TOS Samples 1
TOS Samples 1
TOS Samples 1
Classroom assessment can be defined as the collection, interpretation, and use of information to help teachers make better
decisions.
Assessment should be aligned with the learning targets/competencies/objectives.
Assessment should be both formative and summative.
It is more than testing or measurement. It is NOT a matter of life and death; pass or fail.
It looks into any change or any improvement in the learning of the pupils.
New trends in classroom assessment do NOT over emphasize scoring and grading, but assessment is understood as ASSIST-
MENT. Assessment is NO longer separate from instruction.
It is holistic.
Formative
Diagnostic
Summative
Standards-Based
Content-standards indicate what the pupils are expected to KNOW (acquisition of knowledge), UNDERSTAND
(meaning making), and DO (doing, demonstrating, performing, or producing). This is the WHAT?
Performance-standards indicate the degree to which the content standards have been achieved. This is the HOW
the pupils will use the WHAT? Performance-standards describe the abilities and skills that the pupils are expected to
demonstrate in relation to content standards and integration of the 21 st century skills.
It supports a balance of assessments, including high-quality standardized testing along with effective formative and summative
classroom assessments.
It emphasizes useful feedback on student performance that is embedded into everyday learning.
It requires balance of technology-enhance formative and summative assessments that measure student mastery of 21st
century skills.
It enables development of portfolios of student works that demonstrate mastery of 21 st century skills to teachers and
prospective employers.
Formative assessment – is done during or at the middle of instruction to continuously monitor the students’ level of
attainment of the learning objectives. The results of this assessment are communicated clearly and promptly to the students
for them to know their strengths and weaknesses and the progress of their learning.
Formative assessment is a continuous and several assessments done during the instructional process for the purpose of
improving teaching and learning.
What makes formative assessment formative is that it is immediately used to make adjustments to help students learn the
lessons better.
This is given only after a series of formative assessments. This is done after instruction to determine the mastery of the end of
the course.
Formative Summative
Purpose To monitor and improve instruction and To document student performance
student learning. on a learning unit
Time of Assessment During instruction After instruction is completed
Assessment Techniques Informal observation, listening to student Chapter tests, final exams, reports,
questions and responses to teacher term papers, projects
questions
Use of Information To improve a process while it is still going To judge success of student
on learning and instruction, and to
identify systematic student errors
Structure Flexible, informal Fixed, formal, standardized for al
Development and Validation of Assessment Tools
Aralin 1: Konsepto ng 5 13 10 1 2 2 2 2 2
Palatandaan ng Bansang
Kaunlaran
Aralin 2: Sektor 7 20 15 1 4 3 3 3 3
Agrikultura
Aralin 3: Sektor 7 20 15 1 4 3 3 3 3
Industriya
Aralin 4: Sektor 5 13 10 1 2 2 2 2 2
Paglilingkod
Aralin 5: Impormal na 5 13 10 1 2 2 2 2 2
Sektor
Aralin 6: Kalakalang 7 20 15 1 4 3 3 3 3
Panlabas
TOTAL 36 100 75 6 18 15 15 15 15
Sample Table of Specification
Midterm Examination
General Science 1
The learning outcomes of a course may be broadly defined to include both subject matter content and instructional objectives. The
former is concerned with the topics to be learned and the latter with the types of performance the students are expected to demonstrate (e.g.
understands, applies, and evaluates concepts).
A table of specification in a very simple form shows how such a table is used in test development. The percentages in a table indicate
their relative degree of emphasis that each content area and each instructional objective is to be given in the test.
Thus, if a 75-item classroom test is to measure a representative sample of subject matter content, 16% of the items should be concerned
with air pressure, another 16% with air temperature and so forth. Similarly, if the test is to measure representative sample of the instructional
objectives (levels of complexity), 10% should measure knowledge of the concepts, 22% should measure understanding of concepts, 40%
should measure application of knowledge and 22% should measure evaluation of the relevance of concepts.
Ateneo de Naga University
College of Education
TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL EXAMINATION (The Teaching Profession)
Level of Complexities
Topics Low Cognitive Middle High Cognitive Total
Level Cognitive Level
(46%) Level (22%)
(32%)
Nature of Teaching Profession (Vocation, Mission 10 10
and Profession)
Sources/Branches of Philosophy of Education 7 7
Traditional Philosophies of Education 19 19
Modern Philosophies of Education 20 9 29
Legal Bases of Philippine Education 12 1 15 28
Code of Ethics for Teachers 3 30 4 37
TOTAL 61 41 29 130
TWO-WAY TABLE OF SPECIFICATION
TOTAL 39.6
(40.00)
time spent/total number of time spent for the quarter x 100 Example: 4.5/40 = 0.1125 x 100 = 11.25
potential item x the number of items allocated to each level of complexities/100 Example: 11.25 x 5 = 56.25/100 = .562
ATENEO TEACHER TRAINING CENTER
Sample Table of Specification
Midterm Examination
General Science 1