Financial Analysis Assignment: Subject: Business Finance
Financial Analysis Assignment: Subject: Business Finance
Financial Analysis Assignment: Subject: Business Finance
From the Balance Sheet, we can see that almost all the assets that
WSS has are current assets and they remain the same through the
years. However, its compositions did have some significant changes.
Cash and cash equivalents were accounted for one-third of short-term
assets in 2017 but were cut off over a half in the next year. Meanwhile,
the current investments went from 57.7% to 74.6% in just one year, but
shortly after went back to where it was in 2017. Not only invest for a
short period, but WSS also invests in the long-term. The company keeps
the risks as low as possible so the non-current investment rate only
takes about 10% part of the short-term one and remains constant. WSS
does not have any long term loans. The statistics do imply that there are
slight changes in the current obligations but it still accounts for a
minority, which can be said that the company is being conservative in
managing its debts. On the other hand, the portion of charter capital is
quite high. This rate maybe is too high, which is not a very good sign
because it may lead to higher license tax and affect the other
transactions. We witness significant changes in retained earnings,
especially in the most recent year, the number almost equals zero It can
be said that 2019 was a bad year for WSS since it does not gain
anything after paying dividends for its shareholders.
3. Ratios Analysis
Year Year Year
201701/0 201801/0 201901/0
1- 1- 1-
12/31KT/ 12/31KT/ 12/31KT/
RATIOS Unit ĐL ĐL ĐL
Current Ratio Times 12.11 9.86 10.81
Quick Ratio Times 10.87 8.95 8.10
Cash ratio Times 3.43 01.09 1.56
Debt to Equity Ratio % 8 11 9
Equity Ratio % 92 90 91
Debt Ratio % 92 90 91
Fixed asset turnover Times 75.17 154.57 70.48
Total asset turnover Times 0.11 0.15 0.04
Gross profit margin % 38.68 60.17 -255.17
Net profit margin % 24.38 49.07 -296.00
ROE % 2.8 7.9 -14.47
ROA % 2.68 7.21 -13.15
a. Liquidity Analysis
The current ratios of WSS were noticed some fluctuations, yet in all
3 years, they are too high. It means that the company can cover their
obligations but on the other hand, it indicates the inefficiency of using its
current assets or its short-term financing facilities and problem in
working capital management. The same situation happens to quick ratio.
It can be said that the association is able to pay off its short-term debts
without having to sell any capital or long-term assets. In addition, the
acid ratios fluctuate contemporaneously with current ratios, which
implies that WSS does not rely much on inventories and they remain the
same through years. On the contrary, the cash ratios are much much
smaller, but it still higher than the rate of 1:1. As we can see about the
ratios, WSS does keep quite a lot of cash on hand. Overall, it can be
said that the liquidity of the company is very high, which describes the
abilities of paying bills in a timely manner.
b. Solvency Analysis
The debt to equity ratio is quite low and it does not change much in
the three year period. This means that WSS relies less on debt and
more on equity to support its business. Debt carries with it the
requirement to make regular payments and to pay interest, so a heavy
debt load can mean increased risk. Under equity financing, ownership is
given up, but equity financing allows the company to control cash
outflows, such as dividends paid. The debt to asset ratio has the same
meaning and the same fluctuations. The minor portion indicates a
smaller degree of leverage, and stays away from financial risk. Contrary
to those two, equity accounts for about nine out of ten of the assets, in
other words, WSS’ investors owned about nine out of ten of the
company. Overall, the solvency ratios can be described as quite good,
this is a good choice to invest in this association.
c. Asset Management
The fixed asset ratio of this organization is way too high, especially
in 2018 this portion was even double the last year. We can tell that this
company is using the fixed assets very efficiently and effective to
generate sales. However, the plant and equipment are probably
breaking down because WSS are operating over capacity. Completely
opposite to the enormous number of fixed asset ratio, the total asset
ratio only remain about 0.1 to 1. The company is using some of the
assets such as inventories, receivables or working capital inefficiently in
creating sales. This low ratio indicates unnecessary blocking of fund in
assets resulting in idle capacity. WSS should keep this ratio about 2:1
instead of relying too much on fixed assets.
d. Profitability Analysis
In 2017 and 2018, the company was doing very well, both gross and
net profit margin is quite high, in 2018 the number even doubled the
previous year. The organization was earning about 0.3 profit per dollar
after excluding all expenses, it indicated higher efficiency of core
operations, meaning it could still cover operating expenses, fixed costs,
dividends, and depreciation, while also providing net earnings to the
business. Nevertheless, in the most recent year, 2019, those number
went from a positive number to an huge negative number, approximate
-300% in net profit margin and -250% in gross profit margin. In other
words, for each dollar of revenue, WSS lost $3 in net profit. The
company is losing money and it may because of high cost of goods sold,
which can be attributed to adverse purchasing policies, low selling
prices, low sales, stiff market competition, or wrong sales promotion
policies. Of course the same thing happen to the ROA and ROE ratios.
The ROA ratio specifically reveals how much after-tax profit the
company generates for every one dollar of assets it holds. It also
measures the asset intensity of the business. The lower the profit per
dollar of assets, the more asset-intensive a company is considered to
be. WSS with a low return on equity are usually less capable of
generating cash internally, and therefore less independent on debt
financing.