Liban V Gordon

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

DANTE V. LIBAN, et al. v. RICHARD GORDON G.R. No.

175352, 18 January 2011, EN BANC (Leonardo-De


Castro, J.)

Facts:

Liban, et al. filed with the Supreme Court a Petition to Declare Richard J. Gordon as Having Forfeited His
Seat in the Senate for having been elected Chairman of the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) Board
of Governors during his incumbency as Senator in violation of Sec. 3, Article VI of the Constitution. It was
advanced by Liban, et al. that the PNRC is a GOCC. Formerly, the Court held that the office of the PNRC
Chairman is NOT a government office or an office in a GOCC for purposes of the prohibition in Sec. 13,
Article VI of the 1987 Constitution. Therefore, Gordon did not forfeit his legislative seat. The Court,
however, held further that the PNRC Charter (R.A 95) is void insofar as it creates the PNRC as a private
corporation which the Congress cannot create. Hence, it directed the PNRC to incorporate under the
Corporation Code and register with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ISSUE: What is the nature of PNRC?

RULING: The PNRC’s structure is sui generis. Although the PNRC is neither a subdivision, agency, or
instrumentality of the government, nor a GOCC or a subsidiary thereof, such a conclusion does not ipso
facto imply that the PNRC is a “private corporation” within the contemplation of the provision of the
Constitution that must be organized under the Corporation Code. In sum, the PNRC enjoys a special
status as an important ally and auxiliary of the government in the humanitarian field in accordance with
its commitments under international law. This Court cannot all of a sudden refuse to recognize its
existence, especially since the issue of the constitutionality of the PNRC Charter was never raised by the
parties

You might also like