PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (P.M.G.S.Y.

)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
Name of the Road:-
Package No:-
Length of the Road:-
Road Code:-
Block:-
Constituancy:-
District:-
State:-
1. Introduction
1.1 Objectives of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)
Rural Road connectivity is a key component of rural development by promoting access to economic and social
services and thereby generating increased agricultural incomes and productive employment opportunities. It is also a
key ingredient in ensuring poverty reduction.

It was against this background of poor connectivity that the Prime Minister announced in 2000, a massive rural
roads program. The Prime Minister’s Rural Road Program (Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, PMGSY) set a target
of:
• Achieving all-weather road access to every village/habitation with a population greater than 1000 by 2003.

• Providing all-weather road access to all villages/habitations of population greater than 500 people [250 in case of hill
States (North-Eastern states, Sikkim, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttaranchal), the desert areas and
tribal areas] by the end of the Tenth Five Year Plan, i.e., 2007.

Achievents of Bharat Nirman and its program for the respective year for Block Dabugam
Nos of Habitation
Sl No. Scheme Year Road Length in KM. provided with all Remarks
weather connectivity.
Balikulunda, Manpur,
1. PMGSY PH-VII 2007-08 10.550 KM 3
Rusuda.
1.2 All Weather Road
This Road will connect to the RD Road Road all weather RD road without any interuption on ODR's &
VRS's during rainy season which ultimately connects to Block HQ Dabugam and District HQ Nabarangpur

1.3 Core Network

The rural road network required for providing the ‘basic access’ to all villages/ habitations is termed as the Core
Network. The Core Network is likely to be a cost-effective conceptual frame work for investment and management
purposes, particularly in the context of scarce resources. Basic access is defined as one all-weather road access from
each village/ habitation to the nearby Market Centre or Rural Business Hub (RBH) and essential social and economic
services.

A Core Network comprises of Through Routes and Link Routes. Through routes are the ones which collect
traffic from several link roads or a long chain of habitations and lead it to a market centre or a higher category road, i.e.
the district roads or the state or national highways. Link routes are the roads connecting a single habitation or a group of
habitations to Through Roads or district roads leading to market centres. Link routes generally have dead ends
terminating on habitations, while Through Routes arise from the confluence of two or more Link Routes and emerge on
to a major road or to a market centre.
habitations to Through Roads or district roads leading to market centres. Link routes generally have dead ends
terminating on habitations, while Through Routes arise from the confluence of two or more Link Routes and emerge on
to a major road or to a market centre.

The Core Network dose not represent the most convenient or economic route for all purposes. However, since
studies show 85-90% of rural trips are to market centres, the Core Network is a cost-effective conceptual frame work
for investment and management purposes, particularly in the context of scarce resources.

The Sub-project road Badaolama to Pangalguda is a link road with Code 0 in block of
#NAME? in District of Nabarangpur This road directly connects the habitations of 165
0 respectively. Thus this link road serves the total population of 0 .

1.4 Geography
The road passes through plain terrain. There are no missing Links. less than 15.00 mtr. The soil adjacent to the road is
of Silty Clay type, which is not suitable for embankment construction, hence soil from borrow pits ( at a distance of 2
km from the road alignment) is proposed to be used in embankment.

1.5 Climatic Condition

The annual average rain fall in this area is about 1662.68 MM (The rain fall datas for last 5 years is enclosed separately.)

1.6 The Sub-Project Road

The road passes through plain terrain. There is school at RD 5-Jan
point of this road. There are no sub-station and
no Water Lines within ROW . 2 nos Electric poles within ROW. 0 nos of Existing Cross drainage Structures along
the road & There is no private lands within the road alignment. However the land owners of both the sides of the road
alignment have been agreed to vacat the encroached government lands.

District:- Nabarangpur
Block:- #NAME?
Road Name:- Badaolama to Pangalguda
Road Code:- 0
Package No:- OR-22-162/XIII
Road Length:- 4.370 Km.
Start point :- Dabugam Latiitude:- Longitude:-
End point:- Block HQ:- Latiitude:- Longitude:-

Population Benefited Chainage

Sl. No. Habitation Benefited
Direct Indirect From To
1 165 0 0.00 0.00
2. Planning and Basic Design Consideration
2.1 Key maps
Block Maps of #NAME? showing all existing connectivity like District/block HQ, new townships, National and
State highway network, mandis, hospitals, colleges, schools etc are furnished in fig-3.

2.2 Preliminary alignment investigation

The strip plan of the proposed road alignment obtained from transact work isfurnished in fig-4.

