CBS Case Club Toolbox For Case Solving
CBS Case Club Toolbox For Case Solving
CBS Case Club Toolbox For Case Solving
There are plenty of opportunities to compete in case competitions at CBS. However, there are few
opportunities to learn how to actually become good at case competitions. This is one of the reasons
why CBS Case Club was founded. In this toolbox, we give you a taste of what we have to offer.
CBS
Student organizations
+ 2-3 competitions
Companies
+ 30 competitions
2
CBS Case Club
The purpose of the club is to educate and train students at Copenhagen Business School in case
solving with the overarching goal of elevating the general case solving level at CBS. CBS Case Club
offers a place for students to meet and learn from like minded case solvers as well as share knowledge
and find peers to form teams for case competitions.
The club facilitates an Academy training program each semester, where students learn about all the
essential parts of case solving together with the leading management consulting company, BCG.
CBS Case Club is run by current and previous CBS students with case solving experience CBS
International Case Teams.
The Case Academy is a training program within the various disciplines of case solving, which is offered
to a selected number of motivated and ambitious students over the course of a semester. Executed
through a series of workshops, the program is tailored to provide students – having no or minor
experience – with the basic tools to excel in case competitions. The workshops, entailing both
theoretical content and practical exercises, will be conducted in cooperation with BCG – and will
elevate your case solving and presentation skills to the next level.
1 3 5 7
Q&A & Case
Structured Midway Case PowerPoint
Competition
Problem Solving Competition skills
at BCG
22th of February 15th of March 29 of March
th
19-20th of April
2 4 6
Finding the Structured Presentation
Right Solution Communication Techniques
08th of March 22th of March 5th of April
CBS Case Competition OPEN is a chance to explore your potential by competing against teams of 4
students from universities across Europe, with the first evaluation based upon power-point solutions of
15 slides to a real-life company case that are uploaded remotely. After all the teams are assessed, a
select few are chosen to take part in semi-finals on the Friday of week 9 with the potential final
occurring later in the day!
How does the toolbox relate to CBS Case Competition OPEN?
The toolbox may seem like a lot at first but don’t panic! CBS Case Competition OPEN is only 15 slides
long compared to the 30-50 slides that this toolbox is designed for. What’s really important to note is
that the principles included throughout the toolbox are exactly the same for CBS Case Competition
OPEN and any traditional case competition.
The main basic tips in producing the slide content for CBS Case Competition OPEN are the following:
• In the first round, you won’t get to present your slides, so it’s very important to make sure that your
points are detailed enough and clear to the evaluators
• Increase the information per slide
• Prioritize your content and leave out any unnecessary information
• Research previous hand-ins found below
Get inspiration for PowerPoints, case-cracking and presentation techniques on the CBS Case
Competition website:
4
How to set your team and
manage your time
Solution Marketing
• Focus on solution slides, • Focus on the marketing
especially the strategy aspect of the solution
umbrella that outlines the
solution
Insights Financials
• Focus area is find key • Responsible for finding
insights financial impact of solution
• Usually conducts • Usually also takes key risks
quantitative analyses and implementation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
SCQA
The SCQA is frequently used tool for case competitions. It works well both as a tool to understand the
context, challenges and key question of the case, but also as a communication tool to make a good
executive summary. We recommend that the team does the SCQA right after reading the case. A good
tip is to first do it individually and then as a group to ensure independent thinking and maximize
chances of getting it right. Make sure that you have a short and crisp SCQ that you are completely
aligned on before moving on the finding the right answer.
The importance of the SCQA cannot be overstated: having the right understanding of the company and
solving the right problem is a must in order to win a case competition.
Focus on XYZ will be essential to our future success
• Several possible directions have been considered and matched with current
business strengths
Recommen
–…
dation
• Given our current business strengths, our future goal should be
–…
• We will, therefore, build up our business model around …
6
Problem Solving Methodology
How Consultants
work
Hypothesis-driven problem solving
The most fundamental skill of any problem solver is hypothesis-based thinking. Structuring analyses in
this way ensures efficiency and focus because only relevant data is being analyzed. A crucial part of
the hypothesis-based methodology is to ensure that the formed hypothesis is falsifiable. When a
falsifiable hypothesis is formed, one should construct a framework that enables testing of the
hypothesis and collect the data required to do so.
