Sending children to the schools

of the taghoot is clear kufr

In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

All praise be to Allah, peace and blessings be on His Messenger and on

his family and companions

The goal of this booklet is to show the evidences for the kufr of sending
children to the schools of kuffar and taghoot. As there is already another
lengthy book, in which many issues concerning this kufr has been
clarifed, I want to keep this booklet short and ponder on some issues
which some people don't want to see.

Taghut teachers and al Walaa

In Islam the kafr does not have walayah over the Muslim. In all
domains of life Allah has ended the walayah of the kafr over the
Muslim. Allah (awj) states: "…And never will Allah grant to the
unbelievers a way (to triumph) over the Believers." (Surah An Nisa 4;
141)

And “O you who believe! Obey Allah, obey the Messenger and those in
authority amongst you…” (Surah An Nisa 4; 59)

And “And obey not the disbelievers and the hypocrites…” (Surah Al
Ahzaab 33; 48)

RasulAllah (saw) stated: “Islam is great, there is nothing above it”

(Bukhari)

The Muslim scholars have explained the fact of the kafr not having the
right of walayah over the Muslim with the following approach: Jassas
states; This ayah and other similar ayahs shows that the kafr in no
manner have walayah over the Muslim and that no kafr can have
hakimiyyah and management over Muslims. In fact, a kafr man who
has a little son who is accepted Muslim because his mother is Muslim,
cannot use the possessions of the child and can not have walayah rights
for when the child is getting married. A kafr father has no right of
walayah at all over his Muslim child. The issue of walayah is so
sensitive that it is not possible for the case of a Muslim be taken to a
non-Muslim court and while one of the parties is Muslim it is not
possible that someone other than a Muslim judges even if it is in favour
of a Muslim. (Shaafee, al-Umm, V/11, 38; Shirazee, al-Muhazzab,
11/257; Ibn Qudama, al-Mukni, 1/532 and al-Mughni, X/623; Zadu’l-
Maad 3/20)

Ibnu'l-Munzeer stated: “Everyone who has earned the characteristic of

ahl-i ‘ilm all agree that a kafr has no administrative right over the
Muslim.” (Ahkamu Ahli Dhimma, 2/414)

One of the truths which must not be forgotten about this is that all
Muslims are obligated to reject the walayah and judgment of the kuffar
while they are living in dar ul harb or in dar ul Islam. (Hukuku-u
Islamiyya wa istilahat-i Fiqhiyya Kamus, 8/250)

“When it comes to general walayah (guardianship) what is meant is the

walayah of only Islamic walayah the main hukm regarding this is the
following “The Believers, men and women, are awliya of one of
another...” (Surah At Tawba 9; 71) (Muntaki sharh muwatta, 3/180)

From this ayah we can obtain the following message; the only type of
permitted walayah is that of which is between the believers. And the
antonym which must be understood is that the prohibited walayah is
that of which is between the Muslim and the kuffar.

The scholars have agreed that administration can not be given to a kafr
and if a Muslim administrator performs kufr he will be discharged, his
guardianship will be annulled and that he will not be obeyed.
(Nawawee, Sharh of Sahih Muslim, 12/229; Fathu’l-Baari, 9/13)

Ibn Mas’ud (ra) states: “Abu Moosa Al Ashaaree (ra) paid his dept to
Umar b. Hattab. Umar (ra) admiring his detailed and attentive
calculation said: “Call upon your bookkeeper so he can teach all, how he
has done his calculation.” Abu Moosa (ra) said: “He does not enter the
masjid.” Upon this Umar (ra) said: “Why? Is he junuub?” Abu Moosa
Al-Ashaaree (ra) answered: “No. He is a Christian.” Umar b. Hattab (ra)
came down on him hard and lectured him saying: “While Allah (swt) as
estranged them do not make them close. While Allah (swt) has
humiliated them do not praise them. After Allah (swt) has declared they
are not to be trusted do not trust them.” (Abu Dawud)
Someone came to Umar (ra) and said: Among the Hira Christians there
is a young man who knowledgeable and can do calculations. Make him
your clerk. Umar (ra) replied: Upon making him my clerk I will have
made him my confdant. (Ibn Abi Hateem)

In the Tafsir of Qurtubi, tafsir of ayah Al-i Imran 118-120 the narration
includes the young man being the best known and that Umar (ra) stated
he would not take on any other than a Muslim as a confdant. As a result
it is not permitted to take on ahl dhimmee as clerks. And their outside
infuence and appointing them as power of attorneys is also prohibited.

