Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document

Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document.
Prepared Jointly by the Borough Council of Wellingborough

And East Northamptonshire Council.
Adopted June 2013

If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative
format (large print, tape format or other languages) please
contact us on 01832 742000 or 01933 229777.
East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 2 of 39

TREES AND LANDSCAPES SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT - Adopted by East Northamptonshire Council on 13 February 2013
and the Borough Council of Wellingborough on 11 June 2013.
Contents
Page
1.0 Introduction 4
2.0 Landscape design for new developments 10
3.0 Trees and development 19
Appendices:
Appendix 1 - List of consultees
Appendix 2 - Landscape maintenance plans
Appendix 3 - Landscape Management Plans - Guidance
Appendix 4 - Example Tree Survey
Appendix 5 - Example Tree Retention Plan
Appendix 6 - Example Tree Protection Plan
Appendix 7 - Example Protective Fencing and Site Signage
Appendix 8 - Glossary of Terms

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Trees, and the landscape they form part of are key to the character of an area and
significantly contribute to the environment surrounding us. Issues relating to their
protection, and the provision of new landscape features are a vital part of the planning
process.
1.2 This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) (Consultation Draft) has been prepared
jointly by East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough1 as
a result of both authorities having similar tree and landscape issues arising through the
planning process at both authorities.
Purpose and structure of this document
1.3 This document sets out the Councils’ approach to landscape design and tree matters
which affect new developments, and promotes high quality, well maintained landscapes
and open spaces. It should be used by those submitting planning applications for
residential development, however the principles can be applied to all types of
development. The document further sets out what is required during the planning
process.
1.4 As this document is intended to have a dual purpose and is divided into two sections:
Section two
Sets out the Councils' approach to landscape design and is intended to:
 promote high quality, well maintained landscapes and open spaces which contribute
to the surrounding environment and are enjoyed by residents and visitors.
 ensure effective management of newly landscaped areas.
 set out the requirements of the Councils when submitting a planning application for
sites where landscape matters are a material consideration.
Section three
Addresses issues relating to existing trees in and around new development, and is
intended to:
 ensure that adequate provision for the protection of trees on and near development
sites is made, and that the guidance contained within British Standard 5837:2012
(Trees and development) is followed appropriately.
 set out the requirements of the Councils when submitting a planning application for
sites where trees are a material consideration.
1
For the purposes of this document "The Council" or "The Council's" will refer to East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of
Wellingborough
Document Status and policy context
1.5 This SPD has been prepared under the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
(the “2004 Act”). The Trees and Landscape SPD is a statutory Local Development
Document (LDD), covering the whole of the District of East Northamptonshire and
Borough of Wellingborough.
1.6 The Trees and Landscapes SPD was prepared in accordance with the Town and
Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (Statutory Instrument
2012 No. 767) (the “2012 Regulations”), which set out the minimum requirements for the
preparation of an SPD. It is essential for these requirements to be met in order for this
document to be classified as a statutory LDD, thereby supplementing the statutory Local
Plans for East Northamptonshire and the Borough of Wellingborough.
1.7 This SPD will supplement policies within the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial
Strategy (CSS), adopted June 2008, the overall joint Development Plan Document (DPD)
for both East Northamptonshire and the Borough of Wellingborough. The specific
preparation process for the Trees and Landscapes SPD is directed by 2012 Regulations
12-14 and 35. The process also needs to have regard to the North Northamptonshire
Statement of Community Involvement (SCI), adopted October 2006.
Consultation under Regulations 12(a) and 35

1.8 This Trees and Landscape SPD (Consultation Draft) has been prepared following
informal preliminary discussions between the two local planning authorities (East
Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough) and key
stakeholders during autumn 2011 – summer 2012. The Consultation Draft was approved
for a 6-week period of public consultation by the East Northamptonshire Council’s
Planning Policy Committee on 22 October 2012 and the Borough Council of
Wellingborough’s Development Committee on 23 October 2012. A list of consultees
(consultation bodies and individuals) is set out in Appendix I.
1.9 A summary of the representations received from the six weeks consultation and the
Council’s responses to these; are set out in a separate document [Statement under
Regulation 12(a)]. This document was considered and adopted by East
Northamptonshire Councils’ Planning Policy Committee on 13 February 2013 and the
Borough Council of Wellingborough’s Development Committee on 11 June 2013. It is
now available to view on both the Council’s websites.

Policy and legal framework
1.10 The Trees and Landscapes SPD supports, and is directed by, a number of policies at
national, regional, sub-regional (Northamptonshire/ North Northamptonshire) wide, and
local (Borough/ District) level. The preparation process is also directed by the 2004 Act
and the 2012 Regulations, although this regulatory framework only sets out the minimum
requirements necessary for this document to be classified as a SPD.
National policies
1.11 National planning policy is set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF),
adopted 27 March 2012. This replaces previous national policies, which were contained
within Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) and Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs).
1.12 The new NPPF contains a range of policies/ sub-sections towards achieving sustainable
development, which the Trees and Landscapes SPD has taken into account:
 Requiring good design – paragraphs 56-68

 Promoting healthy communities – paragraphs 69-78
 Meeting the challenge of climate change – paragraphs 93-108
 Conserving and enhancing the natural environment – paragraphs 109-125
Regional policies
1.13 Under the 2004 Act, the East Midlands Regional Plan (adopted March 2009) forms
part of the statutory planning policy framework. Nevertheless, the Government (Secretary
of State for Communities and Local Government) has signalled its intention to abolish
Regional Plans (Regional Spatial Strategies) and it is anticipated that this will take place
during 2012/13, following the recent implementation of the 2011 Localism Act (April
2012).
North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (adopted June 2008)

1.14 The North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (CSS) is the principal DPD guiding
development within East Northamptonshire and the Borough of Wellingborough, together
with Kettering and Corby Boroughs. This sets out a vision for the delivery of high quality
development and the protection and enhancement of valuable built and natural
resources. The Trees and Landscapes SPD, once adopted, would supplement CSS
Policy 5; Policy 13 (specifically parts (h), (i), (l), (n) and (o)), and Policy 16 (specifically
parts (j) and (k)).
1.15 The 2008 CSS is now under review, with consultations now taking place on the
"emerging plan" document, due to end on October 2012. The pre-submission draft Core
Strategy review is likely to be published for formal statutory consultation during early
2013. This will be followed by an Independent Examination and it is anticipated that the
Core Strategy review will be adopted by 2014.
Legal and regulatory framework (trees)

