Representing Geography: Geographic Information Systems and Science, 2nd Edition
Representing Geography: Geographic Information Systems and Science, 2nd Edition
Geographic Information Systems and Science, 2nd edition Paul Longley, Michael Goodchild, David Maguire, and David Rhind.
2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBNs: 0-470-87000-1 (HB); 0-470-87001-X (PB)
64 PART II PRINCIPLES
Figure 3.1 Schematic representation of the daily journeys of a sample of residents of Lexington, Kentucky, USA. The horizontal
dimensions represent geographic space and the vertical dimension represents time of day. Each person’s track plots as a
three-dimensional line, beginning at the base in the morning and ending at the top in the evening. (Reproduced with permission of
Mei-Po Kwan)
since representation is at the heart of our ability to solve when decisions have to be made about the geographic
problems using digital tools. Any application of GIS world, it is effective to experiment first on models or rep-
requires clear attention to questions of what should be resentations, exploring different scenarios. Of course this
represented, and how. There is a multitude of possible works only if the representation behaves as the real air-
ways of representing the geographic world in digital form, craft or world does, and a great deal of knowledge must
none of which is perfect, and none of which is ideal for be acquired about the world before an accurate representa-
all applications. tion can be built that permits such simulations. But the use
of representations for training, exploring future scenarios,
The key GIS representation issues are what to and recreating the past is now common in many fields,
represent and how to represent it. including surgery, chemistry, and engineering, and with
technologies like GIS is becoming increasingly common
One of the most important criteria for the usefulness
in dealing with the geographic world.
of a representation is its accuracy. Because the geo-
graphic world is seemingly of infinite complexity, there Many plans for the real world can be tried out first
are always choices to be made in building any represen- on models or representations.
tation – what to include, and what to leave out. When US
President Thomas Jefferson dispatched Meriwether Lewis
to explore and report on the nature of the lands from the
upper Missouri to the Pacific, he said Lewis possessed ‘a
fidelity to the truth so scrupulous that whatever he should
report would be as certain as if seen by ourselves’. But he 3.4 The fundamental problem
clearly didn’t expect Lewis to report everything he saw in
complete detail: Lewis exercised a large amount of judg-
ment about what to report, and what to omit. The question Geographic data are built up from atomic elements, or
of accuracy is taken up at length in Chapter 6. facts about the geographic world. At its most primitive,
One more vital interest drives our need for represen- an atom of geographic data (strictly, a datum) links a
tations of the geographic world, and also the need for place, often a time, and some descriptive property. The
representations in many other human activities. When a first of these, place, is specified in one of several ways
pilot must train to fly a new type of aircraft, it is much that are discussed at length in Chapter 5, and there are
cheaper and less risky for him or her to work with a also many ways of specifying the second, time. We often
flight simulator than with the real aircraft. Flight simu- use the term attribute to refer to the last of these three.
lators can represent a much wider range of conditions For example, consider the statement ‘The temperature at
than a pilot will normally experience in flying. Similarly, local noon on December 2nd 2004 at latitude 34 degrees
CHAPTER 3 REPRESENTING GEOGRAPHY 69
45 minutes north, longitude 120 degrees 0 minutes west, some rapidly. Some attributes are physical or environ-
was 18 degrees Celsius’. It ties location and time to the mental in nature, while others are social or economic.
property or attribute of atmospheric temperature. Some attributes simply identify a place or an entity, dis-
tinguishing it from all other places or entities – examples
Geographic data link place, time, and attributes. include street addresses, social security numbers, or the
Other facts can be broken down into their primitive parcel numbers used for recording land ownership. Other
atoms. For example, the statement ‘Mount Everest is attributes measure something at a location and perhaps at
8848 m high’ can be derived from two atomic geographic a time (e.g., atmospheric temperature or elevation), while
facts, one giving the location of Mt Everest in latitude others classify into categories (e.g., the class of land use,
and longitude, and the other giving the elevation at that differentiating between agriculture, industry, or residential
latitude and longitude. Note, however, that the statement land). Because attributes are important outside the domain
would not be a geographic fact to a community that had of GIS there are standard terms for the different types (see
no way of knowing where Mt Everest is located. Box 3.3).
