PROFILE Influence of TRAIN Law on the Financial Priority of Teachers in terms of:

No. Of Respondents Basic Needs Financial Security QUALITY OF LIFE FAMILY INSURANCE NEEDS
Age Sex Civil Status Employee Status Monthly Income
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 1 2 1 2 3 3 2 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2
2 1 2 1 2 3 3 2 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2
3 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 2 1 1 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 1 2 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 1 2 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 4 2 2 2 2
6 1 2 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 1 2 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1
7 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 4 2 2 3 4
8 2 1 1 2 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2
9 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 4 2 3 2 3
10 2 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 1
11 1 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 1
12 6 1 2 1 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4
13 6 1 2 1 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3
14 8 2 2 1 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
15 5 2 2 1 5 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2
16 4 1 1 1 2 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2
17 3 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2 2
18 8 2 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
19 1 2 1 2 2 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
20 1 2 1 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
21 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 2
22 4 2 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 2 2 3
23 1 1 1 1 3 4 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 4 2 4 3 4 2 2 2 3
24 1 2 1 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 3
25 1 2 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 2 2
26 7 1 2 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
27 1 1 1 1 4 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 4 3 4 4 3 3 3
28 1 2 1 1 3 3 4 4 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3
29 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 4 2 2 2
30 3 1 1 1 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3
3.4 3.3 3.7666666667 3.3333333333 2.9 3.0666666667 3.0333333333 2.6333333333 2.7 2.5333333333 3.1666666667 2.9 2.7333333333 3.1 2.6 3.7333333333 2.8333333333 2.4666666667 2.4333333333 2.6666666667
 CIVIL
Age FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE SEX FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
STATUS
21-25 16 53.33 MALE 15 50 Single 25 83.33
26-30 4 13.33 FEMALE 15 50 Maried 5 16.67
31-35 2 6.67 TOTAL 30 100 TOTAL 30 100.00
36-40 2 6.67
41-45 1 3.33 EMPLOYEE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
46-50 2 6.67 STATUS
51-55 1 3.33 PERMANENT 14 46.67
56-60 2 6.67 CONTRACTUAL 16 53.33
TOTAL 30 100 TOTAL 30 100.00

MOMTHLY INCOME FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Below Php 10,000 0 0.00
Php 11,000- Php 15, 000 6 20.00
Php 16, 000- Php 20, 000 16 53.33
Php 21, 000- Php 25,000 4 13.33
Php 26, 000 and above 4 13.33
TOTAL 30 100.00
Influence of TRAIN Law on the Financial Priority of Teachers in terms of:
BASIC NEEDS
FREQUENCY WEIGHTED VERBAL
STATEMENTS TOTAL RANK
4 3 2 1 MEAN INTERPRETATION
1 13 16 1 0 30 3.40 STRONGLY AGREE 2
2 12 15 3 0 30 3.30 STRONGLY AGREE 4
3 23 7 0 0 30 3.77 STRONGLY AGREE 1
4 14 12 4 0 30 3.33 STRONGLY AGREE 3
5 12 8 5 5 30 2.90 AGREE 5
COMPOSITE MEAN 3.34 STRONGLY AGREE

FINANCIAL SECURITY
FREQUENCY WEIGHTED VERBAL
STATEMENTS TOTAL RANK
4 3 2 1 MEAN INTERPRETATION
1 8 16 6 0 30 3.07 AGREE 1
2 8 15 7 0 30 3.03 AGREE 2
3 5 10 14 1 30 2.63 AGREE 4
4 7 7 16 0 30 2.70 AGREE 3
5 6 9 10 5 30 2.53 AGREE 5
COMPOSITE MEAN 2.79 AGREE

SCORING VERBAL INTERPRETATION

1.00-1.74 Strongly Disagree

1.75-2.50 Disagree
2.51-3.25 Agree
3.26-4.00 Strongly Agree

QUALITY OF LIFE
FREQUENCY WEIGHTED VERBAL
STATEMENTS TOTAL RANK
4 3 2 1 MEAN INTERPRETATION
1 10 15 5 0 30 3.17 AGREE 1
2 10 10 7 3 30 2.90 AGREE 3
3 8 10 8 4 30 2.73 AGREE 4
4 11 12 6 1 30 3.10 AGREE 2
5 6 11 8 5 30 2.60 AGREE 5
COMPOSITE MEAN 2.90 AGREE

FAMILY INSURANCE NEEDS

FREQUENCY WEIGHTED VERBAL
STATEMENTS TOTAL RANK
4 3 2 1 MEAN INTERPRETATION
1 24 4 2 0 30 3.73 STRONGLY AGREE 1
2 11 5 12 2 30 2.83 AGREE 2
3 6 6 14 4 30 2.47 DISAGREE 4
4 5 7 14 4 30 2.43 DISAGREE 5
5 6 11 10 3 30 2.67 AGREE 3
COMPOSITE MEAN 2.83 AGREE
 BASIC NEEDS FASHION
SEX 1 2 3 4 5 ∑AVE ∑AVE
MALE SR-1 SR-2
AVE 0 0
AVE*AVE 0 0 0 0 0
FEAMLE CF= 0
AVE
AVE*AVE 0 0 0 0 0 TSS= 0

