0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views3 pages

Plate 2

1. The document provides input data for analyzing anchor forces in 8 anchors connecting a baseplate to concrete, including anchor type and size, embedment depth, material properties, geometry, and loading. 2. Analysis of the anchors under design loads found a maximum tension force of 37.79 kN and compression force of 35.79 kN. Tension forces in individual anchors ranged from 0 to 10.375 kN. 3. Capacity checks for the maximum 37.79 kN tension force found it was below the limits for steel failure, pullout-concrete cone failure, concrete cone failure, and splitting failure.

Uploaded by

snoari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views3 pages

Plate 2

1. The document provides input data for analyzing anchor forces in 8 anchors connecting a baseplate to concrete, including anchor type and size, embedment depth, material properties, geometry, and loading. 2. Analysis of the anchors under design loads found a maximum tension force of 37.79 kN and compression force of 35.79 kN. Tension forces in individual anchors ranged from 0 to 10.375 kN. 3. Capacity checks for the maximum 37.79 kN tension force found it was below the limits for steel failure, pullout-concrete cone failure, concrete cone failure, and splitting failure.

Uploaded by

snoari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

1 Input data

Anchor type and size: HIT-RE 500 V3 + HIT-V(5.8) 2X 4-M16


Seismic/Filling set or any suitable annular gap filling solution
Effective embedment depth: hef,act = 165 mm (hef,limit = - mm)
Material: 5.8
Approval No.: ETA 16/0143
Issued I Valid: 12/7/2560 | -
Proof: Engineering judgement SOFA BOND - based on ETAG BOND testing
Stand-off installation: eb = 0 mm (no stand-off); t = 10 mm
Baseplate: S 235; E = 210,000.00 N/mm2; fyk = 235.00 N/mm2; gMs = 1.100
lx x ly x t = 200 mm x 500 mm x 10 mm;
Profile: Flat bar; (L x W x T) = 500 mm x 20 mm x 0 mm
Base material: uncracked concrete, C25/30, fc,cube = 30.00 N/mm2; h = 300 mm, Temp. short/long: 30/30 °C
Installation: hammer drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry
Reinforcement: No reinforcement or Reinforcement spacing >= 150 mm (any Ø) or >= 100 mm (Ø <= 10 mm)
no longitudinal edge reinforcement

Geometry [mm] & Loading [kN, kNm]


2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces y
Load case: Design loads 8 4

Anchor reactions [kN] Tension


Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
7 3
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
1 0.000 0.625 0.000 -0.625
2 1.202 0.625 0.000 -0.625
3 7.317 0.625 0.000 -0.625 x
4 10.375 0.625 0.000 -0.625
5 0.000 0.625 0.000 -0.625
6 1.202 0.625 0.000 -0.625 6 2
7 7.317 0.625 0.000 -0.625
8 10.375 0.625 0.000 -0.625
5 1
max. concrete compressive strain: 0.11 [‰]
Compression
max. concrete compressive stress: 3.23 [N/mm2]
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0/142): 37.790 [kN]
resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0/-213): 35.790 [kN]

Anchor forces based on a rigid base plate assumption!

3 Tension load (EOTA TR 029, Section 5.2.2)


Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilisation bN [%] Status
Steel failure* 10.375 52.333 20 OK
Combined pullout-concrete cone failure** 37.790 120.522 32 OK
Concrete cone failure** 37.790 115.622 33 OK
Splitting failure** 37.790 157.105 25 OK
* most unfavourable anchor **anchor group (anchors in tension)

3.1 Steel failure


NRk,s [kN] gM,s NRd,s [kN] NSd [kN]
78.500 1.500 52.333 10.375

3.2 Combined pullout-concrete cone failure


Ap,N [mm2] A0p,N [mm2] 2
t Rk,ucr,25 [N/mm ] scr,Np [mm] ccr,Np [mm] cmin [mm]
355,749 163,840 12.00 405 202 ∞
2 0
yc t Rk,ucr [N/mm ] k y g,Np y g,Np
1.018 12.22 3.200 1.276 1.128
ec1,N [mm] y ec1,Np ec2,N [mm] y ec2,Np y s,Np y re,Np
0 1.000 76 0.728 1.000 1.000
N0Rk,p [kN] NRk,p [kN] gM,p NRd,p [kN] NSd [kN]
101.357 180.784 1.500 120.522 37.790

3.3 Concrete cone failure


Ac,N [mm2] A0c,N [mm2] ccr,N [mm] scr,N [mm]
473,025 245,025 248 495
ec1,N [mm] y ec1,N ec2,N [mm] y ec2,N y s,N y re,N
0 1.000 76 0.766 1.000 1.000
k1 N0Rk,c [kN] gM,c NRd,c [kN] NSd [kN]
10.100 117.249 1.500 115.622 37.790
4 Shear load (EOTA TR 029, Section 5.2.3)
Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilisation bV [%] Status
Steel failure (without lever arm)* 0.625 31.400 2 OK
Steel failure (with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pryout failure** 5.000 339.763 2 OK
Concrete edge failure in direction ** N/A N/A N/A N/A
* most unfavourable anchor **anchor group (relevant anchors)

4.1 Steel failure (without lever arm)


VRk,s [kN] gM,s VRd,s [kN] VSd [kN]
39.250 1.250 31.400 0.625

4.2 Pryout failure (concrete cone relevant)


Ac,N [mm2] A0c,N [mm2] ccr,N [mm] scr,N [mm] k-factor
532,525 245,025 248 495 2.000
ec1,V [mm] y ec1,N ec2,V [mm] y ec2,N y s,N y re,N
0 1.000 0 1.000 1.000 1.000
N0Rk,c [kN] gM,c,p VRd,cp [kN] VSd [kN]
117.249 1.500 339.763 5.000

5 Combined tension and shear loads (EOTA TR 029, Section 5.2.4)

bN bV a Utilisation bN,V [%] Status


0.327 0.020 1.500 19 OK
baN + baV ≤ 1.0

You might also like