See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/253329325

STATUS OF CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN SAMAR, PHILIPPINES:

INPUT TO INTERVENTION PROGRAM

Data · July 2013

CITATIONS READS

0 3,850

4 authors, including:

Elmer Irene Sherrie Ann

Samar State University Samar State University
17 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS    2 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Local and Indigenous Knowledge towards a Climate Change Resilient Community View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Elmer Irene on 31 May 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 STATUS OF CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN SAMAR, PHILIPPINES:
INPUT TO INTERVENTION PROGRAM

Elmer A. Irene, Sherrie Ann C. Labid, Emerita A. Pacayra

Abstract

This paper discusses the result of the study that assessed the status of children in conflict with the
law (CICL) of Catbalogan City, Samar, Philippines. The data was obtained during the research period
between June to November 2011. Since the law RA 9344, otherwise known as Juvenile Justice and
Welfare Act of 2006, mandates that the identity of the child offenders must be protected, the researchers
were not allowed to interview and have a personal contact with subjects. However, secondary data were
secured through triangulation method. Hence, information about the status of the children in conflict with
the law is herein presented. The method was done by interviewing the social welfare staff, police
personnel, village officials, parents of the CICL and other members of the community. Significant findings
were revealed and perceived patterns and observations were established regarding the common offenses,
problems, solutions, activities and needs of these CICL as perceived by the key informants during the
interview and focus group discussion.

Introduction
In the Philippines, the justice system provides a law that treats every CICL in a manner that
recognizes and upholds human dignity and worth, and instills in the child respect for the fundamental rights
and freedom of others. This law, otherwise known as Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 or RA 9344
authored by Senator Francis Pangilinan, asserts that no child 15 or younger may be charged for a criminal
act and minors above 15 but below 18 may be held criminally liable only if they are shown to have acted
with discernment.

The law also provides resources for the rehabilitation and intervention programs for CICL.
However, a number of cities and local government units are not aware of this provision of the law much
more of providing resources for CICL . But even if facility and services are provided, there are still some
flaws with the law. For instance, it is observed that a child is taken in custody for status offenses a number
of times. These minor offenders use the law to translate it into a license to commit all other possible
offenses or crimes because they know that they cannot be sent to jail due to exempt in criminal liability
(Pagunuran, 2008).

The number of CICL is alarming and a significant problem worldwide. According to the UNICEF
data, there are 1 million children in detention today. And 90% of children in conflict with the law are just
petty offenders. As cited by the data four out of five children who commit an offense only commit one in
their lifetime. The majority of children who end up in the criminal justice system are from deprived
communities and discriminated against minorities.

In the Philippines over 50,000 children have been arrested and detained since 1995 (UNICEF).
Roughly 28 children get arrested every day, or more than one child for every hour. There were more than
4,000 CICL cases reported in year 2010. And there was a move by the lawmakers such as Senator
Escudero, Senator Sotto and local executives to amend or repeal the law. But social welfare secretary
Dinky Soliman and other non government groups stressed that these CICL are also victims of
circumstances. The authorities should not go after these youths but the adults who are taking advantage
and victimizing these young people. Salinlahi Alliance and Akap Bata partylist, groups working for
children’s welfare also believe that correct implementation, rather than amendment, suspension or repeal of
the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, coupled with proper education about the law and necessary
budget allocation, should be prioritized by the government. The legislators should instead look at how the
government can improve the lives of the Filipino people through reforms and programs that would alleviate
poverty which is the primary cause of crimes whether by adults or minors (San Miguel as cited by Umil,On-
line, 2011).

In Catbalogan City, there are substantial cases of CICL recorded in the office of City Social
Welfare and Development (CSWD). These children are now in custody of the office. Some of them report
regularly to the office and undergoing rehabilitation. The CSWD personnel believe that the law is good
considering that it promotes moral recovery and restorative justice and not a punitive one which these petty
youth offenders are subjected to. However, they admit that they have less control of those who are
passively participating in the intervention program. And so the question remains, what would happen to our
present society with some of our youth having problems in their early stage of life? What is the status of
CICL in Catbalogan and what is the most suitable intervention program that will be used to help them?
 It is in this context that proponents of the project were motivated to conduct an assessment of the
status of Children in Conflict with the Law of Catbalogan as an input to an Intervention program.

