Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER STUDIES

RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Name of Group:
Name of Student: Sumague, Acoba, Rivera
Program:
Course/Section:
Title of Lab Act/Expt:
Date of Performance:
Instructor/Professor: Rionel Belen Caldo, BSCpE, MPA, MSc ECE

Category Exemplary Satisfactory Developing Unsatisfactory

SCORE (4) SCORE (3) SCORE (2) SCORE (1)
A. Specifications The program works and The program works and The program produces The program is producing
meets all of the produces the correct correct results but does not incorrect results.
Weight = 10% specifications. results and displays them display them correctly.
correctly. It also meets
most of the other
specifications.

B. Readability The code is exceptionally The code is fairly easy to The code is readable only The code is poorly
well organized and very read. by someone who knows organized and very difficult
Weight = 10% easy to follow. what it is supposed to be to read.
doing.
C. Reusability The code could be reused Most of the code could be Some parts of the code The code is not organized
Weight = 10% as a whole or each routine reused in other programs. could be reused in other for reusability.
could be reused. programs.

D. Documentation/Oral The documentation is well The The The

Presentation written/well presented and documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio
clearly explains what the n consists of embedded n is simply comments n is simply comments
code is accomplishing and comment and some simple embedded in the code with embedded in the code and
Weight = 20% how. header documentation that some simple header does not help the reader
is somewhat useful in comments separating understand the code.
understanding the code. routines.

E. Delivery The program was delivered The program was delivered The code was within 2 The code was more than 2
Weight = 10% on time. within a week of the due weeks of the due date. weeks overdue.
date.
F. Efficiency The code is extremely The code is fairly efficient The code is brute force and The code is huge and
Weight = 20% efficient without sacrificing without sacrificing unnecessarily long. appears to be patched
readability and readability and together.
understanding. understanding.
G. Originality Significant evidence Project is effective or Project shows some Project (idea and
of originality and imaginative. imagination. implementation) is
Weight = 20% inventiveness. Uses an simple and basic.
imaginative way to
communicate topic.
Outstanding project.
Project is
unique.

Weight Total =100% TOTAL SCORE :

GRADE :
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE :
INSTRUCTOR"S SIGNATURE :
Note:

TOTAL SCORE = Category item A x weight A + Category item B x weight B +...Category item N x weight N
GRADE = (TOTAL SCORE/4)x 50 + 50
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE = EXEMPLARY, SATISFCATORY, DEVELOPING, UNSATISFACTORY
http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/coe/cecs/views/programs/undergrad/grade_prog.shtml
ENT

Score

23 88.3333333333333
 Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER STUDIES

RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Name of Group:
Name of Student: Bernardo, Gandeza and Felipe
Program:
Course/Section:
Title of Lab Act/Expt:
Date of Performance:
Instructor/Professor: Rionel Belen Caldo, BSCpE, MPA, MSc ECE

Category Exemplary Satisfactory Developing Unsatisfactory

SCORE (4) SCORE (3) SCORE (2) SCORE (1)
A. Specifications The program works and The program works and The program produces The program is producing
meets all of the produces the correct correct results but does not incorrect results.
Weight = 10% specifications. results and displays them display them correctly.
correctly. It also meets
most of the other
specifications.

B. Readability The code is exceptionally The code is fairly easy to The code is readable only The code is poorly
well organized and very read. by someone who knows organized and very difficult
Weight = 10% easy to follow. what it is supposed to be to read.
doing.
C. Reusability The code could be reused Most of the code could be Some parts of the code The code is not organized
Weight = 10% as a whole or each routine reused in other programs. could be reused in other for reusability.
could be reused. programs.

D. Documentation/Oral The documentation is well The The The

Presentation written/well presented and documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio
clearly explains what the n consists of embedded n is simply comments n is simply comments
code is accomplishing and comment and some simple embedded in the code with embedded in the code and
Weight = 20% how. header documentation that some simple header does not help the reader
is somewhat useful in comments separating understand the code.
understanding the code. routines.

