6-Year-Follo Up. 3 Steps Techniques. Francesca Valati-1 PDF
6-Year-Follo Up. 3 Steps Techniques. Francesca Valati-1 PDF
6-Year-Follo Up. 3 Steps Techniques. Francesca Valati-1 PDF
506
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
507
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
Fig 1 Sixteen-year-old patient with a very “healthy” oral condition. No caries or periodontal pathologies
were detected. However, at attentive examination, both mandibular first molars revealed a loss of enamel,
dentin exposure, and missing antagonistic contacts. The patient suffered from early dental erosion related
to an excessive consumption of acidic beverages.
508
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
a b
Fig 2 Palatal aspect of two different patients affected by dental erosion. In the less severe case (left), the
incisal edges are thinner, but still maintained; in the second example (right), the undermining of the palatal
surfaces was more conspicuous and the incisal edges had completely fractured off. Often a diagnosis of
eventual parafunctional habits is used to justify the tooth structure loss. However, looking at the contact
points with the antagonistic dentition, in this second patient, it was impossible to identify wear facets.
a b
Fig 3 Patient affected by severe dental erosion. The two central incisors have lost almost half of their original
clinical crown length. The patient was unaware of the degree of their destruction, since the slow supraerup-
tion of the teeth had kept their incisal edges always at an almost correct position. Unusually, in this patient the
mandibular anterior teeth did not supraerupt. Furthermore, the patient developed a gummy smile.
struction can be very subtle and thus aware of the amount of tooth destruc-
difficult to discover due to the somewhat tion. In fact, due to compensatory su-
hidden location of the palatal tooth sur- praeruption, the fractured incisal edges
faces, especially where there is a slow may remain positioned almost at the
progression of the disease. Eventually, same place of the original incisal edges
the palatal destruction will affect the fa- (Figs 3 and 4).
cial aspect of the teeth, leading to the In addition, due to the scarcity of in-
weakening and ultimately shortening of formation about dental erosion, patients
the incisal edges. However, due to the do normally not associate the changing
slow change, patients may not be fully of the shape of the anterior teeth with the
509
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
510
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
a b
Fig 5 Thirty-year-old patient. Ten years earlier, a diagnosis of bruxism was made to explain the degrada-
tion of the patient’s dentition. An occlusal guard was prescribed and worn constantly, as illustrated in (b).
During our consultation, not only were there no corresponding wear facets on the antagonistic teeth, but
the patient could not even bring the opposing occlusal surfaces in close antagonistic contact. Hence, the
parafunctional habit was not the correct diagnosis. On the contrary, the patient was suffering of dental ero-
sion related to an excessive consumption of acidic beverages.
a b
Fig 6 Intraoral view of a patient affected by severe dental erosion at the initial consultation. His chief
complaint was the changing of the shape of his anterior teeth. Even though the maxillary anterior teeth were
severely damaged, the patient did not report any symptoms of pain. He also presented the typical signs of
instability of the occlusion due to severe loss of tooth structure, a supereruption of the mandibular anterior
teeth and the altered occlusal plane (reverse smile), accompanied by an accentuated curve of Spee.
edges of the maxillary anterior teeth are might be surprised about how little of
compromised, conventional crowns for the original tooth is left after conven-
all involved teeth are often proposed to tional crown preparation (Fig 7). What
the patient. still remains of these maxillary anterior
In case of severe dental erosion, teeth after years of degradation would
however, the amount of the remaining be removed, in the case of crown thera-
tooth structure (especially in deep bite py, to guarantee the path of insertion of
patients) could be misleading and one the crowns (mesial and distal aspects)
511
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
Fig 7 Deep bite patient suffering from erosion. The facial aspect of the teeth is almost intact but very
undermined. In this patient, crown preparation would lead to the almost complete removal of the coronal
part of the tooth and elective endodontic treatment would then be necessary.
512
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
513
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
a b
Fig 10 Maxillary occlusal view of the palatal aspect of two patients, both affected by dental erosion.
Intercepting an ACE class I patient (a), when the enamel is thinner, but still intact, will lead to the complete
resolution of the dental problem, since only preventive measures are necessary at this stage. An ACE class
IV patient (b), instead, needs a full-mouth rehabilitation. The difference of age between these two patients
was only 10 years. The dental erosion etiology was the same (bulimia).
