0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views13 pages

Untitled Document PDF

The document presents an analysis of decision making under uncertainty using multiple criteria. It evaluates three alternatives across different states of nature and calculates expected monetary values, maximax, maximin, and regret values to determine the optimal decision. The analysis finds that the modify alternative has the highest expected value and is the best decision according to the expected value criterion. It also finds that different decision criteria can produce different optimal decisions.

Uploaded by

Chinish Kalra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views13 pages

Untitled Document PDF

The document presents an analysis of decision making under uncertainty using multiple criteria. It evaluates three alternatives across different states of nature and calculates expected monetary values, maximax, maximin, and regret values to determine the optimal decision. The analysis finds that the modify alternative has the highest expected value and is the best decision according to the expected value criterion. It also finds that different decision criteria can produce different optimal decisions.

Uploaded by

Chinish Kalra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

STATES OF fNATURE

ALTERNATIVES N1: (PROSPERITY) N2: (RECESSION)


(0.6) (0.4)
A1: (BUY NEW) $ 950,000 $ - 200,000

A2: (MODIFY) $ 700,000 $ 300,000

(A) EXPECTED VALUE

EXPECTED VALUE = ∑ (Probability * Corresponding PAYOFF)

EXPECTED VALUE (FOR BUY NEW)

Expected Value = (0.6 * 950,000) + (0.4 * - 200,000)


Expected Value = $ 490,000

EXPECTED VALUE (FOR BUY NEW)

Expected Value = (0.6 * 700,000) + (0.4 * 300,000)


Expected Value = $ 540,000

STATES OF fNATURE

ALTERNATIVES N1: (PROSPERITY) N2: (RECESSION) EMV


(0.6) (0.4)
A1: (BUY NEW) $ 950,000 $ - 200,000 $ 490,000
A2: (MODIFY) $ 700,000 $ 300,000 $ 540,000

MAXIMUM EXPECTED VALUE = $ 540,000


BEST DECISION = A2 (MODIFY)
(B) MAXIMAX CRITERION

STATES OF fNATURE

ALTERNATIVES N1: (PROSPERITY) N2: (RECESSION) MAXIMAX


(0.6) (0.4)
A1: (BUY NEW) $ 950,000 $ - 200,000 $ 950,000
A2: (MODIFY) $ 700,000 $ 300,000 $ 700,000

MAXIMAX DECISION = A1 (BUY NEW)


MAXIMAX VALUE = $ 950,000

(C) ​MAXIMIN METHOD

STATES OF fNATURE

ALTERNATIVES N1: (PROSPERITY) N2: (RECESSION) MINIMUM


(0.6) (0.4)
A1: (BUY NEW) $ 950,000 $ - 200,000 $ - 200,000
A2: (MODIFY) $ 700,000 $ 300,000 ​ $ 300,000

MAXIMIN DECISION = A2 (MODIFY)


MAXIMIN = $ 300,000
(D) ​HURWICZ METHOD

Given Coefficient Value (a) = 0.3

EXPECTED VALUE = a * BEST PAYOFF + (1 - a) * WORST PAYOFF

EXPECTED VALUE (FOR BUY NEW)

Expected Value = (0.3 * 950,000) + (0.7 * - 200,000)


Expected Value = $ 145,000

EXPECTED VALUE (FOR MODIFY)

Expected Value = (0.3 * 700,000) + (0.7 * 300,000)


Expected Value = $ 420,000

STATES OF fNATURE

ALTERNATIVES N1: (PROSPERITY) N2: (RECESSION) Expected Value


(0.6) (0.4)
A1: (BUY NEW) $ 950,000 $ - 200,000 $ 145,000
A2: (MODIFY) $ 700,000 $ 300,000 $ 420,000

MAXIMUM EXPECTED VALUE = $ 420,000


BEST DECISION = A2 (MODIFY)
f STATES OF NATURE

ALTERNATIVES WEAK NORMAL STRONG


(0.4) (0.25) (0.35)

DRAGON $ 130,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000


SCORPION $ 700,000 $ - 170,000 $ - 430,000
LION $ - 290,000 $ - 199,000 $ 550,000

(A) CONSERVATIVE (MAXIMAX) CRITERION

f STATES OF
NATURE

ALTERNATIVES WEAK NORMAL STRONG


(0.4) (0.25) (0.35) MAXIMAX

DRAGON $ 130,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 ​ ​$ 75,000


SCORPION $ 700,000 $ - 170,000 $ - 430,000 $ 700,000
LION $ - 290,000 $ - 199,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000

