Rsi r2 Super Rsi Faq
Rsi r2 Super Rsi Faq
Rsi r2 Super Rsi Faq
TradingMarkets.com
February 21, 2007
In early 2005, we published the R2 Strategy on TradingMarkets which quickly became one of our more
popular strategies. The strategy was also presented at "The Traders Expo" in Fort Lauderdale last year.
In the "MoneyShow.com Best Webcasts of 2006" it was voted the number one presentation in the "Best
for Traders" category. We recently updated and improved our research, leading to this article that shares
our latest findings with you.
The Improved R2 Strategy is a simple six-rule Market Timing Strategy which uses the 2-period RSI as
its primary tool. Our research has shown that there is little statistical evidence using the standard 14-
period RSI. But, when you shorten the period to a 2-, 3- or 4-period RSI, test results significantly
improve. By using the 2-period RSI as we do here, you can see back-tested results of 84.31% correct in
the S&P 500 Index going back to 1995 (12 years).
The SPX is above its 200-day simple moving average (you can use any S&P 500 derivative product,
including the SPYs, E-minis, etc).
Day 1 - the 2-period RSI is below 65. This tells us that the market is in a neutral to possibly oversold
condition.
Buy the market (SPX, SPY, E-mini, etc) on the close Day 3.
Comment by EA Author: The EA only references the closing values of RSI for the prior three days.
Whatever RSI is doing during the current day has no bearing on anything and will not be taken into
consideration for any signals. Therefore, a signal is generated immediately after closing of the 3rd day
if all of the criteria are met, and that signal will be valid all day during the 4th day.
EA development history
a Yahoo MT Group member known as Bluto picked up the above story and developed an EA titled RSI-
R2, which evolved in version 1.0 to 1.3. At that point, Bluto decided to add further refinements but
keeping the code unavailable (Versions 1.4 onwards). At about the same time, another member (Dave
Roland) developed the same EA but able to trade ALL currencies without needing to open a chart for
each and add the EA into it manually. That EA's title is: Multipair RSI. It also developed several
versions.
How it works
That's it. Control then passes back to MT4 via the last statement of "return(0)" in the init_start() routine
until the next tick occurs and calls the EA at which point we repeat the entire process again.
I hope that this helps clarify what the EA is doing under the hood.
-bluto
R2_Arrows_v4 is and indicator for RSI_R2 EA by TransportDavid. It places buy/sell arrows. He also
made another indicator for Robert's Optimized EA. (AnyMA_Rsi_R2_Indi_Opt.mq4)
Indicator written just for bluto's Super RSI does not exist at this time. But you can use R2_Arrows_v4
on it. It is close although not 100% since bluto's Super Rsi have some additions.
With both EA you can also use another indicator which is regular RSI with daily dots on top of it, so
you can easy see follow buy sell rules. Made by Accrete. Name RSI_LiDo.mq4
They both use the same logic, the same method, but they are different enough to try them both. Robert
is using addition filter HMA3.mq4. With Robert's EA you can play with different Moving Averages,
not only simple as in original method. You can also try many different (trailing) stops.
Bluto's EAs offer two different exits. Default is parabolic stop. If you want to use his trailing stop, you
should turn off parabolic stop (lots of Q’s on this below).
What else? Open all charts on DAILY timeframe, put EA and both indicators on each chart, let EA use
default settings - optimized RSI. Each, Bluto's and Robert's EA use different optimized RSI numbers.
Roberts numbers you will find inside EA in the code, and Bluto's optimized numbers you will find in
setting menu of EA. Don't forget to enter correct RSI setting into each indicator for every chart.
Remember, each chart have it's own RSI settings.
Q: Bluto, are you using this EA (on Daily charts) on all of the currency pairs or just the 4 majors? Also,
when you say "15 lots per signal", are these standard lots or mini lots and which broker are you using?
Thank you.
A: I'm running the EA on a chart for every pair. It should work equally well for any pair. I'm using 15
mini-lots @ IBFX. And yes, those would be daily charts. The EA is coded to use daily RSI & SMA
signals.