1.16 The Council is guided by legislation and policy guidance at a national, regional and
local level relating to trees. Specifically, The Town and Country Planning Act 1990

(Section 197), which charges the Local Planning Authority with a duty to ensure,
whenever it is appropriate, when granting planning permission, that adequate provision is
made for the preservation and planting of trees through planning conditions and the
serving of Tree Preservation Orders (TPO's).
1.17 Principally trees may be protected through the designation of a TPO (TPO), or through
them being situated within a designated conservation area. However, other controls,
such as planning conditions, restrictive covenants and Forestry Commission felling
restrictions may apply.
Tree Preservation Orders

1.18 TPOs are formal, documented designations made by the Council under Part Vlll of the
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Town and Country Planning (Trees)
Regulations 2012. Their intention is to protect and highlight trees which are considered
to have a high level of public visual amenity value, or those which have a historic or
commemorative connection. With the backing of national law, it is a criminal offence to
carry out works to a protected tree without the consent of the Local Planning Authority.
1.19 An application for consent to carry out works to a TPO protected tree must:
 be made in writing to the Local Planning Authority
 state the reasons for making the application
 identify the tree(s) to which the application relates on a plan
 specify the tree(s) work operations for which consent is sought.
2
Application forms and guidance notes are available from the Council.
1.20 On receipt of a valid application the Local Authority has 8 weeks to make a decision. In
dealing with the application the Authority may;
 refuse consent
 grant consent unconditionally
 grant consent subject to conditions
 Grant partial consent and partial refusal.
If the Authority refuses consent, grant consent subject to conditions or fail to determine
the application within the 8 week time frame the applicant can appeal to the Planning
Inspectorate.3
Conservation Areas
1.21 Conservation areas are areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or
appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. They are designated by the
2
Applications within East Northamptonshire:
http://www.east-northamptonshire.gov.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.aspx?documentID=633&pageNumber=7
Applications within Wellingborough

http://www.wellingborough.gov.uk/info/200074/planning/583/application_forms_and_information_packs/6
3
http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/appeals/otherappealscasework/treepreservation
Local Authority and their designation brings about a number of controls relating to trees.
1.22 Principally the designation of a conservation area prevents pruning or felling of any tree
over 7.5cm diameter, at 1.5m above ground level, (or 10cm if thinning to help the
growth of other trees) without giving the Council six weeks prior notification of any
intended works.
1.23 The notification can take any form i.e. the submission of a national notification form,
letter or email (known as a section 211 notice), however it must describe the work
proposed and include sufficient particulars to identify the trees. The six weeks notification
time allows time for the Council to create a TPO if considered appropriate, however if a
tree is dead or dangerous, six weeks notification to the Council is not required but
contractors or tree owners are advised to give five days notice of intended work.
1.24 The penalties for destruction of a tree subject to a TPO or a tree within a conservation
area are currently a fine of up to £20,000 and £2,500 unlawful pruning. These are
determined by the magistrates or crown courts.
The Councils’ Corporate Plans

1.25 Both East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough have
produced corporate plans, setting out their key priorities and proposed outcomes over a
four year period.
East Northamptonshire Council

1.26 East Northamptonshire Council’s Corporate Plan 2011-15 was approved on 27 April
2011. The Council’s overarching corporate outcomes are summarised as:
 Improvements for the community: Sustainable
 Effective processes: effective partnership working, strong community leadership
Borough Council of Wellingborough

1.27 The Borough Council of Wellingborough approved its Corporate Business Plan in 2010.
The Council’s stated mission is to “lead, engage and perform”. It has identified five
priority objectives:
1. Promoting high quality growth

2. Reducing crime and anti-social behaviour
3. Improving life changes for young people
4. Delivering efficient and responsive services
5. Enhancing the environment
1.28 The Trees and Landscape SPD will deliver a range of specific policy objectives, which
are closely related to the Councils’ corporate outcomes and objectives. The specific
outcomes to be delivered by this SPD are:

Trees and Landscapes Links to East Links to Borough Council
SPD outcomes Northamptonshire Council of Wellingborough
corporate outcomes corporate outcomes
 Promote high quality, well  Good quality of life:  Promoting high quality
maintained landscapes Sustainable; Healthy growth
and open spaces which  Reducing crime and anti-
contribute to the social behaviour
surrounding environment  Enhancing the environment
and are enjoyed by
residents and visitors
 Ensure effective  Good quality of life:  Reducing crime and anti-
management of newly Sustainable; Clean; Healthy social behaviour
landscaped areas  Effective management  Enhancing the environment
 Set out the requirements  Good quality of life:  Promoting high quality
of the councils when Sustainable growth
submitting a planning  High quality service delivery  Delivering efficient and
application for sites  Effective management responsive services
where landscape matters  Enhancing the environment
are a material
consideration
 Protect existing, and  Good quality of life:  Enhancing the environment
Increase biodiversity / Sustainable
ecological value of
development site.
 Ensure that adequate  Good quality of life:  Promoting high quality
provision for the Sustainable growth
protection trees on and  Effective management  Delivering efficient and
near developments sites responsive services
is made, and that the  Enhancing the environment
guidance contained within
British Standard
5837:2012 (Trees and
development) is followed
appropriately
 Set out the requirements  Good quality of life:  Promoting high quality
of the Councils when Sustainable growth
submitting a planning  High quality service delivery  Delivering efficient and
applications for sites  Effective management responsive services
where trees are a material  Enhancing the environment
consideration
1.29 The Corporate Plans have also been guided by the sustainable communities strategies
(SCSs), prepared by the local strategic partnerships for East Northamptonshire and
Wellingborough. Both emphasise the enhancement or improvement of the natural and
built environment as important community aspirations.
1.30 Overall, it is emphasised that the Trees and Landscape SPD is closely tied to the
delivery of priority SCS and corporate outcomes, as highlighted above.

