Scribd
Upload
30 views

Excel 2003 Statistical Functions

This document describes the SLOPE function in Excel 2003, how it is used, and compares its results to earlier Excel versions. The SLOPE function returns the slope of a linear regression line predicting y from x. Excel 2003 improved SLOPE by using a two-pass method to calculate means first before determining sums, addressing rounding errors in previous versions when data had little variation but many significant digits.

Uploaded by

Leon Fourone
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views

Excel 2003 Statistical Functions

This document describes the SLOPE function in Excel 2003, how it is used, and compares its results to earlier Excel versions. The SLOPE function returns the slope of a linear regression line predicting y from x. Excel 2003 improved SLOPE by using a two-pass method to calculate means first before determining sums, addressing rounding errors in previous versions when data had little variation but many significant digits.

Uploaded by

Leon Fourone
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Excel 2003 Statistical Functions: SLOPE

SUMMARY
The purpose of this article is to describe the SLOPE function in Excel 2003, to illustrate
how the function is used, and to compare the results of the function in Excel 2003 with
the results of the SLOPE function in earlier versions of Microsoft Office Excel.
MORE INFORMATION
The SLOPE(known_y's,known_x's) function returns the slope of the linear regression
line that is used to predict y values from x values.

Syntax
SLOPE(known_y's,known_x's)

The arguments, known_y's and known_x's, must be arrays or cell ranges that contain
equal numbers of numeric data values.

The most common usage of the SLOPE function includes two ranges of cells that
contain the data, such as SLOPE(A1:A100, B1:B100).

Example Usage
To illustrate the SLOPE function, follow these steps:

1. Create a blank Excel worksheet.


2. Copy the following table:
y-values x-values
1 = 3 + 10^$D$3 Power of 10 to add to data
2 =4 + 10^$D$3 0
3 =2 + 10^$D$3
4 =5 + 10^$D$3
5 =4+10^$D$3
6 =7+10^$D$3 pre-Excel 2003
when D3 = 7.5
=SLOPE(A2:A7,B2:B7) 0.75

when D3 = 8
#DIV/0!

3. Select cell A1 in your blank Excel worksheet.

Excel 2003 Statistical Functions


Page 1 of 4
4. Click Paste on the Edit menu so that the entries from the table fill cells A1:D13
in your worksheet.
5. Click the Paste Options button, and then click Match Destination Formatting.
6. With the pasted range still selected, point to Column on the Format menu, and
then click AutoFit Selection.
You may want to format cells B2:B7 as Number with 0 decimal places, and cells A9:D9
as Number with 6 decimal places.

Cells A2:A7 and B2:B7 contain the y-values and the x-values that are used to call
SLOPE in cell A9.

If you have a version of Excel that is earlier than Excel 2003, be aware that SLOPE can
exhibit rounding errors in the earlier versions. The behavior of SLOPE has been
improved in Excel 2003.

If you use a version of Excel that is earlier than Excel 2003, the worksheet gives you a
chance to run an experiment and discover when rounding errors occur. If you add a
positive constant to each of the observations in cells B2:B7, it should not affect the
value of SLOPE. If you plot x,y pairs with x on the horizontal axis and y on the vertical
axis, adding a positive constant to each x value shifts the data to the right. The best-fit
regression line would still have the same slope.

Increasing the value in cell D3 adds a larger constant to cells B2:B7. If cell D3 is less
than or equal to 7, then there are no rounding errors that appear in the first 6 decimal
places of SLOPE. But then try 7.25, 7.5, 7.75, and 8. Cells D7:D12 show values of
SLOPE when cell D3 = 7.5 and 8 respectively. Note that rounding errors have become
so severe that division by 0 occurs when cell D3 = 8.

Earlier versions of Excel produce wrong answers in these cases because the effects of
rounding errors are more profound with the computational formula that is used by these
versions. Still, the cases that are used in this experiment can be viewed as extreme.

If you have Excel 2003, you will see no changes in the values of SLOPE if you try the
above experiment. However, cells D7:D12 show rounding errors that you would have
obtained with earlier versions.

Results in Earlier Versions of Excel


For example, if the two data arrays are named X's and Y's, earlier versions of Excel used
a single pass through the data to compute the sum of squares of X’s, the sum of X's, the
sum of Y's, the sum of XY's, and the count of the number of observations that are in
each array. These quantities were then combined into the computational formula that is
given in the Help file in earlier versions of Excel.

Results in Excel 2003


The procedure that is used in Excel 2003 uses a two-pass process through the data. First,
the sums of X's and Y's, and the count of the number of observations in each array are
computed; from these the means (averages) of the X and the Y observations can be
computed. On the second pass:

Excel 2003 Statistical Functions


Page 2 of 4
The squared difference between each X and the X mean is found and these
squared differences are summed.

-and-
The products (X – X mean) * (Y – Y mean) are found for each pair of data
points and summed.
SLOPE is then computed as the ratio of the second of these sums to the first. Notice that
neither of these sums is affected by adding a constant to each X value because that same
value is added to the X mean. In the numeric examples, even with a high power of 10 in
cell D3, these three sums are not affected, and the results of the second pass are
independent of the entry that is in cell D3. Therefore, the results in Excel 2003 are more
stable numerically.

Conclusions
Replacing a one-pass approach by a two-pass approach gives better numeric
performance of SLOPE in Excel 2003. The Excel 2003 results will never be less
accurate than the results from earlier versions.

In most practical examples, however, you are not likely to notice a difference between
the Excel 2003 results and the results in earlier versions of Excel. You are unlikely to
notice a difference because typical data is unlikely to exhibit the kind of unusual
behavior that this experiment illustrates. Numeric instability is most likely to appear in
earlier versions of Excel when data contains a high number of significant digits that are
combined with relatively little variation between data values.

The following procedure for finding the sum of squared deviations for a sample mean is
more accurate than the alternative procedure:

1. Find the sample mean.


2. Compute each squared deviation.
3. Sum the squared deviations.
The alternative procedure is frequently named the "calculator formula" because it is
suitable for use with a calculator for a small number of data points. With the calculator
formula, the procedure is as follows:

1. Find the sum of squares of all observations, the sample size, and the sum of all
observations.
2. Compute the sum of squares of all observations minus {[(sum of all
observations)^2]/sample size}.
There are many other functions that have been improved in Excel 2003 by replacing the
one-pass procedure with the two-pass procedure that finds the sample mean on the first
pass and computes the sum of squared deviations for it on the second pass.

A short list of such functions includes VAR, VARP, STDEV, STDEVP, DVAR,
DVARP, DSTDEV, DSTDEVP, FORECAST, SLOPE, INTERCEPT, PEARSON,
RSQ, and STEYX. Similar improvements were made in each of the three Analysis of
Variance tools in the Analysis ToolPak.
Excel 2003 Statistical Functions
Page 3 of 4
For more information about the SLOPE function, click Microsoft Excel Help on the
Help menu, type slope in the Search for box in the Assistance pane, and then click
Start searching to view the topic.

Excel 2003 Statistical Functions


Page 4 of 4

You might also like