-bluto
Q: I've been running this on Velocity4x demo on 17 pairs since yesterday. One buy trade opened
yesterday on eur/gbp at .6754...
The only change to defaults was to turn on money management, otherwise trades would not open (not
enough margin in 10K demo for opening 10 lot trade!). So with money management turned on the
above trade opened for .2 lots
A:
Turn off MM and change the lot size from 10-Lots to 0.01-Lots. You'll have enough money for the 17
pairs.
Bodaire
Q: Can this EA be opened just at the brokers daily open (00:00) time for about 1 or 2 hours instead of
leaving it on 24/7? Because, once it takes a trade, the trade will still be running on the brokers server, so
we can turn off our computers. What do you think?
A:
With the RSI-R2 trade orders, you don't want to turn off the EA and I'll tell you why in a moment.
Likewise, I'm not certain what your logic is with regards to letting the EA run for the first few hours
after broker daily open. There's nothing magical about those first two hours that gives a higher
probability of getting a signal. You don't know when the trade is going to signal....it could be anytime in
a 24 hour period.
Whether you need to leave the EA up and running or not really depends on how it was designed. For an
EA lets say that always places orders with a 20 pip takeprofit and a 20 pip stoploss, you've set the upper
and lower limits so it doesn't matter if you turn the EA off or not...The order is on the broker server with
all of the known parameters. With other EA's like RSI-R2, there isn't any fixed takeprofit or stoploss
assigned to the order when it's placed....the EA manages this dynamically. In fact, takeprofit is assigned
as an absurd value like 700 which means you'll let the order run as far as it can go. On the stoploss side,
you definitely need the EA up and running because it uses a parabolic stop routine and continuously
updates the stoploss value of the order on the server as time passes...sort of a dynamic trailing stop. The
server will not maintain the parabolic stop and if you turn the EA off and the trade goes against you, it
could get ugly. Hope that helps.
Q:
If the EA gets a counter signal from RSI before the PSAR level is encountered doesn’t it close the prior
trade then also?
A 1:
Yes...indeed it does. However, the likelihood of that seems remote considering how infrequent the right
conditions line up for a signal.
A 2:
Good questions. The buy/sell signal criteria is very strict and there's only one set of conditions each for
buy/sell. Closing orders is a different subject. That line of code you mention is in fact a hard exit per the
original criteria from the trade journal article. The author of the method says if you have an open buy
order and RSI rises above a value of 75 (overbought), then close the order....presumably because
momentum should be slowing and a reversal might be coming. That's one way to exit the order.
Another method obviously is via the parabolic stop. Yet another one is....say you have an open buy
order and RSI never rises above 75, the order isn't stopped out, and suddenly you get a sell signal (very
unlikely).
A 3:
I have had 4 positive demo trades (each on a different currency pair) since March 23rd and I believe
that all of them exited due to the condition I showed. None of them hit the PSAR level. Thanks for
clarifying that point. Don’t forget, some back test results show barely over 1 trade per month over 15
months of testing. So you are not going to be encountering tradable conditions that often.
A 4:
Yeah, that’s what everyone has been saying. I’ve had it running when others have reported trades
occurring so I thought it was something in my setup. I tested from 1/1 to current and it took only a total
of 5-6 trades depending on the currency, so I will let it ride for the rest of April and see what happens. It
does look promising. So simple, yet effective. I have to learn more about the RSI and its workings so
that I understand what its doing, in order to go live with it.. we'll see.. I'm looking forward to Gremlin
coming around as well. I have it running on 17 pairs in one instance of MT4. It has taken 5 trades all on
different pairs.
Q: It gave me 9 trades, 6 on the GBPUSD and 3 on the EUR. My complaint was that my Balance
never was above my initial $10k and I ended up losing $21.32 demo trading 0.10-Lots each time. Bluto
was making money. This version has the same bug as the original. After a trade is stopped out it will
not trade again.
09/04/2007
V2.0 runs in each chart, so to run all pairs the EA has to be in every chart. Multi_pair runs in GBP/JPY
chart but trades all pairs.
11/04/2007
(Attached RSI Ver 1.1 to this message) Ok folks - here's the original....well almost. I made two small
but beneficial tweaks.