Now in signifcance to the topic it is relevant to discuss the fact that the
kuffar have no right of walayah or hidana over the Muslim. Children
which attend school are taught to take their teachers as a reference
points and an authority above them. As mentioned above these actions
are not allowed and actions as such will lead them to misguidance.

The following are verses from the Qur’an providing evidence to this
argument:

Allah (swt) says “…and follow not the path of those who know not.”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2; 169),

“…But the evil ones ever inspire their friends to contend with you if ye
were to obey them, ye would indeed be Pagans.” (Surah Al Anam 6;
121)

“And obey not the disbelievers and the hypocrites…” (Surah Al Ahzaab
33; 48)

“…and do not follow the desires of those who have no knowledge.”

(Surah Al-Jaatheeyah 45; 18)

“So obey not the mukadhibeen (denier of the Truth).” (Surah Al-Qalam
68; 8)

“And obey not every hallaafn maheen (despicable men, ready with
oaths)” (Surah Al Qalam 68; 10)

“…and do not obey from them a sinner nor an ingrate.” (Surah Al Insan
76; 24)

“…follow not the whims of those who deny Our revelations, those who
believe not in the Hereafter and deem (others) equal with their Lord.”
(Surah Al-Anam 6; 150)

"Follow what has been sent down unto you from your Lord and follow
not any awliyaa' besides Him. Little do you remember" (Surah Al A’raf
7; 3)

“…Do right and do not follow the way of the mufsideen (mischief-
makers).” (Surah Al A’raf 7; 142)

“…so both go straight and do not follow the path of those who know
not.” (Surah Yoonus 10; 89)

“…and obey not him in whose heart We have made heedless of Our
Remembrance and who follows his own desires and whose affair has
been lost” (Surah Al Kahf 18; 28)

In regards to walayah there are a few features which must be addressed.

The frst is to look and see what meanings walayah carries, secondly an
explanation regarding the characteristics a wali must carry or the one
who can take on the responsibilities of walayah and last but certainly
not least we need to tackle the main topic and explain what relation
walayah has with sending the Muslim children to the schools of the
kuffar.

Walayah has been given the following meanings: guardianship, power

of attorney, friendship/allegiance, niyah, place, time, helping in deen
and association, full closeness in beliefs and being side by side. (R.
Isfahani, al-Mufradat, 837)

Walayah also means to take on a job, to own tasarruf, to be an amr,

riyasah (administration and authority), to take on the duty of help, to
support. (Jawharee, as-Sihah Taju’l-Luga, 6/2528-2530; Firuzabadee,
Kamusu’l-Muhit, 4/404; Isfahani, Mufradat, 83)

It will not be hard to notice that in the Islamic sense walayah carries all
of the above meanings all at once. However the most important and the
most relevant meanings to our topic of walayah are guardianship,
power of attorney, riyasah, to be an Amr, to support and to own
tasarruf.

The term walayah will be used to explain and make clear the
relationship between the Muslim child and the kafr, the child will come
across and has to deal with on day to day bases in the schools of the
kuffar.

When a child is sent to school he is left all alone unattended by his

guardian and entrusted into the hands of the kuffar. While the child is in
school his teachers or even the school principal becomes his wali and
they have walayah over the child the entire time the child is in the
institution. Here we come across our second must be addressed feature
who has the right of walayah and who can be wali of the Muslim
children?

Although becoming a wali or having walayah is the right of a Muslim

over a Muslim it is a privilege and not a right of certain Muslim. To
clarify, only a Muslim can be a wali or have walayah over a Muslim
however this wali must carry certain characteristics. For example just
because an insane person is accepted to be Muslim because he was
Muslim before he lost his sanity, this does not give him the right to be a
wali over anyone. On the contrary, because an insane person is not
trustworthy and does not have sanity he can not be given walayah. Or if
a Muslim Amr who has walayah over his entire Ummah makes bateel or
loses his faith he will loose the privilege he had as an Amr and his
walayah will be annulled.