CONSERVATIVE (MAXIMAX DECISION) = SCORPION


MAXIMAX VALUE = $ 700,000
(B) MINIMAX REGRET APPROACH

REGRET TABLE:
f STATES OF
NATURE

ALTERNATIVES WEAK NORMAL STRONG


(0.4) (0.25) (0.35) MAXIMAX

DRAGON $ 570,000 $0 $ 525,000 ​ $ 570,000


SCORPION $0 $ 245,000 $ 980,000 $ 980,000
LION $ 990,000 $ 274,000 $0 $ 990,000

MINIMAX REGRET VALUE = $ 570,000


MINIMAX REGRET DECISION = DRAGON

(C) ​EXPECTED VALUE

EXPECTED VALUE = ∑ (Probability * Corresponding PAYOFF)

EXPECTED VALUE ( FOR DRAGON)

EMV = ($ 130,000 * 0.4) + ($75,000 * 0.25) + (25,000 * 0.35)


EMV = $ 79,500

EXPECTED VALUE ( FOR SCORPION)

EMV = ($ 700,000 * 0.4) + ($ - 170,000 * 0.25) + ($ - 430,000 * 0.35)


EMV = ​$ 87,000

EXPECTED VALUE ( FOR SCORPION)

EMV = ($ - 290,000 * 0.4) + ($ - 199,000 * 0.25) + ($ 550,000 * 0.35)


EMV = $ 26,750

BASED ON HIGHEST EMV OF $ 87,000, BEST DECISION IS SCORPION.


(D)

Expected Value of Perfect Information = Expected Value with perfect information -


Maximum Expected Monetary Value

EXPECTED VALUE WITH PERFECT INFORMATION = ∑ (Probability * Corresponding


BEST PAYOFF)

EXPECTED VALUE WITH PERFECT INFORMATION = (0.4* $700,000) + (0.25* $75,000)


+ (0.35 * $550,000)

EXPECTED VALUE WITH PERFECT INFORMATION = $ 491,250

Expected Value of Perfect Information = Expected Value with perfect information -


Maximum Expected Monetary Value

Expected Value of Perfect Information = $ 491,250 - $ 87,000

Expected Value of Perfect Information ​= $ 404,250

Ultra-Smart Research must be willing to pay $ 404,250 for the perfect information
service offered by the marketing firm.
(A) MAXIMIN CRITERION

f STATES OF
NATURE

ALTERNATIVES VERY AVERAGE


FAVORABLE MARKET UNFAVORABLE MINIMUM
MARKET MARKET

BUILD NEW PLANT $ 300,000 $ 210,000 $ - 280,000 ​ ​$ - 280,000


SUB CONTRACT $ 160,000 $ 100,000 $ - 15,000 $ - 15,000
OVERTIME $ 120,000 $70,000 $ - 8,000 $ - 8,000
DO NOTHING $0 $0 $0 $0

MAXIMIN DECISION = DO NOTHING


MAXIMIN = $ 0

(C)​ EQUALLY LIKELY DECISION

FORMULA::
EQUALLY LIKELY VALUE FOR AN ALTERNATIVE = AVERAGE OF ALL ITS PAYOFFS
UNDER DIFFERENT STATES OF NATURE

f STATES OF
NATURE

ALTERNATIVES VERY AVERAGE


FAVORABLE MARKET UNFAVORABLE EQUALLY
MARKET MARKET LIKELY VALUE

BUILD NEW PLANT $ 300,000 $ 210,000 $ - 280,000 $ 76,667


SUB CONTRACT $ 160,000 $ 100,000 $ - 15,000 ​$ 81,667
OVERTIME $ 120,000 $70,000 $ - 8,000 $ 60,667
DO NOTHING $0 $0 $0 $0

EQUALLY LIKELY VALUE = $ 81,667


EQUALLY LIKELY DECISION = SUB CONTRACT

STANDARD DEVIATION (FOR MOTEL)

VARIANCE = [(-8,000 - 12,400)^2 * 0.2] + [(15,000 - 12,400)^2 *0.4] + [(20,000 -


12,400)^2 *0.4)]
VARIANCE = 109,040,000
STANDARD DEVIATION = 10,442.222

STANDARD DEVIATION (FOR RESTAURANT)

VARIANCE = [(6,000 - 2,000)^2 * 0.2] + [(6,000 - 8,000)^2 *0.4] + [(6,000 - 6,000)^2 *0.4)]
VARIANCE = 4,800,000
STANDARD DEVIATION = 2190.89

STANDARD DEVIATION (FOR THEATRE)

VARIANCE = [(6,000 - 5,600 )^2 *0.2] + [(6,000 - 5,600)^2 *0.4] + [(5,000 - 5,600)^2 *0.4)]
VARIANCE = 240,000
STANDARD DEVIATION = 489.898

(A) ​CONSERVATIVE (MAXIMIN APPROACH)


STATES OFfNATURE

ALTERNATIVE S1 S2 S3 MINIMUM
(0.4) (0.35) (0.25)