1. Provision to indicate if broker permits fractional lot sizes. Comes in handy if you're using money
management. Also moved money management code into a function call.
2. Added an external variable to store the RSI Period value which was previously a hardcoded value of
2. Through backtesting with high quality modeling, I've found that each pair has optimum values for
RSI Period which are different from each other. I think the value of 2 from the original trade journal
where this method was described was applicable to stocks. I've assigned the optimum value to each pair
in the opening initialization function. These have worked real well for me.
Folks - I think we're on to a good thing with this EA. Let's keep the EA private to our community here
if possible instead of broadcasting it all over the place unless that goes against policy. Let me know if
you have any questions.
-bluto
-----------------
20/04/2007
Attached is the latest version of RSI-R2 (Ver 1.3). I added a check to compare the daily close to the
SMA200. If a long trade is open and price has closed below the SMA200, the order is closed. Likewise,
if a short trade is open and price has closed above the SMA200, the order is closed. This should help to
address doomed trades like the current USDCAD that just keep moving in the wrong direction. Kudos
to Mike for the suggestion.
bluto.
21/04/2007
Some individuals using RSI-R2 Ver 1.2 have voiced their reservations about the effectiveness of the
default PSAR stop routine. I've been doing some hardcore testing of various alternative trailing stop
routines for the past few days. My conclusion is that the existing PSAR is quite suitable for this
particular EA. Being that it runs on a daily timeframe, it needs a lot of headroom to do it's thing and the
other conventional trailing stop methods I've tested have caused trades to stop out prematurely.
Therefore, I'm going to leave the default PSAR method in place unless somebody discovers a better
alternative. Another discovery due to closer inspection is that three pairs in particular positively thrive
under this EA: GBPJPY, CHFJPY & EURJPY. Keep an eye on these pairs and possibly consider
allocating larger lot sizes because the profitability under several years of backtesting using the
optimized RSI settings in Ver 1.2 is phenomenal. Any feedback is always appreciated.
bluto
Comments:
RSI-R2 comes under the category of dip-buyers. Most dipbuyers that I have seen work best with no
stop at all -- correct me if I am wrong, but the original strategy that this EA is based on didn't have one
either. This causes large intratrade drawdowns which is unfortunately a feature of dip-buying.
So the best strategy may be simply to have a fixed disaster-prevention stop which rarely gets hit, at 500
pips or so from the entry price, or several ATR.
I think its best to concentrate on tuning the entry. Since this is an overbought-oversold trigger, how
about using more than one overbought/oversold indicator such as unsmoothed Stochastic(2) (my tests
show that this does reduce drawdown), or simply a % change of closes?
22/04/2007
This template was put together by Anica & Mario Slavinec. It will give you what you want. Put the
rsi2_v2.tpl in templates and R2_Arrows_v2.mq4 in indicators. Hope this helps
David AKA spiritfriends
I've also changed the name of the EA to "Super RSI" and I'm only furnishing the executable version
from here on out because I've employed some private proprietary code functions. This will also keep
the original trade approach uniform and free from the clutter of all the EA mutations and clones. Sorry
if anyone takes exception to this. I'm here to share EA's that can help you make money, not to teach
others how to roll their own EA's from mine or how to program by copying my code.
Drop the EA on as many DAILY charts as you want, set the lot size and any other settings, and let the
EA do it's thing. Remember - the EA doesn't trade often so if you like a lot of action, perhaps a different
EA is what you need. If you want limited market exposure and fewer trades with a high probability of
success, this EA is for you.
Cheers!
Super RSI supercedes RSI-R2 with some enhanced internal workings to improve the probability of
winning trades.
-bluto
(2.) Use the optimizer and backtest each pair using the Default_RSI_Period as the value to optimize
with a starting value of 2, step of 1 and stop value of, say 10.
(3.) Run the optimizer and determine which RSI value gives you the best profit, least drawdown, etc.