514
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
515
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Table 1 List of the patients classified according to their gender, age, ACE classification and time of func-
tion of the final restorations, delivered at the level of the maxillary anterior teeth
FV PV
Indi-
Direct Direct Indirect
rect
1 M 31 V 13–23 13–23 65 68
13–11
2 M 46 IV 13–23 22 68 72 72
21, 23
3 M 50 V 13–23 13–23 48 53
4 F 42 IV 13–23 13–23 66 67
5 M 64 VI 13–23 13–23 67 71
6 F 35 IV 13-23 13–23 76 71
7 F 27 IV 12–22 13–23 24 18
8 F 36 V 12–22 13–23 33 36
9 F 31 IV 12–22 12–22 44 47
10 M 40 IV 13–23 13–23 50 54
11 M 34 IV 12–22 13–23 23 43
12 M 37 IV 13–23 13–23 31 32
8 IV 3 V
Total 5F 7M 64 19 D 51 ID
1 VI
Interestingly, before entering the Ge- were not sent for an evaluation of their
neva Erosion Study, only three patients digestive system. For all the others an
were aware that the cause of their dental upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and
status was related to acidity in the oral 24 hour pH monitoring were performed.
cavity. According to the ACE classifica- The respective investigations confirmed
tion, there were eight ACE class IV, three in 6 patients the presence of gastroe-
ACE class V, and one ACE class VI pa- sophageal reflux and those individuals
tients (Table 1). received medical treatment accordingly
Before starting the treatment, a con- (proton pump inhibitors therapy). For the
sultation with an expert in cranioman- remaining patient, the only possible eti-
dibular disorders and one with a gas- ology of the observed erosion was ex-
troenterologist were provided. Only the cessive ingestion of acidic beverages
patients affected by bulimia (5 out of 12) (eg, carbonated sodas), a habit con-
516
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
firmed later by the patient. For all pa- Following an equal protocol, after 1
tients, dental treatment started before month of functioning without anterior
the erosive process was under control. guidance, six palatal composite restor-
The rationale behind this choice was ations were placed and the anterior con-
to cover and seal the exposed dentin tacts reestablished (step 3 of the 3-step
as soon as possible, and thereby pro- technique). According to the given in-
tecting the involved teeth from further terocclusal space, it was decided for
damage caused by both the acid attack each individual patient whether direct
and the attrition of the antagonistic teeth or indirect restorations were best suited.
(dentin and pulp protection). When the distance to the antagonistic
A vitality test was performed using teeth was more than 1 mm, an indirect
cotton pellets soaked with coolant approach was preferred. Overall, 51 in-
(Endo-Ice Refrigerant Spray, Coltène/ direct and 19 direct restorations were
Whaledent) on all the teeth (except when placed.
radiographies confirmed a previous root When the indirect approach was se-
canal treatment), and surprisingly the lected, the palatal aspect of the max-
majority of teeth were still vital, despite illary anterior teeth was prepared ac-
the advanced loss of tooth structure. cording to the same protocol as for the
Interestingly, only three patients com- direct approach, before taking the final
plained about thermal tooth sensitivity. impression. First, the palatal dentin was
A concomitant diagnosis of parafunc- cleaned with a nonfluoride-containing
tional habits (bruxism and/or clenching) pumice prophylaxis paste. The exposed
was registered for 4 of the 12 patients; sclerotic dentin was gently roughened
however, before treatment only 2 pa- with a coarse diamond bur, to remove the
tients were wearing an occlusal appli- most superficial layer, and then immedi-
ance (guard). ately sealed. The surface was etched for
Three patients were also smokers. 15 seconds with 37% phosphoric acid,
This is particularly important information abundantly rinsed with water, dried, and
when it comes to the evaluation of the then the primer and the bond were ap-
status of the periodontal tissues. plied, following the manufacturer’s in-
All 12 patients received a full-mouth ad- structions (Optibond FL, Kerr). A flow-
hesive rehabilitation, following the same able composite was subsequently used
protocol (the 3-step technique).43-45. to thicken the hybrid layer (Tetric flow T,
An increase in vertical dimension Ivoclar Vivadent). Prior to taking the fi-
of occlusion (VDO) was arbitrarily de- nal impression, the periphery of the pre-
cided on the casts articulated in max- pared surface was gently touched with
imum intercuspation position (MIP), and a slowly rotating diamond bur to remove
transferred to the mouth by means of any eventual adhesive resin from the
posterior provisional composite restor- enamel finish line.46-50
ations (step 2 of the 3-step technique). Also still prior to impression taking,
Due to the presence of these posterior the interproximal contact zones between
restorations, an anterior open bite was the maxillary anterior teeth were slightly
created. opened using thin diamond strips, and
517
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
518
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
al edge was shortened and the length pared teeth was air abraded (Cojet, 3M
created by the palatal veneer was re- Espe), and the existing enamel etched
moved (butt joint preparation). Particular (37% phosphoric acid) for 30 seconds.
