Critique Paper Changes Applied

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Saewyc, E. M., Bearinger, L. H., McMahon, G., Evans, T. (2006).

A national Needs
Assessment of Nurses Providing Healthcare to Adolescents. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 22, (5), 304-313.

The purpose of the study was to determine any improvement of knowledge and skills to
for addressing health issues of in adolescents and to assessdetermine their the change in
interest in receiving training for adolescent’s health issues by comparing the resultsit with
a previous assessment. The period between the studies wasdifferences between the
studies were 12 years, and the. The authors argue that there is athe lack of knowledge
concerning the care ofwhen caring for adolescents. They accessed the original data to
compare the similarity of group participants. The sample size wasThe differences of
participants were 75, being those participants of the recent study. While the samples were
of moderate size, the problem lies infor the comparisons of knowledge and skills. These –
these comparisons of knowledge are subjective because there was no type of instrument
measurement used that could have actually determined the knowledge of the participants.
Instead, only a The survey was used to analyze the difference between the two periods
times. Also, the sample sizes were not the same for the two studies, and this affects
theThis apparently is not consistent in the collection of data because of the for it lacks
equality in the inequal number of participants. The study does not indicate any
difference in which gender was more involved in the study. Also, it does not point out
Not to pointed out either it says where whether these participants come from a rural zone
or urban zone nor does neither it say if there is any difference among them in nationality
or point of originof nationalism. The moral standards of the participants seem not to be
affecting when this study was conducted. The study does not reflect In the study shows
no any hard choices about how to care for adolescents, and instead its only addresses
talks about the knowledge and skills of the participants on the topiccaring for adolescents.
The audience to which the study is directed to is to the community of health care
professionals and it uses a clear and appropriate language and is understandable. It
emploies appropriate references to the literature supporting their thesis, and It uses
enough medium that supports their consent. Uses uses and identifies these resources
correctly, but. However, since it is being the case that these two studies areitself this
study is of a decade apart there have been additional resources that have become
available is some of their resources since 1981 taking into account that this report was
written in 2006, making this makes a difference of 15 years. The authors use many
references to verifycheck their points according to the response achieved through the
survey. The author acknowledges that there is a gap of knowledge and preparation among
nurses about the health of adolescents. The aAuthors’ main concernconcerned is the care,
skill and type of treatment that is giving to the adolescents, especially to the ones that are
from a certain sexual status or preferences., whish I would note that there has not been
any discernable no type of progress to in the education of this type even though we had
have grown to be more open minded or toand we hear more about this topic. It The study
stressed that the majority of the participants has have a great handlingindicate that they
have done well in provding education in their offices on sexual transmission and sexual
education but in contrast that there is not such progress on managingit does not manage
advice concerning sexuality of their sexualism or advice of theon HIV/AIDS.
The study has merit, but the power of the study needs to increase by obtaining a greater
exemplary size.

You might also like