(4.) Update the specific OptimumRSI_xxxxxx property for the pair you've optimized with the RSI value
determined in step 3.
bluto
---------------------
25/04/2007
Super RSI Ver 1.2 - Plz use this version
A few minor tweaks and enhancements to provide better signals. You can use this without affecting any
existing open trades.
bluto
---------------------
27/04/07
The only difference between Super RSI & RSI-R2 is a proprietary little function I added to Super RSI
to better qualify the trend which should enhance the chances of a winning trade.
bluto
------------------
Robert's versions:
2. RSI_R2_EA_multi_ pairFixed
This version has the bug fix that was found in the original and still found in the original multipair
version.
4. RSI_R2_EA_V2. 1
This is the version with modular coding instead of straight line code. It also has many options to try for
trailing stop as well as ideas posted by Gideon. Everything selectable by turning switches on or off
using setting of 0 for off and 1 for on.
As stated in a prior post the bug had to do with the original ea not correctly recognizing the close of a
trade when the trade hit the stop or take profit. It did not happen often. I discovered this bug because the
backtest of one of the pairs did not place trades after Sept 2006 even though it placed trades if I set the
start date to Oct 1, 2006.
Robert
---------------
05/05/2007 : RSI EA Version 2.1
Here is the latest version of the RSI_R2 ea.
Someone requested a check to prevent a trade from being placed on the same day a trade was closed.
I have not seen bluto post this so I am attaching my version with that function added. The input
useDelay is used to select this function. Set to 1 to use it, 0 otherwise.
------------------------
11/05/2007
Robert,
Your suggestion regarding use of CCI50 vs. RSI 14 is most likely the best solution to the trend reversal
issue in this EA.
CCI50 when tracing below 100 then above 0 provides better signals than RSI 14. Each time CCI traces
< 50 the EA will wait for a new signal long until < 100 then 0. You have already coded CCI50
regarding open positions.
I appreciate your effort and work with this and other EAs. Regarding the many EA concepts I have
followed at this site RSI_R2 is most similar to the reverse divergence concept which is a successful
method.
Incidentally CCI50 low value on this chart identified a reverse positive divergence thus confirming a
long position in this TF. Subsequently CCI traced a classic positive divergence the price low of which
touched the 200 sma. This observation is immaterial to the EA. Nevertheless CCI50 is doing a better
job of identifying first a RPD then followed by a CPD which is the actual trade event manually. This
phenomena identifies a tradable event with the trend which is lower risk.
To the extent you are able to develop this EA I appreciate and thank you.
Regards,
Loren
-------------------
12/05/2007
I found that I did not have a correct understanding of the RSI signal. From further study of the code I
have found that the RSI buy signal is valid when all three bars are below 65. Sell signal is valid when
all three bars are above 35.
Backtest results show that using the filter and confirmation helped on the USDCAD but did not
help on the GBPUSD.
What helped more on the GBPUSD was using different buy and sell levels and the filter.
Robert
----------------------------
19/05/2007
I think you'll find Super RSI 1.3 to be hands down the most profitable version of all. If you want the
version 1.5 which has some additional secret sauce, email me.
bluto
----------------------------
01/06/2007
Here's an updated version of Super RSI that contains a few more optimizations and improved order
handling to protect from opening more than one order for a given signal the same day. You can simply
replace any previous versions of Super RSI that are active without worrying about affecting any open
orders.
(Attached RSI-R2_EA_Ver._1.6.ex4)
bluto
-----------------------
05/06/2007
Q: Bluto,
Are you still running the EA live in all the pairs and long only positions or you changed something in
your strategy? Thank you for sharing this great EA.
Deep
-------------------------
A: Yes....all pairs. The EA trades both long & short...and always has. Haven't changed anything with
the original strategy but I've tightened up the signal over the past few revisions to avoid danger. Next
up....improved stop feature.
bluto
Q: on the usdjpy and while I was watching it the EA initiated a stop loss at 121.60 while it was
currently trading at 121.73. It must have sensed a change in the market and it entered a stop to preserve
my profit. Bluto, is that how it normally works?
1. Added "OverrideMagicNumber" as requested for those who want to run the EA for the same chart
under two or more different MT4 sessions. Use a unique override Magic Number on the 2nd, 3rd, etc.
sessions to avoid order conflicts on the broker server.