2.0 Landscape design for new developments.
2.1 For the purposes of this SPD, "landscape" includes all visual features that make up the
appearance and composition of the natural environment. From country parks and
gardens, to woodlands and meadows, through to street planting and community
orchards. All of these make up the landscape that surrounds us and contribute to the
distinctive character of our towns and villages.
2.2 The maintenance and enhancement of existing green spaces within the landscape
through development is key to the creation of high quality areas which are used and
enjoyed by residents and visitors. Quality landscape provision within new developments
relies on good design and planning.
2.3 For the purposes of this document, the term "green space" will refer to areas such as
parks, gardens, street planting and play spaces etc. All of which make up the wider
landscape that surrounds us.
Why is landscape design important?
2.4 Well designed, planned and maintained green spaces can be the making of a new
development and can have a positive impact on the areas where we live and work. The
benefits of well designed green spaces range from increased economic investment
through to cultural, social and environmental benefits. Well designed green spaces can
also:
 Reduce the predicted effects of a warming climate, particularly in urban areas.
 Improve the health and well being of residents and visitors.
 Reduce crime and provide a "sense of place".
 Significantly increase local biodiversity.
 Increase the value and attractiveness of an area.
2.5 Conversely, green spaces that are poorly planned, have no clear use, and are
inappropriately planted and maintained can become underused and run down, often
leading to anti social behaviour. Green space which results from the "left over's" of
development can become a maintenance and financial burden, offering no real benefit to
the surrounding area.

Landscape design and the planning process
2.6 Landscape provision and green space design is an integral part of the planning
process. Where early consideration is given to landscape matters, new developments
tend to have a stronger sense of place and character and a feeling of increased quality.
2.7 When submitting a planning application for development, the Council will expect to see
evidence that landscape provision and green space design have been clearly considered
as part of the site design.
2.8 The following questions should be used as a prompt when designing a site and also by
the Local Authority as a guide to green space design:
1. Does the site sit comfortably within the surrounding landscape?
 All sites form part of the wider landscape and have the potential to impact (positively
and negatively) on their surroundings. For all developments, an assessment of the
surrounding landscape character should be made and the site layout designed in such a
way to ensure that it complements its surroundings. In addition, the potential for the site
to "link" into the surrounding landscape should be explored.
 For larger scale developments, the county wide landscape character assessments
should be consulted to ensure that the intended use of the site does not detrimentally
impact on the surrounding landscape. Further general information on landscape
character assessments can be sourced from Natural England 4. County specific
information can be sourced from the River Nene Regional Park5
 Designated zones of wildlife importance should also be consulted, such as the Upper
Nene Valley Gravel Pits Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific
Interest (SSSIs) and the Nene Valley Nature Improvement Area (NIA) as part of a wider
landscape assessment.
2. Does the site layout incorporate a clear green infrastructure?
 Green infrastructure (G.I) is a network of green spaces and environmental features that
link together within the surrounding landscape.
 While isolated landscape features (such as parks, woodlands and allotments etc) can
provide a range of benefits, where they are strategically connected to other nearby
features, these benefits to the environment and the local community are significantly
increased.
4
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/landscape/englands/character/assessment/default.aspx
5
http://riverneneregionalpark.org/default.asp?PageID=426&n=RNRP+Home+2+Jan12
 Not only should early consideration be given to linking useable green spaces within the
development, but also to how these green spaces link to any wider G.I in the
surrounding area. A G.I network should not simply stop at the site boundaries but create
opportunities to link into the surrounding area.
Image 2 - Green infrastructure plan for Priors Hall (East Northamptonshire and Corby).
Local scale areas of open space are linked by tree lined avenues to the central recreation area,
which links provide access to the surrounding courtside. (Source: David Lock Associates)

3. Are existing site features protected and enhanced within the proposed layout
of the development?
 The value of retained natural features is significant, and existing features such as
wooded areas, trees, hedgerows and watercourses can contribute to the character of a
new development and create a sense of early maturity. Where practical, existing
features should be retained and incorporated into the layout of the site. The following
should be considered:
 Does the existing topography of the site provide interesting viewpoints? Consider
how these could be incorporated into the site layout.
 Does the site contain wooded areas, mature trees and hedgerows? These can
add significant value to the character of a development site and the design should
seek to plant new trees where possible. Further details concerning trees and
development can be found in section three.
 Does the site have existing ecological value or certain habitats which need to be
protected and enhanced as part of the development?
 Can existing watercourses be utilised as part of the landscape design? Where
appropriately incorporated, these can add significant interest to open space areas.
 If a neighbouring site contains existing natural features, consider how these can
be linked to new "green features" in the proposed development.
Image 3 - Mature trees incorporated into a new open space area create a sense of early
maturity. Higham Ferrers. (Source: East Northamptonshire Council)
4. Is the open space well designed and usable?
 If there is a requirement for the provision of more formal green space within the site,
such as play areas, parks and sports facilities, they should be of high quality design.
Where these spaces are not appropriately designed, they can often be to the detriment
of the surrounding area.
 The "Open Space SPD" should be consulted for sites within in East Northamptonshire6.
When designing a formal open space, the following should be considered:
 Does the area have a clear purpose and use?

It is important to consider what type of open space is being designed and what
its intended use will be. Areas that do not have a clear purpose or use are often
underused. Areas marked as "open space" which do not have a clear purpose,
use and design are not considered to be acceptable.
 Does the open space contribute to the character of the surrounding area?
Understanding the existing character of the surrounding area is the first step in
designing a green space that contributes to the distinctiveness and identity of
the area.
Regardless of the end use of the space, it should reflect and enhance the
character of its surroundings, or where this is not possible, create a new
character for the development.
 Is the open space multi functional and sustainable?

All types of open space should have an element of multifunctionality and
sustainability. Consider how a sports pitch might be used as part of a
sustainable drainage system? Could the park be used for community events and
celebrations? Are gardens designed to encourage wildlife and add to the
biodiversity of the area?
 Does the area have a clear circulation?

How people move within and access an open space is key to creating a
successful design. Consideration should be given to how users might want
access the open space initially and also how they would walk or cycle around it.
Areas should have clear routes that enable access for all.
 Is play equipment is required?

