World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

APPLICATION NOTE 051

AXIEM Co-Simulation with Modelithics Models

Introduction

When designing high frequency circuits, parasitic effects can drastically deteriorate circuit
performance if not appropriately addressed. It is not enough to simply run a schematic level
simulation even if including transmission line interconnect effects. The best chance a designer
has at first-pass design success is through incorporating high-accuracy parasitics models for all
lumped elements or active devices in a design, combined with accurate electromagnetic
analysis for any passive interconnect structure. As outlined in various resources, the methods
for combining electromagnetic analysis and lumped parasitic models is not always
straightforward and can be somewhat involved [1]-[6].

The purpose of this paper is to describe a recommended procedure for using Microwave Global
Models™, as included in Modelithics® CLR Library, in conjunction with NI/AWR’s AXIEM® 3D
planar electromagnetic analysis tool. To illustrate this process, EM co-simulation is compared to
measured S-parameter data of an elliptic high-pass filter.

Nuhertz Technologies’ FilterSolutions® software was used to generate the high-pass elliptical
filter design featured in this paper. The design process starts by establishing and entering
design requirements into the FilterSolutions software and interactively using Modelithics CLR
Library models along with NI/AWR Microwave Design Environment in a procedure similar to that
described in reference [7]. The design goals for this filter are: 5GHz center frequency, maximum
passband ripple of 0.05dB, stopband ratio of 1.2 and stop band attenuation of 25.27dB.

The design process proceeds by selecting the filter topology (elliptical high-pass) and other
design options such as frequency, rejection and bandwidth requirements. The result of the
synthesis that follows is a hybrid lumped / distributed element filter design based on ideal
components. A substrate material (20mil Rogers 4003C) and the Modelithics model part family
(CAP-ATC-100A-001) are then selected and substituted into the ideal filter design. The design
schematic diagram and layout are exported from FilterSolutions to NI/AWR Design Environment
for optimization and further analysis (Figure 1). As explored later in this paper, the inclusion of

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

1 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

Modelithics accurate parasitic models aids prediction of, and facilitates compensation for, the
impact of parasitic effects.

After inclusion of the parasitic models, the most dramatic changes in response are, shifting of
the entire pass-band to a lower frequency range and degradation of the out-of-band rejection. In
order to compensate for these changes, the schematic diagram must be optimized. The first
optimization is completed on the component part values. This optimization will determine the
correct component values needed to compensate for the frequency shift caused by the internal
parasitics of the SMD components and the substrate. After the first optimization is complete,
FilterSolutions will select the closest part value from the Modelithics model part family defined
earlier. The second optimization is performed on the interconnect line lengths and widths to
further improve performance. More information on this process can be found in [7].

FilterSolutions automatically sets up an EM analysis; however the EM structure itself as well as

port configurations must be modified to obtain the most accurate results. The EM analysis setup
procedure for Axiem is the focus herein. This straightforward design process helps to eliminate
guesswork and greatly simplify and speed-up what is normally an extremely iterative and
manually intensive filter design flow.

Figure 1. Left - Layout of 5GHz elliptic high-pass filter. Right - Fabricated 5 GHz elliptic high-pass filter on
20mil Rogers 4003C. Dashed red lines indicate measurement reference planes.

Simulating Pad Stack Effects

By default, Modelithics models include both substrate and solder pad (“pad stack”) effects.
There are two ways to complete co-simulations with Modelithics models: 1) allow the model to
account for all parasitics including pad stack effects (Sim_mode=0) and omit pad geometries
© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com
2 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

from the EM simulation, or 2) remove the pad stack effects from the parasitic model
(Sim_mode=2) and include pad geometries in the EM simulation. As long as the pads used fall
within the Modelithics model’s valid pad range, either method will produce similar results. The
advantage of performing an EM simulation with the pad geometries included is the inclusion of
step discontinuity effects when the pads are a different width than the feed line. (For more
information on using the Sim_mode parameter, see Modelithics Application Note 37 [2]).

