0% found this document useful (0 votes)
633 views1 page

Guage R&R Study

This document presents data from a gauge repeatability and reproducibility study. It shows measurements from 3 appraisers using a vernier caliper to measure the thickness of 10 slip gauge parts. Statistics like the average measurement, repeatability, and reproducibility are calculated. The results indicate a gauge repeatability and reproducibility percentage of 1382.67%, meaning the gauge system needs improvement to reduce variability between measurements.

Uploaded by

Mkrp Kameswar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
633 views1 page

Guage R&R Study

This document presents data from a gauge repeatability and reproducibility study. It shows measurements from 3 appraisers using a vernier caliper to measure the thickness of 10 slip gauge parts. Statistics like the average measurement, repeatability, and reproducibility are calculated. The results indicate a gauge repeatability and reproducibility percentage of 1382.67%, meaning the gauge system needs improvement to reduce variability between measurements.

Uploaded by

Mkrp Kameswar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Krisam Automation

Quality Assurance
GAUGE REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY DATA SHEET

File number Gauge Name Appraiser A Part Number Gauge Name Appraiser A
-------------- Vernier Caliper Ramesh -------------- Vernier Caliper Ramesh
Part Name Gauge Number Appraiser B Part Name Gauge Number Appraiser B
Slip gauge - 0.10 kr-G-1 Saranappa 0 kr-G-1 Saranappa
Characteristic Specification Gauge Type Appraiser C Characteristic Gauge Type Appraiser C
Thickness 0.090 0.100 Thickness measuring Sai Thickness Thickness measuring Sai
Characteristic Classification Trials Parts Appraisers Date Performed Characteristic Classification Trials Parts Appraisers Date Performed
Significant 3 10 3 15-04-2008 Significant 3 10 3 15-04-2008

APPRAISER/ PART AVERAGE Measurement Unit Analysis % Tolerance (Tol)


TRIAL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Repeatability - Equipment Variation (EV)
1. A 1 0.080 0.120 0.080 0.120 0.100 0.140 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.140 0.102 EV = R x K1 Trials K1 % EV = 100 (EV/Tol)
2 2 0.100 0.080 0.160 0.080 0.080 0.140 0.080 0.080 0.100 0.080 0.098 = 0.045 x 3.05 2 4.56 = 100(0.138/0.010)
3 3 0.120 0.080 0.140 0.080 0.140 0.080 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.108 = 0.138 3 3.05 = 1382.67
4 AVE 0.100 0.093 0.127 0.093 0.107 0.120 0.080 0.087 0.100 0.120 xa= 0.103 Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (AV)
5 R 0.040 0.040 0.080 0.040 0.060 0.060 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 ra= 0.044 AV = {(xDIFF x K2)2 - (EV2/nr)}1/2 % AV = 100 (AV/Tol)
6. B 1 0.080 0.140 0.140 0.120 0.140 0.140 0.060 0.120 0.160 0.080 0.118 = {(0.009 x 2.7)^2 - (0.138 ^2/(10 x 3))}^1/2 = 100(0.000/0.010)
7 2 0.120 0.080 0.080 0.100 0.080 0.120 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.090 = 0.000 Appraisers 2 3 = 0.00
8 3 0.140 0.080 0.120 0.100 0.160 0.080 0.100 0.140 0.160 0.120 0.120 K2 3.65 2.70 n = number of parts
9 AVE 0.113 0.100 0.113 0.107 0.127 0.113 0.080 0.113 0.133 0.093 xb= 0.109 Repeatability & Reproducibility (R & R) r = number of trials
10 R 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.020 0.080 0.060 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.040 rb= 0.056 R&R = {(EV + AV )}
2 2 1/2
Parts K3

11. C 1 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.100 0.080 0.120 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.086 = {(0.138^2 + 0.000^2)}^1/2 2 3.65 % R&R = 100 (R&R/Tol)
12 2 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.120 0.100 0.160 0.080 0.100 0.140 0.160 0.110 = 0.138 3 2.70 = 100(0.138/0.010)
13 3 0.140 0.140 0.080 0.120 0.100 0.140 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.104 Part Variation (PV) 4 2.30 = 1382.67
14 AVE 0.100 0.100 0.080 0.113 0.093 0.140 0.080 0.087 0.100 0.107 xc = 0.100 PV = RP x K3 5 2.08 Gauge system needs improvement
15 R 0.060 0.060 0.000 0.020 0.020 0.040 0.000 0.020 0.060 0.080 rc= 0.036 = 0.044 x 1.62 6 1.93
16. PART X= 0.104 = 0.072 7 1.82 % PV = 100 (PV/Tol)
AVE ( Xp ) 0.104 0.098 0.107 0.104 0.109 0.124 0.080 0.096 0.111 0.107 Rp= 0.044 Tolerance 8 1.56 = 100(0.072/0.010)
17 (ra + rb + rc) / (# OF APPRAISERS) = R= 0.045 Tol = Upper - Lower 9 1.67 = 720.00
18 (Max x - Min x) = xDIFF= 0.009 = 0.1 - 0.09 10 1.62
19 R x D4* = UCLR= 0.117 = 0.010
20 R x D3* = LCLR= 0.000
All calculations are based upon predicting 5.15 sigma (99.0% of the area under the normal distribution curve).
* D4 =3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials; D 3 = 0 for up to 7 trials. UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are K1 is 5.15/d2, where d2 is dependent on the number of trials (m) and the number if parts times the number of operators (g) which is
beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct. Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit as originally used or dis- assumed to be greater than 15.
card values and re-average and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations. AV - If a negative value is calculated under the square root sign, the appraiser variation (AV) defaults to zero (0).
K2 is 5.15/d2, where d2 is dependent on the number of operators (m) and (g) is 1, since there is only one range calculation.
Notes: K2 is 5.15/d2, where d2 is dependent on the number of parts (m) and (g) is 1, since there is only one range calculation.
d2 is obtained from Table D 3, "Quality Control and Industrial Statistics"

You might also like