Computational Analysis and Design of Single Screw Extruders Having Screws of Complex Geometry With Mixing Elements

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS AND

DESIGN OF SINGLE SCREW


EXTRUDERS HAVING SCREWS OF
COMPLEX GEOMETRY WITH MIXING
ELEMENTS
John Vlachopoulos
McMaster University
Nick Polychronopoulos *
Polydynamics, Inc.
Shinichiro Tanifuji
Hyper Advanced Simulation Laboratory (H.A.S.L.)

SPE EUROTEC 2011


BARCELONA, SPAIN
The “heart” of every extruder is an
ARCHIMEDEAN SCREW attributed to
Archimedes 287-212 BC but, actually
known to Egyptians for irrigation in the Nile
Delta and the auger (screw drill) for
carpentry was known to the Greeks before
the 3rd Century BC.

See:
Chris Rorres, J.Hydraul.Eng., Vol.126, 71-80,
(January 2000)
SINGLE SCREW EXTRUDER:
Rotating screw in a heated barrel.

Early developments for rubber


due to Thomas Hancock in 1820 in
England.

Modern developments started in


the 1950’s.
MODELING of EXTRUSION started in the
1950’s
Prominent names
at DUPONT (USA) o Maillefer (parallel
o McKelvey developments in
o Gore Switzerland, 1950’s)
o Squires
1950’s
- Maddock (Union Carbide) 1950’s
- McKelvey’s book on P.P. appeared in 1962
- The book by Z. Tadmor and I. Klein appeared in
1970
MODELING OF EXTRUSION IS 60 YEARS
OLD, BUT MANY CHALLENGES REMAIN
SINGLE SCREW EXTRUSION IS THE MOST
COST-EFFECTIVE WAY TO MELT AND PUMP A
POLYMER

SCREW DESIGN calls for

- OUTPUT MAXIMIZATION
- MELT TEMPERATURE MINIMIZATION
- EXTRUSION STABILITY
- MELT QUALITY

OPTIONS:
- CONVENTIONAL single flighted screws
- BARRIER screws
- Screws with MIXING SECTIONS
Conventional single screw (also
called: plasticating) extruders are
composed of three sections:
In all screws at least the first 70% or so of
melting is due to the shear stress in the
melt film between the barrel and the solid
bed surface.
BARRIER SCREW PRINCIPLE

- Increased melting.
- At least 80% is melted by shear over
the solid bed (i.e. very little conductive
melting).
MADDOCK (Union Carbide)
MIXING SECTION
CHALLENGES:
SOLID PARTICLES TRANSPORT
(pellets, size, properties, powders,
difficult to describe mathematically
particle flow)
MELTING OF THE PACKED BED OF SOLID
PARTICLES
(how do solid particle properties affect
the melting rate?)
COMPLEX SCREW GEOMETRY
(barrier screws, screws with various
types of mixing elements)
Our present modeling approach

Current focus

MODULAR, EASY TO UPGRADE MODELS FOR EACH SECTION


DARNELL AND MOL (1956) MODEL

BALANCE OF FORCES AND TORQUES


MELTING (Tadmor’s Model)
In the late 50’s, Bruce Maddock did experiments,
pulling the screw and examining what happened.
The conclusion was that MELTING REALLY OCCURS
IN A FILM BETWEEN BARREL AND SOLID BED. A
MELT POOL FORMS IN FRONT OF THE REAR
FLIGHT, as shown:
Metering section:
We decided to use the Hele – Shaw
flow approximation layer – by – layer
2.5D analysis with 3D geometry
Because our objective is screw design
which means, simulation for a starting
geometry, geometry upgrade…..till
satisfactory results obtained.
50 or more runs maybe need.
“trial – and – error on the computer
screen”.
3-D NAVIER – STOKES for creeping
non – Newtonian flow
=
0 = −∇P + ∇ ⋅ τ ∇ ⋅V = 0
1  ∂Vi ∂V j 
 τ ij = f (eij ) i, j = 1,2,3
eij = +

2  ∂x j ∂xi 

=
ENERGY: ρ C PV ⋅ ∇ T = k ∇ T + τ : ∇ V 2

HELE – SHAW FLOW APPROXIMATION


∂  ∂P  ∂  ∂P  h
z 2 du
S  +  S  = 0 S ( x, y ) = ∫
∂x  ∂x  ∂y  ∂y  o
η ( x, y , z )

S ∂P S ∂P ∂P z′dz′ ∂P z′dz′
h h

Vy ( z ) = − ∫ Vx ( z ) = −
∂x ∫0 η ( z′)
Vx = − Vy = −
h ∂x h ∂y ∂y 0 η (z′)
=
ENERGY: ρ C PV ⋅ ∇ T = k ∇ T + τ : ∇ V 3D
2
PLABOR JAPAN EXPERIMENTS
Barrel Diameter = 40 mm

5D 10D 12D
FEED COMPRESSION METERING

give measured value of pressure at


both ends as boundary condition.
predict pressure distribution /
temperature distribution / extruder
output
Material:LDPE, Power-law approximation
McMaster University Experiments
- Single flighted screw, no mixing element
- D=38 mm, L/D=24
Material: HDPE (80 RPM)
• FLOW RATE
- Measured: 13.34 kg/hr
- Predicted: 13.67 kg/hr
• PEAK PRESSURE
- Measured: 29.75 MPa
- Predicted: 27.21 MPa
--------------
Somewhat better results for LDPE
BRAMPTON ENGINEERING/McMASTER
UNIVERSITY EXPERIMENTS CANADA

- L/D=30, Diameter (D)= 88.9mm


- 4 different screw designs
- LDPE MI 0.3
- LLDPE MI 1
Experimental conditions
• 16 runs performed: 4 screws x 2
polymers x 2 output rates

• Pressures measured at 8 locations


along screw, plus at end of screw
- values recorded once per second

• Melt temperature measured at


end of screw
L/D=30, Diameter (D)= 88.9mm
Barrier screw with Maddock
Simulation

Measurement
Lagrangian melting particle simulation HDPE
(Diameter of the initial solid particles: 5 mm)
Lagrangian melting particle simulation HDPE
(Diameter of the initial solid particles: 5 mm)
Lagrangian melting particle simulation HDPE
(Diameter of the initial solid particles: 2.5 mm)
Lagrangian melting particle simulation HDPE
(Diameter of the initial solid particles: 2.5 mm)
THANKS
Q&A

You might also like