Objectives

In general, this project aimed to determine the status of the children in conflict with the law (CICL) of
Catbalogan as input to intervention program. Specifically, it sought answers to the following objectives:

1. Determine the profile and number of the CICL of Catbalogan City in terms of:
1.1 age;
1.2 sex;
1.3 Place of residence;
1.4 status offenses committed; and
2.1 crimes commited.
2. Identify and describe the CICL in terms of:
2.1 problems they encountered;
2.2 basic needs;
2.3 daily activities; and
2.4 reasons why they committed offenses or crimes;
3. Assess the intervention programs of the local village units also known as barangay(Brgy.);
and
4. Identify current intervention programs of the social welfare services and police officers in
the locality.

Materials and Methods

The researchers used descriptive-qualitative research methodology and survey techniques to

collect and analyze data. The respondents are the CICL of Catbalogan City, the local village Officials, the
peace council or Lupon and some residents in the barangay where they reside as well as the agencies that
conduct intervention programs for the CICL.

Total enumeration of the cases recorded in the office of social welfare of Catbalogan were utilized
in the study. Simple frequency count and measures of variability were employed to analyze the data.
 The locale of the study were the barangays where frequent cases of CICL occurred and one
barangay located in the central area of the city. After ranking five barangays, respective punong barangay,
secretary or Lupon chairman were invited for a guided interview together with some long time residents of
the barangay who have direct contact or have handled cases of CICL in their barangay. Researchers
assured the respondents that the rights of the CICL will be protected. For triangulation, focus group
discussions were also conducted with the PNP personnel and CSWD staff. Their impressions as well as
perceptions about CICL were noted and tabulated.

The key informants from the barangay level that served as the source of information about CICL
totaled to twelve enumerated as follows: Brgy. 13, Canlapwas and San Pablo, six with two from each
barangay ; Brgy. Munoz, Brgy. 3 and Brgy. San Andres, three with one per barangay; and Brgy.
Guindapunan with three key informants. From the PNP and CSWD, four personnel were interviewed with
two from each agency.

Results and Discussion

The initial result of the study was obtained from the office of CSWD. This includes the
demographic profile of CICL, the type of offenses committed and the status of their cases. The period
covered from 2009 to first quarter of 2011.

Sex
The children covered by the project were predominantly male (43 out of 45, or 96%; see Figure 1)
and only 2 out of 45 or 4% are female.

50
45
40
35
30
25
%

20
15
10
5
0

M ale Fem ale

Figure 1. Percentage distribution of CICL by sex, 2009-2011

 This result shows a similar trend to the CICL studies conducted in Metro Manila. In the UP Law
Center project in 1981, which covered 323 cases, 86.46% were male and 13.54% were female. In the
PAYO survey in 1996, which covered 232 children, 92% were male and 8% were female. The PNP data of
2001 that covered 5,905 cases showed that 83% were male and 17% were female (Save the Children -
UK).

Age at the Time of the Commission

A majority (23%) of the children were 17 years of age at the time of the alleged commission of the
offence (see Figure 2.). This age group was followed by children who were 16 (18%). Next are 15, 14 and
13 years of age all pegged at 13%. While only three out of 45 or 7% are 11 years old at the time of the
commission. Only two children aged eight and ten were covered by the project and four files did not
indicate the age of the children at the time of commission of the offense.

25 22
20 18
15 13 13 13

10 9
7
5 2 2
0
Ages of CICL

8 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 No answer

Figure 2. Distribution of Cases by Age, 2009-2011

Educational Background

The office of social welfare in the city does not have a record of educational background of the
CICL. However, key informants from the different barangays who are familiar with these child offenders
revealed to the researchers that these children are on and off in school. The highest educational
attainment they have reported is third year high school and most of the CICL are no longer attending
school. Local agencies are giving scholarship programs to them but they have less control of those who do
not continue with their studies. The social welfare officer confirmed that even though they are offered such
scholarship yet their daily subsistence such as food and clothing should also be met in order to boost their
interest in going to school. Their program only provides aid for matriculation and other school expenses.