2. Per Loren's suggestion, added a boolean flag option to use the 200 day EMA instead of the default
200 day SMA for the signal criteria. In my preliminary testing, I saw no difference in using either
method.
bluto
----------------------------
The EA uses HMA only as a filter to verify the current trend. The EA still looks at price above SMA
200 to place a buy trade or below to place a sell trade. If HMA trend is currently opposite the direction
taken by the price vs SMA 200 relationship the filter does not allow the trade. This resulted in reducing
the drawdown while a trade was active by a significant amount.
Robert
Q:
I had commented earlier on a broader window for entering a trade matching the GMT to GMT+3 of the
brokers we use. Any thoughts on that? (Dave Roland)
A: Funny you should ask about that...I'm studying this whole broker time zone thing as we speak and
have some ideas. Perhaps a "window of opportunity" could be used based on a range of time around
GMT to detect the RSI signals rather than a hard End-Of-Day3/Opening-Of_Day4 basis driven by the
broker's server clock. I think it's feasible.
(Dave Roland)
If the trades opened by FXDD at GMT+3 are just as valid as different trades opened three hours later at
Velocity4X for example then our EA should pick up all the valid trades. How broad that time frame
should be
I don’t know but today, Velocity4X picked up three new trades that I didn’t get on FXDD. This is
significant.
If the trades at Velocity4x meet your criteria and work, this could really blow your already great EA
into the stratosphere. If we on average, doubled the number of trades. Wow.
Bluto: Ok....consider it the next feature of ver. 1.9 I'm on it. The GMT plus/minus timezone swings will
be user entered property values.
Q: When I did the research a few weeks ago based upon what I read it started as RSI R2 and Bluto's
version spun off from it and became Super RSI. All the iterations of Super RSI 1.0- 1.8 are the same
premise with modifications, fixes and additions. You will find tons of info here including a FAQ
http://www.forexmt4.com/mt_yahoo/ and files on both RSIs. Version 1.7 has the trailing stop as well as
the parabolic stop where 1.5 or 1.6 was only the parabolic stop. 1.6 or 1.7 fixed multiple or same pairs
being opened once a position closed in a 24 hr period. 1.8 added new features with magic numbers and
other things. 1.9 (not published yet 16/06/2007) - I believe Bluto is adding more features including a
broker time shift option.
A: It started out as RSI-R2 but I changed the name of it when I decided to add some proprietary signal
code to it and distribute the .ex4 version only.
Q: You have the default RSI values for 19 currencies. That's just so... well, PRIME. I see you have the
non-specified pair default at 4. Can you recommend a 20th pair you think would work well with the
default RSI 4? I'd like to run an even 20.
Thanks
-Derk
A: There are only 19 currency pairs available with my broker, IBFX, so those were the ones I was able
to optimize. It's easy to perform the optimization if you have additional pairs for your broker. Just set
the "UseOptimizedRSIPeriods" to false and then optimize the "Default_RSI_Period" value for the given
pair, usually based on a range of 3 - 8.
Q: how could you optimize a specific RSI value for each pair?
Q: Can we trade mini? I started it last nite and had it set for 0.1 lots but it opened a standard lot.
Does it only trade on the 4 hr chart?
A: The EA is designed to work with any type of account. Make sure you set the
"BrokerPermitsFractionalLots" to true, but better yet, make sure your broker in fact permits this.
Optionally, use the money management feature to take the headaches out of determining lot sizes based
on broker permissions and your desired risk.
bluto
Q: If the stop loss is set to other than "0" will it interfere with the parabolic stop loss?
Thanks,
Jeff
A: The stoploss value is designed to work only with the newer stop mechanism. If you want to use the
parabolic method, set it to true, set the newer method to false and leave stoploss set to zero. The two
methods are mutually exclusive. If parabolic has worked well for you in the past, then by all means,
continue using it. They're both very viable stop mechanisms. I gather you monitor your trades pretty
closely, so you always have the manual method at your convenience if things turn for the worse.
Q: Excellent trades. In your experience, are there any pairs you have decided specifically not to trade?
