3-Way Match and The GR Based IV Flag
3-Way Match and The GR Based IV Flag
3-Way Match and The GR Based IV Flag
IV flag
Hi folks,
I'm using SAP in finance for the last 6 months. I have recently requested that
the ""GR Based IV flag"" be removed from all vendors in the vendor master.
The goal was to allow us to enter invoices without the goods receipt (GR).
When we enter an invoice w/out the GR it gets automatically blocked for
quantity discrepancy (tolerance on qty is set to zero). My current dilemma is
that I am hearing from consultants that because I have turned off the ""GR
Based IV flag"" I have in fact eliminated the 3-way match. I don't agree with
the rationale and my counter argument is:
1. If the ""GR Based IV flag"" is on then the 3 way match is at the GR level
2. If the ""GR Based IV flag"" is off then the 3 way match is at the line
summary level.
Either way you have a 3 way match. It seems that some folks are getting hung
up on ""semantics"". Assuming that a 3-way match mean a specific GR must
be linked to a specific Invoice & PO.
How can I untangle this misconception? In ideas that I can use to try to
demonstrate the 3 way match is still on regardless of the ""GR Based IV
flag""?
share this
AC
Alberto Centeno
asked 12 years ago
updated 8 months ago
11 Answers | Add an answer
Best Answers First
Alberto,
I see there are quite a few replies to your question, but I'm tempted to answer it as this
is my area of expertise :)
GR-based IV flag makes sure that you can post the invoice only after the GR is posted.
So, if you turn off the GR-IV flag, you can post the invoice. But it would be blocked for a
qty variance (as there is no GR). If you want to pay these invoices even before posting
the GR, you'd have to unblock these invoices in transaction MRBR by deleting the
quantity block.
There are couple of ways to avoid the invoices posted before GRs from getting blocked.
These include changing certain configuration.
Cheers,
Mat
M
manthena
12 years ago
reply to this
In my humble opinion you have a major financial control problem if you've changed your
system so that there is no check your company has actually received the goods before
processing a vendor invoice for payment. If your stores department are being slow at
receipting goods that is where management resources need to be deployed.
JW
James Wilson
12 years ago
reply to this
Hi Alberto,
Have this "GR Based IV flag" tick in the purchase order rather than in the
vendor master, this will help solve your problem.
NV-SAP
varadhan narasimhan
12 years ago
reply to this
hi ,
Dont remove the GR based IV flag as it will help you to book a bill very easily aga that
GRN no , But if you want to book a bill then every time you have to change to Qty and
value as per GRN of that bill while doing MIRO transaction.This will not block the bill
from payment purpose.
---
RR
Rajesh Ranjan
12 years ago
reply to this
Hi Mat
Could you able let us know the configuration that need to be done to post the invoice
without GR and invoice not getting blocked for quantity?
Thanks
Auroar
GS
gobi suppiah
12 years ago
reply to this
To post invoice without GR you will need to turn off the GR Based IV flag
at the Vendor Master, PIR and PO level. There is also the configuration
around Account Assignment categories that governs whether a GR is required
for the item at the time of IR. This config path is SPRO---> Material
Management ----> Purchasing ------> Account Assignment----> Maintain
Account Assignment Categories.
Hi,
3 way match happends irrespective of fact PO is GR based inovie or not. The 3 way
match happens at the line item level.
S
satchidanand_t
11 years ago
reply to this
hi,
where we can set GR -IV flag in venor master
regards
sajeev
SS
sajeev s
11 years ago
reply to this
It's in the purchasing data view at the vendor master. If you don't see it, chances are the
field is suppressed for the account group.
N
nomi4hire
9 years ago
reply to this
Your statement is correct, the 3 way match does occur, it is just a summary
by line. So if you have an iv qnty of 10 and 2 GR = 10, the iv will become
available for payment.
Regards,
Irene