attention was paid to rounding off all the A coat of adhesive resin (Optibond FL)
line angles. In case of dentin exposure, was applied, but not cured before seating
immediate dentin sealing (Optibond FL the restoration. A warmed-up compos-
and Tetric flow) was performed, as pre- ite was then applied to the restorations
viously explained. A retraction cord size (Miris, Coltene/Whaledent), before pos-
zero was applied (GingiBraid, DuxDen- itioning them on the teeth and light cur-
tal), and the impression taken (Express ing. Any excess of the luting composite
2 3M ESPE). Temporary restorations was carefully removed before the poly-
were performed chairside using a provi- merization; however, after removal of the
sional composite material (Telio, Ivoclar rubber dam, additional cleaning of the
Vivadent), molded to the prepared teeth gingival margins was performed if ne-
with a well-adapted silicon key, previ- cessary, but only using a scalpel. No ro-
ously used for the diagnostic mock-up. tary instruments were used. Finally, stat-
Since no cement was utilized, sufficient ic and dynamic occlusion was checked
retention for two weeks of clinical service and adjusted if indicated.
was achieved by both the contraction of After the restoration of the maxillary
the product and the presence of minimal anterior teeth, the patients’ treatment
interproximal excess. A total of 64 FVs continued with the replacement of the
were fabricated in the laboratory using provisional posterior restorations by final
feldspathic porcelain (Creation CC, Willi adhesive restorations (full-mouth adhe-
Geller International), following standard sive rehabilitation).
laboratory procedures, including refrac- Finally, at the end of the treatment, a
tory dies. Three different commercial Michigan-type occlusal appliance was
dental laboratories were involved. delivered to patients also affected by
The bonding of the facial veneers was parafunctional habits (4 out of the 12
carried out 2 weeks after impression tak- patients). All the patients enrolled in
ing, and followed the protocol developed the Geneva Erosion Study are sched-
and published by Magne et al.51-54 The uled for an annual check-up where
rubber dam was placed and each ven- intra- and extraoral photographs are
eer was bonded individually. The intag- taken, occlusion is controlled and sev-
lio surfaces of the ceramic veneers were eral clinical parameters are evaluated;
etched for 60 s with hydrofluoric acid, consequently all the records of the pa-
and then placed in alcohol and ultrason- tients participating in this study were
ically cleaned for 6 min. Subsequently, updated yearly. All clinical evaluations
three coats of silane (Silicup, Heraeus, were performed using standard dental
or Mondobond plus, Ivoclar Vivadent) diagnostic instruments and visual in-
were applied and dried in the oven for spection with the aid of magnification
1 min at 100ºC. Finally, a coat of bond (x2.5) (ErgoVision HD Telescope; Sur-
(Optibond FL, Kerr) was applied without giTel) and a state-of-the-art dental unit
curing. The sealed dentin on the pre- with overhead lighting.
519
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Table 2 Modified USPHS Criteria applied for the Table 3 Detailed description of the teeth restored
clinical evaluation of five clinical parameters select- with various types of palatal and facial veneers
ed for the study
Secondary
Delta
decay
The subjective patient satisfaction is
Alpha None measured by using visual analogue
Bravo Discrete crack scales (VAS).
Restoration failure
Charlie Chipping The VAS analyzed not only the pa-
Delta Bulk fracture tient’s satisfaction from an esthetic point
Alpha None of view, but it also took into considera-
Postoperative tion the patient’s perception of the over-
Bravo Moderate
Sensitivity (air)
all treatment time, how the treatment
Charlie Severe
was structured, and how the different
therapeutic phases were handled by the
clinician. Descriptive statistical methods
The restorations were analyzed fol- were implemented to analyze the data
lowing the well-established US Pub- collected from this clinical trial.
lic Health Service (USPHS) evaluation
method.55,56 The scoring system is de-
fined as follows (Table 2): Results
Alpha: excellent result, restorations
without changes or clinically ideal. A total of 70 palatal and 64 facial restor-
Bravo: acceptable result, restorations ations were delivered to the 12 patients
with changes that are clinically ac- participating in the study (Table 3).
ceptable and do not require replace- The noticeable discrepancy between
ment. the number of PV and FV (70 versus
Charlie: unacceptable, restorations 64) is explained by the systematically
with major changes that require re- applied strategy of minimally invasive
placement to prevent further deterio- dentistry adopted in the Geneva Ero-
ration. sion Study. In fact, 2 of the 24 canines
Delta: unacceptable, immediate re- did not require palatal veneers, and 6
placement necessary. (25%) of the same 24 canines did not
520
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
Veneers
Clinical results for the palatal veneers (PVs). Numbers 1 to 12 correspond to the patients examined (I= Indirect; D=Direct)
50
50
51
to the central and lateral maxillary
1
I
incisors, however, all had to be re-
19
19
19
stored with both palatal and facial
D
veneers, due to the advanced state
6
I
of dental erosion.