EM Extraction Setup

The designer may decide to draw their layout from scratch in AXIEM or, if a schematic with
transmission line elements exists, the designer may choose EM extraction. This app note will
focus on extracting the EM structure from a previously created schematic. To extract an EM
Structure from a schematic, view the schematic layout and ensure the layout is correctly
snapped together. If not, select all elements in the layout and go to Edit Menu > Snap Together
(Figure 2). Failure to snap together the layout prior to EM extraction can cause errors.

Figure 2: Incorrect layout (left). Layout correctly snapped together (right).

NI/AWR Design Environment contains a script to generate automatically the EXTRACT and
SUBSTACK elements to be used in Axiem. To use this utility, all the designer must do is set the
schematic containing the MSUB element as the active window and go to Scripts > EM >
Create_stackup, review the substrate and grid size, and check the “Union Shapes” and “Explicit
Ground (Lower)” options in the EM Extraction dialog window. (For more information on AXIEM
substrate setup see reference [3]). Review the schematic and ensure all transmission line
elements are enabled in the EM extraction. This is completed by double-clicking the model and
ensuring the “enable” box is checked under Properties > Model Options > EM Extraction. Once
© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com
3 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

setup is complete, right-click the EXTRACT block in the schematic and select Add Extraction to
create the EM document. The resulting EM structure will contain all elements enabled for EM
Extraction.

The following section describes a procedure for including pads within the Axiem simulation and
modifying the EM structure to correctly set the reference planes for Modelithics models in
Sim_mode=2 (Figure 4). For simplicity, if the pad stack is excluded from the Axiem simulation
and the Modelithics models are in Sim_mode=0 (Figure 3), skip directly to the “Port
Configuration and De-embedding” section.

Modifying EM the Structure for simulation using Sim_Mode=2

In this section, the pad stack effects are excluded from the Modelithics models and simulated
within the AXIEM simulation. Removing the pad stack effects from the Modelithics model is
accomplished by setting the model’s Sim_mode parameter to 2. Newer versions of the
Modelithics CLR library have an additional parameter that influences how the pad stacks are
treated. The Pad_mode parameter must be set to 1 to include the pads in the layout1. Double-
click on each model and verify the “enable” box is checked under Properties > Model Options >
EM Extraction. Once the setup is complete, right-click the EXTRACT block in the schematic
and select Add Extraction to create the EM document. The resulting EM structure will contain
all transmission lines and pads, as well as also blocks representing the physical components’
position on the pads. The next step is to setup the correct reference planes for the ports.

MODcavx0603102
ID=AVX_AccuP_C1
C=1e-7 uF
MSUB=
Sim_mode=0 - Full Parasitic Model
Tolerance=1
PADW=1 mm
PADL=0.95 mm
PADG=0.65 mm
Pad_mode=0 - Default to Sim_Mode
C_Discrete=Continuous

1
MDLX 2

Figure 3: Example of Modelithics model with Sim_mode=0 in schematic view (left) and layout view (right).

1
Pad_mode parameter is only available in later versions of the Modelithics CLR Library.

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

4 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

MODcavx0603102
ID=AVX_AccuP_C2
C=1e-7 uF
MSUB=
Sim_mode=2 - No Pad Stacks
Tolerance=1
PADW=1 mm
PADL=0.95 mm
PADG=0.65 mm
Pad_mode=0 - Default to Sim_Mode
C_Discrete=Continuous

1
MDLX 2

Figure 4: Example of Modelithics model with Sim_mode=2 in schematic view (left) and layout view (right).

Start with the newly extracted EM Document (Figure 5). All transmission line elements, should
already have had the Union operation performed. Change the material for all pads to match that
of the transmission lines and perform another Union operation.

Figure 5: Newly extracted EM Document.