Many aspects of the Earth’s surface are comparatively
static and slow to change. Height above sea level Geographic attributes are classified as nominal,
changes slowly because of erosion and movements ordinal, interval, ratio, and cyclic.
of the Earth’s crust, but these processes operate on
scales of hundreds or thousands of years, and for most But this idea of recording atoms of geographic infor-
applications except geophysics we can safely omit time mation, combining location, time, and attribute, misses a
from the representation of elevation. On the other hand fundamental problem, which is that the world is in effect
atmospheric temperature changes daily, and dramatic infinitely complex, and the number of atoms required for
changes sometimes occur in minutes with the passage a complete representation is similarly infinite. The closer
of a cold front or thunderstorm, so time is distinctly we look at the world, the more detail it reveals – and it
important, though such climatic variables as mean annual seems that this process extends ad infinitum. The shoreline
temperature can be represented as static. of Maine appears complex on a map, but even more com-
The range of attributes in geographic information is plex when examined in greater detail, and as more detail
vast. We have already seen that some vary slowly and is revealed the shoreline appears to get longer and longer,
Types of attributes
The simplest type of attribute, termed nominal, Attributes are interval if the differences
is one that serves only to identify or distinguish between values make sense. The scale of Celsius
one entity from another. Placenames are a good temperature is interval, because it makes sense
example, as are names of houses, or the numbers to say that 30 and 20 are as different as 20 and
on a driver’s license – each serves only to identify 10. Attributes are ratio if the ratios between
the particular instance of a class of entities and values make sense. Weight is ratio, because it
to distinguish it from other members of the makes sense to say that a person of 100 kg is
same class. Nominal attributes include numbers, twice as heavy as a person of 50 kg; but Celsius
letters, and even colors. Even though a nominal temperature is only interval, because 20 is not
attribute can be numeric it makes no sense to twice as hot as 10 (and this argument applies
apply arithmetic operations to it: adding two to all scales that are based on similarly arbitrary
nominal attributes, such as two drivers’ license zero points, including longitude).
numbers, creates nonsense. In GIS it is sometimes necessary to deal with
Attributes are ordinal if their values have data that fall into categories beyond these
a natural order. For example, Canada rates its four. For example, data can be directional or
agricultural land by classes of soil quality, with cyclic, including flow direction on a map, or
Class 1 being the best, Class 2 not so good, compass direction, or longitude, or month of
etc. Adding or taking ratios of such numbers the year. The special problem here is that the
makes little sense, since 2 is not twice as much number following 359 degrees is 0. Averaging
of anything as 1, but at least ordinal attributes two directions such as 359 and 1 yields 180, so
have inherent order. Averaging makes no sense the average of two directions close to North can
either, but the median, or the value such that appear to be South. Because cyclic data occur
half of the attributes are higher-ranked and half sometimes in GIS, and few designers of GIS
are lower-ranked, is an effective substitute for software have made special arrangements for
the average for ordinal data as it gives a useful them, it is important to be alert to the problems
central value. that may arise.
70 PART II PRINCIPLES
and more and more convoluted (see Figure 4.18). To char- example, in describing the elevation of the Earth’s surface
acterize the world completely we would have to specify we could take advantage of the fact that roughly two-
the location of every person, every blade of grass, and thirds of the surface is covered by water, with its surface
every grain of sand – in fact, every subatomic particle, at sea level. Of the 5 million pieces of information needed
clearly an impossible task, since the Heisenberg uncer- to describe elevation at 10 km resolution, approximately
tainty principle places limits on the ability to measure 3.4 million will be recorded as zero, a colossal waste.
precise positions of subatomic particles. So in practice any If we could find an efficient way of identifying the area
representation must be partial – it must limit the level of covered by water, then we would need only 1.6 million
detail provided, or ignore change through time, or ignore real pieces of information.
certain attributes, or simplify in some other way. Humans have found many ingenious ways of describ-
ing the Earth’s surface efficiently, because the problem
The world is infinitely complex, but computer we are addressing is as old as representation itself, and
systems are finite. Representations must somehow as important for paper-based representations as it is for
limit the amount of detail captured. binary representations in computers. But this ingenuity is
One very common way of limiting detail is by itself the source of a substantial problem for GIS: there
throwing away or ignoring information that applies only are many ways of representing the Earth’s surface, and
to small areas, in other words not looking too closely. users of GIS thus face difficult and at times confusing
The image you see on a computer screen is composed of choices. This chapter discusses some of those choices, and
a million or so basic elements or pixels, and if the whole the issues are pursued further in subsequent chapters on
Earth were displayed at once each pixel would cover an uncertainty (Chapter 6) and data modeling (Chapter 8).
area roughly 10 km on a side, or about 100 sq km. At this Representation remains a major concern of GIScience,
level of detail the island of Manhattan occupies roughly 10 and researchers are constantly looking for ways to extend
pixels, and virtually everything on it is a blur. We would GIS representations to accommodate new types of infor-
say that such an image has a spatial resolution of about mation (Box 3.5).