12
D
Six of the 24 maxillary canines in-
volved in the study were considered
6
I
perfectly rehabilitated after the res-
11
D
toration of their palatal aspect with
6
palatal veneers. Consequently, no
I
10
further treatment was considered
D
necessary for these teeth.
4
I
To avoid bias, the recall assess-
D
9
ments were not performed by the
same clinician who had placed the
6
restorations. Seventy palatal ve- I
D
8
6
I
6
The mean observation time of the
palatal veneers was 50.3 months
I
6
The results of the clinical evaluation
are presented in Table 4. As for the
I
6
I
5
5
I
6
6
I
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Bravo
Alpha
Bravo
Alpha
Alpha
Bravo
Delta
Delta
Marginal
adapta-
Table 4
failure
ation
seal
signs of infiltration.
521
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
63
58
63
64
one of the six PVs was rated
1
“Bravo”, because it was con-
sidered to be superficially
discolored.
12
6
The clinical performance
of the 64 FVs over a period of
11
1
3
4
4
1.9 to 6.3 years was favora-
ble too. The mean observa-
10
1
5
5
6
All FV restorations were rat-
ed “Alpha” for the marginal
9
4
4
4
adaptation, except one, rat-
ed “Bravo”.
The marginal seal of all
8
2
2
4
4
the FV was rated “Alpha”,
except for six teeth, where
7
1
3
4
6
6
6
6
(Table 5).
None of the restorations
(FV and PV) failed over the
3
6
6
6
Clinical results for the facial veneers
6
6
6
6
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Bravo
Bravo
Alpha
Bravo
Alpha
Bravo
Delta
Delta
Delta
Restoration
522
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
a b
Fig 11 Palatal view, initial status and 6-year follow-up of a heavy smoker patient included in the Geneva
Erosion Study. Note the no infiltrated margins between the composite palatal and the ceramic facial ve-
neers. The picture was taken without any previous cleaning of the restorations.
(Endo-Ice® Refrigerant Spray; Coltène/ Table 6 Summary of gingival and plaque record-
ings.
Whaledent). Thanks to the ultrathin facial
veneers, it was possible to reliably as-
Patient details N = 12
sess the vitality of all the restored teeth.
None of them lost their vitality during the BOP 13.3%
523
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
Fig 12 (a and b) Initial status and after 3-year follow-up of a bulimic patient included in the Geneva Erosion
Study.
a b
Fig 13 (a and b) Initial status and 5 year folllow-up. This patient was the most extreme case included in
the Geneva erosion study. The maxillary anterior teeth were restored with two veneers (palatal and facial),
with minimal if any tooth preparation. After 5 years of clinical service, the veneers presented still excellent
conditions, despite the initial lack of facial enamel, the type of occlusion, and reduced clinical crown hight.
None of the teeth lost their vitality.
524
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
ation and the establishment of adequate tremely compromised tooth structure, ie,
retention and resistance form are still mainly eroded sclerotic dentin.
considered by numerous clinicians as In fact, the dentin was often extensive-
being more reliable than bonding. This ly exposed on both the palatal and the
conception was, and still is, leading to a facial aspect, and its quality was all but
high number of crowns delivered to re- ideal for predictable bonding, due to its
store such teeth. Unfortunately, accord- either sclerotic or over-etched character.
ing to this strategy aiming to provide Before 2012, there was literally no robust
more long lasting restorations, addition- scientific documentation available as a
al precious tooth structure must be sac- basis for determining the correct way of
rificed. In this study the involved anter- bonding to such eroded dentin.70
ior maxillary teeth were all ranging from Without adequate literature support, it
ACE class IV to VI, representing a real was decided – in the context of the Ge-
challenge for the restorative dentist. The neva Erosion Study – to apply a uniform
population of patients treated featured protocol consisting of the gentle removal
not only extensive dentin exposure, but of the most superficial dentinal layer, fol-
frequently also short clinical crowns. In lowed by etching the remaining dentin
fact, the final restoration length often al- for only 15 s, and to subsequently seal
most doubled the initial one. For the ma- this conditioned surface. The follow-
jority of the teeth involved in this study, up examination confirmed the efficacy
endodontic treatment would have been of the described approach in terms of
required, as well as crown lengthening, thermal isolation as no postdelivery sen-
to obtain adequate retention and resist- sitivity of the restorations was reported.