E. Delivery The program was delivered The program was delivered The code was within 2 The code was more than 2
Weight = 10% on time. within a week of the due weeks of the due date. weeks overdue.
date.
F. Efficiency The code is extremely The code is fairly efficient The code is brute force and The code is huge and
Weight = 20% efficient without sacrificing without sacrificing unnecessarily long. appears to be patched
readability and readability and together.
understanding. understanding.
G. Originality Significant evidence Project is effective or Project shows some Project (idea and
of originality and imaginative. imagination. implementation) is
Weight = 20% inventiveness. Uses an simple and basic.
imaginative way to
communicate topic.
Outstanding project.
Project is
unique.

Weight Total =100% TOTAL SCORE :

GRADE :
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE :
INSTRUCTOR"S SIGNATURE :
Note:

TOTAL SCORE = Category item A x weight A + Category item B x weight B +...Category item N x weight N
GRADE = (TOTAL SCORE/4)x 50 + 50
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE = EXEMPLARY, SATISFCATORY, DEVELOPING, UNSATISFACTORY
http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/coe/cecs/views/programs/undergrad/grade_prog.shtml
ENT

Score

26 93.3333333333333
 Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER STUDIES

RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Name of Group:
Name of Student: Mendoza, Pandinuela and Bati
Program:
Course/Section:
Title of Lab Act/Expt:
Date of Performance:
Instructor/Professor: Rionel Belen Caldo, BSCpE, MPA, MSc ECE

Category Exemplary Satisfactory Developing Unsatisfactory

SCORE (4) SCORE (3) SCORE (2) SCORE (1)
A. Specifications The program works and The program works and The program produces The program is producing
meets all of the produces the correct correct results but does not incorrect results.
Weight = 10% specifications. results and displays them display them correctly.
correctly. It also meets
most of the other
specifications.

B. Readability The code is exceptionally The code is fairly easy to The code is readable only The code is poorly
well organized and very read. by someone who knows organized and very difficult
Weight = 10% easy to follow. what it is supposed to be to read.
doing.
C. Reusability The code could be reused Most of the code could be Some parts of the code The code is not organized
Weight = 10% as a whole or each routine reused in other programs. could be reused in other for reusability.
could be reused. programs.

D. Documentation/Oral The documentation is well The The The

Presentation written/well presented and documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio
clearly explains what the n consists of embedded n is simply comments n is simply comments
code is accomplishing and comment and some simple embedded in the code with embedded in the code and
Weight = 20% how. header documentation that some simple header does not help the reader
is somewhat useful in comments separating understand the code.
understanding the code. routines.

E. Delivery The program was delivered The program was delivered The code was within 2 The code was more than 2
Weight = 10% on time. within a week of the due weeks of the due date. weeks overdue.
date.
F. Efficiency The code is extremely The code is fairly efficient The code is brute force and The code is huge and
Weight = 20% efficient without sacrificing without sacrificing unnecessarily long. appears to be patched
readability and readability and together.
understanding. understanding.
G. Originality Significant evidence Project is effective or Project shows some Project (idea and
of originality and imaginative. imagination. implementation) is
Weight = 20% inventiveness. Uses an simple and basic.
imaginative way to
communicate topic.
Outstanding project.
Project is
unique.

Weight Total =100% TOTAL SCORE :

GRADE :
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE :
INSTRUCTOR"S SIGNATURE :
Note:

TOTAL SCORE = Category item A x weight A + Category item B x weight B +...Category item N x weight N
GRADE = (TOTAL SCORE/4)x 50 + 50
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE = EXEMPLARY, SATISFCATORY, DEVELOPING, UNSATISFACTORY
http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/coe/cecs/views/programs/undergrad/grade_prog.shtml
ENT

Score

25 91.6666666666667
 Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER STUDIES

RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Name of Group:
Name of Student: Flores, Malijan and Areglado
Program:
Course/Section:
Title of Lab Act/Expt:
Date of Performance:
Instructor/Professor: Rionel Belen Caldo, BSCpE, MPA, MSc ECE

Category Exemplary Satisfactory Developing Unsatisfactory

SCORE (4) SCORE (3) SCORE (2) SCORE (1)
A. Specifications The program works and The program works and The program produces The program is producing
meets all of the produces the correct correct results but does not incorrect results.
Weight = 10% specifications. results and displays them display them correctly.
correctly. It also meets
most of the other
specifications.

B. Readability The code is exceptionally The code is fairly easy to The code is readable only The code is poorly
well organized and very read. by someone who knows organized and very difficult
Weight = 10% easy to follow. what it is supposed to be to read.
doing.
C. Reusability The code could be reused Most of the code could be Some parts of the code The code is not organized
Weight = 10% as a whole or each routine reused in other programs. could be reused in other for reusability.
could be reused. programs.