A1 50 80 30 30
A2 35 50 40 35
A3 60 30 50 30

MAXIMIN VALUE = 35
MAXIMIN DECISION = ALTERNATIVE A2

(C) ​BAYE’S DECISION RULE (EMV)

STATES OFfNATURE

ALTERNATIVE S1 S2 S3 EMV
(0.4) (0.35) (0.25)

A1 50 80 30 ​$ 55.50
A2 35 50 40 $ 41.50
A3 60 30 50 $ 47

EXPECTED PAYOFF = ∑ (Probability * Corresponding PAYOFF)


EMV (FOR ALTERNATIVE 1)

EMV = (0.4 * 50 + 0.35 * 80 + 0.25 * 30)


EMV = $ 55.50

EMV (FOR ALTERNATIVE 2)

EMV = (0.4 * 35 + 0.35 * 50 + 0.25 * 40)


EMV = $ 41.50

EMV (FOR ALTERNATIVE 3)

EMV = (0.4 * 60 + 0.35 * 30 + 0.25 * 50)


EMV = $ 47

BASED ON HIGHEST EMV, BEST DECISION IS ALTERNATIVE A1.

REGRET TABLE:
STATES OFfNATURE

DECISION STRONG DEMAND WEAK DEMAND MAXIMUM

SMALL COMPLEX, d1 12 0 12
MEDIUM COMPLEX, d2 6 2 6
LARGE COMPLEX, d3 0 16 16

MINIMAX VALUE = 6
MINIMAX REGRET APPROACH DECISION = CHOOSE MEDIUM COMPLEX
(D) EMV DECISION

STATES OFfNATURE

DECISION STRONG DEMAND WEAK DEMAND EMV


(0.8) (0.2)
SMALL COMPLEX, d1 8 7 7.8
MEDIUM COMPLEX, d2 14 5 12.6
LARGE COMPLEX, d3 20 -9 14.2

EXPECTED COST = ∑ (Probability * Corresponding Cost)

FOR SMALL COMPLEX


EXPECTED COST = (0.8 * 8) + (0.2 * 7) = 7.8

FOR MEDIUM COMPLEX


EXPECTED COST = (0.8 * 14) + (0.2 * 7) = 12.6

FOR LARGE COMPLEX


EXPECTED COST = (0.8 * 20) + (0.2 * -9) = 14.2

SINCE LARGE COMPLEX HAS THE MAXIMUM EMV, THEREFORE CHOOSE LARGE
COMPLEX.

CASELOAD

DECISION MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH EXPECTED COST


(0.1) (0.3) (0.6)
REASSIGN STAFF 50 60 85 $ 74,000
NEW STAFF 60 60 60 $ 60,000
REDESIGN 40 50 90 $ 73,000

MINIMUM EXPECTED COST = $ 60,000


DECISION = NEW STAFF

(C) ​OPPORTUNITY LOSS TABLE


CASELOAD

DECISION MODERATE HIGH VERY HIGH EOL


(0.1) (0.3) (0.6)
REASSIGN STAFF 10 10 25 $ 19,000
NEW STAFF 20 10 0 $ 5,000
REDESIGN 0 0 30 $ 18,000

EXPECTED OPPORTUNITY LOSS = ∑ (Probability * Corresponding Regret Cost)

FOR REASSIGN STAFF

EXPECTED REGRET COST = (0.1 * 10) + (0.3 * 10) + (0.6 * 25)


EXPECTED REGRET COST = $ 19 (IN THOUSANDS)

FOR NEW STAFF

EXPECTED REGRET COST = (0.1 * 20) + (0.3 * 10) + (0.6 * 0)


EXPECTED REGRET COST = $ 5 (IN THOUSANDS)

FOR REDESIGN

EXPECTED REGRET COST = (0.1 * 0) + (0.3 * 0) + (0.6 * 30)


EXPECTED REGRET COST = $ 18 (IN THOUSANDS)

Expected value of perfect information = Minimum Expected Regret Loss


Expected value of perfect information = $ 5000
Expected Value of Perfect Information = Expected Value with perfect information -
Maximum Expected Monetary Value

Expected Value with perfect information = $ 3,450 - $ 2,650


Expected Value with perfect information = $ 800

EVPI is the maximum amount the investor will be willing to pay for additional
information about a decision problem, i.e., if we have perfect information about the
state of nature before the decision is made, how much is this information worth. In
this case, it is $ 800.

(D) Let payoff for stock under good economy X.

EMV (for stock) = 0.2X + (0.3 * 2000) + (0.5 * 5,000)


EMV (for bond) = $ 2,650

AT POINT OF INDIFFERENCE

EMV (for stock) = EMV (for bond)


0.2X + 600 - 2500 = 2,650
0.2X = 4550
X = $ 22,750

Payoff for Stock under good economy = $ 22,750

You might also like