0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views35 pages

Igneous Rock Classification PDF

This document discusses igneous rock classification systems. It describes the goals of classification schemes, including being practical, systematic, hierarchical, and unambiguous. Textural characteristics like grain size are considered first in classification, as they provide broad genetic implications. Mineral modal amounts and chemical characteristics are also used for classification. The British Geological Survey's procedure is outlined, starting with clast size for pyroclastic rocks and proceeding through determining root names and qualifiers. The QAPF classification scheme for plutonic rocks is also described.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views35 pages

Igneous Rock Classification PDF

This document discusses igneous rock classification systems. It describes the goals of classification schemes, including being practical, systematic, hierarchical, and unambiguous. Textural characteristics like grain size are considered first in classification, as they provide broad genetic implications. Mineral modal amounts and chemical characteristics are also used for classification. The British Geological Survey's procedure is outlined, starting with clast size for pyroclastic rocks and proceeding through determining root names and qualifiers. The QAPF classification scheme for plutonic rocks is also described.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

Igneous Rock Classification

(Chapter
(C 2)
Igneous (or Igneous-
Igneous-looking) Rock
Classifications Adopted
LeMaitre, R.W. (2002) Igneous Rocks:
Cl ifi i and
Classification d Gl Terms, 2ndd
Glossary off T
Edition. Cambridge University Press, 236 p.
• Summary of 30 years of deliberations of the
International Union of Geological Sciences
(IUGS) Subcommission of Igneous Rocks
• Th accepted
The t d standard,
t d d b butt nott perfect
f t

Gillespie, M.R. and Styles, M.T. (1999) BGS


R k Cl
Rock Classification
ifi i Scheme:
S h V
Volume
l 11.
Classification of Igneous Rocks. BGS
Research Report 99-06
• BGS classification (based largely on IUGS), but
with some useful differences
Goals of Classification
Scheme for rock classification should be:
• Practical and logical
• Systematic – easy for information retrieval
• Hierarchical – based on experience
p of user or level of
information about rock
• Based on descriptive attributes - with a minimum
of genetic terms
• Named adequately using a relatively small
number of root names (e.g. granite) - with or
without qualifier terms (e.g. muscovite
muscovite-biotite
biotite granite).
• Unambiguous - with precisely defined rock names
Low-level hierarchical approach for
Low-
classification
l ifi ti off igneous
i material
t i l (BGS)
Main discriminatingg factors used
in igneous classification
• Mineral grain size, or fragment size and textural
characteristics

• Modal amounts (volume %) of minerals

• Chemical characteristics

There are a tremendous number of names for igneous


rocks, but there are fortunately much fewer that are
common.
Textural criteria is considered first - broad
genetic implications

• Fragmental - rock
composed of disaggregated
igneous material, deposited
and later amalgamated.

• Genetic implication is that it


erupted at surface, became
Agglomerate
gg - consolidated py
pyroclastic deposit
p
disaggregated and rapidly
composed of volcanic bombs and subangular deposited from air or water
fragments in a tuff matrix.
to form a rock = pyroclastic
http://www.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndm/mines/resgeol
http://www mndm gov on ca/mndm/mines/resgeol rock
/northwest/kenora/Guide/kenoraguide_e.asp
Textural criteria is considered first - broad
genetic implications
• Phaneritic - crystals that compose
rock are readily visible with naked
eye
• Genetic implication is that it cooled at
depth and crystallized slowly =
Gabbro (image source: Darrell Henry) plutonic or intrusive rock

• Aphanitic - crystals, if any, are too


small to be readily visible with
naked eye
• Genetic implication
p is that it cooled at
surface and crystallized rapidly =
Basalt (image source: Darrell Henry)
volcanic or extrusive rock
Mineralogical parameters
• Modal amounts (volume %) of minerals
• Point counts or visual estimates of mineral content
• Primary modal classification parameters
• Q=q quartz,, tridymite,
y , cristobalite
• A = alkali feldspar i.e. orthoclase, microcline, perthite,
anorthoclase, sanidine, and albite (An0-An5)
• P = plagioclase
l i l A 100) and
(A 5-An
(An d scapolite
lit
• F = feldspathoids i.e. nepheline, leucite, kalsilite, analcime,
sodalite, nosean, hauyne, cancrinite, pseudo
pseudo-leucite
leucite
• M = mafic minerals e.g. mica, amphibole, pyroxene, olivine,
opaque minerals, accessory minerals, epidote, allanite, garnet,
melilite,
lili monticellite,
i lli primary
i carbonate
b
• M’ = M – (muscovite + apatite + primary carbonate)
Chemical parameters
• Used when modal
mineral parameters are
unavailable