2.3 Site Photographs

Photographs of the road alignment are taken at important critical pointrs such as narrow width, Existing CD structure,
Markets, Godowns, Educational,Health& Religious institutions at different chainages. (Photographs Enclosed.).

2.4 Road Design Brief

The detail description of design issues and solution in finalising the drawing, provision of CD structures, drainage
issues etc. is as follws in a tabular formate.

Table 2.1 (Road Design Brief)

Sl.
Location Issue Design Solutions
No.
1 0/00 The Proposed road is connecting The Intersection has been proposed to be
RD Road Road which developed properly with cautionary signages for
altimately goes to the block/district HQ. The road the road safety.
starts with a T intersection while the proposed
road gets developed there will be substential
traffic using this road.
2 0/540 Existing 300 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
3 0/750 to Village Area C.C. Road Proposed
1/050
4 0/970 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
has been proposed at the point.
5 1/390 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
6 1/720 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 1000 mm Single row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
7 1/725 to To Protect Road Embankment Protection Wall is Proposed
1/825
8 1/830 to Village Area C.C. Road Proposed
2/130
9 1/840 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
has been proposed at the point.
10 2/130 To Protect Road Embankment One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
11 2/460 Existing 450 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 1000 mm Single row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
12 2/575 Existing 600 mm Double row HPC One HP culvert of size 1000 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
13 2/915 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 1000 mm Single row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
14 3/444 Existing 450 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 1000 mm Single row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
15 3/920 Existing 350 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
16 4/040 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
17 4/150 to Village Area C.C. Road Proposed
4/600
4/510 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
18 4/650 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
has been proposed at the point.
19 4/750 New Proposed RCC Slab Culvert One RCC Slab Culvert (1x3x2) has been
proposed at the point.
20 4/750 to To Protect Road Embankment Toe Wall is Proposed
4/850
21 4/900 Existing 300 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
has been proposed at the point.
22 5/180 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
has been proposed at the point.
23 5/300 to To Protect Road Embankment Toe Wall is Proposed
5/400
24 5/515 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
25 5/900 Existing 450 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
26 6/300 New Proposed HPC One HP culvert of size 1000 mm Double row NP
3 has been proposed at the point.
25 6/700 to 7/0 Due to Built up area Drain is proposed

26 6/800 Existing 300 mm Single row HPC One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
has been proposed at the point.
27 0 Narrow Formation of Road One HP culvert of size 900 mm Single row HPC
has been proposed at the point .
28 0 Narrow Formation of Road One HP culvert of size 900 mm Single row HPC
has been proposed at the point .
29 0 To Protect Road Embankment in the downstream Protection Wall is Proposed with Side slope
of the Irrigation Canal Bridge. Pitching.
30 0 Built Up Area So C.C. Road Proposed
31 0 A damaged RCC slab culvert of size 1x1.0x5.0mtr One HP culvert of size 900mm Double row NP 3
is existing. has been proposed at the point.
32 0 A damaged HP culvert of size 600 mm single row One HP culvert of size 600 mm Single row NP 3
NP 2 is existing. has been proposed at the point.
33 0 A damaged RCC slab culvert of size 1x1.0x5.0mtr One HP culvert of size 900mm Double row NP 3
is existing. has been proposed at the point.
34 0 Due to Built up area & village end Drain is proposed at LHS
2.5 Transect Walk Summary
Existing Additional Land Required Type of Loss
Chainage Land Village Remarks/ Suggestion
Width LHS RHS LHS RHS
Barren barren
0/540 7.00 1.66 1056.00 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
0/750 to
7.20 0.00 0.00 House House C.C. Road Proposed
1/050
Residenti Residential
0/970 7.40 1.68 1.68 al Land Land
Culvert Proposed
Barren Barren
1/390 7.80 2.05 2.05 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
Barren Barren
1/720 6.85 2.10 2.64 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
1/725 to Residenti Residential
7.00 2.68 1.84 Protection Wall is Proposed
1/825 al Land Land
1/830 to
6.98 0.00 0.00 House House C.C. Road Proposed
2/130
Barren barren
1/840 6.90 1.97 1.68 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
Barren Barren
2/130 6.90 2.54 2.20 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
Agricultu Agricultur
2/460 6.90 2.75 1.84 ral Land al Land
Culvert Proposed
Agricultu Agricultur
2/575 6.90 2.68 2.34 ral Land al Land
Culvert Proposed
Agricultu Agricultur
2/915 6.90 1.98 1.68 ral Land al Land
Culvert Proposed
Barren barren
3/444 6.90 1.58 1.42 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
Agricultu Agricultur
3/920 6.90 1.67 1.67 ral Land al Land
Culvert Proposed
Barren Barren 165
4/040 6.90 1.97 2.10 Land Land
Culvert Proposed
4/150 to
6.90 0.00 0.00 House House C.C. Road Proposed
4/600
Residenti Residential
4/510 6.50 2.95 2.40 al Land Land
Culvert Proposed