Place of Residence
CSWD records show that 69% of children covered in the research resided in the respondent
barangays: Canlapwas and Guindapunan both shared the highest percent at 24%, Brgy. 3 at 11% and
Brgy. Munoz and San Andres shared the same spot at 7% ( see Figure 3).

25

20

15

10

0
Canlapwas Guindapunan Brgy Munoz San Andres
3
Figure 3 Top 5 Barangays of Last Residence

The residence of more than 30% of the children were spread throughout the following barangays:
Brgy 4 (1 %), Brgy 5 (2 %), Brgy 7 (1 %), Brgy 9 (1 %), Brgy 12 (1 %), Brgy 13 (2 %) and Brgy San Pablo
(1 %). No addresses were indicated in 7 % of the children’s records.
Based on the location of these barangays, most of the CICL cases are concentrated on the outskirts
of the city. Barangays Canlapwas and San Andres are located in the north, Brgy. Guindapunan in the east,
Brgy Munoz in the west and Brgy 3 in the south of the city (see Figure 4). To find out if the location was
one of the factors to the CICL cases, the researchers also conducted interview to the barangay officials in a
barangay located in the central area. According to the key informants, police visibility and proximity of the
3
barangay to the police station hindered commission of the crime by the CICL. And if ever they will commit
crimes, they will be easily nabbed. According to one official in that barangay, “Because Catbalogan is just
a small city, they have no place to hide...”
 Figure 4. Locator Map of CICL

When that official was asked as to what happened to the notorious residents back in the days when
their barangay was famous for crimes by both child and adult offenders, he replied “they just grown and
become matured”. While others, he added, transferred to other place and no longer staying in their
barangay. Maturity is also noted by other key informants in other barangay as the solution to CICL. When
they grow older they feel ashamed as well as embarrassed of committing such offenses especially against
property; thus crimes tend to decrease in their area. One respondent. a Brgy. San Pablo official, replied
that that their barangay is just fortunate that the new generation of their youth are mostly gay or tend to be
“gay” and not violent.

Types of Offenses
Although there were only 45 children, the total number of criminal cases tabulated reached 46. Some of
the children had two or more criminal charges filed against them. CSWD records showed that an
overwhelming number (61%) of the criminal charges against the children involved crimes against property,
specifically: theft 40%, robbery, 18% (see Table 1 and 2). Followed by crime against a person, 28%, crime
against a person in authority, 7% and sex related offenses, 4%.
 Table 1
Types of Crimes committed from 2009 - 2011

Categories of Crime Number of Cases %

Crime against property 28 61
Crime against a person 13 28
Crime against a person in 3 7
authority
Sex related 2 4

Table 2
Types of Offenses committed from 2009-2011

Type of Offenses committed No. of Cases %

Attempted Murder 1 2
Attempted Rape 1 2
Carnapping 1 2
Direct Assault 2 4
Frustrated Homicide 2 4
Frustrated Murder 7 16
Illegal Possession of deadly 1 2
weapon
Murder 2 4
Rape 1 2
Robbery 3 7
Robbery Hold-up 5 11
Slight Physical Injury 1 2
Theft 18 40

Pattern of Crimes Committed

 Most of the crimes/offenses committed in the period of three years were crimes against property.
As seen in the fig. 5, most number of crimes occurred in 2010 where it pegged the highest percentage of all
crimes/offenses. However, the data obtained may not be conclusive to indicate 2010 as worst year for
CICL because other offenses/crimes were not recorded in the office of CSWD. When asked, a Lupon
chairman of Brgy. 13 revealed that there are still many crimes or offenses unreported because victims just
kept silent for fear of retaliation from these offenders or they just brushed them off. And what is more
alarming is that some of these crimes committed by CICL are considered heinous crimes such as robbery
(11%), carnapping and rape (2 %) and murder (20%).