10 km, and know that anything much less than 10 km
across is virtually invisible. Figure 3.3 shows Manhattan
at a spatial resolution of 250 m, detailed enough to pick
out the shape of the island and Central Park.
It is easy to see how this helps with the problem of 3.5 Discrete objects and
too much information. The Earth’s surface covers about
500 million sq km, so if this level of detail is sufficient continuous fields
for an application, a property of the surface such as
elevation can be described with only 5 million pieces
of information, instead of the 500 million it would take
to describe elevation with a resolution of 1 km, and
the 500 trillion (500 000 000 000 000) it would take to 3.5.1 Discrete objects
describe elevation with 1 m resolution.
Another strategy for limiting detail is to observe that Mention has already been made of the level of detail as
many properties remain constant over large areas. For a fundamental choice in representation. Another, perhaps
even more fundamental choice, is between two conceptual
schemes. There is good evidence that we as humans like to
simplify the world around us by naming things, and seeing
individual things as instances of broader categories. We
prefer a world of black and white, of good guys and bad
guys, to the real world of shades of gray.
The two fundamental ways of representing
geography are discrete objects and
continuous fields.
This preference is reflected in one way of viewing
the geographic world, known as the discrete object view.
In this view, the world is empty, except where it is
occupied by objects with well-defined boundaries that
are instances of generally recognized categories. Just as
Figure 3.3 An image of Manhattan taken by the MODIS the desktop is littered with books, pencils, or computers,
instrument on board the TERRA satellite on September 12, the geographic world is littered with cars, houses, lamp-
2001. MODIS has a spatial resolution of about 250 m, detailed posts, and other discrete objects. Thus the landscape
enough to reveal the coarse shape of Manhattan and to identify of Minnesota is littered with lakes, and the landscape
the Hudson and East Rivers, the burning World Trade Center of Scotland is littered with mountains. One characteristic
(white spot), and Central Park (the gray blur with the of the discrete object view is that objects can be counted,
Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis Reservoir visible as a black dot) so license plates issued by the State of Minnesota carry
CHAPTER 3 REPRESENTING GEOGRAPHY 71
the legend ‘10 000 lakes’, and climbers know that there
are exactly 284 mountains in Scotland over 3000 ft (the
so-called Munros, from Sir Hugh Munro who originally
listed 277 of them in 1891 – the count was expanded to
284 in 1997).
The discrete object view represents the geographic
world as objects with well-defined boundaries in
otherwise empty space.
Biological organisms fit this model well, and this
allows us to count the number of residents in an area
of a city, or to describe the behavior of individual bears.
Manufactured objects also fit the model, and we have
little difficulty counting the number of cars produced in
a year, or the number of airplanes owned by an airline.
But other phenomena are messier. It is not at all clear
what constitutes a mountain, for example, or exactly how Figure 3.5 Bears are easily conceived as discrete objects,
a mountain differs from a hill, or when a mountain with maintaining their identity as objects through time and
surrounded by empty space
two peaks should be counted as two mountains.
Geographic objects are identified by their dimensional-
ity. Objects that occupy area are termed two-dimensional, The discrete object view leads to a powerful way of
and generally referred to as areas. The term polygon is representing geographic information about objects. Think
also common for technical reasons explained later. Other of a class of objects of the same dimensionality – for
objects are more like one-dimensional lines, including example, all of the Brown bears (Figure 3.5) in the Kenai
roads, railways, or rivers, and are often represented as Peninsula of Alaska. We would naturally think of these
one-dimensional objects and generally referred to as lines. objects as points. We might want to know the sex of
Other objects are more like zero-dimensional points, such each bear, and its date of birth, if our interests were in
as individual animals or buildings, and are referred to monitoring the bear population. We might also have a
as points. collar on each bear that transmitted the bear’s location
Of course, in reality, all objects that are perceptible to at regular intervals. All of this information could be
humans are three dimensional, and their representation in expressed in a table, such as the one shown in Table 3.1,
fewer dimensions can be at best an approximation. But the with each row corresponding to a different discrete object,
ability of GIS to handle truly three-dimensional objects and each column to an attribute of the object. To reinforce
as volumes with associated surfaces is very limited. a point made earlier, this is a very efficient way of
Some GIS allow for a third (vertical) coordinate to be capturing raw geographic information on Brown bears.