A: The method is universal...it works with all pairs. Some may move a little more slowly than others
but the signal is usually good across the board.
bluto
Q: What's your preference, bluto? The new stop or the parabolic stop?
Bodaire
Q: Is the parabolic or trail stop the only way Super RSI exits a trade? How does it handle the situation
when the parabolic is on the wrong side of price?
A: Well, remember that these are daily trades we're dealing with. The only solution would be to run a
tighter stop but then you increase the risk of shadowing the trade too closely and getting stopped out
prematurely....backtests and forward tests have demonstrated this over and over. The only alternative I
can think of is to monitor the trades manually and get out when you feel a reasonable profit objective
has been met. There really is no single solution....such is the fun of trading...half technicals, half
artform.
In spite of what they may give back, the EA generates a tremendous amount of profit over the long
haul.
bluto
Q: It was mentioned here that in the versions v1.7 and 1.8, the parabolic stop loss is only activated only
after a profit.....
Is it the same for v1.6 that has only parabolic stop loss?..... In version 1.6, if the trade does not see a
profit level; will it be without a stop loss?... Or it will take care of the stop loss no matter it sees any
profit level or not?...
A:
Q: Does anyone know if Super RSI has the ability to reverse position? The trade I'm concerned with is
the eurusd long. It's about -60 and has been down from the beginning. And parabolic is on the wrong
side to trigger a stop loss. How does Super RSI treat trades like this? Can it reverse or exit on it's own
per some other rule? Thx.
A: No, not currently. You'd have to exercise manual discretion. However, I'm always open to fresh
ideas and I'm working on a few of my own.
Q: Pardon but... that still does not answer Ben's question (and I asked the same thing a while ago): How
does Super RSI deal with trades that go negative rapidly, if the parabolic and trailing stops cannot thus
work?
A: The parabolic stop is not foolproof as we've seen. For the time being, if it doesn't catch a trade going
in the wrong direction from the get-go, then manual discretion can/should be used ASAP subject to how
much steel your stomach is made of. The RSI value check is also another threshold that will be used to
close trades automatically, but considering that these are daily charts, the time delay in waiting for that
exit signal to occur may be too late to avoid serious negative damage. At this time, I don't have an
answer for the lead balloon trades, but fortunately, with the winning trade percentage, they shouldn't
occur too often.
As long as everyone can be aware of this, some manual judgment and a watchful eye isn't too steep of a
price to ask considering the overall profitability of this EA.
One other point on this topic...the parabolic method may slip on the early catch of a bad runaway trade,
but the alternate latest method I added would certainly halt the losses and contain them to whatever the
Stoploss setting is. That's why I included this feature in the most recent build.
I wonder if this is possible for v1.8. If it is I think it would give people the security of a trade not going
against and still allow them to use the Parabolic stop.
Q: Could v1.8 first be set so that your alternate method would stop any bad runaway trade - then, when
the trade is in profit, could the trade use F7 to switch to the Parabolic stop?
A: Sure. You could start of with the traditional stop, and then once a pre-determined profit level is
attained, the parabolic method could kick in. The target profit level could be a pip value setting that you
set. Easy to do.
bluto
Q:I have been using it with the parabolic stop and am quite happy with it. I am not exploring (much for
mow) the Trail option.
But you have said that if one is using the parabolic, to set StopLoss to zero. Now, if true that the
parabolic only controls the stop once it is in profit, why could not one just use the stoploss value with
the parabolic option, just to make sure that if it goes negative right off, that one only loses "X" amount?
A: You could but it behaves a bit more squirrely depending on which side of the trade PSAR happens
to be on as opposed to the fixed location of the stop used with the standard method. I've had mixed
results with this so I don't use it. This is still an area I'm devoting a lot of attention and research into.
We'll come up with a more robust method yet. I have a new stop-stepper thingy I'm working on and it
seems to be pretty cool so far.
bluto
Q: I like the money management feature. Would you code an external variable which allows the user to
select the % risk assumed. 2% is popular but does not fit ever pair. As you know there is code in
AnyMA_RSI_R2_EA_Opt which permits this feature. Thank you
A: The risk variable is a user setting and can accommodate whatever value you want to set it at per pair.
