Fish Data Description
Fish Data Description
TYPE: Sample
SIZE: 159 observations, 8 variables
DESCRIPTIVE ABSTRACT:
159 fishes of 7 species are caught and measured. Altogether there are
8 variables. All the fishes are caught from the same lake
(Laengelmavesi) near Tampere in Finland.
SOURCES:
Brofeldt, Pekka: Bidrag till kaennedom on fiskbestondet i vaera
sjoear. Laengelmaevesi. T.H.Jaervi: Finlands Fiskeriet Band 4,
Meddelanden utgivna av fiskerifoereningen i Finland.
Helsingfors 1917
VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS:
___/////___ _
/ \ ___ |
/\ \_ / / H
< ) __) \ |
\/_\\_________/ \__\ _
|------- L1 -------|
|------- L2 ----------|
|------- L3 ------------|
SPECIAL NOTES:
I have usually calculated
Height = Height%*Length3/100
Widht = Widht%*Length3/100
PEDAGOGICAL NOTES:
I have mainly used only Species=7 (Perch) and here is some of the
models and test, we have used
Weight=a+b*(Length3*Height*Width)+epsilon
Ho: a=0;
Heteroscedastic case. Question: What is proper weighting,
if you use Length3 as a weighting variable.
Log(Weight)=a+b1*Length3+epsilon
Weight^(1/3)=a+b1*Length3+epsilon
(Given by Box-Cox-transformation)
Ho: a=0;
Log(Weight)=a+b1*Length3+b2*Height+b3*Width+epsilon
Ho: b1+b2+b3=3;
i.e. dimension of the fish = 3
Weight^(1/3)=a+b1*Length3+b2*Height+b3*Width+epsilon
(Given by Box-Cox-transformation)
Ho: a=0;
Weight=a*Length3^b1*Height^b2*Width^b3+epsilon
Nonlinear, heteroscedastic case.
What is proper weighting?
Is obs 143
REFERENCES:
Brofeldt, Pekka: Bidrag till kaennedom on fiskbestondet i vaara
sjoear. Laengelmaevesi. T.H.Jaervi: Finlands Fiskeriet Band 4,
Meddelanden utgivna av fiskerifoereningen i Finland.
Helsingfors 1917
SUBMITTED BY:
Juha Puranen
Departement of statistics
PL33 (Aleksanterinkatu 7)
000014 University of Helsinki
Finland
e-mail: [email protected]