4/650 6.80 3.00 2.65 House House Culvert Proposed

Resident Residenti
4/750 7.00 2.50 2.40 RCC Slab Culvert (1x3x2)
ial Land al Land
Agricult
4/750 to Agricultur
6.80 2.30 3.50 ural Toe Wall is Proposed
4/850 al Land
Land
Barren Barren
4/900 6.50 265.00 2.70 Culvert Proposed
Land Land
Barren Barren
5/180 7.00 2.50 2.40 Culvert Proposed
Land Land
 Agricult
5/300 to Agricultur
6.80 2.30 3.50 ural Toe Wall is Proposed
5/400 al Land
Land
Agricult
Agricultur
5/515 6.50 2.50 2.40 ural Culvert Proposed
al Land
Land
Agricult
Agricultur
5/900 6.40 2.30 2.50 ural Culvert Proposed
al Land
Land
Agricult
Agricultur
6/300 6.40 2.30 2.50 ural Culvert Proposed
al Land
Land
Agricult
6/700 to Agricultur
6.40 2.30 2.50 ural Drain is proposed
7/0 al Land
Land
Agricult
Agricultur
6/800 6.40 2.30 2.50 ural Culvert Proposed
al Land
Land
0 6.50 265.00 2.70 House House C.C Road Proposed

2.6 Checklist
Transect walk done Yes No
Transect walk summary table included Yes No
Photographs taken Yes No
Major changes in alignment perceived Yes No
Design brief provided Yes No
3. Topographic Survey
3.1 General
Topographic survey true to ground realties have been done using precision instruments like and auto levels. The in-
house standards, work procedures and quality plan prepared with reference to IRC: SP 19-2001, IRC: SP 20, IRC: SP
13 and current international practices have been followed during the above survey.

3.2 Traversing
Traverse has been done by Prismatic Compass having angular measurment accuracy of ± 30 sec. Bearing have been
taken up by WCB method.

3.3 Leveling
Levels were taken by auto level and having linear measurment accuracy of ± 5mm

3.4 Cross Section & Detailing

Cross sections were taken at 30 m interval. All physical features of the road were recorded. The cross section details
were taken for a further distance greater than half the formation width beyond the shoulders on either side of the road.

3.5 Data Processing

All data from topographic survey recorded by auto level & Prismatic compass and final alignment, plan, profile were
prepared and presented in Newgen Section Manager Software & AutoCAD Format.

3.6 List of TBM

TBMS RL LOCATION
TBM 1 100.000 On LHS Electric Pole
TBM 2 102.000 On LHS Tube Well
TBM 3 100.560 On LHS Culvert Top
TBM 4 100.510 On RHS Boundary Wll
TBM 5 99.580 On LHS Electric Pole
TBM 6 98.250 On RHS Tube Well
TBM 7 100.250 On RHS Electric Pole
TBM 8 95.860 On LHS Culvert Top
TBM 9 99.580 On LHS Electric Pole
TBM 10 97.580 On LHS Culvert Top
TBM 11 98.560 On LHS Tube Well
TBM 12 101.200 On RHS Boundary Wll
TBM 13 100.200 On LHS Electric Pole
TBM 14 100.400 On LHS Culvert Top
TBM 15 100.250 On LHS Tube Well
TBM 16 100.040 On LHS Electric Pole

3.7 Check List

Reference pillars given Yes No
TBM with northing-easting given Yes No
Traverse survey carried out Yes No
Cross section and detailing carried out Yes No

4.0 Soil and Materials Survey

4.1 General
The soil and material investigations were done following the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2002 and IRC: SP: 72-2007 and
other relevant IS codes. The potential sources of borrow areas for soil and quarry sites have been identified.