Data required
to test the
hypothesis
Confirm Conclusion
Case Initial
Analysis
question hypothesis
New
Falsify
hypothesis
Relevant
framework to test
the hypothesis
Example:
Confirm / New
Question Hypothesis Analysis falsify hypothesis
7
Problem Solving Methodology
How Consultants
work
The MECE issue tree
Issue trees are used to break down complex problems into more manageable sub-issues. While the
previous section explained the process of hypothesis testing, the MECE framework helps identify the
relevant hypotheses. MECE is an acronym for "Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive" and is a
way of organizing information – often in the context of issue trees. If the issue tree is done in a "MECE"
way, all sub-issues collectively exhaust the solution space (all possible solutions) and the sub-issues
are mutually exclusive (no sub-issues are overlapping). A MECE issue tree ensures that no possible
solution is missing and that work streams can be distributed among the case team members without
any duplication of the work.
Example:
Selected
Question MECE issue tree hypotheses
By putting pressure
on government in
How to reduce supply in
growing countries,
growing countries?
drug problems can
be reduced
How to reduce How to stop drugs in
supply for drugs transit?
By increasing the
How to punishment for
How to stop distribution in
reduce distributing drugs,
user countries?
the problems can be
quantity reduced
of drug How to help users
use? recognize the real costs?
By increasing the
How to reduce
How to punish users punishment for using
demand for
more? drugs, problems can
drugs?
be reduced
How to reduce perceived
How can drug benefits of users?
problems be
reduced?
How to improve anti-
How to help addiction treatments?
users recover
By handing out clean
from drugs? How to improve needles, drug
rehabilitation ? problems can be
reduced
How to How to make drugs
reduce healthier and safer?
the How to reduce
By developing a
impact the dangers?
How to encourage switch new, healthier drug,
of drug
to less harmful drugs? drug problems can
use?
be reduced
Idea generation
We have experienced that most teams are having issues with switching into a highly creative mode to
come up with a good idea when they under time pressure. We have identified three common pitfalls
when teams try to brainstorm: 1) You try to think of the good idea directly 2) You hold back ideas that
could inspire your colleagues 3) You shut down your colleagues creativity by being realistic and critical
to early in the process. Shortly, we will present you with a simple method that allows you to avoid these
issues. Furthermore, we have also seen that a lot of teams struggle with deciding on a solution and
therefore spends an too much time in the brainstorming phase. The way to overcome this is to have a
process that the group has jointly decided on and which it trusts to give a “good enough” idea. Here it is
important to remember that there is no perfect solution. In the end, the winner will the team that
presents the most well-argued and compelling solution to the judges. Thus, the idea is just one
parameter of your solution and it is only as strong as your argumentation and story.
The method that we recommend to incorporate in your process is called ”The Disney Dreamer”. It
consists of three phases that your team go through. First we have the dreamer phase where you write
up all your ideas up a blackboard – everything is good enough, so not criticism. The trick here is to
think quantity over quality because you want expansive thinking and not restricted thinking. By being
inspired by each others crazy ideas, you will develop creative out of the box ideas you would otherwise
never have thought of. The next phase, the realist, is really all about thinking how can we make these
crazy ideas work. How can we adjust and combine them so that they actually become feasible. Force
yourself to find ways of making the impossible possible. The last phase, the spoiler, is finally the time to
be critical of your ideas. Bring out the devil’s advocate and narrow down your best solution/combined
solution. When you have completed the process you will feel good about your solution because you
know it was the outcome of a comprehensive process.
A highly effective approach to case cracking is to push your team to select a solution very early in the
process. This allows for the the majority of the time being spent on building a solid argumentation and
obtaining depth in the solution. The team starts by doing the SCQ to narrow down the context and case
question. Directly thereafter, the team initiate a thorough brainstorm on recommendations to get all
ideas on the table. After this, the team narrows down the solution primarily based on business logic,
only making strictly necessary analysis and check ups with data outside of the case. Using this
approach a team can settle on a solution within the first 4-6 hours. This makes the majority of the time
available to build the argumentation for the chosen solution, limiting time spent on other options that
won’t be presented anyway.
Keep in mind that there is no “correct” solution in case competitions, just as in real world consulting.
Therefore, in a case competition an extra hour spent analyzing your way to the optimal solution might
sometimes be better spent on building your argumentation. The upside here is clear: The extra time
allows you to obtain more depth in your solution and strengthen your arguments. However, selecting
your solution based on less data points and analysis implies the risk of uncovering contradicting data
points at a later stage. Here you face the choice of “making it fit” or changing your solution and losing
time. The approach is often useful in case competitions, since the strict time pressure does not allow
for a full analysis of all relevant alternative solutions.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time spent deciding on solution Time spent building argumentation Illustrative
10
Structured and Effective
Communication
Storylining
When building slides, action titles are the foundation of your communication. Action titles summarize
the key message of the slide in as short a manner as possible. An action title differs from a regular
headline, as it provides a complete, sensible argument that would work outside the context of the given
slide. The idea of “storylining” is that a list of the action titles should work as a script that stands on its
own and summarizes your story. You can think of the action titles as collectively forming an “elevator
speech” of the case solution. It is a way to structure key messages and ensure consistent
communication.
1 2 3 4 5
Front page By focusing on Changing competitive To successfully Simplicity has defined
simplicity, flexibility landscape and compete, the client other industries for years
and transparency, the unsatisfied customers must develop a simple and the client must
client can reduce put the client under platform that provides leverage the same
churn rates and grow pressure across all flexibility and enhances simplicity platform in their
revenue from 2018 product categories transparency value proposition
6 7 8 9 10
Flexibility to tailor Transparency in pricing Employing a risk Simplicity, flexibility and We recommend to
individual services will solves a central mitigating strategy will transparency improve reconnect with
enable the client to challenge for the client maximize revenue customer satisfaction customers by building a
provide customers and facilitates an potential while reducing and decrease churn, simple platform that
exactly what they want, improving customer risk resulting in strong top allows for service
thereby decreasing churn satisfaction line growth by 2018 flexibility and price
transparency
• We possess a number strongholds today which have been the backbone of our performance, namely
– High customer loyalty (customer survey with churn rates)
– Low production cost (graph for comparative variable cost across competitors)
– High brand awareness (customer survey with brand awareness)
See SCQA example on page 6 for more
11
Structured and Effective
Communication
Storyboarding
The storyboard is a translation of the Dot-Dash into slides and a tool for putting a presentation together
in an efficient way. You draw up the slides on a white board with action titles (dots) and then visualize
the supporting arguments (dashes). Visualizing ideas and arguments on slides requires a lot of practice
and therefore it makes sense do to this together as a team to help each other out. Typically, some team
members are better than others at slide production, and storyboarding can help leverage the strengths
of different team members.
Tell what you want to tell them, then tell them,
and then tell them what you just told them
To win a case competition, you have to communicate your findings
effectively. Generally, it is a good idea to repeat you main findings
three times to make sure the judges remember them. We
recommended that you start with an executive summary, then you
present the actual solution, and lastly, you synthesis the main findings
of the solution.
12
Structured and effective
communication
• If receiver might
disagree upfront
• If receiver needs basic
understanding before
• Summarizes first conclusion /
• Easier for the receiver to digest – does not recommendation
Deductive
have to look for the pattern
reasoning structure
• Structures in the most logical order
Why?
How? Do A Do B Do C
13
Fundamentals of Slide Production
•Set the stage and tell them what challenge you are solving
"Executive
•Tell the recommendation and its impact up front
summary"
•Tool: SCQA – 1-2 Slides
•What is the implementation strategy and what are the risks?
"Impact, risk and •What is the impact? Show that you solve the problem!
implementation" •3-4 slides
14
Fundamentals of Slide Production
Slide writing
commandments
•Show it, don't tell it – a figure is worth a thousand bullets
•Less is more – design your slides for quick reading
•Keep focus on what is important - avoid excessive use of colors
•Focus on one key message per slide
Text or graphs?
15
Presentation Techniques
When communicating your findings it is essential that you capture your audience and convince them
through a compelling story. Our experience tells us that a great story and an okay idea is more likely to
win than a great idea and an okay story. One way to engage in storytelling is to start out with a short 30
second story that is highly related to the main point of your solution, then present the solution, and
finish off by synthesizing the conclusion back into the story to wrap up.
In terms of presenting your solution, what you verbally communicate and what is on the slides should
be able to stand alone. You need to have prepared your presentation enough for you to be able to tell
your story while looking the judges in the eyes – only looking at the presentation if strictly needed.
Furthermore, your team should agree on how you want to stand and in which order. Practice how you
will switch from person to person and how you will stand so you look professional both during the
presentation and the Q&A. You should always aim to practice your complete presentation as a team
three times. Great the judges when entering and exciting the stage.
In terms of your body language, try to come across as a professional, but friendly & open, consultant.
You are there to give you recommendations on an issue, and you should step into this role-playing
scenario. When practicing, help each other become aware of highly distracting habits so that they don’t
take attention away from the message you a trying to deliver.
When you have finished building your main deck, you send it off to your slide master who will spend an
hour aligning the layout and fixing slides. This gives the team an opportunity to identify question that
will most likely be asked – the main holes in your solution – and therefore you should prepare answers
for these. This is where back-up slides come in. Remember to make an overview of your solution and
an appendix that will allow you to jump directly to a slide in the Q&A session (make short-cut in your
logo to bring you to the overview slide). Align on who will navigate the slides on the computer in the
Q&A session. Notice how you can strategically plan for the Q&A session by for example incorporating
something into your presentation where you invite the judges to ask about it in the Q&A, or leave out
something in your presentation that you are sure they will ask about. This way you can partly control
the uncertainty of the Q&A session. Make sure to align on how you split the Q&A questions.
The following is a list of tips we have created for the Q&A session:
How to answer Things not to do
• Make sure to answer the question being asked • Never interrupt or add to your teammates
• Have a very polite attitude answers unless they are completely wrong
• Adjust your language style to the audience: • Don’t end every answer with, “I hope that
etc. SME versus large corporation answers your question”
• If you have no idea what to answer, then tell • Never say “I” when presenting – there is no “I”
them that you don’t know in a confident way in a solution – you are a team
• Never become offensive towards the judges
16
A few tips on productive teamwork
Have fun!
It is an advantage also to have fun while doing the case cracking. It makes the process more enjoyable,
but it is also important to allow for creative brainstorming, which is critical for your final product. A really
good idea can get you a long way towards winning a competition, therefore this should not be
overlooked. We recommend that you do some social activities before you start case cracking if you do
not know each other well beforehand. This will improve your team dynamics.
17
Seven guiding principles on how
to win a case competition
Keep in mind throughout the whole process that the judges will consist of representatives from the
case company as well as the other partner companies. It is valuable to consider what they will be
looking for in the winning solution. While this can be hard to predict, it can give some insights. For
example, it is unlikely that the case company is looking for business as usual. Often they see a case
competition as a source of inspiration and is looking for new good ideas. Also, remember that the
judges are regular people. It matters whether they find your presenting style trustful and convincing.
Furthermore, if you know which company they are representing, you can tailor your Q&A answers
towards their expertise. 18
Seven guiding principles on how
to win a case competition
19
Authored by
Ricco Hansen
Building on previous work by Christoffer Breum Nielsen & Jakob Lyngsø Jørgensen
Thanks to Sophus Rosendahl for feedback and editing