ance form for the restorations if con- Interestingly, in case of existing tooth
ventional crown preparation had been sensitivity before treatment, it was large-
performed (biological failure). In order ly improved, if not completely eliminated
to preserve the remaining tooth structure after completion of the restorations.
to a maximum and to not further weaken In retrospect, the choice of maintain-
the already compromised dentition, two ing a maximum of the remaining tooth
separate veneers (a palatal and a facial structure, and the strategy of placing two
one) were delivered for each maxillary independent restorations with two differ-
anterior tooth treated. While there is a ent paths of insertion (no problem with
strong body of evidence in the litera- undercuts and therefore no need for re-
ture regarding the longevity of so-called moval of the mesial and distal marginal
classical facial veneers, reliable data on ridges) has been validated by the favora-
the clinical performance of dual veneer ble outcome in terms of biological suc-
restorations is still lacking. cess presented in this study. All the teeth
When the present study was initiated, that had tested vital before treatment kept
concerns were raised on how two ve- their vitality throughout all follow-up ex-
neers, made of different materials (com- aminations. It should be underlined that
posite on the one hand and ceramics on several of the restored teeth presented
the other) could be predictably bonded, an initial clinical crown height that was
not only between them, but also to ex- almost doubled by the final veneers.
525
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
This was even the case in some patients a more recent in vitro study published by
where occlusal parafunctional habits had Gresnigt et al,76 it was concluded that
been diagnosed at the initial examination. ceramic veneers bonded to composite
Also under these specific conditions, no restorations provided favorable results,
failure of the described adhesive restor- supporting the previous clinical findings
ations was observed to date, indicating of the same group.77
that the patients were obviously compli- Only one tooth in the present study
ant in terms of systematically wearing was rated “Bravo”, the defect was con-
their occlusal appliances. sidered acceptable in the palatal junc-
In terms of longevity of anterior bond- tion between the facial and the palatal
ed ceramic restorations, Magne et al71 veneer and it did not require repair.
reported a 0% frequency of clinically un- However, since Peumans et al59 re-
acceptable fractures (ie, fractures that ported that veneers with restoration
would require a complete replacement margins located in composite fillings
of the restoration. These findings were showed a secondary caries incidence
also confirmed by other authors, who of 10% after 10 years, long-term follow-
published similar low failure percent- ups are needed to determine how the
ages.72-74 In the present study, only one union between the two veneers will age.
patient presented a crack at the the me- Despite the rather short observa-
sial surface level of a central incisor’s tion time of this study and considering
facial veneer. The crack was discovered the severely compromised initial status
after the delivery of the restoration at the of the teeth involved, the combination
1-week follow-up. of separate palatal and facial veneers
The respective veneer was extremely showed very promising results up to 6
thin, due to the current tendency to limit years of follow-up, revealing a survival
tooth preparation to a minimum. Poly- rate of 100%.
merization shrinkage of the luting com- Thanks to the Sandwich Approach,
posite could have led to critical stress the remaining tooth structure was pre-
concentrations between the adhesive served to a maximum, no respective
interface and the ceramic subsurface.75 mucogingival surgery was necessary
The crack was stable at the 2-year (except one case, done for esthetic rea-
follow-up, revealing an intact adhesive sons) and no elective endodontic tre-
bond between tooth, composite and watment was performed.
ceramic. This finding is in line with ob- At the level of the anterior teeth, the
servations reported by other authors on enamel was reduced but still present at
the presence and evolution of cracks in the cervical (palatally), mesial, distal and
ceramic veneers, and similarities drawn facial aspects providing a strong scaf-
relative to cracks in enamel. Secondary fold for the restorations. Thanks to the
caries did not occur at any of the ven- Sandwich Approach this enamel frame-
eer restorations, despite the fact that work was almost completely preserved.
the ceramic facial veneers were exten- In 2008, Vailati and Belser formulated
sively in contact with the palatal com- the Tennis Racket theory,43 to justify the
posite veneers at the palatal aspect. In bilaminar technique. According to this
526
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
theory, the author believes that the pres- comprehensive dental treatment plan. In
ence of an enamel framework is crucial this context, three different success cri-
for the strength of the anterior teeth, like teria should be considered, ie, biological,
the marginal ridges in the premolars. mechanical, and esthetic success.
