Distillation and Absorption in Packed Columns: Convenient Design and Correlation Method
Distillation and Absorption in Packed Columns: Convenient Design and Correlation Method
For this case, where diffusion occurs equally in both direc- tained from correlations of mass transfer factors. Proce-
tions, mass transfer coefficient, K , is theoretically independ- dures for integrating Equation 6 are also given in detail later.
ent of the partial pressure of the component considered (6). As a matter of interest, the relationship between H. T. U.
and K is seen from Equations 4 and 5 to be:
H G
H.T . U. = -
n
= -
KaIIM,,, (7)
Equations 1 and 2 can be combined and rearranged to give As previously shown (2), this equation becomes, upon differ-
the relation : entiation of the product, (pG/M,) :
dpGS
dw = - (9)
pa -vm
Furthermore, for
which becomes on integration: this case diffusion
occurs chiefly in
(4) o n e direction, and
by the Stefan diffu-
Thus the required height of column for any problem could sion e q u a t i o n (6)
be determined by a solution of Equation 4, provided that the t h e r a t e is greater
value of K can be predicted. t h a n for two-di-
There is another way of looking a t the problem, however, r e c t i o n a l diffusion
which has proved to be more convenient. The quantity, by t h e factor
rI/pu, where pu is
L: can be considered a measure of the difficulty of a
desired separation, just as the required number of theoretical
the logarithmic
m e a n of (n - p )
and (II--p*). Thus
plates is a measure of the difficulty of a separation to be the value of K in
carried out in a plate column. Because of the similarity of E q u a t i o n 2 is no
the two concepts, as is later discussed in detail, the authors longer independent
have called the solution of the above integration "the number of concentration but
of transfer units." Thus the number of transfer units, n, is: varies inversely
with p g f , and it is
n = J,p2 3 (5) the product, Kpd,
which is independ-
FIGURE 2. GRAPHICAL DETER- e n t of concentra-
This equation can be expressed in terms of mole fraction in MINATION OF NUMBER OF TRANSFER tion. Accordingly,
the vapor, y, as well as partial pressures: UNITSFOR RECTIFICATIONOF ETHA- from Equations 9
NOL-WATER(DATAFROM FIGURE 1)
and 2 the following
Y Y* AV I/ AY e q u a t i o n is ob-
0.001 0,009 0.008 125
0.01 0.035 0.025 40 tained:
0.05 0.16 0.11 9.1
0.10 0.27 0.17 5.9
By this means, without any consideration being given to the 0.20 0.38 0.18 5.56
calculation of the total number of moles being transferred, 0.30
0.4
0.44
0.55
0.14
0.15
7.14
6.67
any problem can be directly expressed as a required number 0.6 0.607 0.107 9.13
of transfer units. Then if experimental data are available as 0.6 0.662 0.062 16.0
0.66 0.696 0.046 22.2
values of height per transfer unit (H. T. U.), the determina- 0.7
0.75
0.732 0.032
0.7725 0 0225 44.5
31.0
(10)
tion of column height involves merely the multiplication of 0.8 0.817 0.017 59.0
n by H. T. U. It is shown later that the values of H. T. U. Area under the curve above feed, 9.3 The integrated form
transfer units; area under the curve below
can' be conveniently correlated with vapor velocity or ob- feed, 2.76 tranafer units. is :
March, 1935 INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY 257
y* = 1 + (a - l)x (16)
FIGURE4.
MI5
GRAPHICAL DETERMINA-
P a15
- -
0.01 0.0150 0.0283 0.01237 80.8 0.985 0.992 81.3
and which have boiling points close together, and for some
other mixtures. Area under curve 4.48 transfer units; by the approximate method
(Equation 18) n 4.18 transfer unita.
258 INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY Vol. 27, No. 3
OF H. T. U.
COMPARISON H. E. T. P.
AND
These mass transfer factors were also to be correlated by
The suggestion made by Peters (9) was that a given separa-
plotting against the Reynolds number. The H. T. U. can,
tion be treated as though it were carried out in a plate column
therefore, be expressed in terms of these j factors, as follows :
and be expressed as a required number of theoretical plates.
G 1
H.T.U.=-
KaII.Mm
=-(’)
ja pkd
a /a The height of the packed column was then divided by this
number to give the height equivalent to a theoretical plate
(H. E. T. P.). The theoretical plate concept implies that the
It is thus apparent that experimental values of H. T. U. can change in composition of the vapor passing through the plate
be readily expressed as mass transfer factors and plotted is equal to the difference between the composition of the en-
against the Reynolds number and also that, from mass trans-
fer correlations, values of H. T. U. are easily obtained.