In the cases studied, the best results were obtained using edge ports. By default, Axiem will not
allow an edge port to be defined in the middle of a conductor. Normally, this would imply that it
is not possible to perform a simulation with the model reference planes defined mid-pad as
would be needed for Sim_mode=2. However, by adding a thin strip of conductor (made of the
same material as the rest of the transmission lines in the circuit) at the location of the part edge
on the pad, it is possible to define an edge port at the correct location.

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

5 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

Proper placement of the conductor strip is shown in Figure 6. Now add edge ports to the
conductor strips on the common edge between conductor strip and component. Once all edge
ports have been defined, delete the block representing the component (maroon rectangle in
Figure 6) from the EM structure.

Add edge ports here

Figure 6:. Illustration of component (maroon) sitting on pads (green). The proper positioning of the additional
conductor strip is shown in yellow.

Port Configuration and De-embedding

The appropriate port configuration that will give the most accurate results depends on the
spacing of the layout. If the edge ports are at least two times the substrate height removed from
any metal (other than the line to which they are connected), the ports should have the Explicit
Ground Reference parameter set to “connect to the lower.” The De-embed option should be
enabled and Ref. plane distance set to zero. However, better results will be obtained by setting
the Explicit Ground Reference to “none” and disabling de-embedding, if the spacing constraint is
not met. For more information on de-embedding in AXIEM, see references [4] and [5]. To
remove coupling between neighboring ports, go to the Port Groups section and assign a unique
name for each port pair, set the type to “mutual.” This is done since Modelithics models already
account for pad-to-pad coupling.

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

6 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

Figure 7: Port setup to connect Modelithics models.

For the input and output ports, draw a conductor box the same width as the line. Make the line
length twice as long as the line width or twice the substrate height, whichever is larger. Add an
edge port, set Explicit Ground Reference to “connect to the lower,” enable de-embedding, and
set the Ref. plane distance equal to the additional line length.

Figure 8: Port setup for input and output ports.

Note on Using Metal Thickness

With some layouts, allowing AXIEM to simulate the EM structure as a planar object (zero
thickness) will yield satisfactory results. However, when the gaps between lines in the layout are
on the order of the line widths used, this simplification may no longer produce accurate results
and the layout will need to be simulated as a 3D object. AXIEM can be set to use the line

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

7 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

thickness specified in the Enclosure Settings by right clicking the EM structure and entering the
Options dialog. In the Mesh tab, uncheck the “Model as Zero Thickness” box.

Figure 9: Enclosure Options dialog.

Meshing in AXIEM

Now, mesh the EM structure by right-clicking the EM structure and selecting Mesh. Check the
mesh to make sure the port setup is correct and the mesh is not producing errors in the Status
Window. An example of a common error/warning when meshing an object is the “high aspect
ratio facets” message. When AXIEM creates a mesh, each area is called a facet. The aspect
ratio of a facet is the ratio of its width to its height. A warning is given but simulation proceeds
when the aspect ratio of a facet exceeds 100; however, an aspect ratio exceeding 1000 results
in an error and failure of the simulation.

Common causes of high aspect ratio facets is shape misalignment and using curved structures
without directing AXIEM to simplify the structure. To simplify the structure, enable “Decimation”
under the Mesh tab. Adding a HI_ASPECT_FACETS annotation to the EM document will allow
viewing of the problem areas and corrections to the layout. High aspect ratio facets are a sign
that the mesh is not appropriate to solve the problem. They unnecessarily increase the number
of facets, and can also cause numerical instabilities when solving the EM structure.
© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com
8 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

Figure 10: Example of meshed EM structure. Note that all ports are grounded.

Simulation and Results

Now disable the EM extract block in the schematic. Leaving the EM extract block active will
overwrite all modifications made to the EM Document. Right-click the EM Structure and select
Simulate. Once the EM data has been generated, create a new schematic including a sub-
circuit element and connect the Modelithics models across the appropriate ports (Figure 11).
Simulate this schematic to obtain the results of the co-simulation. The final filter response
comparing the effect of Sim_modes in the EM co-simulation can be seen in Figure 12.

