Foundations of Guidance
Foundations of Guidance
Basic Guidance
I. Foundations of guidance
A. Development of guidance
i. Philosophy
Philosophers1
o Pythagoras (c. 580-500 BC). Fulfilment and peace of mind came from
understanding the harmony of the universe. This was best achieved by
music and mathematics.
o Sophocles (c. 496-406 BC). Greek tragedy can show a more
sophisticated understanding of the human predicament than can
contemporary psychology. Storytelling is a valuable medium for
exploring psyche and circumstance.
o Plato (c. 427-347 BC). For Plato, self-expression was inseparable from
self-control. Self-discipline, reason and reflection distinguished us from
other forms of life and allowed us to be self-aware. Personal
development could not take place without the development of the
society of which we are part.
o Aristotle (384-322 BC). Understanding was built up from action and
observation rather than down from Platonic abstraction. Choice was
only possible and meaningful in those who could exert control over
their passions. We are social creatures, therefore we learn with and in
relation to others more than via introspection and isolation.
o St. Augustine (354-430 AD). If we turn from God, the result can only
be evil. We find ourselves only within God. We develop ourselves
only through God. God is our counselor; the method of contact is
prayer.
o Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes asked how we could live
together constructively and cooperatively within societies. He believed
that a central royal authority was essential. Without such authority, our
lives were ‗nasty, brutish, and short‘. Social values shaped individual
consciences more than vice-versa. Therefore, society was the bedrock
of individual identity, development and well-being.
o Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). There is no such thing as direct
observation. Presuppositions cannot be put to one side. Observations
are always, by their very nature, constructions of events. Constructions
of human perception are determined by individual mental sets and also
by categories of thinking that we all share and cannot avoid. The
1
Based on: Howard, A. (2000). Philosophy for Counselling and Psychotherapy: From Pythagoras to
Postmodernism. NewYork, NY: Palgrave.
underlying conditions, without which no experience can be read at all,
include space, time, causality, freedom, and order.
o Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832). The greatest happiness of the greatest
number is the foundation of morals and legislation. We can calculate
the individual pleasures and pains and then determine our best
individual actions. We can total the individual pleasures and pains that
will be consequent upon political decisions and thereby calculate the
best social policies. Ethical decision making thereby becomes a
problem of accountancy—we must add up the net pleasure of each
available option and select the one that delivers the most happiness.
o Sören Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855). Self is not simply to be found.
It must be created. Self is always seeking to become more than it
currently is. Self is forever becoming, yet unbecoming to itself. This is
painful. Human spirit lies in our ability to despair; but if we succumb to
despair, we are ruined.
o Sigmund Freud (1856-1939). Psychoanalysis can become indispensable
to all the sciences which are concerned with the evolution of human
civilization. The religions of mankind must be classed among the mass
delusions. What decides the purpose of life is simply the programme of
the pleasure principle.
o Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961). Jung criticized Freud for reducing
human motivation to sexual drives and the ‗pleasure principle‘. The
spiritual dimension of existence was not an infantile avoidance of
adulthood, but a feature of growing maturity and insight. Human
qualities mattered more than professional qualifications.
o Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980). The ‗self‘ is a little God which inhabits
me and which possesses my freedom as a metaphysical virtue. Human
reality is its own surpassing toward what it lacks. ‗Being for itself‘ is
that restless spirit that moves on from whatever we had made of
ourselves. ‗Being for others‘ is the ‗me‘ that is an observed object for
others making something of themselves. It is absurd that we are born;
it is absurd that we die.
ii. Psychology4
The mental health of the community
o The development of one‘s positive self-attitudes is fostered.
o Each individual is given the opportunity to become what he has the
potential to become.
o Respect for all individuals is demonstrated and encouraged.
o Each is enabled to maintain his individuality while remaining a part of
his society.
o Each is helped to find meaning and purpose in life.
o Each is helped to develop the ability to take life as it comes and master
it.
3
Wrenn, G. (1962). The counselor in a changing world. Washington, DC: APGA Press.
4
Based on: Gibson, R.L., Mitchell, M.H., & Higgins, R.E. (1973). The development and management of school
guidance programs. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
Prejudice and behavior
o ―Show me a person who is full of prejudice, and I will show you a sick,
unhappy, fearful individual, who is not going anywhere and who is not
growing. People don‘t shut other people out; they fence themselves in.
Show me, on the other hand, an individual who is free of prejudice, and
I will show you an exciting, creative, developing human being, who is
both secure and mature, and who will certainly relate in a well-adjusted
fashion to the society in which we live.‖5
o Prejudice is an unfavourable attitude toward an object which tends to
be highly stereotyped, emotionally charged, and not easily changed by
contrary information. The problems arising from prejudice are
compounded by its emotionally charged nature and its resistance to
change. One‘s social actions reflect his attitudes. Thus if prejudice is
an unfavorable attitude, and if one‘s social actions are engendered by
his attitudes, prejudice is indeed a powerful determinant of behavior.
o A major effect of prejudice and its resultant social actions is its impact
upon the development of one‘s self-concept, or identity.
iii. Sociology
The school and the community
o The school is an institution of society. While it will reflect national
goals, attitudes, and beliefs, it will also respond to the direct social
influences of the local school community.
o The educational manager is concerned with the accurate identification
of the role and status of the educational institution within the
community; community concepts of education and the educational
process; influences and ―pressures‖ which can affect that process;
significant community groups; and roles and patterns of living within a
community.
5
Young, W.M. Jr. (1964). To be equal. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
The school as a social institution
o The school is a social institution whose members participate in social
activities, assume or are assigned social roles, and in general behave
and function in a way within the system that is expected or approved by
the members.
o The school may be studied as a distinct social institution with
characteristics which distinguish it and set it apart, such as a definite
population, a clearly defined structure, a network of anticipated social
relationships within this structure, and its own unique personality or
culture.
o School practices either reinforce existing differences between students
or create a more common culture by establishing situations in which
contact is encouraged between students of varying backgrounds and
abilities.
iv. Anthropology
Culture and the individual
o Man is born into a culture that is man-made. In other words, our culture
includes both the material objects which man has developed for his use
and the meanings that they have for him. It further includes the
attitudes and values which we exhibit and the institutions we create to
preserve them. It is also evident that individuals are not only born into
a culture but that they are shaped by that culture.
o This culture in which the individual lives and develops will determine
his coping styles, language, child rearing and family expectancy
patterns, prejudices, beliefs, and traditions. Based on this cultural
environment, his personal hierarchy of values will also include
concepts of education, worthwhile educational goals, views of teachers
and other educators, plus viewpoints on student expectancies at the
different education levels, all of which influence the individual as he
pursues his formal education.
i. Foreshadowings of guidance
Early civilizations (Greek and Hebrew)
Middle Ages
17th century (e.g. Vives, Garzoni, Powell,Drury)
18th century (e.g. Rousseau, Pestalozzi)
6
Partly based on: Aubrey, R.F. (1977). Historical development of guidance and counseling and implications for the
future. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 55: 288-295 and Pope, M. (2000). A brief history of career counseling in
the United States. The Career Development Quarterly, 48(3): 194-211.
o Certification of counselors; APGA to ACDA
1990s-present (Modern guidance)
o Multicultural counseling
o Use of technology in guidance
o Impact of globalization on guidance
o Comprehensive guidance programs
o Lifespan guidance
7
Based on: Salazar-Clemeña, R.M. (2002). Family ties and peso signs: Challenges for career counseling in the
Philippines. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(3): 246-256.