Any attempt to remove it may lead to a It appears obvious that a restoration
weakening of the entire structure and an should integrate as close as possible
increase of the tooth flexibility. The pala- to the adjacent dentition (esthetic suc-
tal veneers not only reinforce the tooth, cess) and it should also be sufficiently
but most of all stop the progression of resistant to last a reasonable amount of
its destruction. Thanks to the bonding to time (mechanical success).
the remaining peripheral enamel, these What is not always explained correctly
restorations show a very satisfactory to patients is the amount of tooth struc-
mid- to long-term clinical performance. ture “iatrogenically” removed to achieve
Finally, all the teeth maintained pulp the two above-mentioned elements of
vitality, even when the erosive destruc- success and the associated negative
tion of the palatal aspect had almost ex- consequences in the long run.
posed the pulp. No hypersensitivity was In fact, preservation of mineralized
developed and, if present before the tooth structure and maintenance of pulp
treatment, the tooth protection related vitality (both directly linked to biological
to the adhesive techniques had clearly success), are not often considered by
improved the original symptoms. patients as key factors at the moment
It could be concluded that the early of accepting proposed dental therapies.
intervention to protect the pulp without Typically, patients affected by severe
waiting for the erosive pathology to be dental erosion present an already exten-
under control played a key role in the sive loss of mineralized tooth structure.
tooth vitality preservation. Hence, their restorative therapy should
The purely additive strategy utilized be even more based on a minimal inva-
in case of the palatal veneers, which re- sive approach to guarantee the so cru-
quired no tooth preparation, proved its cial biological success.
validity as translated by 100% biological As conventional crowns are clearly
success. Despite the recommendations considered a too aggressive approach,
made by several authors,78 in the au- this cohort of patients affected by den-
thors’ opinion dental treatment should tal erosion have been treated in accord-
be initiated as soon as possible in case ance with the guidelines of the “3-step
of erosion patients, even when the path- technique,” using exclusively adhesive
ology is still active, as in the case of bu- techniques with the maximum preserva-
limic patients. tion of tooth structure.
In this article, the up to 6-year fol-
low-up of 12 patients affected by se-
Conclusion vere dental erosion and subsequently
treated with minimally invasive adhe-
The promotion of long-lasting oral func- sive techniques, is illustrated. Based
tion should be the primary objective in any on the mid-term results, it has been
527
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
shown that two separate veneers (one tive in comparison to full crowns. These
facial, one palatal) can reliably restore encouraging results from a biological,
a maxillary anterior tooth, even in case mechanical, and esthetic success point
of severely compromised eroded denti- of view, should seriously question if con-
tion. Thus the described treatment ap- ventional full crowns in the anterior sex-
proach clearly represents an excellent tants are still indicated to treat this par-
and tooth structure-preserving alterna- ticular population of patients.
528
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
VAILATI ET AL
Treat Severe Dental Erosion: clinical report. J Prosthodont Implants Res 2007;18(Suppl
A Case Report. J Adhes 2003 Dec;12:255–259. 3):97–113.
Dent 2012;14:83–92. 31. Ambard A, Mueninghoff L. 40. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA.
22. Guo J, Reside G, Cooper LF. Rehabilitation of a bulimic Tooth structure removal
Full-mouth rehabilitation patient using endosteal associated with various
of a patient with gastroe- implants. J Prosthodont preparation designs for an-
sophageal reflux disease: a 2002;11:176–180. terior teeth. J Prosthet Dent
clinical report. J Prosthodont 32. Bonilla ED, Luna O. Oral reha- 2002;87(5):503-9.
2011;20 (Suppl 2):S9–S13. bilitation of a bulimic patient: a 41. Wood KC, Berzins DW,
23. Spreafico RC. Composite case report. Quintessence Int Luo Q, Thompson GA,
resin rehabilitation of eroded 2001;32:469–475. Toth JM, Nagy WW. Resist-
dentition in a bulimic patient: 33. Bartlett D. Intrinsic causes ance to fracture of two all-
a case report. Eur J Esthet of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci ceramic crown materials fol-
Dent 2010;5:28–48. 2006;20:119–139. lowing endodontic access. J
24. El Aidi H, Bronkhorst EM, 34. Beier US, Kapferer I, Dum- Prosthet Dent 2006;95:33–34.
Huysmans MC, Truin GJ. fahrt H. Clinical long-term 42. Vailati F, Belser UC. Classi-
Dynamics of tooth erosion evaluation and failure fication and treatment of the
in adolescents: a 3-year characteristics of 1,335 all- anterior maxillary dentition
longitudinal study. J Dent ceramic restorations. Int J affected by dental erosion:
2010;38:131–137. Prosthodont 2012;25:70–78. the ACE classification. Int
25. Reston EG, Closs LQ, 35. Wolleb K, Sailer I, Thoma A, J Periodontics Restorative
Busato AL, Broliato GA, Menghini G, Hammerle CH. Dent 2010;30:559–571.