• R
Reported
t d iin weight%
i ht%
oxide

or

• Calculated as normative
values of mineral content
i.e. CIPW norm
BGS procedure for starting to determine an
igneous (sedimentary) name
Clast--size designations - pyroclasts
Clast

bomb lapillus

ash
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Products/Pglossary/
Volcaniclastic classification – variable sizes
Volcaniclastic classification – ash sized

vitric tuff,
tuff Hawaii

http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/hazards/explosivepast/
BGS procedure for starting to determine an
igneous (sedimentary) name
BGS procedure for classifying ‘exotic’
igneous rocks
BGS procedure for starting to determine an
igneous (sedimentary) name
Qualifiers to a root name
• Mineral name(s) qualifier
• Multiple minerals should be ordered with increasing amounts
closest
l t to
t roott e.g. muscovite-biotite
i bi i granite
i
• Mineral qualifier should be consistent with implied
mineralogy of root name: e.g.
e g not quartz granite
• Mineral qualifier “-bearing” is commonly 5 or 10% threshold
– must be defined – e.g.
g tourmaline-bearingg ggranite
• Volcanic glass qualifiers
• 50-80% gglass = glassy
g y
• 20-50% glass = glass-rich
• 0-20% glass = glass-bearing
• TAS-named volcanic rock with glass prefixed by “hyalo-”
hyalo- e.g.
eg
hyalo-andesite
• Note: if >80% glass = obsidian, pitchstone, etc.
Qualifiers to a root name
• Textural term(s) qualifier – e.g. porphyritic granite
• Finer-than-normal ggrain-size = micro- e.g.
g micro-granite
g
(exceptions: diabase or dolerite = micro-gabbro)
• Color index (M’ = M – (muscovite + apatite + primary carbonate))
• M’ = 0-10 = hololeucocratic
• M’ = 10-35% = leucocratic
• M’ = 35-65%
% = mesocratic
• M’ = 65-90% = melnocratic
• M’ = 90-100% = holomelanocratic
• Note: some QAPF plutonic rocks require and “leuco
leuco-” or “mela
mela-”
qualifier
• Chemical term(s) qualifier – e.g. Sr-rich granite (define term)
• Genetic term(s) qualifier – e.g. anatectic granite
• Tectonic term(s) qualifier – e.g. post-deformational granite
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
QAPF classification
(M<90%)

• Q (or F), A and P


normalized to 100%

• An easier method of
plotting:
Q with plagioclase ratio
i (100*P/(A+P))
i.e.

• Some fields require


q
further consideration
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Field 2 (alkali feldspar
granite)
• If sodic amphiboles or
pyroxenes are present, use
“peralkaline
peralkaline granite
granite”
If M’<10%, use “alaskite”

Field 6 (alkali feldspar


foid-bearing syenite)
If rich in complex Zr and Ti
minerals (e.g. eudialyte),
use “agpaite”
“ i ”
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Field 11 (foid syenite)
• Named for most abundant
foid mineral e.g. “nepheline
syenite”

Field 13 (foid monzodiorite


or foid monzogabbro)
• Use the most common foid
• If plagioclase = An0-50, use
“foid monzodiorite”.
monzodiorite”
• If plagioclase = An50-100, use
foid monzogabbro
“foid monzogabbro”.
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Field 5 (tonalite)
• If M’<10%, use
“trondhjemite” or
“plagiogranite”

Field 9 (monzodiorite,
monzogabbro)
• If plagioclase = An0-50, use
“monzodiorite”.
• If plagioclase = An50-100, use
“monzogabbro”.
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Field 14 (foid diorite, foid
gabbro)
• Use the most common foid
• If plagioclase = An0-50, use
“f id di
“foid diorite”.
it ”
• If plagioclase = An50-100, use
foid gabbro
“foid gabbro”.

Field 15 (foidolite)
• Use the dominant foid as
the basis for a name e.g.
nephelinolite
“nephelinolite”
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Field 10 (diorite, gabbro,
anorthosite)
• If M<10%, use anorthosite.
• If M>10% and plagioclase
= An
A 0-50, use “diorite”.
“di it ”
• If M>10% and plagioclase
= An50-100, use “gabbro”
gabbro .

• “Gabbros” are further


subdivided
bdi id d andd additional
ddi i l
diagrams must be used
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Gabbroic rock subdivision

• Based on relative abundance


of plag, opx, cpx, ol, hbl
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
Leuco and Mela-
Leuco- Mela subdivisions
Plutonic (coarse-
(coarse-grained) igneous rocks
QAPF classification
(M>90%)
Volcanic (fine-
(fine-grained) igneous rocks
Volcanic (fine-
(fine-grained) igneous rocks
Fi ld 2 (alkali
Field ( lk li feldspar
f ld
rhyolite)
•If sodic amphiboles or
pyroxenes are present, use
“peralkaline rhyolite”

Field 6 (trachyte)
•If
If sodic amphiboles or
pyroxenes are present, use
“peralkaline trachyte”

Field 11 (phonolite)
• Modify root name by
dominant foid
Volcanic (fine-
(fine-grained) igneous rocks

Field 9,10 (basalt, andesite)


• Color index > 35% for basalt
and <35% for andesite
• Likely
Lik l to
t needd TAS

Field 13, 14, 15 (phonolitic


basanite or phonolitic
tephrite)
• If normative ol>10%,
ol>10% use
“phonolitic basanite”
• If normative ol<10%, use
“phonolitic tephrite”
TAS chemical classification
R
Requirements
i t ffor use:
• must be volcanic rock
g
• mode cannot be determined (too fine-grained or gglassy)
y
• a bulk analysis is available

Unusual high-
Mg volcanic
rocks are
considered first
TAS chemical classification

More normal
volcanic rocks
• analyses should be
normalized to 100%
• Some fields require
CIPW norm
• Alkali basalt is ne-
normative, but subalkali
basalt is not

• a good practice is to
add (TAS) to the term
e.g. andesite (TAS)
TAS chemical classification
Subdivision of K-
types of rhyolites to
basalts

Subdivision of
rhyolites and
trachytes
Field classification of QAPF igneous rocks

You might also like