specified for all point locations. Buildings are sometimes But it is not perfect as a representation for all
represented by assigning height as an attribute, though if geographic phenomena. Imagine visiting the Earth from
this option is used it is impossible to distinguish flat roofs another planet, and asking the humans what they chose as
from any other kind. Various strategies have been used for a representation for the infinitely complex and beautiful
representing overpasses and underpasses in transportation environment around them. The visitor would hardly be
networks, because this information is vital for navigation impressed to learn that they chose tables, especially when
but not normally represented in strictly two-dimensional the phenomena represented were natural phenomena such
network representations. One common strategy is to as rivers, landscapes, or oceans. Nothing on the natural
represent turning options at every intersection – so an Earth looks remotely like a table. It is not at all clear how
overpass appears in the database as an intersection with the properties of a river should be represented as a table,
no turns (Figure 3.4). or the properties of an ocean. So while the discrete object
72 PART II PRINCIPLES
Table 3.1 Example of representation of geographic in a landscape that has been worn down by glaciation
information as a table: the locations and attributes of each of or flattened by blowing sand than one recently created
four Brown bears in the Kenai Peninsula of Alaska. Locations by cooling lava. Cliffs are places in continuous fields
have been obtained from radio collars. Only one location is where elevation changes suddenly, rather than smoothly.
shown for each bear, at noon on July 31 2003 (imaginary data) Population density is a kind of continuous field, defined
everywhere as the number of people per unit area, though
Bear Sex Estimated Date of collar Location, the definition breaks down if the field is examined
ID year of installation noon on 31 July so closely that the individual people become visible.
birth 2003 Continuous fields can also be created from classifications
of land, into categories of land use, or soil type. Such
001 M 1999 02242003 −150.6432, 60.0567 fields change suddenly at the boundaries between different
002 F 1997 03312003 −149.9979, 59.9665 classes. Other types of fields can be defined by continuous
003 F 1994 04212003 −150.4639, 60.1245 variation along lines, rather than across space. Traffic
004 F 1995 04212003 −150.4692, 60.1152 density, for example, can be defined everywhere on a
road network, and flow volume can be defined everywhere
on a river. Figure 3.6 shows some examples of field-
view works well for some kinds of phenomena, it misses like phenomena.
the mark badly for others. Continuous fields can be distinguished by what is
being measured at each point. Like the attribute types
discussed in Box 3.3, the variable may be nominal,
3.5.2 Continuous fields ordinal, interval, ratio, or cyclic. A vector field assigns
two variables, magnitude and direction, at every point in
While we might think of terrain as composed of discrete space, and is used to represent flow phenomena such as
mountain peaks, valleys, ridges, slopes, etc., and think winds or currents; fields of only one variable are termed
of listing them in tables and counting them, there are scalar fields.
unresolvable problems of definition for all of these Here is a simple example illustrating the difference
objects. Instead, it is much more useful to think of terrain between the discrete object and field conceptualizations.
as a continuous surface, in which elevation can be defined Suppose you were hired for the summer to count the
rigorously at every point (see Box 3.4). Such continuous number of lakes in Minnesota, and promised that your
surfaces form the basis of the other common view of answer would appear on every license plate issued by the
geographic phenomena, known as the continuous field state. The task sounds simple, and you were happy to
view (and not to be confused with other meanings of get the job. But on the first day you started to run into
the word field). In this view the geographic world can difficulty (Figure 3.7). What about small ponds, do they
be described by a number of variables, each measurable count as lakes? What about wide stretches of rivers? What
at any point on the Earth’s surface, and changing in value about swamps that dry up in the summer? What about a
across the surface. lake with a narrow section connecting two wider parts, is
it one lake or two? Your biggest dilemma concerns the
The continuous field view represents the real scale of mapping, since the number of lakes shown on a
world as a finite number of variables, each one map clearly depends on the map’s level of detail – a more
defined at every possible position.
detailed map almost certainly will show more lakes.