MODcatc100A001
ID=ATC_100A_C3
C=C7 pF
MSUB=Mdlx20MilRogers4003C1
Sim_mode=sim_flag
Tolerance=1
Pad_mode=0 - Default to Sim_Mode
C_Discrete=Continuous

1
MDLX 2

SUBCKT
ID=S1
PORT NET="EM_Extract_Doc_pads"
P=1
Z=50 Ohm 8 7 1
MDLX

MODcatc100A001
1 6 ID=ATC_100A_C2
PORT C=C4 pF
P=2 MSUB=Mdlx20MilRogers4003C1
2 5 Sim_mode=sim_flag
Z=50 Ohm
Tolerance=1
2 Pad_mode=0 - Default to Sim_Mode
3 4 C_Discrete=Continuous

2 1
MDLX

MODcatc100A001
ID=ATC_100A_C1
C=C1 pF
MSUB=Mdlx20MilRogers4003C1
Sim_mode=sim_flag
Tolerance=1
Pad_mode=0 - Default to Sim_Mode
C_Discrete=Continuous

Figure 11: Schematic used for co-simulation.

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

9 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

Figure 12: Comparison of EM co-simulation with pads included (red line) versus EM co-simulation without
pads (brown line).

To validate the results of the EM co-simulation results, the 5GHz elliptic high-pass filter was
fabricated and tested on a 20mil Rogers 4003C substrate. Figure 13 shows the progressive
improvement in simulation to measurement agreement as more parasitic effects are included.
Not surprisingly, the ideal circuit simulation (black) shows poor agreement with measured data.
The parasitic simulation including substrate effects and component parasitic effects (magenta)
shows improvement over the ideal simulation, but the cut-off frequency is still not accurately
predicted. This is likely because the filter is a hybrid lumped element / distributed filter. Although
the inclusion of Modelithics models accurately captures the capacitor performance, interactions
of the layout and the radial stub transmission line model may not be fully captured with only the
circuit-level simulation. This is why the use of EM co-simulation (red and brown) results in a
more accurate prediction of cut-off frequency, pass-band behavior, and more closely models
out-of-band performance.

Figure 14 shows a narrowband comparison of 3dB cut-off frequency prediction by simulation

versus measured data. Table 1 lists the 3dB cut-off frequencies of all simulations and shows the
calculated percent error of the predicted cut-off frequency from the measured cut-off frequency.
The cut-off frequency of the high-pass filter was predicted accurately by EM co-simulation within
0.8% of the measurement. This is a drastic improvement over the 14.3% shift in cut-off
frequency prediction by the ideal circuit-level simulation. Failing to account for parasitic,
substrate, and layout effects when designing this high frequency circuit would have caused a
severe discrepancy between design goals and realized filter performance. However, using
accurate parasitic models to account for the parasitics of the components combined with EM

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

10 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

analysis to account for layout effects, first-pass design success was achieved with this filter
design.

Figure 13: S11 (left) and S21 (right) for an elliptic high pass filter.
Black line – circuit simulation results using ideal components without EM co-simulation
Magenta line - circuit simulation results using Modelithics models without EM co-simulation
Red line – EM co-simulation using Modelithics models (Sim_mode=2) including pads in layout
Brown line – EM co-simulation results using Modelithics models (Sim_mode=0) excluding pads from layout
Blue symbols – measured S-parameter data

Table 1: 3dB cut-off frequencies for simulations and measured data. Percent error for simulated 3dB cut-off
frequency versus measured 3dB frequency.

