space Complexity: DFS algorithm needs to store only single path from the root node, hence space complexity of
DFS is equivalent to the size of the fringe set, which is O(bm).
Optimal: DFS search algorithm is non-optimal, as it may generate a large number of steps or high cost to reach
to the goal node.
• Standard failure value: It indicates that problem does not have any solution.
• Cutoff failure value: It defines no solution for the problem within a given depth limit.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Completeness: DLS search algorithm is complete if the solution is above the depth-limit.
Optimal: Depth-limited search can be viewed as a special case of DFS, and it is also not optimal even if ℓ>d.
Advantages:
• Uniform cost search is optimal because at every state the path with the least cost is chosen.
Disadvantages:
• It does not care about the number of steps involve in searching and only concerned about path cost. Due
to which this algorithm may be stuck in an infinite loop.
Example:
Completeness:
Uniform-cost search is complete, such as if there is a solution, UCS will find it.
Time Complexity:
Let C* is Cost of the optimal solution, and ε is each step to get closer to the goal node. Then the number of steps
is = C*/ε+1. Here we have taken +1, as we start from state 0 and end to C*/ε.
Space Complexity:
The same logic is for space complexity so, the worst-case space complexity of Uniform-cost search is O(b1 + [C*/ε]).
Optimal:
Uniform-cost search is always optimal as it only selects a path with the lowest path cost.
This algorithm performs depth-first search up to a certain "depth limit", and it keeps increasing the depth limit
after each iteration until the goal node is found.
This Search algorithm combines the benefits of Breadth-first search's fast search and depth-first search's
memory efficiency.
The iterative search algorithm is useful uninformed search when search space is large, and depth of goal node is
unknown.
Advantages:
• Itcombines the benefits of BFS and DFS search algorithm in terms of fast search and memory efficiency.
Disadvantages:
• The main drawback of IDDFS is that it repeats all the work of the previous phase.
Example:
Following tree structure is showing the iterative deepening depth-first search. IDDFS algorithm performs various
iterations until it does not find the goal node. The iteration performed by the algorithm is given as:
1'st Iteration-----> A
2'nd Iteration----> A, B, C
3'rd Iteration------>A, B, D, E, C, F, G
4'th Iteration------>A, B, D, H, I, E, C, F, K, G
In the fourth iteration, the algorithm will find the goal node.
Completeness:
Time Complexity:
Let's suppose b is the branching factor and depth is d then the worst-case time complexity is O(bd).
Space Complexity:
Optimal:
IDDFS algorithm is optimal if path cost is a non- decreasing function of the depth of the node.
Bidirectional search can use search techniques such as BFS, DFS, DLS, etc.
Advantages:
Time Complexity: Time complexity of bidirectional search using BFS is O(b d).