Tessarollo FR. Restoration of Clinical and radiographic 43. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-
occlusal vertical dimension evaluation of patients receiv- mouth adhesive rehabilitation
in dental erosion caused by ing both tooth- and implant- of a severely eroded den-
gastroesophageal reflux: supported prosthodontic tition: the three-step tech-
case report. Oper Dent treatment after 5 years of nique. Part 3. Eur J Esthet
2010;35:125–129. function. Int J Prosthodont Dent 2008; 3:236–257.
26. Schmidlin PR, Filli T, Imfeld C, 2012;25:252–259. 44. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-
Tepper S, Attin T. Three- 36. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, mouth adhesive rehabilitation
year evaluation of posterior Sadan A. Biomechanical of a severely eroded den-
vertical bite reconstruction considerations for the res- tition: the three-step tech-
using direct resin composite toration of endodontically nique. Part 2. Eur J Esthet
– a case series. Oper Dent treated teeth: a systematic Dent 2008; 3:128–146.
2009;34:102–108. review of the literature, Part II 45. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-
27. Magne P, Magne M, Bel- (Evaluation of fatigue behav- mouth adhesive rehabilitation
ser UC. Adhesive restor- ior, interfaces, and in vivo of a severely eroded den-
ations, centric relation, and studies). Quintessence Int tition: the three-step tech-
the Dahl principle: mini- 2008;39:117–129. nique. Part 1. Eur J Esthet
mally invasive approaches 37. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Dent 2008;3:30–44.
to localized anterior tooth Sadan A. Biomechanical 46. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D.
erosion. Eur J Esthet Dent considerations for the res- Immediate dentin sealing
2007;2:260–273. toration of endodontically supports delayed restoration
28. Hayashi M, Shimizu K, treated teeth: a systematic placement. J Prosthet Dent
Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Restor- review of the literature – 2007;98:166–174.
ation of erosion associated Part 1. Composition and 47. Magne P, Kim TH,
with gastroesophageal reflux micro- and macrostructure- Cascione D, Donovan TE.
caused by anorexia ner- alterations. Quintessence Int Immediate dentin sealing
vosa using ceramic laminate 2007;38:733–743. improves bond strength of
veneers: a case report. Oper 38. Cheung GS, Lai SC, Ng RP. indirect restorations. J Pros-
Dent 2007;32:306–310. Fate of vital pulps beneath thet Dent 2005;94:511–519.
29. Kavoura V, Kourtis SG, a metal-ceramic crown or a 48. Magne P. Immediate dentin
Zoidis P, Andritsakis DP, bridge retainer. Int Endod J sealing: a fundamental pro-
Doukoudakis A. Full-mouth 2005 Aug;38:521–530. cedure for indirect bonded
rehabilitation of a patient 39. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, restorations. J Esthet Restor
with bulimia nervosa. A case Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Dent 2005;17:144–154.
report. Quintessence Int Comparison of survival and 49. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The
2005;36:501–510. complication rates of tooth- “Dual Bonding Technique”
30. Van Roekel NB. Gastro- supported fixed dental pros- - A modified method to
esophageal reflux disease, theses (FDPs) and implant- improve adhesive luting pro-
tooth erosion, and pros- supported FDPs and single cedures. Int J Periodont Rest
thodontic rehabilitation: a crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Dent 1997;17:537–545.
529
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
50. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, 60. Aristidis G, Dimitra B. Five 70. Zimmerli B, De Munck J,
Lüthy H, Schärer P. Dual year clinical performance Lussi A, Lambrechts P, Van
application of dentin bond- of porcelain laminate Meerbeek B. Long-term
ing agents: Effect on veneers. Quintessence Int bonding to eroded dentin
bond strength. Am J Dent 2002;33:185–189. requires superficial bur prep-
1996;9:115–119. 61. Meijering AC, Roeters FJ, aration. Clin Oral Investig
51. Magne P, Belser UC. Novel Mulder J, Creugers NH. 2012;16:1451–1461.
porcelain laminate prepar- Patients’ satisfaction with 71. Magne P, Perroud R,
ation approach driven by a different types of ven- Hodges JS, Belser UC.