Areas of open space often are required to contain an element of play equipment
for varying age groups. In these situations, the incorporation of “natural play”
elements should be used where possible. Large play boulders, mounds and
tunnels can add significant value to the appearance and enjoyment of play areas
in open spaces.
6
East Northamptonshire Council's Open Space SPD: http://www.east-northamptonshire.gov.uk/openspacespd

Image 4 - Newly renovated open space. The design has incorporated clearly defined uses,
good circulation and effective planting and surfacing. Victoria Park, London. (Source: The
Landscape Institute)
5. Does the proposed street layout and design incorporate appropriate tree and
shrub planting?
 Some of the most effective landscaping associated with new development is achieved
through appropriate road layouts and street design. This is often where the character of
the development can be clearly emphasised and key routes through the site can be
highlighted.
 Street trees should be included as part of the landscape design for all developments.
Not only can this type of planting help to enclose the roadway and give a feeling of
quality, it can also help to create valuable shade areas in the summer months, improve
air quality and increase the biodiversity value of the area.
 The appropriate use of tree planting to create avenues and planted parking areas can
help to give a sense of direction and place within a development, especially when used
on the key routes.

 The provision of individual front gardens (rather than just paving and hard surfacing) in
the street not only contributes to the character and distinctiveness of an area, but also
allows new residents to express their individuality and can significantly contribute to the
habitat and wildlife potential of the site as a whole.
Image 5 - New street planting along a strategic routes provides a sense of natural direction and
encloses otherwise vast road structures. Priors Hall, Corby. (Source: East Northamptonshire
Council)
Image 6 - Planting in front gardens provides key habitat areas and significantly contributes to
the character of the street. Higham Ferrers. (Source: East Northamptonshire Council)
6. Do the planting and street furniture details reflect the overall design?
 Even where the overall design of the green spaces and networks for a site is well
considered and designed, its quality can be significantly reduced by not selecting
appropriate planting, furniture and surfacing etc. To ensure that the overall design is not
diminished, the following should be considered:
 The planting choice through the site should clearly reinforce the overall design of
the green spaces. Trees and plants should be selected that are appropriate for
their intended surroundings, and, where appropriate, native species (of local
provenance) should be chosen.
 Interest can be added to a scheme by using surfacing and materials in an

imaginative way. Consider how furniture choices could impact on the use of a
space, is formal seating needed? Could shaped boulders be utilised? Could
standard bollards and railings be replaced by more creative structures?
Image 7 - Paving design, planting choices and the use of unusual benches add to design
quality. Corby Station. (Source: North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit)

Maintenance of landscape
2.9 The success of new landscape features and green spaces not only depends on high
quality design, but also appropriate and continued management.
2.10 Regardless of quality a particular design for newly landscaped areas, if inadequate
provision has been made for ongoing maintenance they can become unattractive and
underused. The most common causes of failure in landscaping and planting schemes
include:
 Poor ground preparation

Trees and shrubs planted into compacted and nutrient poor soil are unlikely to
thrive and may die.
 Soil contamination and weed growth.

Contaminants within the soil and heavy weed growth can have a significant affect
on newly planted areas, preventing establishment and inhibiting growth.
 Competition for water and nutrients

New planting can become over dominated by existing grasses and
shrubs, even well kept grasses around new trees will reduce the growth rate of
new trees.
 Animal damage
Unless new planting is protected, animal damage can result in huge planting
losses. Methods of protection should be appropriate to the surrounding area, for
example, where deer are known to be present the protection level will be
significantly increased.
 Mechanical damage
Trees which are unprotected by guards around the base of the trunk can be
easily damaged by strimming and mowing.
 Poor aftercare
All elements of newly planted landscapes can fail if appropriate aftercare is not
received.
2.11 Where developments require the provision of new landscaping, a maintenance plan
should be submitted with the planting details, providing site specific details for each new
planted area. The period of time to which any maintenance plan applies will depend on
the site conditions and proposed planting, and will be set via the associated planning
conditions for the development. Applicants are advised that planning conditions generally
require replacement planting where plants have failed to become established within the
first five years. Maintenance details should be submitted with all landscaping schemes
and should (as a minimum) include the information detailed in appendix 2.

2.12 To ensure that all new landscapes are appropriately managed from the outset,
identification of who will manage each area should be established during the
planning process.
3. Trees and development.

3.1 Trees and woodlands are considered to be some of the most visually significant
landscape features that define the character of our towns and villages. From the ancient
woodlands at Wakerley, to the Victorian street planting found in our towns, trees are a key
part of our distinctive area.
3.2 Existing trees can significantly contribute to the setting of new developments, and can
give the impression of early maturity and increased design quality. Because of their
importance, local planning authorities in the UK have a duty to consider tree protection and
planting when assessing planning applications for development.
3.3 Without appropriate consideration, existing trees and hedges can be easily damaged and
lost through development. Damage can occur to trees through thoughtless construction
practices such as vehicle collisions and root severance, as well as through more indirect
factors, such as changes in the surrounding ground levels, compaction of the soil
structure and contamination. One movement of a heavy vehicle over a tree's roots is
enough to cause irreparable damage, while trenching and compaction causes
excessive damage to trees all too frequently.
Image 8 - Severe root damage caused by trenching for services and ineffective protective
fencing. The damage caused is likely to result in structural failure and crown dieback.
(Source:AIE.org.uk)
A Guide to BS5387:2012.
3.4 British Standard 5837:2012 (BS 5837:2012 - Trees in relation to design, demolition and
construction - Recommendations) provides clear guidance on how trees and hedges
should be accounted for as part of developments to ensure appropriate retention,
protection and management. It is the key document used by the Council when assessing
planning applications where trees and hedges are a material consideration and its
requirements should be closely followed by applicants.
3.5 Where trees and hedges are a consideration, a number of tree specific reports and
surveys will be required at various stages of the planning process. These cover all
stages of a development from the initial site and tree survey, through the construction of
new buildings, to future planting and landscape maintenance.
3.6 Figure 1 (below), outlines the tree based information that may be required at each
stage of the planning process, depending on the size of the site, tree cover and overall
complexity. Further clarification can be sought from the Council regarding the level
of detail required for a particular application prior to submission. Sections 3.7 to 3.18 of
this document provide a brief description of each of the report and plans listed below.
Planning stage Minimum arboricultural detail required.