Imam ash-Shafi said: "A kafr has no walayah over a muslim woman,
even if she is his own daughter. Because even though (her father) Abu
Sufyan was alive it was Ibn Said ibn al-As who married Umm Habiba to
Rasulullah (sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam). [He is Khalid ibn Said ibn as-
As, the son of the uncle <brother of her father>.] It was also reported
that it has been Negus or Uthman ibn Affan who married her to
Rasulullah (sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam). In any case wasn't it her father
who gave her to marriage. And it is far from truth that Abu Sufyan
gave her to marriage. Both were muslims (Ibn Said and Uthman) and I
don't know a muslim male who is a nearer relative to Umm Habiba. But
Abu Sufyan didn't have walayah over his daughter. Because Allah, the
Almighty has cut the bonds of muwala between muslims and
mushrikun, ergo He has cut the bonds of heritage, blood money etc."
(ash-Shafi, al-Umm 5/15)

"A kafr father has no right of walayah over his muslim daughter."
(Imam al Marginani-al Hidaya sharh al Bidayatu'l Mubtadi)

Reported from AbdurRazzaq ath-Thawri, from Juwaybir, from Dahhaq

ibn Mazahim; RasulAllah (sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam) said: „Whoever
believes in Allah and the Yawm al Akhira (or whoever believes in Allah
and His Messanger) should not expose his posterity to the mushrikin.“
(Ibn Nahhas, Mash'ari-ul Ashwak 705)

al Ikhtilat – Mixing of the genders

Ikhtilat is the mixing of men on women in one place, mingling with each
other, sitting with each other and so on and so forth. All this are from
the things which are haram in the Sharia, because this is a cause of
ftnah (dissonance) and leads to following desires which will make
people fall into immorality and misdeeds.

The evidences that mixing of genders is haram are many in the Qur'an
as well as in the Sunnah. From these evidences are:

Allah (ta'ala) says:

And when you ask [his wives] for something, ask them from behind a
partition. That is purer for your hearts and their hearts. (al Ahzab 33/53)

Ibn Kathir said in the tafsir to this ayah:

Meaning, same like it is prohibited for you to enter to their rooms, you
are not allowed to look at them at all. And if someone from you has
something to ask, don't look at them and don't ask what you need
except behind a curtain.

And Rasulullah (salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam) has prohibited the free

mixing of men and women, even in Allah's most beloved places on
earth, the mosques. He, salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam, did this, by having
the rows of women behind the men and stayed for a while after prayer
in the position until the women left. And he, salliAllahu alayhi wa
sallam, specifed a door for the women in the mosque.

And the evidences for this is as follows:

Narrated Umm Salama, radhiAllahu anha: Whenever Allah's Messenger
(salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam) fnished his prayers with Taslim, the
women would get up and he would stay on for a while in his place
before getting up. Ibn Shihab said, "I think (and Allah knows better),
that the purpose of his stay was that the women might leave before the
men who had fnished their prayer." (Sahih al-Bukhari 837)

And in Sunan Abu Dawud there is a chapter called: Women Leavig

Before Men After Prayer. There is one hadith in this chapter:

Umm Salamah, radhiAllahu anha said; When the Messenger of Allah

(salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam) gave the salutation, he stayed for a while.
By this people thought that women should return earlier than men.
Sunan Abi Dawud 1040

In a chapter in Sunan Abu Dawud called: Separating The Women From

The Men In The Masjid following hadith is narrated:
Ibn Umar reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be
upon him, said, “It would be better if you had left this door to the
mosque for women.” Naf’ said, “Ibn Umar never again entered through
it until the day he died.” Sunan Abi Dawud 462

While mixing of the genders is not kufr, the legalization of it is kufr.

About the curricula of the taghut schools

It is self-evident and accepted that the curricula of education in Taghut

schools are kufr and shirk curricula that kill Islam in the hearts of
children and produce generations of infdels (kuffar) who disavow the
principles of deen. The goal of these curricula is to produce a generation
of people who denounce the deen, deny it and become an effective tool
used by the enemies of deen, so they can hide behind them in order to
fnish it (the deen) off.

And they do this by building castles of kufr (schools) through which

they teach children the ideology and system of kufr from a very early
stage in children's life.

The child absorbs all that he receives as a child, so the childhood period
is a period of reception, following and imitation. So these tawagheet
took advantage of this point and established those castles of kufr
(schools) which establish kufr and destroy anything that is related to
deen. Instead of creating children on the love of deen and dedication to
it, these schools are based on the love of the country and nationalism.

And instead of teaching children the principles of Islamic Sharia they

indoctrinate them the principles of rotten democracy and secular,
capitalist, socialist and other kufr ways and system.

As for the glorifcation of the taghut, they teach this from the primary
stage, they urge them to love the taghut and they teach devotion to him.

They also take away from their hearts the Aqeedah of al Walaa and al
Baraa by urging them to love the other and that all human beings are
equal. There is no difference between a Buddhist, a Crusader, or a
Muslim.

They also obligate them to commit clear kufr and shirk through their
performance of pagan holidays and their commitment to some kufr
rituals that they practice, such as celebrating national holidays and other
manifestations of kufr and shirk in Allah.

If we deal with each of the subjects taught in these castles in the frst
years of the primary stage, for example, we will fnd that this particular
stage is stage in which all the curriculum materials are flled with kufr.
And by Allah, almost every lesson in each subject is full of establishing a
kufr principle or a kufr theory or a kufr slogan, whether this is in a
direct or indirect way. Such as placing pictures that have a certain
insinuation and content. And the child is affected by it, such as putting
pictures where genders are mixing, women are half naked (without
hijaab), glorifying idols, and glorifying personalities of kufr and
atheism, and this is known to everyone who has seen these approaches.

Compliance with kufr is kufr

I say whoever knows the truth about these fortresses of kufr and sends
his children to them in spite of his knowledge of the kufr in it, this is
apparent and obvious compliance with it and aid for it and it does not
beneft him to say my intention was such and such. This is clear kufr in
Allah, and there is no excuse this. We ask Allah for safety.

Allah (ta'ala) says:

And it has already come down to you in the Book that when you hear
the verses of Allah [recited], they are denied [by them] and ridiculed; so
do not sit with them until they enter into another conversation. Indeed,
you would then be like them. Indeed Allah will gather the hypocrites
and disbelievers in Hell all together. (Nisa 4/140)

And Allah (ta'ala) says:

And when you see those who engage in [offensive] discourse
concerning Our verses, then turn away from them until they enter into
another conversion. And if Satan should cause you to forget, then do not
remain after the reminder with the wrongdoing people. (A'raf 6/68)

Ibn Kathir said:

Suddi said from Abi Malik and Said ibn Jubayr about the words: And if
Satan should cause you to forget, if you forget and remember do not
remain with them. Muqatil ibn Hayyan said the same. And this ayah is
referred to it: And it has already come down to you in the Book that
when you hear the verses of Allah [recited], they are denied [by them]
and ridiculed; so do not sit with them until they enter into another
conversation. Indeed, you would then be like them. That is, if you sit
with them and remained passive than you are equal on this what they
are on.”

Qurtubi said in the tafsir of this ayah:

so do not sit with them until they enter into another conversation. That
is, something different from kufr. Indeed, you would then be like them.

This indicates that it is obligatory to avoid sinners if they appear to be a

sinner. Because those who do not avoid them are content with their
actions, and being contant with kufr is kufr. Allah azza wa jal says:
Indeed, you would then be like them. Whoever sits in a transgressive
gathering and does not deny them will be with them. They have to be
rejected when they speak evil or do evil. If someone is not able to deny
them, then he has to leave them so that he is not among the people of
this verse.

At Tabari said in the tafsir to this word of Allah:

Indeed, you would then be like them.
This means, and it has already come down to you that when you hear
the verses of Allah, they are denied and ridiculed; indeed, you would
then be like them, means: if you don't stand up and leave them in this
situation, you are the same like them in their deeds. Because you have
disobeyed Allah by sitting with them, you hear the verses of Allah, they
are denied and ridiculed; like they have disobeyed Him by mocking the
Ayat of Allah. You have come with a disobedience towards Allah
similar to the one who came with it. Therefore you are like them in
disobeying Allah.

Hamd ibn Ateeq said:

“According to the dhahir of the ayah; anyone who hears that the ayah of
Allah held in defance or ridiculed, unless they turn to a different
subject, sits with them without acceptable coercion applied to him, he is
kafr just as they are. Even if he does not do the same thing they did,
there is no difference. It is because such situation is contenting to kufr.
Showing content to kufr is kufr.

Relying on this and similar ayahs the ulama said anyone which shows
content to any sin will be accounted as having performed it. It will not
be accepted from him even if he states that he does not accept it by heart
or that he dislikes it. It is because the hukm is according to the dhahir.
He performed kufr openly and became kafr. (Sabil an Najat)

Sulayman ibn Abdullah said:

And it has already come down to you in the Book that when you hear
the verses of Allah [recited], they are denied [by them] and ridiculed; so
do not sit with them until they enter into another conversation. Indeed,
you would then be like them. Indeed Allah will gather the hypocrites
and disbelievers in Hell all together. (Nisa 4/140)

So He (Blessed and Most High is He) mentioned that He has sent down
a Command upon the Mu’minin, in the Book, [Al-An‘am: 68] that when
they hear the Verses of Allah being denied and ridiculed, that they
should not sit with them until they discuss something else; and that
whosoever sits with those disbelieving in the Verses of Allah and
mocking them, at the time of their kufr and mockery, then that person is
just like them. And He did not differentiate between the Kha’if
(someone with Khawf, someone who fears) or other than him- except
the Mukrah (the one who is forced). (ad Dalail)

The one who knows the state of these castles of kufr, and despite that
lets his children join these castles of kufr is a big kafr. Because he is
aware of the condition of these kufr castles, and despite that he went out
with own will and in his whole mind and put his children in it. So by
Allah, is this not a clear indication and evidence of the kufr of this father
(parent)? No excuse will beneft such a person.

Then some ignorant people come to us, after the rulings of the Lord of
the Worlds, saying, that as long as their children avoid kufr then it is not
kufr to send them to this schools and other empty nonsense like this!!

We say to people like them, you ignorant, you are yourself an adult, you
are lacking mind and deen, you fear for yourself from falling from your
deen among these kufr societies So how can you be sure of a small child
that it protects its deen? How can you burden it to stand against all the
kufr, fusuq and shirk that it will face in this institutions of the
tawagheet? How do you expect that it will be able to speak up against
each and every kufr while it is all day amongst the kuffar teachers,
kuffar principals and children from the mushrikeen? Do you really see
your child safe for a single moment in this kufr castle?!!
The correct view is that whoever sits in a assembly where the Ayah of
Allah are denied and is silent and does not rise or deny, then he is
content with this, because silence is a sign of contentment.
Do you insure that he is infuenced by a kufr doctrine from the doctrines
that they study in these kufr castles? !!

We say to him that Allah says to those who sit with the kuffar while
they hear the Ayah of Allah being denied and mocked that they are
kuffar. So how about the one who sends his children to places he knows
for certain that they call to kufr in the verses of Allah and call for its
destruction and call for fghting against the Deen of Allah in all forms?
And despite this he sends his children to these kufr castles who fght
against the Deen and the Millah Hanifyyah (pure of faith). Can such a
person be a Muwahhid Muslim?

And the ones who don't know the situations and states of these schools,
they are even doing a bigger evil. They expose their children to
something that they have no knowledge of.

The ruling of staying in gatherings where Allahs verses are denied

and mocked in schools

It is well known in the deen of Islam that the attendance in these

gatherings based on clear shirk, clear kufr and mocking the ayah of
Allah is a great sin that Allah will not forgive - except through
repentance and iman – therefore the warning about it is the most serious
warning.

