Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21 views

    Course Completion Times (Hours) : Current Training Proposed Training Current Training

    Uploaded by

    Hope Trinity Enriquez
    1.) The document contains data on course completion times under current and proposed training methods. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the mean completion times and variances between the two methods. 2.) Hypothesis testing using a z-test showed no significant difference between the population means of current and proposed training. However, an F-test found a significant difference between the population variances. 3.) Based on the statistical analyses, the proposed training method has a more consistent completion time compared to the current method, as evidenced by the significantly different population variances between the two. Therefore, the proposed training method is preferred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Course Completion Times (Hours) : Current Training Proposed Training Current Training

    Uploaded by

    Hope Trinity Enriquez
    21 views5 pages
    1.) The document contains data on course completion times under current and proposed training methods. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the mean completion times and variances between the two methods. 2.) Hypothesis testing using a z-test showed no significant difference between the population means of current and proposed training. However, an F-test found a significant difference between the population variances. 3.) Based on the statistical analyses, the proposed training method has a more consistent completion time compared to the current method, as evidenced by the significantly different population variances between the two. Therefore, the proposed training method is preferred.

    Original Title

    AIRFORCE TRAINING PROPGRAM

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1.) The document contains data on course completion times under current and proposed training methods. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the mean completion times and variances between the two methods. 2.) Hypothesis testing using a z-test showed no significant difference between the population means of current and proposed training. However, an F-test found a significant difference between the population variances. 3.) Based on the statistical analyses, the proposed training method has a more consistent completion time compared to the current method, as evidenced by the significantly different population variances between the two. Therefore, the proposed training method is preferred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    21 views5 pages

    Course Completion Times (Hours) : Current Training Proposed Training Current Training

    Uploaded by

    Hope Trinity Enriquez
    1.) The document contains data on course completion times under current and proposed training methods. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the mean completion times and variances between the two methods. 2.) Hypothesis testing using a z-test showed no significant difference between the population means of current and proposed training. However, an F-test found a significant difference between the population variances. 3.) Based on the statistical analyses, the proposed training method has a more consistent completion time compared to the current method, as evidenced by the significantly different population variances between the two. Therefore, the proposed training method is preferred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    Course Completion Times (hours)

    Current Training Proposed Training


    76 74
    76 75 1.) Current Training
    77 77
    74 78 Column1
    76 74
    74 80 Mean
    74 73 Standard
    77 73 Median
    72 78 Mode
    78 76 Standard
    73 76 Sample Va
    78 74 Kurtosis
    75 77 Skewness
    80 69 Range
    79 76 Minimum
    72 75 Maximum
    69 72 Sum
    79 75 Count
    72 72
    70 76 Similarity: Values of mean, m
    70 72 Difference: Values of variance
    81 77
    76 73
    78 77 2.) Ho: There is no difference betw
    72 69 H1: There is difference betwee
    82 77
    72 75
    73 76
    71 74
    70 77
    77 75
    78 78
    73 72
    79 77
    82 78
    65 78
    77 76
    79 75
    73 76
    76 76

    81 75
    69 76
    75 80
    75 77
    77 76
    79 75
    76 73
    78 77
    76 77
    76 77
    73 79
    77 75
    84 75 3.) Hypotheses are formulated to
    74 72
    74 82 Ho: Population variances are e
    69 76 H1: Population variances are n
    79 76
    66 74 F-Test Two-Sample for Varian
    70 72
    74 78
    72 71 Mean
    Variance
    Observati
    df
    F
    P(F<=f) on
    F Critical

    F statistic is equal to 2.47729. P


    level of significance). Thus, nu
    significant difference between
    Current Training Proposed training

    Column1 Column1

    75.0655737704918 Mean 75.4262295082


    0.505093646275282 Standard Error 0.320909752216
    76 Median 76
    76 Mode 76
    3.94490748712403 Standard Deviation 2.506385288242
    15.5622950819672 Sample Variance 6.281967213115
    -0.069325276438235 Kurtosis 0.586940413874
    -0.220533558110778 Skewness -0.28748624289
    19 Range 13
    65 Minimum 69
    84 Maximum 82
    4579 Sum 4601
    61 Count 61

    Similarity: Values of mean, mode and median are same.


    Difference: Values of variances and standard deviation are different.

    Ho: There is no difference between population mean.


    H1: There is difference between population mean.

    Population Variance
    Current 16.2628501077255
    Proposed 6.41243459526008

    Mean
    Current 75.0175438596491
    Proposed 75.3859649122807

    z-Test: Two Sample for Means


    Variable 1 Variable 2
    Mean 75.0655737704918 75.4262295082
    Known Variance 15.307 6.17898
    Observations 61 61
    Hypothesized Mean
    Difference 0
    z -0.607687327405413
    P(Z<=z) one-tail 0.271697434770869
    z Critical one-tail 1.64485362695147
    P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.543394869541738
    z Critical two-tail 1.95996398454005

    z statistic is equal to -0.607687. P value is 0.54339 which is greater than 0.05 (value of
    level of significance). Thus, null hypothesis cannot be rejected. There is no difference
    between population means.

    Hypotheses are formulated to test the euality of population variances.

    Ho: Population variances are equal.


    H1: Population variances are not equal.

    F-Test Two-Sample for Variances

    Variable 1 Variable 2
    75.0655737704918 75.4262295081967
    15.5622950819672 6.28196721311475
    61 61
    60 60
    2.47729645093946
    0.000289015769198
    1.53431417981236

    F statistic is equal to 2.47729. P value is 0.0005 which is less than 0.05 (value of
    level of significance). Thus, null hypothesis has been rejected. There is
    significant difference between population variances.
    indicatin- that this method is more
    4.)
    consistent with the completion time.
    Based on the data available the
    proposed method is  preferred.

    Yes I would suggest to interchange the


    5.)
    data, then conduct same data. If still
    test gives same results. Then there is
    need for new training program.

    You might also like