Ipcrf Cliffen
Ipcrf Cliffen
Ipcrf Cliffen
Department of Education
Region VII CENTRAL VISAYAS
Division of Bais City
BAIS CITY SPECIAL SCIENCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
3 3 3 3 0.225
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
literacy and and across and across and across and
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject 3
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills and/or numeracy
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV skills as shown in 3
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a
7 6 5 rating of 4
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
3 3 3 3 0.225
Services to develop critical 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
and creative develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
thinking, as well as and creative and creative and creative and creative
other higher- order thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as 4
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given
supported by supported by supported by any MOV 3
any1ofthe other any1 of the other 1of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services organized and 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
resources, to address to address to address to 4
including ICT, to learning goals learning goals learning goals address
address learning as shown in as shown in as shown in learning goals
goals. MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with a as shown in
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
Timeliness
Timeliness
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Presente
1. Classroom observation tool (COT)
rating sheet and/or inter-observer
agreement form about knowledge of
content within and across curriculum
teaching areas
5. Managed learner
behavior constructively by
applying positive and non-
violent discipline to ensure
2. Praising the learners/Giving
5. Managed learner positive feedback
behavior constructively by
applying positive and non- 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
violent discipline to ensure
learning- focused 4. Ensuring learners’ active
environments. participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended
2. Formative/summative assessment
11. Monitored and tools with TOS and frequency of errors
evaluated learner progress with identified least mastered skills
and achievement using
learner attainment data. 3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing
index of mastery
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
2. Certificate of Training
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip
9. Mentoring pre-service/inservice
teachers
darat
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Kudarat
EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII - CENTRAL VISAYAS
Division of Bais City
BAIS CITY SPECIAL SCIENCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CLUSTER 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
### #DIV/0!
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues.
research to enrich with colleagues.
knowledge of
content and
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
pedagogy.
least 4 of the of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
given MOV MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective to March effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services teaching strategies 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
to promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking, as well as thinking as well thinking as well thinking as well thinking as well
other higher- order as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS
thinking skills. as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
8 7 6 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Work with June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education Environment colleagues to to March shared effective shared effective shared effective shared effective evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 classroom classroom classroom classroom shown
of Learners effective management management management management
techniques in the strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
management of engage engage engage engage
the classroom learners in learners in learners in learners in
structure to activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
engage learners, done in done in done in done in
individually or in different different different different
groups, in physical physical physical physical
meaningful learning learning learning learning
exploration, environments environments environments environments
discovery and as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
hands-on activities MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
within a range of rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
physical learning
environments.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited Exibited Exibited Exibited No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education effective and to March effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
Services constructive 2019 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
behavior behavior behavior behavior behavior
management skills management management management management
by applying skills by skills by skills by skills by
positive and non- applying applying applying applying
violent discipline to positive and positive and positive and positive and
ensure learning- non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
focused discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
environments. ensure ensure ensure ensure
learning- learning- learning- learning-
focused focused focused focused
environments. environments. environments. environments.
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
8 7 6 5
Efficiency Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast No acceptable
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 6. Worked with June 2018 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues to to March colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues but evidence was
Services share 2019 atleast in the atleast in the atleast in the no evidence of shown
differentiated, district/cluster school level to department/gra sharing with
developmentally level to share share lesson de level to others
appropriate lesson share lesson
learning
experiences to Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
address learners’ least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson evidence was
gender, needs, as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced shown
strengths, shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV by either MOV
interests and 1 and 1 and 1 and 2 or 3 but no
experiences. supported by supported by supported by evidence of
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the sharing with
other other other others
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Develop and June 2018 7.50% Quality Develop and Develop and Develop and Develop and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and Planning applied effective to March applied applied applied applied evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 effective effective effective effective shown
planning and strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the
management of planning and planning and planning and planning and
developmentally management management management management
sequenced developmentall developmentall developmentall developmentall
teaching and y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
learning processes teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
to meet curriculum learning learning learning learning
requirements and process as process as process as process as
varied teaching shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
contexts. 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues, to March collaborative collaborative led collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of reviews of collaborative reviews of shown
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner reviews of teacher/learner
to plan, facilitate feedback as feedback as teacher/learner feedback as
and enrich evidenced by evidenced by feedback as evidenced by
teaching practice. the MOV the MOV evidenced by the MOV
submitted submitted the MOV submitted
submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development
use of appropriate development development development and appropriate
teaching and and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
learning use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
resources, and learning and learning and learning resources as
including ICT, to resources as resources as resources as shown in the
address specific shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
learning goals. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education Assessment collaboratively with to March reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services and colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y assessment shown
Reporting review the design, assessment assessment assessment tools with
selection, tools with tools with tools with colleagues as
organization and colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the
use of a range of shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
effective MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
diagnostic,
formative and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
summative least 4 assessment assessment assessment evidence was
assessment assessment tools as tools as tool as shown
strategies tools as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
consistent with evidently shown in any of the in any of the in any of the
curriculum in any of the acceptable acceptable acceptable
requirements. acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education collaboratively to March collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
evaluation in the in the in the in the
strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment assessment assessment assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted
attainment data to
support learner
progress and
achievement.
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Presente
1. Providing motivation
6. Worked with
colleagues to share 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
developmentally to address learners’ differences
appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and 3. Corresponding instructional materials
experiences. showing differentiated and
✘
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
to address learners’ differences
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communication using other modalities
(e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement
6. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation
7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
udarat
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
an Kudarat
EMPLATE
on of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII CENTRAL VISAYAS
Division of Bais City
BAIS CITY SPECIAL SCIENCE ELEMENTARY SCHOO
Feedback:
RATEE
ublic of the Philippines
partment of Education
VII CENTRAL VISAYAS
Division of Bais City
SCIENCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
RATEE RATER
lippines
ucation
VISAYAS
City
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL