6 Plate Girder Bridges
6 Plate Girder Bridges
6 Plate Girder Bridges
Santha Kumar
Plate girders became popular in the late 1800's, when they were used in
construction of railroad bridges. The plates were joined together using angles
and rivets to obtain plate girders of desired size. By 1950's welded plate girders
replaced riveted and bolted plate girders in developed world due to their better
quality, aesthetics and econom y. Fig.7.15 shows the cross sections of two
common types of plate girder bridges. The use of plate girders rather than rolled
beam sections for the two main girders gives the designer freedom to select the
order to comply with the minimum head-room clearance required, the half
used in railway bridges where the maximum permissible approach gradient for
the track is low. In this case the restraint to lateral buckling of com pression flange
stiffness, which are connected together with a moment resisting joint. If the
The design criterion for main girders as used in buildings, was discussed
that are to be considered in the design of plate girders in bridges, are discussed.
welding additional cover plates or by using thicker flange plate in the region of
larger moment. In very long continuous spans (span> 50 m) variable depth plate
thumb rules such as those given below. Such rules also give a good estimate of
dead load of the bridge structure to be designed. For highway and railway
bridges, indicative range of values for various overall dimension of the main
Here, l is the length between points of zero moment. The detailed design
The load effects (such as bending moment and shear force) are to be
found using individual and un-factored load cases. Based on these, the
summation of load effects due to different load combinations for various load
factors are obtained. Since bridges are subjected to cyclic loading and hence are
is not permitted under BS 5400: Part - 3. The design is made based on Limit
· Web buckling
· Fatigue effect
variation of stress over the depth at failure varies. A compact section can develop
full plastic moment i.e. rectangular stress block as shown in Fig.7.16 (a). Before
component plates should not occur. Thus the compact section should possess
minimum thickness of elements on the compression zone such that they do not
buckle locally before the entire compression zone yields in compression. The
Fig.7.17, where f y
is to be substituted in SI units (MPa).
The section that does not fulfill the minimum thickness criterion of compact
locally before full section plastic capacity is reached. Therefore the design of
such section is based on triangular stress block wherein yielding at the extreme
The moment capacity of the compact and non-compact cross sections can
Mupym
Z =f / for compact sec tions (7.6a)
Zf=/ for
M uym - non compact sec tions (7.6b)
Where, f y
- yield stress
Z p
- plastic modulus
Z - elastic modulus
Even in the compact section, the use of plastic modulus does not imply
Part - 3 precludes plastic analy sis and does not allow any moment redistribution
the consequent low cycle fatigue failure. When non-compact sections are used
the redistribution will not occur and hence plastic analysis is not applicable.
A typical bridge girder with a portion of the span, over which the
buckled view of a portion of the span. The displacements at mid span, where the
beam is laterally restrained, will be only vertical, as shown in Fig. 7.18(c). A part
of the beam between restraints can translate downwards and sideways and
rotate about shear centre [Fig. 7.18(d)]. Failure may then be governed by lateral
compression flange, the geometry of cross section, moment gradient etc. The
procedure in detail for calculating the value of the limiting compressive stress is
Web buckling
The web of plate girders resist the shear in the three modes, namely (i)
pure shear, (ii) tension field action and (iii) that due to formation of collapse
mechanism. These are disc ussed in detail in the chapters on plate girders. They
2
p2 Et
qk
c2
=d
()
12 1 -µ
(7.7)
Where,
da 2
k5.344
=+ = when 1.0
ad
da
k 4=+5.34
< when 1.0
ad
Where t, d and a are the web thickness, depth and distance between
The elastic local buckling of the web in shear does not lead to collapse
Limit State, since the web experiences stable post-buckling behaviour. In mode
(ii), a tension field develops in the panel after shear buckling. In mode (iii) the
maximum shear capacity is reached, when pure shear stress in mode (i) and the
membrane stress, pt in mode (ii) cause yielding of the panel and plastic hinges in
1 (d/a)] of the tension field with respect to neutral axis (NA) and the first mode
Thus the resistance to shear in the three-modes put together is given by,
()
22
pqq
tcc =+ 3- 2.25Sin
- 22 Sin
3 1.5 (7.8)
qqq
yyy
2
1a pt 2
If m Sinfw =
43 dq y
12
qq pt p
uc t=+ () 2
+ -f 5.264 Sin m Cot Sin
fw
qqyyfyqy
(7.9)
2
1a pt 2
If m Sinfw >
43 dq y
qpq
utc =+ +
d 2
43m Sin
fw
qa2qq
yyy
Where, m fw
is the non-dimensional representation of plastic moment
Mp
m fw 2 =
dtf yw
the anchorage of the tension field forces created in the end panels by appropriate
Shear-moment Interaction
whole section with and without considering contribution of the web, respectively.
VD and V R
are the shear capacities with tension field theory, considering flanges
and ignoring the flanges, respectively. However, for girders with longitudinal
stresses in the different web panels using the relevant critical buckling strengths
of the panel.
Fatigue effect
progressively increasing crack and finally failure, even though stresses are well
within the static strength of the material. It may be low cycle fatigue, due to stress
ranges beyond yielding or high cycle fatigue, at stresses below the elastic limit.
IS: 1024 gives the guide line for evaluating fatigue strength of welded details, that
Plate girders have a very low torsional stiffness and a very high ratio of
major axis to minor axis moment of inertia. Thus, when they bend about major
axis, they are very prone to lateral-torsional instability as shown in Fig.7.20 (a).
the completed structure, the compression flange is usually stabilised by the deck.
a possible mode of failure and such cases have to be adequately braced. Thus,
lateral bracings are a system of cross frames and bracings located in the
lateral stability.
Loads that act transverse on the plate girders also cause the lateral
bending and the major contribution is from wind loads. Since plate girders can be
very deep, increase in girder depth creates a larger surface area over which wind
plate girder bridges to increase lateral stability of compression flange. But, it can
not be adopted for the half-through or through girder bridges because it interferes
with functions of the bridge. In these cases, the deck is designed as a horizontal
beam providing restraint against translation at its level and the flange far away
from the deck is stabilised by U-frame action as shown in Fig. 7.15(a). The
depends upon the transverse member, the two webs of the main girder (including
any associated vertical stiffener) and their connections. In this case, the effective