Your task clearly reflects a discrete object view of the
Objects are distinguished by their dimensions, and phenomenon. The action of counting implies that lakes are
naturally fall into categories of points, lines, or areas. discrete, two-dimensional objects littering an otherwise
Continuous fields, on the other hand, can be distinguished empty geographic landscape. In a continuous field view,
by what varies, and how smoothly. A continuous field on the other hand, all points are either lake or non-lake.
of elevation, for example, varies much more smoothly Moreover, we could refine the scale a little to take account
2.5 dimensions
Areas are two-dimensional objects, and volumes representation is only necessary in areas with
are three dimensional, but GIS users sometimes an abundance of overhanging cliffs or caves,
talk about ‘2.5-D’. Almost without exception the if these are important features. The idea of
elevation of the Earth’s surface has a single value dealing with a three-dimensional phenomenon
at any location (exceptions include overhanging by treating it as a single-valued function of two
cliffs). So elevation is conveniently thought of horizontal variables gives rise to the term ‘2.5-
as a continuous field, a variable with a value D’. Figure 3.6B shows an example, in this case an
everywhere in two dimensions, and a full 3-D elevation surface.
CHAPTER 3 REPRESENTING GEOGRAPHY 73
(A)
(B)
Figure 3.6 Examples of field-like phenomena. (A) Image of part of the Dead Sea in the Middle East. The lightness of the image at
any point measures the amount of radiation captured by the satellite’s imaging system. (B) A simulated image derived from the
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, a new source of high-quality elevation data. The image shows the Carrizo Plain area of Southern
California, USA, with a simulated sky and with land cover obtained from other satellite sources (Courtesy NASA/JPL–Caltech)
of marginal cases; for example, we might define the scale would still be problems in defining the levels of the scale).
shown in Table 3.2, which has five degrees of lakeness. Instead of counting, our strategy would be to lay a grid
The complexity of the view would depend on how closely over the map, and assign each grid cell a score on the
we looked, of course, and so the scale of mapping would lakeness scale. The size of the grid cell would determine
still be important. But all of the problems of defining how accurately the result approximated the value we could
a lake as a discrete object would disappear (though there theoretically obtain by visiting every one of the infinite
74 PART II PRINCIPLES
were released from molecules of silver nitrate when the
unstable molecules were exposed to light, thus darkening
the image in proportion to the amount of incident light.
We think of the image as a field of continuous variation
in color or darkness. But when we look at the image,
the eye and brain begin to infer the presence of discrete
objects, such as people, rivers, fields, cars, or houses, as
they interpret the content of the image.
(A)
(B)
Figure 3.11 The six approximate representations of a field used in GIS. (A) Regularly spaced sample points. (B) Irregularly spaced
sample points. (C) Rectangular cells. (D) Irregularly shaped polygons. (E) Irregular network of triangles, with linear variation over
each triangle (the Triangulated Irregular Network or TIN model; the bounding box is shown dashed in this case because the unshown
portions of complete triangles extend outside it). (F) Polylines representing contours (see the discussion of isopleth maps in Box 4.3)
(Courtesy US Geological Survey)
Figure 3.12 Representative radar images showing the evolution of supercell storms that produced F5 tornadoes in Oklahoma City,
May 3, 1999. WSR-88D radar TKLX scanned the supercells every five minutes, but the images shown here were selected
approximately every two hours
their formation. She went on to study paleoclimatology by analyzing soil and speleothem sediments. Both
studies, as well as her dissertation research on wildfire representation, reinforced her interest in developing
conceptual models of processes and examining the relationships between space and time. Since she moved
to the University of Oklahoma, a suite of world-class meteorological research initiatives has offered her
unique opportunities to extend her interest in physics to fundamental research in GIScience through
meteorological applications. Weather and climate offer rich cases that emphasize movement, processes, and
evolution and pose grand challenges to GIScience research regarding representation, object-field duality,
and uncertainty. May enjoys the challenges that ultimately connect to her fundamental interest in how
things work.
computer to distance on the ground; how can there be in Chapter 6, where it is important to the concept of
distances in a computer? What is meant is a little more uncertainty.