Allah (ta'ala) says:

Indeed, Allah does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives
what is less than that for whom He wills. And he who associates others
with Allah has certainly fabricated a tremendous sin. (Nisa 4/48)

And Allah (ta'ala) says:

"Worship Allah and avoid Taghut." (Nahl 16/36)

The one who believes this principle necessarily knows that attending
seminars, meetings and conferences in which the ayah of Allah or
denied and mocked kufr is irrefutable and indisputable. And whoever
doubts this, let him review his religion and ask Allah for guidance. Its
only rule now is to avoid, move away, prohibit, and completely absolve
oneself from it and what is in it. This is exactly what Allah Almighty
commanded His Messenger Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon
him, to follow the Millah of Ibrahim Hanifa (pure of faith) and he was
not from the mushrikeen.
Allah (ta'ala) says:
There has already been for you an excellent pattern in Ibraham and
those with him, when they said to their people, "Indeed, we are
disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than
Allah. We have denied you (made takfeer on you), and there has
appeared between us and you animosity and hatred forever until you
believe in Allah alone." (Mumtahana 60/4)

And Allah (ta'ala) says:

And it has already come down to you in the Book that when you hear
the verses of Allah [recited], they are denied [by them] and ridiculed; so
do not sit with them until they enter into another conversation. Indeed,
you would then be like them. Indeed Allah will gather the hypocrites
and disbelievers in Hell all together. (Nisa 4/140)

Qurtubi said about this ayah:

Indeed, you would then be like them.
This indicates that it is obligatory to avoid sinners when it (sins) appears
from them because those who do not avoid them are satisfed with their
actions. And compliance with kufr is kufr.

Whoever sits in a gathering or a place of disobedience and does not

reject them when they spoke bad, is from them. And if he is unable to
reject them, then he should stand up for them so that he is not among
the people of this verse.

It is narrated on the authority of Umar bin Abdul Aziz, "A people who
drank alcohol was taken in front of him and he was told about one of
those present that he was fasting, so he sterted the punishment with
him. And recited this ayah: Indeed, you would then be like them.
Meaning, compliance with disobedience is disobedience. That is why
the perpetrator and the contented are punished.

The Millah of Islam is Tawheed in its belief and its deeds at the same
time, it is the sincerity of worship to Allah Almighty in all its meanings.
And staying away, avoiding and completely disbelieving and rejecting
all forms of shirk and its types, and to show hostility and hatred
whenever possible. Whoever sits with the kuffar while they reject,
disbelieve and mock the ayah of Allah, there is no doubt about his
disbelief.
Shawkani said in „ad Dawa'a al 'ajil f difa' al aduw" (Urgent medicine in
pushing the enemy): „There is no difference between the one who does
the deed of disobedience and the one who is content with it but doesn't
do it. Or between those who are not content with it, but abstained from
forbiding it … And whoever is able to enjoin good and forbid evil (but
doesn't do it), his guilt was more severe, his punishment greater, and his
transgression bigger.“

Learning and teaching kufr in the scale of the Sharia

Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) says:

And they followed [instead] what the devils had recited during the
reign of Sulayman. It was not Sulayman who disbelieved, but the devils
disbelieved, teaching people magic and that which was revealed to the
two angels at Babylon, Harut and Marut. But the two angels do not
teach anyone unless they say, "We are a trial, so do not disbelieve [by
practicing magic]." And [yet] they learn from them that by which they
cause separation between a man and his wife. But they do not harm
anyone through it except by permission of Allah. And the people learn
what harms them and does not beneft them. But the Children of Israel
certainly knew that whoever purchased the magic would not have in the
Hereafter any share. And wretched is that for which they sold
themselves, if they only knew. (Baqara 2/102)

Ibn Arabi said in his book „Ahkam al Qur'an“ in the frst volume about
this ayah:
Sulayman, alayhi salam, never disbelieved nor did magic, but the devils
disbelieve in their magic and that they taught it to people. And the one
who believes in kufr is Kafr, and the one who speaks it is Kafr and the
one who teaches it (is a kafr).

Allah (ta'ala) says:

And [yet] they learn from them that by which they cause separation
between a man and his wife.

Ibn Arabi said:

It has been showed to us that a part of magic separates one from his
wife, and combines one’s with his wife, and both are kufr.