4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing

Soil samples have been collected along and around the road alignment at three (3) locations per km, from the adjoining
borrow areas, as well as one sample is collected from the existing road. Soil Classification tests like grain size analysis
and Atterberg’s limit were conducted for all the samples collected. Standard Proctor test and the corresponding 4 day
soaked CBR test were conducted either for a minimum of one test per km for soil samples of same group or more tests
due to variation of soil type. The following tests were conducted as detailed below:

• Grain size analysis as per IS : 272 (Part 4) – 1985

• Atterberg’s limit as per IS : 2720 (Part 5) – 1985
• Standard Proctor density test as per IS : 2720 (Part 7) – 1980
• 4 day soaked CBR test as per IS : 2720 (Part 16) – 1985

The details of soil tests

The details of soil tests are attatched in annexure-1

4.3 Analysis of Test Results

The laboratory soaked CBR value ranges from (3.0% to 4.0%), Which is enclosed in a separate sheet. The soil
laboratory test results is summarized in Table 4.1

Table 4.1 CBR values for different stretches

SL. NO. SECTION C.B.R Soaked in (%) C.B.R UnSoaked in (%)

1. 168 0/0-1/0 42279.00

2. 177 1/0-2/0 42280.00
3. 0 2/0-3/0 42281.00
Month & Year of
4. 0 3/0-4/370
Traffic volume
5. 0 0.00 0.00
6. 0 0.00 0.00
7. 0 0.00 Nov
8. 0 0.00 2015
9. 0 0.00 0.00

4.4 Coarse and Fine Aggregates

The stone aggregates shall be procured from 5 where as the locally available sand shall be used.
The source and the lead distance from the quarry to project site is in separate sheet in lead statement .The aggregates
and sand where available and acceptable shall be used for bituminous work, concrete works, other pavement works.
The stone aggregate shall be procured from 5 quarry & sand from River 5 .
Figure -3 Quarry Map
The detail quarry map has been enclosed.
4.5 Sub-soil investigation for bridges
As there are no Major/Minor bridges in the road alignment sub soil Investigation, Bore log & Test results are not required
4.6 Checklist
Borrow pit suitable Yes No
SSI for existing ground Yes No
Investigation for coarse/fine aggregate Yes No
Quarry map Yes No

5.0 Traffic Survey

5.1 General
In the present scenario of new connectivity road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume count has been conducted on the already
completed RD Road to Jaldhia .Road in the vicinity of the project road. The Classified Volume Count
survey has been carried out in accordance with the requirements of the TOR and relevant codes (IRC: SP: 19-2001,
IRC: SP: 20, IRC: SP: 72-2007).The surveys have been carried out by trained enumerators manually under the
monitoring of Engineering Supervisor. Traffic count location with the similar road and project road are enclosed.

5.2 Traffic Data and Analysis

The traffic count done was classified into different vehicle category as given below:
• Motorized vehicle comprising of light commercial vehicle, medium commercial vehicle, heavy commercial vehicle,
trucks, buses, agricultural tractors with trailers, car, jeep, two wheelers etc.
• Non- motorized vehicles comprising of cycle, rickshaw, cycle van, animal drawn vehicle etc.
The number of laden and un-laden commercial vehicles was recorded during the traffic counts. Traffic volume count
for this project road was done during peak season. The seasonal variation Once (for a period of 75 days from 1st
November to 15th January) is adopted based on local enquiry.
Average of 3 day traffic data is presented in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Average Daily Traffic at junction of 2.19 KM & Proposed road (both ways).
Sl. No. Type of Vehicle Day-1 Day-2 Day-3 Average
30.12.99 30.12.99 30.12.99
1 Car, Jeep, Van 10 10 8 9
2 Auto Rickshaw 0 0 0 0
3 Scooters/Motorbikes 32 34 35 34
4 Bus / Minibus 3 5 5 4
5 Trucks 11 11 8 10
6 Tractors 10 11 13 11
7 Cycles 0 0 0 0
8 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 177 151 166 165
9 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 4 5 4 4
10 Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
Total commercial vehicle per day (CPVD) 24 27 26 26
Total motorised vehicle per day 69
Total non-motorised vehicle per day 169

a). Traffic volume and mix do not vary along the Road Yes No
b). Traffic volume and mix vary along the Road Yes No
c). Traffic volume and mix will vary along the road in the Future Yes No
d). There is a potential for through traffic using the Road Yes No
e). Percentage of loaded Vehicle. Yes 30% No
5.3 Traffic Growth Rate and forecast
An average annual growth rate of 6% over the design life has been adopted.