diagnostic mock-up. J Esthet eer restorations. J Dent Performance of novel-design
Restor Dent 2004;6:7–16. 1997;25:493–497. porcelain veneers for the
52. Magne P, Perroud R, Hod- 62. Dumfahart H, Schaffer H. recovery of coronal vol-
ges JS, Belser UC. Clinical Porcelain laminate veneers. ume and length. Int J Peri-
performance of novel-design A retrospective evaluation odontics Restorative Dent.
porcelain veneers for the after 1-10 years of service: 2000;20:440–457.
recovery of coronal vol- Part 2-clinical result. Int J 72. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F,
ume and length. Int J Peri- Prosthodont 2000;13:9–18. Vadini M, D’Amario M. Clin-
odontics Restorative Dent 63. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. ical evaluation on porcelain
2000;20:440-457. Tooth structure removal laminate veneers bonded
53. Magne P, Douglas WH. associated with various with light-cured composite:
Porcelain veneers: dentin preparation designs for an- results up to 7 years. Clin
bonding optimization and terior teeth. J Prosthet Dent Oral Investig 2012;16:
biomimetic recovery of the 2002;87:503–509. 1071–1079.
crown. Int J Prosthodont 64. Layton DM, Clarke M, 73. Fradeani M, Redemagni M,
1999;12:111–121. Walton TR. A systematic Corrado M. Porcelain lami-
54. Magne P, Douglas WH. review and meta-analysis of nate veneers: 6- to 12-year
Additive contour of porcelain the survival of feldspathic clinical evaluation – a retro-
veneers: a key element in porcelain veneers over 5 and spective study. Int J Peri-
enamel preservation, adhe- 10 years. Int J Prosthodont odontics Restorative Dent
sion, and esthetics for aging 2012;25:590–603. 2005;25:9–17.
dentition. J Adhes Dent 65. Burke FJ. Survival rates for 74. Fradeani M. Six year follow-
1999;1:81–92. porcelain laminate veneers up with empress veneers.
55. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of with special reference Int J Periodontics Restorative
criteria for the clinical evalua- to the effect of prepar- Dent 1998;18:217–225.
tion of dental restorative ma- ation in dentin: a literature 75. Magne P, Kwon KR,
terials. 1971 Clin Oral Inves- review. J Esthet Restor Dent Belser UC, Hodges JS,
tig 2005 Dec;9:215–232. 2012;24:257–265. Douglas WH. Crack propen-
56. Cvar J, Ryge G. Criteria for 66. Petridis HP, Zekeridou A, sity of porcelain laminate
the Clinical Evaluation of Malliari M, Tortopidis D, veneers: a simulated opera-
Dental Restorative Materials. Koidis P. Survival of ceramic tory evaluation. J Prosthet
US DHEW Document, US veneers made of different Dent 1999;81:327–334.
PHS 790244. San Francisco: materials after a minimum 76. Gresnigt MM, Ozcan M,
Printing Office, 1971:1–42. follow-up period of five Kalk W, Galhano G. Effect of
57. Layton DM, Walton TR. The years: a systematic review static and cyclic loading on
up to 21-year clinical out- and meta-analysis. Eur J ceramic laminate veneers
come and survival of feld- Esthet Dent 2012;7:138–152. adhered to teeth with and
spathic porcelain veneers: 67. Peumans M, Van Meer- without aged composite
accounting for clustering. Int beek B, Lambrechts P, restorations. J Adhes Dent
J Prosthodont 2012;25: Vanherle G. Porcelain 2011;13:569–577.
604–612. veneers: A review of literature. 77. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W,
58. Beier US, Kapferer I, J Dent 2000;28:163–177. Ozcan M. Clinically lon-
Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. 68. Calamia JR. Clinical evalu- gevity of ceramic laminate
Clinical performance of por- ation of etched porce- veneers bonded to teeth
celain laminate veneers for lain veneers. Am J Dent with and without existing
up to 20 years. Int J Prostho- 1989;121:594–596. composite restorations up to
dont 2012;25:79–85. 69. Oztürk E, Bolay S, Hickel R, 40 months. Clin Oral Investig
59. Peumans M, de Munck J, Ilie N. Shear bond strength of 2013;17:823–832.
Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, porcelain laminate veneers to 78. Hazelton LR, Faine MP. Diag-
Vanherle G, van Meerbeek B. enamel, dentine and enamel- nosis and dental manage-
A prospective ten-year clin- dentine complex bonded with ment of eating disorder
ical trial of porcelain veneers. different adhesive luting sys- patients. Int J Prosthodont
J Adhes Dent 2004;6:65–76. tems. J Dent 2013;41:97–105. 1996;9:65–73.
530
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3