The intention of citing this verse and the legal ruling that Ibn Al-Arabi
deduced from it is that the teacher of kufr and the one who learns it are
kuffar (disbeliever) alike, i.e. the teacher who teaches people kufr and
the learners who learn from him this kufr -and there is no expression
that this rule only applies to magic- are kuffar.

What is taught here in some books, if not most of them, especially in

primary schools, is obvious kufr. And there is no disagreement between
scholars that the teacher of kufr and his learner are kuffar.

Ibn al-Salah was asked about the ruling of someone who works with the
books of Ibn Sina and reads in his books and those of other
philosophers?

He said: This is not allowed. And whoever does this, deceived his
religion and was subjected to great ftnah. And he is not from the
scholars, but he is a shaytan from the human shayatin.

The ruling about learning and teaching philosophy and logic

Philosophy is the base of foolishness and decadence, the subject of

confusion and delusion, and the example of aberration and heresy. And
whoever wears it with, learns it or teaches it, ... Shaytan will possess
him. ar Rasail al Muniriyya, vol. 2

It is no secret to those who have seen the books of some scholars, their
emphasis on not going into the science of ilm ul kalam, philosophy and
logic because it leads to clear kufr, like Ibn Sina and other philosophers.
And this in learning and teaching philosophy and logic which is the
theory of Kufr (disbelief) and Ilhad (atheism). What do you think about
learning what is kufr in itself? Is this not the more important to prohibit
and emphasize it as a matter of priority?!

You know that the laws in the College of Law and Economics and the
study of kufr curricula in schools is a clear kufr. There is no doubt in the
kufr of its teachers and its students alike and they the frst whom
shaytan takes possession of and they are from his party.

His parents make him a Jew or a Christian or a Magian

A believer should not be surprised after knowing the state of schools of

the taghut and their bad effects on Muslims, individuals, groups and
nations, because it is one of the greatest evil things, so it must be hated,
denied and we must declare al Baraa (distance ourselves) from it.
It is not permissible for a Muslim who believes in Allah and the Last
Day to put his children to danger in the arms of schools of the taghut.

RasulAllah (salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam) said:

There is none born but is created to his true nature (Islam). It is his
parents who make him a Jew or a Christian or a Magian quite as beasts
produce their young with their limbs perfect. Do you see anything
defcient in them? Then he quoted the Qur'an., The nature made by
Allah in which He has created men there is no altering of Allah's
creation; that is the right religion." (ar-Rum:30) Sahih Muslim 2658

Every child is born on the ftrah, on the true nature with the instinct of
Islam. And if he was left in this condition, he would not have chosen
other than Islam. He would not had have turned away from this ftrah if
there wasn't corruptions and alterations. The most important of them
are false teachings and bad corrupt education. The saying of the
Messenger of Allah, salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam: It is his parents who
make him a Jew or a Christian or a Magian clearly shows this.

That is: they deal with the child with causes and means, which makes
him a pure Christian, or a Jew or a Majusi. And from this: handing the
young kids to the deceitful schools of the kuffar, or atheists under the
pretext of learning. They are raised in their lap and receive their
education and their beliefs from them. And the heart of the child is
subject to what is thrown in it from the good and evil. But that is
tantamount to engraving on stone. They deliver them to these schools
cleanly, then they get them back polluted. So woe to those who are the
cause for their children's error, delusion and temptation.

Ahmad Shakir said:

Is it permissible for a father, whether he is knowledgable or ignorant, to
send his children to learn this creed and act upon it? Is it permissible for
a Muslim man to follow the judiciary in the light of this “Yasaq al Asri”
and to work with it and present its clear law? … The matter in these
laws is crystal clear, clear like the sun, it is obvious and open kufr, there
is no concealment in it, no maneuvering. There is no excuse for anyone
who ascribes himself to Islam, whoever it is, to work with it and submit
to it or approve it. So let a person be warned and every person is
responsible for himself. (Umda al Tafsir, vol. 4)
They used not to prevent one another from wrongdoing that they did

Sending children is one of the greatest causes of kufr billah. Therefore it

is obligatory on the Muslim to stay away from this. Allah ta'ala says:

Cursed were those who disbelieved among the Children of Israel by the
tongue of David and of Jesus, the son of Mary. That was because they
disobeyed and [habitually] transgressed.
They used not to prevent one another from wrongdoing that they did.
How wretched was that which they were doing.
You see many of them becoming allies of those who disbelieved. How
wretched is that which they have put forth for themselves in that Allah
has become angry with them, and in the punishment they will abide
eternally.
And if they had believed in Allah and the Prophet and in what was
revealed to him, they would not have taken them as allies; but many of
them are defantly disobedient. (Maida 5/78-81)

Abdullah bin Mas'ud (May Allah be pleased with him) reported:

The Messenger of Allah (salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam) said, "The frst
defect (in religion) which affected the Children of Israel was that man
would meet another on the way and say to him: 'Fear Allah and abstain
from what you are doing, for this is not lawful for you.' Then he would
meet him the next day and fnd no change in him, but this would not
prevent him from eating with him, drinking with him and sitting in his
assemblies. When it came to this, Allah led their hearts into evil ways on
account of their association with others." Then he (salliAllahu alayhi wa
sallam) recited, "Those among the Children of Israel who disbelieved
were cursed by the tongue of Dawud (David) and 'Isa (Jesus), son of
Maryam (Mary). That was because they disobeyed (Allah and the
Messengers) and were ever transgressing beyond bounds. They used
not to forbid one another from the Munkar (wrong, evildoing, sins,
polytheism, disbelief) which they committed. Vile indeed was what they
used to do. You see many of them taking the disbelievers as their
Auliya' (protectors and helpers). Evil indeed is that which their own
selves have sent forward before them; for that (reason) Allah's wrath fell
upon them and in torment will they abide. And had they believed in
Allah and in the Prophet (Muhammad) and in what has been revealed
to him, never would they have taken them (the disbelievers) as Auliya'
(protectors and helpers); but many of them are the Fasiqun (rebellious,
disobedient to Allah)." (5:78-81)

Then he (salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam) continued: "Nay, by Allah, you

either enjoin good and forbid evil and catch hold of the hand of the
oppressor and persuade him to act justly and stick to the truth, or, Allah
will involve the hearts of some of you with the hearts of others and will
curse you as He had cursed them." [Abu Dawud and At-Tirmidhi, who
categorized it as Hadith Hasan]

The wording in At-Tirmidhi is: Messenger of Allah (salliAllahu alayhi

wa sallam) said, "When the Children of Israel became sinful, their
learned men prohibited them but they would not turn back. Yet, the
learned men associated with them and ate and drank with them. So,
they were cursed at the tongues of Dawud and 'Isa (Jesus), son of
Maryam (Mary), because they were disobedient and were given to
transgression." At this stage the Messenger of Allah (salliAllahu alayhi
wa sallam) who was reclining on a pillow sat up and said, "No, By Him
in Whose Hand my soul is, there is no escape for you but you persuade
them to act justly." (Riyadh as Saliheen 196)

It is not permissible for a Muslim to send his children to schools,

because it is one of the greatest causes of disbelief in this era and is the
means of the taghoot to spread their religion.

The nature of the taghut schools

Schools are the temples built by the tawagheet to produce a generation

who is not religious but believes in his deen (in the religion of the
taghut) and his law and is hostile and fghts for it. And we have good
evidence for that. Those who call themselves secular are a class of
people who have studied in the temples of the tawagheet.

After they graduated, they started to call for the religion of the taghut
and his law. And they want to implement this kufr religion of
democracy and the free mixing of genders and nudity under the name
of civilization and personal freedom. And all of this was injected to
them in the temples of education of these tawagheet which they call
schools. A muslim stays away from these institutions and teaches his
children in his home under his eyes and protection and under his
walayah.

Conclusion

All the reasons in this small booklet prove that it is clear kufr to send
children to the school of taghut. The kufr for this is an so many different
levels, from giving walayah to the kuffar, to compliance to kufr,
learning and teaching kufr. Everybody who sends his children to the
schools of the taghut is a kafr. Even if he doesn't send them to these
castles of kufr but doesn't see it as kufr or doesn't make takfeer on the
ones who send their children to these schools is a kafr.