Pre-application Tree Survey
Draft tree retention / removal plan
Full Tree Survey

Planning Application
Finalised tree retention/removal plan
Tree Protection Plan
Retained trees and root protection areas shown on proposed layout

plan
Strategic hard and soft landscape design, including species and

location of new planting
Arboricultural impact assessment
Matters that may be dealt Detailed Arboricultural Method Statement

with by planning
conditions. Alignment of utilities and services (including drainage), including
(However this is details of installation methods where required.
dependant on the site method
complexity and these
reports / plans may be Dimensioned Tree Protection Plan
required as part of the
initial submission Schedule of works to retained trees, e.g. access facilitation pruning
documents.)
Detailed hard and soft landscape design
Arboricultural site monitoring schedule

Tree survey
3.7 The starting point in producing a successful design is the gathering of good baseline
information. A tree survey should be undertaken as part of the initial site investigations,
and should record all relevant information for trees on and adjacent to the site. This may
include details of habitats and protected species contained within the trees where
appropriate.
3.8 As a result of a Tree Survey, the existing trees will fall within one of four categories (A, B,
C or U) depending on their quality. Those in category A are considered to be the most
desirable to retain, with those which are clearly dead being recorded as U. BS5837:
2012 provides clear guidance on the use of these retention categories.
3.9 The baseline data collected in the survey should be made available to all relevant parties
in the planning process at an early stage as it forms an important part of the evidence
base underpinning the Design and Access Statement. The classification of the trees
should be based on the condition and value of the trees at the time of the study, and not a
preconceived layout for the site, and may also include (where relevant) details of any
nearby veteran and/or ancient trees. An example Tree Survey is provided in Appendix 4.
Tree Retention plan
3.10 A plan showing trees proposed for retention and removal should be submitted in draft
during any pre application discussions with the Council, or as a finalised version when
submitting a planning application. It should be to a recognisable scale and record all
onsite trees. It should show the following:
 Trees to be retained: marked with their survey numbers and circled with a
continuous line.
 Trees to be removed: marked with their survey numbers and circled with a dashed
line or similar. An example of a Tree Retention Plan can be found in Appendix 5.
Tree Protection Plan
3.11 A Tree Protection Plan shows how the retained trees and hedges will be physically
protected during site clearance and construction of the development. It should be
superimposed over a final site layout drawing and clearly indicate the precise location
of all protective barriers and proposed hard surfacing.
3.12 The location of protective barriers around retained trees should be based on the
required Root Protection Areas (RPAs) rather than an area which fits comfortably around
the construction. BS 5837:2012 sets out a specific method for the calculation of RPA's,
however this can be simply translated for single stemmed trees, by multiplying the
diameter the trunk of each tree by 12. An example of a Tree Protection Plan can be found
in Appendix 6.

3.13 Any required ground protection or commentary on alternative protection should also be
noted on the Tree Protection Plan. Areas designated by the protective fencing as
construction exclusion zones (CEZ's) should not be altered or disturbed without the prior
agreement of the Local Planning Authority.
3.14 CEZs should be denoted on site by the use of securing "herras" style fencing which is
clearly signed as a "Construction exclusion zone". The use of chestnut paling or plastic
mesh is not appropriate. The protective fencing should be erected prior to any onsite
works and remain in place until the completion of the development. Where full Root
Protection Areas are not possible due to the constraints of the site, alternative methods
of ground protection should be used. Examples of appropriate protective fencing and
signage can be found in Appendix 7.
Arboricultural Impact Assessment
3.15 An Arboricultural Impact Assessment (AIA) should draw on all of the baseline tree
information and the proposed site layout, and provide an evaluation of the direct and
indirect impacts of the development on the nearby trees.
3.16 It should take account of any required tree loss to facilitate the layout, discuss the
elements of the proposals that could have a damaging arboricultural impact and propose,
where appropriate, mitigation measures. An AIA should include copies of the Tree
Survey, the Tree Retention / Removal Plan and provide details of any required facilitation
pruning.
Arboricultural Method Statement
3.17 The Council may also ask for the submission and approval of an Arboricultural Method
Statement. These statements detail how the development will actually take place around
any retained trees.
3.18 While the level of detail required in a Aboricultural Method Statement will vary from
site to site, they generally cover the same basic topics such as how demolition will occur,
where any materials will be stored and how the development will be phased. The Council
can advise applicants on the content of the method statement, should this be required.
Designing with trees
3.19 While it is recognised that many factors will need to be taken into consideration when
designing the layout of a new development, tree retention has the potential to significantly
contribute to the sites character and needs to be accounted for at an early stage.
3.20 Following the completion of the surveys and analysis of the site described in paragraphs
3.6 to 3.10; consideration should be given to which trees are the most suitable for
retention. Trees of the highest quality (those categorised as A and B trees in the Tree
Survey) should be retained as part of the proposed layout, as they are likely to have the
most positive contribution to their surroundings.
3.21 Trees of moderate and low value (category C and below) should not automatically
be considered for removal, as they may play a useful role in site screening, or as and
important habitat feature. As part of the design the following factors should be considered:
 Physical dimensions of retained trees

The physical size and shape of the trees is likely to be the first factor to be
considered. The crown shape and spread, along with the root area should be
considered as part of the design.
 Current and future relationships

A realistic assessment of the current and future relationships between the existing
trees and new structures should be made. Retained trees that are inappropriately
incorporated into site layout can become a nuisance, often leading to pressure for
them to be removed.
Larger trees might be better suited to areas of open space or more extensive private
gardens where conflict is less likely to occur. The potential impact of the shading
caused by tree canopies should be considered, and situations where dense shading
could be problem should be avoided. Seasonal problems such as Honeydew and leaf
drop might also need to be considered.
 Roadways and surfacing

Access into a site is often one of the first issues to be considered when a development
is planned, and can have a significant impact on existing trees.
Traditional road construction and surfacing does not allow water and nutrients to
percolate through to the soil (and roots) beneath. Also the excavation and compaction
required to construct an access can easily damage the soil structure and the root
areas of retained trees.
To avoid this type of damage, main access driveways and other hard surfaces
should fully avoid the RPA's of retained trees. Where this is not possible, the use of
alternative, porous road, "no dig" construction techniques should be used.
 Alternative construction techniques

On particularly constrained sites, the use of alternative foundations may be required.
These should be discussed with the Council during the planning process.
 Services
Requirements for above and below ground services should be considered.
Underground services should not cut through the required root protection areas for
retained trees. Where there is no alternative route, specialist installation
methods should be considered.

