Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 175 views

    Supplement To Complaint To Dean Landeta-Burdick 12:13

    Uploaded by

    karen
    This letter from an attorney supplements a previous complaint letter sent to a university dean regarding Louis Shenker and Beth Peller. The attorney informs the dean that Peller filed a false police report claiming Shenker violated his conditions of release by reposting a video where he states he will sue Peller. However, the police report notes Shenker did not contact Peller as barred. Additionally, the attorney previously cross-examined Peller who testified under oath that she did not fully view or read the video before claiming it contained physical threats against her.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Supplement To Complaint To Dean Landeta-Burdick 12:13

    Uploaded by

    karen
    175 views2 pages
    This letter from an attorney supplements a previous complaint letter sent to a university dean regarding Louis Shenker and Beth Peller. The attorney informs the dean that Peller filed a false police report claiming Shenker violated his conditions of release by reposting a video where he states he will sue Peller. However, the police report notes Shenker did not contact Peller as barred. Additionally, the attorney previously cross-examined Peller who testified under oath that she did not fully view or read the video before claiming it contained physical threats against her.

    Original Description:

    Supplemental Complaint to Dean Landeta-Brudick 12/13/19

    Original Title

    Supplement to Complaint to Dean Landeta-Burdick 12:13

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This letter from an attorney supplements a previous complaint letter sent to a university dean regarding Louis Shenker and Beth Peller. The attorney informs the dean that Peller filed a false police report claiming Shenker violated his conditions of release by reposting a video where he states he will sue Peller. However, the police report notes Shenker did not contact Peller as barred. Additionally, the attorney previously cross-examined Peller who testified under oath that she did not fully view or read the video before claiming it contained physical threats against her.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    175 views2 pages

    Supplement To Complaint To Dean Landeta-Burdick 12:13

    Uploaded by

    karen
    This letter from an attorney supplements a previous complaint letter sent to a university dean regarding Louis Shenker and Beth Peller. The attorney informs the dean that Peller filed a false police report claiming Shenker violated his conditions of release by reposting a video where he states he will sue Peller. However, the police report notes Shenker did not contact Peller as barred. Additionally, the attorney previously cross-examined Peller who testified under oath that she did not fully view or read the video before claiming it contained physical threats against her.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    LAW OFFICE OF KAREN D.

    HURVITZ
    34 TANGLEWOOD DRIVE
    CONCORD, MA 01742
    (617) 513-3365

    December 14, 2019

    Dean Christina Landeta-Burdick


    [email protected]

    RE: Louis Shenker Complaint against Beth (Barucha)(Calamity) Peller

    Dear Dean Landeta-Burdick,

    I am submitting this letter as a supplement to the letter complaint that I sent to you yesterday.

    Ms. Peller is unrelenting in her attempts to have Louis jailed for his Constitutionally protected
    right of free speech. I was contacted yesterday by the Assistant District Attorney who is
    handling the case against Louis in Northampton District Court. He informed me that Ms. Peller
    walked into the Northampton Police Department to report a violation of Louis’ conditions of
    release. The supposed violation was that he had reposted the video in which he claims that he is
    going to sue her for what she has done to him. I am attaching the police report that documents
    her actions.

    Ms. Peller was in court when the conditions of release were announced by the Judge. They
    provide only that Louis not contact her. He has not. She is now compounding her misdeeds by
    filing a false police report. If you read the report, even the officer who took it notes that in the
    video Louis merely claims that he is going to sue her. Nothing else.

    In regard to her patently false claims that the video was full of physical threats that Louis made
    to her, I cross-examined Ms. Peller about this video last Tuesday. She testified, under oath, that
    she did not read what he had written on a banner on the video -"LAWYERS ACTIVATED" -
    and that she did not listen to the entire video before she reported it as containing threats of
    physical violence against her. Her testimony in this regard does not pass the straight face test.

    Very truly yours,

    1
    Karen D. Hurvitz

    You might also like