Likewise, for absorption, I
the column, fewer transfer units than theoretical plates are Another example may be given, as applied to absorption.
required; if values of Ay decrease, the reverse is true. Suppose a concentration of 5 per cent (by volume) water
Because of the ease of “stepping off” theoretical plates on vapor in air is to be reduced to (a) 0.05 per cent or (b) 0.005
a McCabe and Thiele diagram compared with the trouble re- per cent by absorption in sulfuric acid so concentrated that
quired to make an additional plot of l / A y vs. y and to de- the equilibrium partial pressure of water vapor is negligible.
termine the area in order to find the number of transfer units, The number of transfer units can be calculated by Equation
the following procedure is suggested for distillation problems 19. A comparison with the required number of theoretical
where extreme accuracy is not necessary. On the McCabe plates is as follows:
and Thiele diagram, transfer units can be “stepped off,” if T R A N S F E R THEORETICAL
care is taken to make the magnitude of enrichment afforded UNITS PLATEB
by each unit, yb‘ - Ya, equal to the average of the values, 0,057 HzO in exit air 4.6 0.99
y*. - yo and g*b - y b . That is, to choose a point b (Fig-
0.005k H 9 0 in exit air 6.9 0.999
Mm av. mol. weight of vapor stream y* = equilibrium mole fraction of diffusing component
Re Reynolds number out of liquid = p * / n
s cross-sectional area (over which G is measured), Ay = y - y*
sq. ft. n = total pressure, atm.
= relative volatility = Y* (1 - 2)
V vapor rate, lb. moles/hr.
a surface area of packing per unit of packed volume, (1 - Y*) 2
a ft./cu. ft. = viscosity, lb./(hr.) (ft.), taken at “film” conditions
C
d
sp. %eat at constant pressure, P. c. u./(lb.) (” C.)
differential operator
p” = density, lb./cu. ft.
h filyocge\fficient
of heat transfer, P. c. u./(hr.) (sq. ft.) LITERATURE C I T E D
b.1
j heat transfer or mass transfer factor (Equations 20 (1) Chilton, T. H., and Colburn, A. P., IND.ESG.CHEW,23, 913-19
and 21) (1931); Trans.Am. Inst. Chem. Engrs.,26,178-96 (1931).
k thermal conductivity, P. c. u./(hr.) (sq. ft.) (” C./ft.) (2) Chilton, T. H., and Colburn. A. P., IND.ENG.CHEM.. 26, 1183-7
diffusion coefficient, sq. ft./hr. (1934).
kd
n number of transfer units (Equations 5 and 12) (3) Colburn, A. P., Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Engrs., 29, 174209
partial pressure of diffusing component, atm. (1933).
P (4) Fallah, R., J.SOC.Chem. I d , 53,262-6T (1934).
P* equilibrium partial pressure of diffusing component ( 5 ) Fenske. M. R.. IND.ENG.CHEM.. 24.482-5 (1932).
out of liquid, atm. (6) Lewis, W. K., and Chang, K. C., Trans. Am‘. Inst. Chem. Engrs.,
AP P - P* 21, 127-38 (1928).
APm true mean value of ( p - p * ) over height of column
APm loearithmic mean of terminal values of (2) - m*) (7) McCabe,
.---
ESQ. CHEM.,17, 605-12
W. L., and Thiele, E. W., IND.
Pa y k a l pressure of inert component (atm.1 ri - p (1Y26).
(8) Murray, I. L., Ibid.. 22, 165-7 (1930).
Po, ogaritimic mean of (n - p ) and (n- p * ) , atm. (9) Peters, W. A., Jr., Ibad., 14,476-9 (1922).
t temp., C. (10) Sherwood, T . K., and Gilliland, E. R., Ibid., 26, 1093-6 (1934).
Atm true mean temp. difference, ’ C.
W rate of transfer of diffusing component, lb. moles/hr. (I1) K.* l4>61-4
X mole fraction of diffusing component in liquid RECEIVED November 9, 1934. Contribution 149 from the Experiments1
Y mole fraction of diffusing COmpOnent in gas = p/n Station of E. I. du Pont de Nemours BE Company.
T HE separation of mate-
rials is a problem often
requiring the attention
of the chemist and engineer. If
A new design method f o r the distillation of
multicomponent mixtures is proposed. The
calculations are based o n the use of “relative
volatility” and “relative operability” of the
method of calculation is to be
able to go from the composition
of the liquid leaving any plate to
that of the liquid leaving the
the materials consist of a mix- subsequent plate. I t is often
t u r e of l i q u i d s , rectification components in the mixture. The procedure is convenient and advantageous
f u r n i s h e s o n e of t h e m o s t rapid and simple, and f o r the condition of infinite t o d i v i d e t h i s step into two
common and convenient means r e f u x the calculation reduces to Underwood’s portions. The first portion con-
of performing this separation. sists in going from the liquid on
Thus, the design of rectifying modification of Fenske’s “relative volatility” the plate to the vapor over it,
equipment is one of the funda- system. For the case where separation between and the latter portion involves
mental problems with which the adjacent components is not relatively complete, going from this vapor to the
chemical engineer is repeatedly the determination of suitable design conditions by liquid from the plate above.
confronted. previous design methods has been tedious. The The composition of the vapor
It would be fortunate indeed above the liquid is determined
if a method of calculation for proposed procedure offers a valuable method for f r o m e q u i l i b r i u m data and
these designs would r a p i d l y facilitating such calculations. The method is plate efficiencies. The e q u i -
give results of high accuracy, useful in determining the proper design condi- librium data may be obtained
but such methods are usually tions, such as dependent terminal concentrations from published results or, for
l a b o r i o u s and time-consuming. h y d r o c a r b o n s , may be esti-
and number of equilibrium plates. The ap- mated by the fugacity plots of
As a great many of the prob-
lems to be solved are proposed plicability of the method is demonstrated by Lewis and co-workers (6,8):
designs, i t is desirable- to have illustrative problems.
Y’fr = Z f P (1)
~