16 2010
14
12
2010
10 2009
8 2011 2010
6 2011

4 2009 2010
2009 2010
2
0
CAProperty CAPerson CAPA Sex Related

Figure 5. Pattern of Offenses committed

Needs and Problems of CICL

As seen in table 3, most of the CICL have problems not meeting their basic needs such as food,
clothing and nice shelter. Based on the interview with key informants from Brgy. Canlapwas, most of the
crimes listed in their barangay came from illegal settlers in the outskirt of their barangay. They do not have
decent living and the road going to their area is narrow that authorities find it difficult to apprehend them.
An official from Brgy. 3 revealed that most of the CICL in their barangay came from a broken family
and he pointed parental love and care as the primary needs of these CICL.
 Table 3
Needs, Problems and Activities of CICL
Needs, Problems and No. of responses %
Activities
A. Needs
Basic Needs 5 63
Safety needs 3 38
Belongingness and Love 5 63
B. Problems
Parental neglect 8 100
Family problem 4 50
Peer pressure 5 63
Lack of food 4 50
Influence of Alcohol 3 38
C. Activities
Selling at public market 3 38
Excursion at the beach 2 25
Strolling around or Istambay 3 38
Scavenging cardboards and 2 25
plastics
Drinking liquors with peer 6 75
groups

Activities of CICL

Most of the CICL tend to stay in the public market where they can easily get an easy job or service
to earn money to buy food. Some are seen scavenging for cardboards, plastics and other objects which
they can sell. Because most CICL are seen not attending schools and not doing anything worthwhile, they
just tend to drink liquors with their peer groups and go to the beach for excursion and drinking sessions as
well.

Drug Involvement and Syndicates exploiting CICL

Key informants from Brgy. 13 reported that they have heard of involvement of CICL in substance
abuse and pushing but they have not verified it. No files on drug related cases were recorded in the six
respondent barangays. The PNP and CSWD confirmed it with no drug-related incidents reported to their
office. However, all the barangay key informants and PNP observed that CICL were aware about their
exemption on criminal liability. But they could not determine if there are adults or syndicates educating
these youth about the law. Backed with their result obtained with standard tools on discernment, CSWD
staff also support that CICL committed crimes due to circumstances and no adults are behind it. While in
Brgy. Canlapwas, local officials apprehended minors on theft and found out that they have an adult
mastermind behind these offenders, who would even informed them that they won’t be put behind bars.
The brgy. Lupon successfully traced the mastermind and warned that he would be imprisoned instead if he
will not stop exploiting minors into crimes. They have neutralized the occurrence of CICL cases after their
prompt action with the said adult mastermind.

Reasons of CICL
All barangay LGU units, PNP and CSWD pointed parental neglect as the primary cause why
CICL committed offenses. Brgy. Guindapunan and Brgy. Munoz had cases in their barangays were these
youth offenders are facing family problems and they are seeking parental care and attention. Other
barangays also pointed influence of liquor and lack of food as the causes why they have commited crimes
against a person and crimes against property, respectively.

On RA 9344
Responses during the Focus Group Discussion with Brgy. Chairman, secretary and lupon were
noted to have a consensus that the law is not fair because the children are already aware of right and
wrong. One Brgy.3 official stated that the law on discernment should be removed because the CICL are
just pretending to be ignorant when in fact they know or aware of their actions in the first place. The Brgy.
Secretary of Guindapunan, based on their records, said that the law is being abused by these children and
they tend to enjoy it by repeatedly committing crimes. These key informants unanimously suggested
lowering the age limit of CICL. They want CICL to be imprisoned for the serious crimes they have
committed. On the other hand, CSWD staff argued that it is the lack of funds and facilities such as a
rehabilitation center and not the law as the weakness of the program on CICL, further they stressed that the
law is good because it is a restorative justice.
 Interventions and Programs for CICL

The Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) in every barangay is mandated to provide programs for the
youth. Based on the interviews with the local officials, the researchers found out that most of the programs
of SK centered on barangay beautification project and sports competition involving not only youths but
adults as well. These projects do not cater to the needs of the CICL and only a little percentage of them is
involved due to political bickering in the barangay unit.

Table 4
Intervention Programs for CICL

Agencies/ Organizations Specific Programs for CICL

1. Sanguniang Kabataan Beautification project, Sports competition, Youth Leadership

(SK) training

2. Brgy. LGU Sports Program, Community Service, Drug Symposium

3. CSWD Scholarship Program (4Ps, etc.), Counseling

3. PNP None

For CICL cases reported to the Brgy chair, some barangay implements punitive measures such as
community service like in Brgy. 13, Brgy. 3 and Brgy. Guindapunan. Part of their community service is to
sweep the streets and clean the barangay hall. However, parents of CICL come to the rescue and often do
the community service in lieu of their children.

As seen in table 4, the police authorities and social welfare services do not have specific programs
for prevention of CICL. The usual protocol in the police agency is after the case is reported and filed in
their office, they would turn it over to the social welfare services where necessary action or filing of case to
the court will be made. The CSWD implements educational scholarship programs for CICL and they also
monitor the barangay unit where there is frequent occurrence of CICL. However, they do not have control
over those who do not cooperate and do not continue schooling.
Conclusion
In the light of the discussion above, the following conclusions were drawn:
1. Children in conflict with the law are usually male, aged 17 years at the time of commission. They reside
in the outskirts of the city of Catbalogan.
2. The children either finished or are currently enrolled in Grade 6, 1st year or 2nd year high school but
are not active in school as perceived by the officials and residents of the barangay.
3. The most common criminal charges against the children involve crimes against property, specifically,
robbery theft, qualified theft, trespassing on private property. This is followed by crimes against
persons, and crimes against persons in authority. Sex-related offences also include children.
4. No cases of drug-related offences were filed in the office of the barangay chairman and CSWD.
5. Most of the offences are committed in year 2010 as per record in the barangay and CSWD.
6. Parental neglect is seen as the primary cause of CICL followed by family problem and peer pressure.
7. Most CICL have problems not meeting their basic needs. Safety, belongingness and parental love are
also longed by these children.
8. To sustain their primary needs for food, they usually work at the public market to earn money. Those
who are not attending school are seen excursioning at the beach and drinking liquors with their peer
groups.
9. Majority of the respondents agreed that the RA 9344 is not fair in terms of age of discernment and they
recommended amending the law.
10. Most of the intervention programs to CICL are in the barangay and CSWD levels. But there is no clear
answer or solution to prevent the occurrence of CICL. On the other hand, the punitive measures in the
barangay level will only deter the CICL but if their needs will not be met then cases of CICL will
continue.

Recommendations

The following recommendations were set forth by the researchers in line with the conclusions of
the study:

1. Promote understanding within the communities of the rights of CICL, the concept of restorative justice
and the important role that the community plays in the promotion of rights and prevention of crime by
 children. This can be done, through advocacy and training seminars as well as information drives on
laws and studies concerning CICL.
2. Special focus should be given to parents who should be educated, be made aware and be made to
appreciate child rights.
3. Special training should be given to barangay officials because many of the officers are not familiar with
laws on CICL.
4. Barangay residents and officials must be made aware of existing mechanisms within the barangay
level, which they could use to protect CICL.
5. Local government units should come up with intervention programs that would cater to the needs of the
CICL thus preventing them to commit crimes. Budget should be allocated to these intervention
programs only.
6. Local agencies such as City Social Welfare and Development and other NGOs should design and
implement a community-based children’s program to minimize if not completely prevent the
commission of crimes among children. It should be properly coordinated with the PNP and the
barangay units.
7. Same study must be conducted in other places to see the difference or validate the results.
 Literature Cited

Mariano, Dan (2011, September 14). Pangilinan Law and “batang hamog”. The Manila Times.net.
Retrieved September 22, 2011, from http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/opinion/columnist1/7263-
pangilinan-law-and-batang-hamog

Pagunuran, Primer (2008, August 6). Children in Conflict with the Law. The Philippines
Today. Retrieved July 13, 2011, from
http://www.philippinestoday.net/index.php?module=article&view=1098

Save the Children – UK. Breaking Rules: Children in Conflict with the Law and the Juvenile Justice Process
THE EXPERIENCE IN THE PHILIPPINES (http://vac.wvasiapacific.org/downloads/SAVE5.pdf)

Umil, Anne Marxze (2011, November 4). Lowering Age of Discernment Won’t Solve Juvenile Delinquency.
Bulatlat.com. Retrieved November 5, 2011, from
http://bulatlat.com/main/2011/11/04/lowering-age-discernment-wont-solve-juvenile-delinquency-
childrens-rights-groups/

UNICEF. Jail is no place for a child (http://www.unicef.org/philippines/children/jj_1.html)

View publication stats