Construction and aftercare
3.22 In addition to the design and layout of a development, the physical practicalities of
developing the site should be considered as part of the Arboricultural Method Statement.
Significant time may have been taken to formulate an appropriate site layout, taking full
account of any onsite trees, and yet they can be easily and significantly damaged at all
stages of the construction.
3.23 While the Arboricultural Method Statement may include details of construction phasing,
protection and pruning that may be required to allow the development to take place, this
information is often not passed on to site clearance and construction contractors.
3.24 To ensure that all parties are aware of the arboricultural factors of the development and
understand the importance of the construction exclusion zones, full details of protected
areas and works likely to affect the trees should be made available. All protected areas
should be appropriately signed, and regular meetings held at key stages of the
development with the appointed Arboricultural Consultant. In some cases, the Council
may wish to monitor the progress of the site, especially where trees may be particularly
sensitive or the site is very constrained.

Appendix 1 – List of Consultees
Organisation
Town Councils
Higham Ferrers Town Council Irthlingborough Town Council
Oundle Town Council Raunds Town Council
Rushden Town Council Thrapston Town Council
Parish Councils
Great Addington Little Addington
Aldwincle Apethorpe
Ashton Barnwell
Benefield Blatherwycke
Brigstock Bulwick
Chelveston-cum-caldecott Clopton
Collyweston Cotterstock
Deene and Deenethorpe Denford
Duddington with Fineshade Easton on the Hill
Fotheringhay Glapthorn
Hargrave Harringworth
Hemmington, Luddington, Thurning Islip
Kings Cliffe Laxton
Lilford-cum-wigsthorpe & Thorpe Achurch Lowick and Slipton
Lutton Nassington
Newton Bromswold Pilton, Stoke Doyle and Wadenhoe
Polebrook Ringstead
Southwick Stanwick
Sudborough Tansor
Titchmarsh Twywell
Wakerly Warmington
Woodford Woodnewton
Yarwell
Bozeat Earls Barton

Easton Maudit Ecton
Finedon Great Doddington
Great Harrowden Grendon
Hardwick Irchester
Isham Little Harrowden
Mears Ashby Orlingbury
Strixton Sywell
Wilby Wollaston

Other Statutory consultees
Northamptonshire County Council –
Planning
Pocket Parks Officer
Head of Countryside
Highways
Northamptonshire Police
North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit
Sport England
Anglian Water
Northamptonshire Wildlife Trust
Forestry Commision
Environment Agency
Natural England
English Heritage
National Planning Casework Unit
Local/interest organisations
Northamptonshire ACRE
Disability Rights Commission
CPRE
RSPB
Groundwork Northamptonshire
Rockingham Forest Trust
River Nene Regional Park
Burghley House Trust
National Trust
Woodland Trust
BTCV
Living Landscape Trust
Wellingborough and District Horticultural Society
North Northants Badgers Assoc
Farming and Wildlife Advisory Trust
Northampton Association for the blind
Ramblers Association
Nene Valley Association
National Trust of Allotments Gardeners
Country Land and Business Association
Composting Association

Appendix 2 – Landscape Management Plans
It is in everyone’s interest to create and sustain an attractive landscape setting to
developments, for the benefit of both occupiers and the public. The submission of a
management plan and its implementation is often made a condition of planning permission or
the subject of a planning agreement.
To achieve this, planned management and maintenance operations are needed for both “soft”
planted and “hard” landscaped spaces. These operations may well need to change over time as
planting matures, and as the changing character and needs of the occupied development evolve.
The content of the management plan will depend on the site and the design and should be
specifically tailored to the area. Specific management of habitat and wildlife areas may also be
required and this should also be included within maintenance plans where necessary. As an
outline, the following information may be required:
Planting and establishment

 Watering in drought periods, including volume, frequency and method of application.
 Weed controls, such as residual and spray herbicide applications and mulch
reinstatement.
 Inspections and making good losses with replacement planting stock.
 Firming -in and possible pruning of wind-rocked plants. Tying-in of climbing plants.
 Hedge clipping and ultimate design heights.
 Formative shrub pruning - note that the routine clipping of shrubs should be avoided.
 Maintenance of 1m diam. mulched surrounds to trees planted in grass areas.
 Slow release fertiliser or residual herbicide applications where appropriate.
 Extension or strengthening of fencing or other barriers where planting is becoming
eroded, trampled or damaged.
Hard Landscaped Areas

 Maintenance of boundary walls, fencing, bollards, and any temporary protective fencing
e.g. post and wire /chestnut palings and trip rails and timing of removal.
 Maintenance of hard paved and loose surfaces such as gravel. Making good damaged
units or subsidence to match original materials.
 Re-levelling of tree grilles in hard paved areas and making-up levels of infilled gravel
mulches. Removal of tree guards, tree grille sections.
 Frequency of removal of litter and rubbish and response time to fly-tipping and
abandoned vehicles.
 Cleaning of stained paving surfaces by pressure washer / removal of chewing gum.
 Repairs to walls and copings. Removal of graffiti.
 Extension / strengthening of fencing or other barriers, consistent with existing designs.
 Reconsideration of failed access / circulation arrangements and appropriate new paving
and / or protective railings.
 Maintenance and cleaning of degraded paint finishes, gates, railings etc
Special Design Features

 Retention, operation and maintenance of water features.
 Operation and repairs / replacement lamping of amenity and special lighting.
 Provision of Public Art and its periodic cleaning / specialist repair.
 Maintenance of safety apparatus and signage.
 Adjustment checks of tree ties, stakes and guards, protective fencing and their timed
removal.
 Inspection for pests, vermin and plant diseases and remedial actions.
Ornamental shrub areas

 Replanting of failed stock or redesign /re-specification of failed areas.
 Mulch replenishment until close cover achieved.
 Formative and seasonal pruning for stem, foliage and flowering budwood.
 Re-balancing of growth, removal of over-vigorous species.
Hedges and Mass Planting

 Hedge cutting – designed heights and frequency of cut. Removal of clippings.
 Thinning of mass planted vegetation where climax trees are emerging.
 Management of understory and herb edges at 5 and 10 + years onward. Periodic
coppicing where appropriate. Formation of new paths.
 Use rabbit guards / tree shelters/ fencing if rodent damage becomes apparent.
 Removal of litter.
Grass and Herb layer

 Re-sowing of failed areas of grass.
 Selective herbicide treatment / feeding during establishment.
 Aeration/thatch removal of high quality amenity lawns.
 Frequency, timing and heights of cut for grass / wild flower meadow edge / bulb areas.
 Appropriate cutting regimes and machinery types and design quality (e.g. cylinder / rotary
/ flail) boxing off of clippings and removal from site or site dispersal.
 Removal of litter prior to cutting.
 Cleaning of paths after grass cutting.
Trees
 Regular safety inspections and report on condition of trees by arboricultural adviser.
 Implementation programmes of recommended tree work to comply with British Standard
B.S. 3998: 2010 'Recommendations for tree work.”
 Procedures for emergency tree work.
 Formative pruning of new trees and progressive crown lifting and leader selection, and
minimum / maximum heights of crown lifting.
 Planned pruning of pleached trees, mop headed pollards or coppiced trees.
 Investigation of failed growth of trees, remedial actions and replanting.
 Aeration of compacted soils and use of soil inoculants where trees become moribund.
 Watering and feeding programme for trees in containers.
 Advice on consent procedures for protected tree work.

Appendix 3 – Example Tree Survey
Tree Species Height Stem Branch Canopy Life General Observations Remaining Category
Number Diameter Spread Height Stage contribution
(m) (mm) (m) (m) (yrs)
T1 Cherry 4.5 310 N - 3.5 1.8 - S M Good overall condition 20+ B
E- 3
(Prunus avium) S - 3.7 2.1
W-3
T2 Robinia 4 307 N - 2.5 2.3 - E Y Storm damage to western <10 U
E -2
(Robinia pseudoacacia) 2 side of canopy with loss of
S - 2.5
W-2 1/3 of crown area.
T3 Cypress 6 321 N - 2.5 0.6 - S SM Over pruning to brown wood <10 C
E-3
(Chamaecyparis 0.5 on western side of canopy.
S-1
lawsoniana) W -1 Poor re-growth.
T4 Cherry 3.5 240 N 3 1-E M Fungal pathogen noted with <10 U
E 2.5
(Prunus padas) S 2.7 1.2 significant crown dieback and
W 2.1 deadwood
T5 Chestnut 9 465 N - 5.6 3.1- N EM Good overall condition, 20+ B
E - 4.9
(Aesculus 2.9 remove minor deadwood over
S-
hipposcastanum) W - 4.8 garage and patio
T6 Lime 10 490 N - 4.5 4.2 - S M Good overall condition 40+ A
E-3
(Tillia cordata) S- 2.9
W - 2.9
T7 Lime 11 494 N - 4.6 3.8 - S M Good overall condition 40+ A
E-3
(Tillia cordata) S- 2.9
W - 2.7
T8 Pine 13 460 N - 3.5 9-N M Good overall condition, 20+ B
E-3
(Pinus nigra) 8.2 remove storm damaged,
S-
W - 2.7 hanging branch.
T9 Beech 10 520 N - 4.6 2.2 - N M Good overall condition 20+ B
E-3
(Fagus sylvatica) S- 2
W - 2.7
T10 Beech 12 530 N - 6.3 1.9 - W M Good overall condition 40+ A
E - 4.9
(Fagus sylvatica) S- 2.1
W - 6.1
This example Tree Survey follows the guidance and recommendations and format set out in BS5837:2012 and relates to a fictional site.
For further information on the content of such a survey, the British Standard should be consulted.
Appendix 5 – Example Tree Retention Plan
Appendix 6 – Example Tree Protection Plan

TREES AND LANDSCAPES SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT - Adopted by East Northamptonshire Council on 13 February 2013 and the Borough Council of Wellingborough on 11 June 2013.
Appendix 7 – Example Tree Protection Plan
Standard method for protective fencing around trees, as set out in BS5837:2012.
Alternative method for protective fencing around retained trees, where ground
anchoring cannot be used.
Examples of signage which should be attached to protective fencing around
retained trees. These signs can be copied and used on site.

Appendix 8. – Glossary of terms
Term Definition
Access facilitation pruning One-off tree pruning operation, the nature and effect of which
are without significant adverse impact in the tree's physiology
or amenity value, which is directly necessary to provide
access for the site operations.
Arboricultural Impact A document which evaluates the direct and indirect effects of
Assessment (AIA) the proposed design and includes the Tree Survey and Tree
Retention Plan.
Arboricultural Method A methodology for the implementation of all phases of a

Statement (AMS) development that is either within the Root Protection Area of
retained trees and landscape features, or has the potential to
result in the loss of damage to retained trees.
British Standards Overall statutory safety standards for the manufacture and/ or
safe operation of goods and services
Conservation Area (CA) An area of special architectural or historic value, the

character and appearance of which it is desirable to preserve
or enhance.
Construction Exclusion Zone An area based on the RPA in which access during the
(CEZ) development is strictly prohibited.
Core Spatial Strategy (CSS) The North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy, adopted
June 2008, is the overarching strategic Development Plan
Document (DPD) covering the whole of East
Northamptonshire, Wellingborough, Corby and Kettering, and
is now currently under review with a replacement CSS
anticipated to be adopted in 2013. CSS Policy 13 provides
the main policy “hook” for this document.
Corporate Plan The Corporate Plan is a non-statutory plan which sets out the
Council’s own policies and priorities, guiding the way that the
Council will provide its services over the next 3-4 years (as
set out in more detail within the Service Plan).
Development Plan Statutory plans and include the Core Spatial Strategy and
Documents (DPDs) site specific plans (e.g. Rural North, Oundle and Thrapston
Plan) which, combined, form the development plan for the
District
Green Space Areas such as parks, gardens, street planting and play
spaces, both private and public.