complicated: when a scale is quoted for a digital database There is a close relationship between the contents
it is usually the scale of the map that formed the source of a map and the raster and vector representations
of the data. So if a database is said to be at a scale of discussed in the previous section. The US Geological
1:24 000 one can safely assume that it was created from Survey, for example, distributes two digital versions of
a paper map at that scale, and includes representations its topographic maps, one in raster form and one in
of the features that are found on maps at that scale. vector form, and both attempt to capture the contents
Further discussion of scale can be found in Box 4.2 and of the map as closely as possible. In the raster form, or
CHAPTER 3 REPRESENTING GEOGRAPHY 79
Figure 3.14 Part of a Digital Raster Graphic, a scan a US Geological Survey 1:24 000 topographic map
digital raster graphic (DRG), the map is scanned at a representation of the map and its digital equivalent. So it
very high density, using very small pixels, so that the is quite misleading to think of the contents of a digital
raster looks very much like the original (Figure 3.14). representation as a map, and to think of a GIS as a
The coding of each pixel simply records the color of container of digital maps. Digital representations can
the map picked up by the scanner, and the dataset include information that would be very difficult to show
includes all of the textual information surrounding the on maps. For example, they can represent the curved
actual map. surface of the Earth, without the need for the distortions
In the vector form, or digital line graph (DLG), every associated with flattening. They can represent changes,
geographic feature shown on the map is represented as a whereas maps must be static because it is very difficult
point, polyline, or polygon. The symbols used to represent to change their contents once they have been printed or
point features on the map, such as the symbol for a drawn. Digital databases can represent all three spatial
windmill, are replaced in the digital data by points with dimensions, including the vertical, whereas maps must
associated attributes, and must be regenerated when the always show two-dimensional views. So while the paper
data are displayed. Contours, which are shown on the map map is a useful metaphor for the contents of a geographic
as lines of definite width, are replaced by polylines of no database, we must be careful not to let it limit our thinking
width, and given attributes that record their elevations. about what is possible in the way of representation. This
In both cases, and especially in the vector case, issue is pursued at greater length in Chapter 8, and map
there is a significant difference between the analog production is discussed in detail in Chapter 12.
80 PART II PRINCIPLES
Spatial Spatial
Transformation Representation in Transformation Representation in
(Operator) Original Map Generalized Map (Operator) Original Map Generalized Map
At Original Map Scale At Original Map Scale
Simplification
At 50% Scale Smoothing
At 50% Scale
Spatial Spatial
Transformation Representation in Transformation Representation in
(Operator) Original Map Generalized Map (Operator) Original Map Generalized Map
Lake Lake
Pueblo Ruins
Collapse Aggregation Miguel Ruins Ruins
At 50% Scale At 50% Scale
Lake Lake
Pueblo Ruins
Miguel Ruins
Ruins
Spatial Spatial
Transformation Representation in Transformation Representation in
(Operator) Original Map Generalized Map (Operator) Original Map Generalized Map
At Original Map Scale At Original Map Scale
Amalgamation Merge
At 50% Scale At 50% Scale
Spatial Spatial
Transformation Representation in Representation in
Transformation
(Operator) Original Map Generalized Map (Operator) Original Map Generalized Map
At Original Map Scale At Original Map Scale
Inlet Bay
Bay
Inlet Bay
Bay
Inlet
Spatial Spatial
Transformation Representation in Transformation Representation in
(Operator) Original Map Generalized Map (Operator) Original Map Generalized Map
At Original Map Scale At Original Map Scale
Enhancement Displacement
At 50% Scale At 50% Scale
Figure 3.15 Illustrations from McMaster and Shea (1992) of their ten forms of generalization. The original feature is shown at its
original level of detail, and below it at 50% coarser scale. Each generalization technique resolves a specific problem of display at
coarser scale and results in the acceptable version shown in the lower right
82 PART II PRINCIPLES
(A) 4
Tolerance
1
15
(B)
3
2
Questions for further study 4. Identify the limits of your own neighborhood, and
start making a list of the discrete objects you are
1. What fraction of the Earth’s surface have you familiar with in the area. What features are hard to
experienced in your lifetime? Make diagrams like think of as discrete objects? For example, how will
that shown in Figure 3.1, at appropriate levels of you divide up the various roadways in the
detail, to show a) where you have lived in your neighborhood into discrete objects – where do they
lifetime, b) how you spent last weekend. How would begin and end?
you describe what is missing from each of
these diagrams?
2. Table 3.3 summarized some of the arguments Further reading
between raster and vector representations. Expand on Chrisman N.R. 2002 Exploring Geographic Information
these arguments, providing examples, and add any Systems (2nd edn). New York: Wiley.
others that would be relevant in a GIS application. McMaster R.B. and Shea K.S. 1992 Generalization in
3. The early explorers had limited ways of Digital Cartography. Washington, DC: Association of
communicating what they saw, but many were very American Geographers.
effective at it. Examine the published diaries, National Research Council 1999 Distributed Geolibraries:
notebooks, or dispatches of one or two early Spatial Information Resources. Washington, DC:
explorers and look at the methods they used to National Academy Press. Available: www.nap.edu.
communicate with others. What words did they use to
describe unfamiliar landscapes and how did they mix
words with sketches?