Maybe I'm not understanding what you're asking for, but whatever it is, I can certainly add it in. Give
me a little more detail on what you're looking for.
bluto
Q: Guys what are the main difference between 1.6 and 1.7?
A: There is absolutely no difference between 1.6 & 1.7 with regards to the signal and trade logic. All
features added for the last few revisions have dealt with things like adding a new stoploss method,
override magic number, and preventing more than one order in a given day. If you're seeing differences
in EA performance between your two brokers, it's purely a function of the different broker data feeds
and server clocks.
bluto
Q: do I expect trade to be initiated right after enabling this EA first time? I am using RSI 1.8 and have a
smiley face on.
A: When you fire the EA up, if there was already a signal for that day, it will immediately initiate a
trade. If there were no valid signals for that day, then the next possible time for any new signals would
be at the opening of a new daily bar per your brokers server clock. Therefore, for this particular EA, it's
probably wise not to start it late in the day since you might be too late for the party on an active signal
that day....start the EA up right at the beginning of a new day just to be safe. If there are fresh signals,
you'll get into them early that way.
1. If you set money management = false, then risk percent is ignored. You then set your own lot sizes.
2. The Stoploss value only works with the newer standard/traditional method recently added. If you're
using the Parabolic Stop method by setting it to true, then leave stoploss = 0 and set the other method
to false.
3. Override magic number was a recently requested feature. It's for folks who want to run the EA on
more than one chart for the same pair on the same account but on different sessions of MT4. The EA
automatically assigns a unique internal magic number specific to each pair by default. If you're running
the EA for the same pair more than once, you need a way to set a different magic number for that 2nd
session and the override magic number is how you do it. This keeps each instance of the EA from
messing with each other's open orders on the broker server.
bluto
Q: In regard of my closed trade e/u with SL 100 may I change other open trades to use ParabolicStop
instead of StopLoss and StandartTrailingStop?
I've tried (changed) SL to 0, UseStandartTrStop to false and Parabolic to true but orders still stay with
initial SL.
Should I modify manually SL to 0 on open (by SuperRSI 1.8) orders?
A: Remove the stoploss, set parabolic to true and standard method to false, and then reset your MT4
session. That should allow the parabolic method to assume control of the stop mechanism.
Q: Can manual trades on the pairs that the EA is attached to be opened and closed without the EA
attempting to manage them and without affecting any trades that the EA already has in progress or is
contemplating?
A: 1. If you set money management = false, then risk percent is ignored. You then set your own lot
sizes.
2. The Stoploss value only works with the newer standard/traditional method recently added. If you're
using the Parabolic Stop method by setting it to true, then leave stoploss = 0 and set the other method to
false.
3. Override magic number was a recently requested feature. It's for folks who want to run the EA on
more than one chart for the same pair on the same account but on different sessions of MT4. The EA
automatically assigns a unique internal magic number specific to each pair by default. If you're running
the EA for the same pair more than once, you need a way to set a different magic number for that 2nd
session and the override magic number is how you do it. This keeps each instance of the EA from
messing with each other's open orders on the broker server.
The EA manages only those orders it has placed and identifies them by a unique internal magic number.
bluto
Q: Bluto: Can I delay the restart of this EA Sunday night after 00:00gmt on IBFX to avoid variable pip
spread and not miss any new trades once I turn it back on? the spread usually tightens back up in an
hour or so.
A: Yes.
Q: Someone reported multiple orders a few days ago, and it got me to thinking.
If there are multiple orders open on a pair, and they all have the same magic number, will SuperRSI
close them *all* when profit/loss is reached?
Thanks,
Ron
A: By design, Super-RSI only allows either one buy order or one sell order for the same
chart/pair/magic number to be open at the same time. There is logic that closes orders based on an RSI
threshold being attained, and the logic does use symbol + magic number as the key. The only way I can
see multiple orders being opened for the same pair is if someone puts the EA on multiple instances of
the same chart. Once that happens, the magic number becomes visible on the broker server and is
subject to being clobbered by another instance of the EA running on another chart for the same pair.
bluto