Measured data Ideal simulation Parasitic simulation Co-simulation with pads Co-simulation without pads
Freq (GHz) 5.072 5.796 5.37 5.031 5.005
Percent Error N/A 14.3% 5.9% 0.8% 1.3%

Conclusion

When using Modelithics models with AXIEM, it is recommended to use explicitly grounded, de-
embedded edge ports when the ports are separated by at least two substrate heights. Mutually
grouping these port pairs removes the coupling between pads already accounted for in the
Modelithics models. If the layout does not permit two substrate heights of separation between
placement of edge ports, better results can be obtained by using implicit grounding and
disabling de-embedding. This application note demonstrates a procedure to improve simulation
to measurement agreement using Modelithics models in conjunction with AXIEM EM simulation.
© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com
11 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

Figure 14: Narrowband view of high-pass filter S21 response showing the accuracy of the 3dB cut-off
frequency predicted by each simulation versus measured data.
Black line –simulation results using ideal components without EM co-simulation
Magenta line - circuit simulation results using Modelithics models without EM co-simulation
Red line – EM co-simulation using Modelithics models (Sim_mode=2) including pads in layout
Brown line – EM co-simulation results using Modelithics models (Sim_mode=0) excluding pads from layout
Blue symbols – measured S-parameter data.

References

[1] "A Plethora of Ports: Making Sense of the Different Types of Ports in AXIEM,"
Application Note, National Instruments AWR, n.d. Web.
<https://awrcorp.com/download/faq/english/appnotes/axiem_ports.aspx>.

[2] “APPLICATION NOTE 037: Performing EM-Circuit Co-Simulation with Modelithics

Models using Sonnet Suites,” Modelithics – Literature, Modelithics, Inc., 23 Sept. 2010,
Web. <www.modelithics.com/paper/1396.pdf>.

[3] "Using the Electromagnetic Simulator," AWRDE Getting Started Guide: Chapter 7.
MWO, National Instruments AWR, n.d. Web.
<https://awrcorp.com/download/faq/english/docs/Getting_Started/gs_em_sim.html>.
© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com
12 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051
World’s Best RF & Microwave Simulation Models

[4] J. Dunn "EM Tips and Tricks for the Circuit Designer," IEEE Microwave Theory and
Techniques Society Monthly Meeting, Japan House, Dallas, Texas, 29 Mar. 2011, IEEE
Microwave Theory and Techniques Society Dallas Chapter, Web.
<http://ewh.ieee.org/r5/dallas/mtt/meetings/2011/2011_03%20ieee_dallas_dunn.pdf>.

J. Dunn "Ten Things Every Designer Should Know When Using AXIEM," AXIEM™ Best
- Practice Guide, National Instruments AWR, n.d. Web.
<https://awrcorp.com/download/faq/ english/appnotes/ten_tips_for_axiem.aspx>.

[5] S. Skidmore, J. Boh. “APPLICATION NOTE 048: Recommendations for Port Setup
When Using ADS Momentum and Modelithics Models,” Modelithics – Literature.
Modelithics, Inc., 11 Aug. 2014. Web. <www.modelithics.com/paper/3298.pdf>.

[6] I. Delgado, L. Levesque, L. Dunleavy and J. Kahler, “Synthesize Filters with Wideband
Success,” Microwaves & RF , July 2014.

[7] I. Delgado, “APPLICATION NOTE 052: A Design Flow for Rapid and Accurate Filter
Prototyping,” Modelithics – Literature. Modelithics, Inc., 30 June 2015. Web.
<www.modelithics.com/paper/3298.pdf>.

About this note

This note was authored by Isabella Delgado (student intern at Modelithics) with substantial help
from Scott Skidmore (Modelithics), Scott Muir (student intern at Modelithics, now with Qorvo)
and Mark Saffian (AWR Group, NI).

Contact Information

For more information about Modelithics’ products and services, please contact Modelithics, Inc.,
Email: [email protected] / Web : www.modelithics.com

For more information about NI AWR software products please see www.ni.com/awr.

All other trademarks are property of their respective holder.

© 2015 MODELITHICS, INC. www.modelithics.com

13 of 13
E-mail: [email protected] Rev. 150623 App Note 051