Atomisation of Ferroalloys: J.J. Dunkley and D. Norval
Atomisation of Ferroalloys: J.J. Dunkley and D. Norval
ABSTRACT
The process of atomisation is introduced and related to granulation. Some processes applicable to
ferroalloys are discussed, along with their limitations and advantages. Examples of applications of
atomisation to the processing of ferroalloys, including ferrosilicon and ferromanganese for use in the
welding industry and as injectable additions to steel or cast iron are also presented. The economics of the
process and the impact of process scale are discussed, along with criteria for process selection and system
design.
Atomisation is the breaking up of liquid into droplets (Fig 1). If a molten material is atomised into droplets,
these normally cool rapidly to produce solid particles. Thus one could say that granulation and atomisation
are conceptually identical, differing only in the size of particles produced. Granulation produces granules,
which may loosely be defined as particles of the millimetre range (sometimes up to >10mm). Atomisation is
normally taken, in a metallurgical context, to imply that the particles resulting are “powder” which can
loosely be taken to mean substantially sub-millimetre range particles. In fact atomised metal powders are
produced with sizes ranging from a few microns to a millimetre. Given that this spans nearly 3 orders of
magnitude, the processes used to make and handle particles of the finer and coarser ends of this range are
very different.
Most ferroalloys and many other metallurgical products, intermediates and waste products arise from
smelting processes, which produce molten materials such as ferroalloys, mattes, metals, or slags. Where
these are finished (as opposed to intermediate or waste) products, they naturally have to be cooled down and
transformed into a readily handled product before sale. For this, there are several options.
Other flow sheets have been proposed including oxidation of atomised alloys with a volatile oxide-forming
element such as W, Mo, V to separate it from other constituents by sublimation. The remaining porous
oxidised cake can then readily be processed hydrometallurgically.
3. ATOMISATION PROCESSES
There are many different processes employed industrially for atomisation [1].
542
The major ones of interest in this industry are those applicable on a large scale (tons/hour) and include: -
• Water atomisation – using water sprays are pressures in the range from 10 to 100bars (exceptionally to
1000bars). Provides outputs to 30t/hour or more.
• Gas/air atomisation – using gas or air jets at pressures from 2 to 20 bars. Provides outputs to about
5t/hour.
• Centrifugal atomisation – using a spinning disk or cup at speeds from 500 to 5000rpm. Provides outputs
to 100t/hour (e.g. for slag) but for sub-millimetre, perhaps 10-30t/hour.
Figure 2. Water atomisation jets (a, b, c) and horizontal granulation for slag etc.
The pressures used depend on two factors. First the desired particle size, and secondly the characteristics of
the melt. Thus sulphur-bearing melts, having low surface tension and viscosity, need much lower pressures
than pure metals. To make an iron powder with mean particle size about 0.12mm needs about 70bars, and
particle size is roughly inversely proportional to pressure. Thus a cast iron shot of about 0.5mm can be made
at about 20bars pressure, but a 50 micron Ferrosilicon may need >200bars pressure.
In round figures, the water flow needed to cool ferroalloys is about 6L/kg. For lower pressure operations all
of this will be pumped to pressure, but it is feasible for high-pressure operations to economise by only
providing a fraction of this flow at pressure, with the balance introduced as LP cooling water. Thus a plant to
atomise iron powder to about 70 microns at 30t/hour has a 1MW, 120bar centrifugal water pump (implying
energy costs of ~30kWhr/t). However another plant producing 40 microns FeSi15 at 8t/hour only needed a
150kW HP pump even when operating at 250bars (implying energy costs of 19kWhr/t).
Water atomisation can be done in open air, or under inert gas. Obviously oxidation of the alloy will be
reduced in the latter case. FeSi is relatively oxidation resistant and, even in open air, may only pick up about
0.1-0.2% oxygen. However FeMn is much more reactive and, even under nitrogen, picks up over 1% of
oxygen (and liberates a correspondingly large amount of hydrogen in the process)
543
3.2 Gas/air atomisation
This process, compared to water atomisation, makes a similar fairly broad distribution, and can make very
fine powders. However it is generally necessary to operate more slowly than water atomising and the energy
needed to compress the approximately one cubic metre per kilogram of gas needed to atomise is far higher
than needed to pump water. Thus a plant to air atomise 2 t/hour of metal would require a compressor rated
for 2000 n.cu.m/hr which at even 5bars would involve a compressor of over 200kW (implying energy costs
of 100kWhr/t).
A drawback of air or gas atomisation is that cooling, compared with water, is slow. This means that large
equipment is needed if freezing is to be complete before the spray contacts the surface. Thus while water
atomisation/granulation can produce particles over a huge range from 10 microns to several millimetres, due
to the slow cooling a dry gas process seldom makes sense for particles much bigger than 200-500microns.