Green Infrastructure (GI) Green infrastructure is strategically planned and managed
networks of natural lands, working landscapes and other
open spaces that conserve ecosystems and provide
associated benefits to people.
Landscape Character A technique used to develop a consistent and comprehensive

Assessment (LCA) understanding of what gives England’s landscape its
character.
It uses statistical analysis and application of structured
landscape assessment techniques. LCAs provide more
detailed descriptions and analysis at a local level within the
national framework of National Character Areas.
Local Development Overarching name for individual documents, which combined

Documents (LDDs) make up the development plan, or Local Development
Framework (LDF) for the District.
Local Development Overarching name for the collection of all documents which
Framework (LDF) make up the Development Plan.
Nature Improvement Areas Nature Improvement Areas are inter-connected networks of

(NIAs) wildlife habitats intended to re-establish thriving wildlife
populations and help species respond to the challenges of
climate change.
National planning policy National planning policies used to be set out in Planning
Policy Statement (PPSs) and Planning Policy Guidance
Notes (PPGs). These have now been replaced by a single
National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
Planning and Compulsory The primary legislation which brought in the current
Purchase Act 2004 development planning system. Much of this will be amended
during 2012 as the recently passed Localism Act (November
2011) will replace many aspects of the 2004 Act.
Regional Plans The East Midlands Regional Plan, adopted in March 2009,
currently forms part of the statutory development plan,
providing a higher strategic policy level above Core
Strategies. It is expected that this will be abolished during
2012 / 2013, as the various provisions of the Localism Act
are implemented.
Regulations Statutory requirements (secondary legislation) which support

primary legislation.
Root Protection Area (RPA) A design tool which indicates the minimum area around a
tree deemed to contain sufficient roots and rooting volume to
maintain the tree's viability, and where the protection of the
root and soil structure is treated as a priority.

Special Protection Areas SPAs are areas which have been identified as being of
(SPAs) international importance for the breeding, feeding, wintering
or the migration of rare and vulnerable species of birds found
within European Union countries. They are European
designated sites, classified under the ‘Birds Directive 1979’
which provides enhanced protection given by the Site of
Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) status all SPAs also hold.
Sites of Special Scientific Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) give legal
Interest (SSSIs) protection to the best sites for wildlife and geology in
England.
Statement of Community The SCI forms a statutory element of the LDF, setting out
Involvement (SCI) public consultation requirements which should be followed
during DPD preparation or submitting and determining
planning applications.
Supplementary Planning SPDs cannot set policy, but provide greater detail on policies
Document (SPD) in DPDs and also form part of the statutory LDF, once
adopted.
Sustainable Communities The most recent SCS for East Northamptonshire Council was
Strategy (SCS) led by the Local Strategic Partnership (known as “ENable”.
This sets out a series of guiding principles for the preparation
of LDDs and non-statutory plans such as the Corporate Plan.
Tree Preservation Order A tree preservation order (referred to in this Guide as a

(TPO) 'TPO') is an order made by a local planning authority ('LPA')
in respect of trees or woodlands. The principal effect of a
TPO is to prohibit the:
(1) cutting down,
(2) uprooting,
(3) topping,
(4) lopping,
(5) wilful damage, or
(6) wilful destruction
Tree Survey A systematic method for the assessment of trees that may be
affected by a development.
Tree Protection Plan (TPP) A scale drawing, informed by the Tree Survey, and based on
the finalized layout, showing the trees for retention and
illustrating the tree and landscape protection measures
proposed.
Tree Retention Plan A scale drawing showing trees proposed for retention and
removal.

Appendix 9 – Contact Details
East Northamptonshire Council Borough of Wellingborough

Address: Planning Policy and Conservation Planning Policy
Planning Services Borough Council of Wellingborough
East Northamptonshire Council Swanspool House
Cedar Drive Doddington Road
Thrapston Wellingborough
Northamptonshire Northamptonshire
NN14 4LZ NN8 1BP
DX No: 701611 Thrapston 12865 Wellingborough
Tel: 01832 742148 01933 229777
Email: planningpolicy@east- [email protected]

northamptonshire.gov.uk


Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document.

Prepared Jointly by the Borough Council of Wellingborough

Adopted June 2013

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 2 of 39

2.0 Landscape design for new developments 10

3.0 Trees and development 19

Appendix 1 - List of consultees

Appendix 2 - Landscape maintenance plans

Appendix 3 - Landscape Management Plans - Guidance

Appendix 4 - Example Tree Survey

Appendix 5 - Example Tree Retention Plan

Appendix 6 - Example Tree Protection Plan

Appendix 7 - Example Protective Fencing and Site Signage

Appendix 8 - Glossary of Terms

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 3 of 39

Purpose and structure of this document

 ensure effective management of newly landscaped areas.

Consultation under Regulations 12(a) and 35

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 5 of 39

 Requiring good design – paragraphs 56-68

North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (adopted June 2008)

Legal and regulatory framework (trees)

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 6 of 39

Tree Preservation Orders

Applications within Wellingborough

The Councils’ Corporate Plans

East Northamptonshire Council

Borough Council of Wellingborough

1. Promoting high quality growth

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 8 of 39

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 9 of 39

Why is landscape design important?

 Reduce the predicted effects of a warming climate, particularly in urban areas.

 Improve the health and well being of residents and visitors.

 Reduce crime and provide a "sense of place".

 Significantly increase local biodiversity.

 Increase the value and attractiveness of an area.

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 10 of 39

1. Does the site sit comfortably within the surrounding landscape?

2. Does the site layout incorporate a clear green infrastructure?

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 12 of 39

 Does the area have a clear purpose and use?

 Is the open space multi functional and sustainable?

 Does the area have a clear circulation?

 Is play equipment is required?

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 14 of 39

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 15 of 39

 Interest can be added to a scheme by using surfacing and materials in an

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 17 of 39

 Poor ground preparation

 Soil contamination and weed growth.

 Competition for water and nutrients

East Northamptonshire Council and the Borough Council of Wellingborough Page 18 of 39

3. Trees and development.

Planning stage Minimum arboricultural detail required.

Draft tree retention / removal plan

Full Tree Survey

Tree Protection Plan

Retained trees and root protection areas shown on proposed layout