BSS= 0
WSS= 0

k-1= 1
(N-1)-(K-1)=

BSS/df = 0 MSB/MSW
WSS/df = #DIV/0! F0.05(1,14)= 4.60

SPEAKING STYLE SPEAKING STY

SEX 1 2 3 4 5 ∑AVE ∑AVE
MALE 160 172 168 166 159 SR-1 SR-2
AVE 2.622951 2.819672 2.754098 2.721311 2.606557 13.52459 7.646512
AVE*AVE 6.879871 7.950551 7.585058 7.405536 6.794141
FEMALE 599 221 285 265 274 CF= 28.01347
AVE 2.786047 1.027907 1.325581 1.232558 1.274419
AVE*AVE 7.762055 1.056593 1.757166 1.5192 1.624143 TSS= 22.32084

BSS= 2.159488
WSS= 20.16135

k-1= 1
(N-1)-(K-1)=14

BSS/df = 2.159488 MSB/MSW

WSS/df = 1.440097 F0.05(1,14)= 4.60

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACADEMIC PERFOR

SEX 1 2 3 4 5 ∑AVE ∑AVE
MALE 169 168 177 130 140 SR-1 SR-2
AVE 2.770492 2.754098 2.901639 2.131148 2.295082 12.85246 12.94884
AVE*AVE 7.675625 7.585058 8.419511 4.54179 5.267401
FEMALE 604 621 619 452 488 CF= 41.60668
AVE 2.809302 2.888372 2.87907 2.102326 2.269767
AVE*AVE 7.89218 8.342693 8.289043 4.419773 5.151844 TSS= 25.97824

BSS= 0.000581
WSS= 25.97766

k-1= 1
(N-1)-(K-1)=14

BSS/df = 0.000581 MSB/MSW

WSS/df = 1.855547 F0.05(1,14)= 4.60

VALUES FORMATION VALUES FORMA

SEX 1 2 3 4 5 ∑AVE ∑AVE
MALE 177 180 175 178 190 SR-1 SR-2
AVE 2.901639 2.95082 2.868852 2.918033 3.114754 14.7541 14.92558
AVE*AVE 8.419511 8.707337 8.230314 8.514915 9.701693
FEMALE 644 628 629 621 687 CF= 55.05521
AVE 2.995349 2.92093 2.925581 2.888372 3.195349
AVE*AVE 8.972115 8.531833 8.559027 8.342693 10.21025 TSS= 33.13448

BSS= 0.001838
WSS= 33.13264

k-1= 1
(N-1)-(K-1)=14

BSS/df = 0.001838 MSB/MSW

WSS/df = 2.366617 F0.05(1,14)= 4.60
 FASHION
∑AVE*A ∑AVE*A
VE SR-1 VE SR-2
0 0

0 0 FASHION
0 0
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE T
Degrees
Sources of Sum of Mean
of
Variation Squares Squares
Freedom
Between Sex 1 0.12 0.12
Within Sex 14 0.45 0.03
Total 15 0.57
#DIV/0! Decision Accept Ho
F0.05(1,14)= 4.60

SPEAKING STYLE
∑AVE*A ∑AVE*A
VE SR-1 VE SR-2
36.61516 13.71916

50.33431

182.9145 58.46914 SPEAKING STYLE

22.86432 7.308643
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE T
Degrees
Sources of Sum of Mean
of
Variation Squares Squares
Freedom
Between Sex 1 5.81 5.81
Within Sex 14 2.51 0.18
Total 15 8.32
1.499544 Decision Reject Ho
F0.05(1,14)= 4.60

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
∑AVE*A ∑AVE*A
VE SR-1 VE SR-2
33.48938 34.09553
 67.58492

165.1857 167.6724 ACADEMIC PERFORMANC

20.64821 20.95905
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE T
Degrees
Sources of Sum of Mean
of
Variation Squares Squares
Freedom
Between Sex 1 0.001 0.001
Within Sex 14 2.11 0.15
Total 15 8.32
0.000313 Decision Accept Ho
F0.05(1,14)= 4.60

VALUES FORMATION
∑AVE*A ∑AVE*A
VE SR-1 VE SR-2
43.57377 44.61592

88.18969

217.6834 222.773 VALUES FORMATION

27.21043 27.84662
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE T
Degrees
Sources of Sum of Mean
of
Variation Squares Squares
Freedom
Between Sex 1 0.01 0.01
Within Sex 14 0.27 0.02
Total 15 0.28
0.000777 Decision Accept Ho
F0.05(1,14)= 4.60
 FASHION

NALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE

F-Value
Verbal
Decicion
Computed Tabular Interpretation

3.65 4.6
Accept Ho Not Significant

SPEAKING STYLE

NALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE

F-Value
Verbal
Decicion
Computed Tabular Interpretation

32.44 4.6
Reject Ho Significant
 ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

NALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE

F-Value
Verbal
Decicion
Computed Tabular Interpretation

0.01 4.6
Accept Ho Not Significant

VALUES FORMATION

NALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE

F-Value
Verbal
Decicion
Computed Tabular Interpretation

0.56 4.6
Accept Ho Not Significant