One way around this is to spray water into the system as well. This reduces vessel size, but adds the costs of
dewatering and drying.
Naturally, the material of the spinning disc or cup has a tough life. However even superalloys have been
made by this method, using a water-cooled copper disc, so the production of ferroalloys in this way is
probably feasible. Particle sizes are typically not very fine (say over 0.2mm), unless very high speeds, over
10,000rpm are used. Another major advantage is that it can produce much narrower distributions than gas or
water atomisation. Thus excessive fines or oversize can be minimised.
544
Figure 4. Centrifugal atomisation principle.
Currently markets for atomised ferroalloys are somewhat limited and comprise <1% of the ferroalloy
business. The following comprise both currently produced products and some suggested markets for future
development.
4.4 Injectables
In steel and iron production, the injection of alloying elements down lances has grown a lot in the past 20
years. It is normal to specify a coarse powder, e.g. 0.1-1.0mm for these applications. Some of these products,
e.g. magnesium metal for desulphurisation of iron, are reactive so fines must be controlled. The process is
used for making small additions, and can be used for trimming of analysis before continuous casting, control
545
of superheat by injecting coolant, or deoxidation, inoculation etc. Metallic products used include magnesium,
calcium, ferrosilicon, ferromanganese, sulphides and many others. Atomisation of these materials offers
good size control (low dusting) and good shape (low wear and easy flow). This is an area of application
likely to see solid growth in future as it offers excellent compositional control and low losses of reactive
additions.
4.6 Silicon
A very large volume of silicon metal is consumed in the chemical industry. Obviously reacting it with
chemicals demands an extended surface are, so powders are needed. The silicone industry makes silanes
from it and has preferences for certain products of reactions that can produce a number of products. The
catalysis of the production of preferred reactions by impurities in the silicon was of considerable interest in
the 80s and it was thought that specific phases of impurity (of the type of CaFeMgSi) were precipitated
during solidification, depending on cooling rate. Elkem constructed an atomiser for silicon, which was
successfully operated on a tonnage basis, but it seems results of using the product did not justify the extra
costs. It may be that the cooling rate was a little too high and granulation might provide a better performance.
5. ECONOMICS
One problem holding back the application of atomisation for the production of powdered ferroalloys has
been, oddly enough, the lack of application of granulation. This leads to a lot of crushing being done, which
generates large amounts of unwanted fines. These are a low value by-product and they are sold at a discount
to lump size ferroalloys. However, if granulation is substituted for crushing, the amount of fines arising falls
dramatically, so it is possible that this source of fines will decline in time. Also the properties of the fines are
uncontrolled, and cannot easily be adjusted to specific market requirements. The particles are always angular
(often very abrasive), often dusty (poor size distribution control) and may be rather reactive due to their
clean surfaces. Atomised powders can be much better controlled in size range and are spheroidal in shape.
They also often have high temperature oxide films that reduce reactivity.
Capital costs of atomising systems depend very greatly on the scale and type of product. For the case of a
Ferroalloy in 10t ladles, atomised at a rate of 15t/hour to a fine, dry product (sub 0.25mm or 60#) we
estimate a cost of $1.5M with output 60t/day (equipment and engineering only, excluding installation and
buildings). This covers all equipment from pouring right through to drying and screening. Operating costs
obviously depend on local rates so estimated consumptions are listed below with typical UK rates to give an
example.
To this should be added an allowance for material losses of 2-5%. At $800/t this is $16-40/tonne.
Depreciation at 10% pa on $1.5M on an output of 15000t/yr is $10/t. Thus total process cost of less than
$100/t is feasible. Capital costs follow normal rules, being related to the square root of capacity up to the
maximum feasible size for single units. Operating costs fall rapidly, with labour costs per annum almost
independent of output (highly mechanized equipment) while energy and gas costs only fall gently per ton
processed. The above example is just processing one ladle every 4 hours; obviously higher outputs are easily
achieved, but markets limit the need for this in many cases.
546
6. PROCESS SELECTION
The selection of the optimum process for a given product demands a lot on experience. Many factors must be
considered including scale of operation, product quality demands, alloy reactivity etc. Unless the equipment
vendor has previous experience of the precise alloy and product in question, trials of different processes are
highly desirable. These both allow users to evaluate product quality, and allow the plant supplier to optimise
production parameters (e.g. atomising pressure) to reduce equipment cost.
7. CONCLUSION
Granulation is widely used in the ferroalloy industry and experience is being gained in pouring ferroalloys in
the necessary controlled manner. Atomisation is conceptually similar to granulation, but involves higher
energy break-up of the liquid to make finer particles. These can have a number of applications and it can be
expected that the development of atomisation technology and of ferroalloy applications will lead to a number
of applications in the industry in coming years.
8. REFERENCES
[1] Yule, A.J. and Dunkley, J.J., “Atomization of melts ” Clarendon Press 1994
547