D. Documentation/Oral The documentation is well The The The

Presentation written/well presented and documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio
clearly explains what the n consists of embedded n is simply comments n is simply comments
code is accomplishing and comment and some simple embedded in the code with embedded in the code and
Weight = 20% how. header documentation that some simple header does not help the reader
is somewhat useful in comments separating understand the code.
understanding the code. routines.

E. Delivery The program was delivered The program was delivered The code was within 2 The code was more than 2
Weight = 10% on time. within a week of the due weeks of the due date. weeks overdue.
date.
F. Efficiency The code is extremely The code is fairly efficient The code is brute force and The code is huge and
Weight = 20% efficient without sacrificing without sacrificing unnecessarily long. appears to be patched
readability and readability and together.
understanding. understanding.
G. Originality Significant evidence Project is effective or Project shows some Project (idea and
of originality and imaginative. imagination. implementation) is
Weight = 20% inventiveness. Uses an simple and basic.
imaginative way to
communicate topic.
Outstanding project.
Project is
unique.

Weight Total =100% TOTAL SCORE :

GRADE :
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE :
INSTRUCTOR"S SIGNATURE :
Note:

TOTAL SCORE = Category item A x weight A + Category item B x weight B +...Category item N x weight N
GRADE = (TOTAL SCORE/4)x 50 + 50
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE = EXEMPLARY, SATISFCATORY, DEVELOPING, UNSATISFACTORY
http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/coe/cecs/views/programs/undergrad/grade_prog.shtml
ENT

Score

22 86.6666666666667
 Lyceum of the Philippines-Laguna
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER STUDIES

RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Name of Group:
Name of Student:
Program:
Course/Section:
Title of Lab Act/Expt:
Date of Performance:
Instructor/Professor: Rionel Belen Caldo, BSCpE, MPA, MSc ECE

Category Exemplary Satisfactory Developing Unsatisfactory

SCORE (4) SCORE (3) SCORE (2) SCORE (1)
A. Specifications The program works and The program works and The program produces The program is producing
meets all of the produces the correct correct results but does not incorrect results.
Weight = 10% specifications. results and displays them display them correctly.
correctly. It also meets
most of the other
specifications.

B. Readability The code is exceptionally The code is fairly easy to The code is readable only The code is poorly
well organized and very read. by someone who knows organized and very difficult
Weight = 10% easy to follow. what it is supposed to be to read.
doing.
C. Reusability The code could be reused Most of the code could be Some parts of the code The code is not organized
Weight = 10% as a whole or each routine reused in other programs. could be reused in other for reusability.
could be reused. programs.

D. Documentation/Oral The documentation is well The The The

Presentation written/well presented and documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio documentation/presentatio
clearly explains what the n consists of embedded n is simply comments n is simply comments
code is accomplishing and comment and some simple embedded in the code with embedded in the code and
Weight = 20% how. header documentation that some simple header does not help the reader
is somewhat useful in comments separating understand the code.
understanding the code. routines.

E. Delivery The program was delivered The program was delivered The code was within 2 The code was more than 2
Weight = 10% on time. within a week of the due weeks of the due date. weeks overdue.
date.
F. Efficiency The code is extremely The code is fairly efficient The code is brute force and The code is huge and
Weight = 20% efficient without sacrificing without sacrificing unnecessarily long. appears to be patched
readability and readability and together.
understanding. understanding.
G. Originality Significant evidence Project is effective or Project shows some Project (idea and
of originality and imaginative. imagination. implementation) is
Weight = 20% inventiveness. Uses an simple and basic.
imaginative way to
communicate topic.
Outstanding project.
Project is
unique.

Weight Total =100% TOTAL SCORE :

GRADE :
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE :
INSTRUCTOR"S SIGNATURE :
Note:

TOTAL SCORE = Category item A x weight A + Category item B x weight B +...Category item N x weight N
GRADE = (TOTAL SCORE/4)x 50 + 50
OVER-ALL PERFORMANCE = EXEMPLARY, SATISFCATORY, DEVELOPING, UNSATISFACTORY
http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/coe/cecs/views/programs/undergrad/grade_prog.shtml
ENT

Score