Table 5.2 Average Annual Daily Traffic at junction of 2.19 KM & Proposed road (both ways).
Sl. No. Type of Vehicle ADT AADT Growth Rate
1 Car, Jeep, Van 9 6%
2 Auto Rickshaw 0
3 Scooters/Motorbikes 34 6%
4 Bus / Minibus 4
5 Trucks 10 6%
6 Tractors 11 6%
7 Cycles 0 6%
264
8 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 165
9 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 4 6%
10 Pedestrian 0
Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd) 26 6%
Total motorised vehicle per day 69 6%
Total non-motorised vehicle per day 169 6%
ESAL 0
6. Hydrological Survey
6.1 General
Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that the rain water can
pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on the following observations:
• Rainfall Data
• Catchments Area
• Time of Concentration
• Existing Cross Drainage Structures

6.2 Rainfall Data

Rainfall Data of #NAME? block as applicable for the project road were collected with maximum
rainfall occurring in the months of July to Septmber .The Rainfall data for last 5 years is mentioned below.
Year/Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
January 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00
February 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 0.00
March 32.00 29.00 79.00 25.00 3.00
April 6.00 75.00 32.00 0.00 124.90
May 87.00 131.00 92.00 197.00 241.00
June 346.00 262.00 666.00 98.00 230.00
July 307.00 549.00 321.00 272.00 188.50
August 474.00 493.00 268.00 253.00 133.00
September 446.00 553.00 246.00 273.00 230.00
October 11.00 54.00 0.00 127.00 117.00
November 0.00 48.00 5.00 17.00 18.00
December 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00
Total 1709.00 2224.00 1814.00 1262.00 1304.40

Average Rain fall = 1662.68 MM

6.3 Catchment Area

The Catchments area is calculated by gathering local information and topographical survey data in some cases where it
was not possible to calculate the same from the tropographical sheet.However, for Nallahs, streams etc the catchment
area was calculated from the tropographical sheet.

6.4 Time of Concentration

Time of concentration (tc) in hours is calculated from the formula of (0.87 x L³/H)0.385 where L is distance from the
critical point to the structure site in km and H is the difference in elevation between the critical point and the structure
site in meters.
6.5 Existing Cross Drainage Structures
There are 0 number of cross drainage structures along the existing project road as listed below:
Table-6.1 List and condition of existing culverts
Description of Existing Structure
Sl. No. Chainage in (km)
Type Span/ Dia. (m) Condition
1. 0 300mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
2. 0 300mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
3. 0 450mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
4. 0 600mm Double Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
5. 0 450mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
6. 0 350mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
7. 0 V.C. Damaged Condition
8. 0 300mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
9. 0 450mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
10. 0 300mm Single Row HPC NP2 Pipe & Foundation Damaged
7. Adopted Geometric Design Standards
7.1 General
The geometric design standards for this project conform to PMGSY guidelines and the guidelines as stated in IRC-SP
20:2002. Recommended design standards vis-à-vis the standards followed for this road are described below.

7.2 Terrain
For this road terrain is plain for which following criteria has been applied.
Terrain Classification Percentage of Cross Slope of the country
Plain 0-10% More than 1 in 10

7.3 Design Speed

The proposed design speed along this project road is as follows:

Plain Terrain
Road Classification
Ruling Min.
Rural Roads (ODR and VR) 50 40
At few places speed has been restricted to 20 km/hr where there are sharp existing turns.

7.4 Right of Way (ROW)

The requirement of ROW for this road is as follows (as specified in IRC-SP 20:2002):

Plain & Rolling Terrain (ROW in M)

Road Classification Open Area Built-up-Area
Normal Range Normal Range
Rural Roads (ODR and VR) 15 15-25 15 15-20

7.5 Roadway Width

Roadway width for this road is given below:

Terrain Classification Roadway Width (m)

Plain and Rolling 0.00 m

7.6 Carriageway Width

The width of carriageway for this project road is 50.67 m

7.7 Shoulders
It is proposed to have 1.988 m wide hard shoulder on both sides of the road.

7.8 Roadway width at cross-drainage structures

The roadway width at culvert locations for this road is 0.00 m
7.9 Sight Distance
The safe stopping sight distance is applicable in the geometric design. The sight distance values for this road as per IRC
recommendations are presented below:-
Design Speed (km/hr) Safe Stopping Sight Distance (m)
40 45
50 60

7.10 Radius of Horizontal Curve

According to IRC recommendations/standards, the minimum radius of horizontal curve for this project road is given below:-
Radius of Horizontal Curve (m)
Terrain Category
Ruling Minimum Absolute Minimum
Plain 90 60

To minimize extra land arrangement, minimum radius used is 20 m and design speed in these curves are also restricted
to 20 km/hr.

7.11 Camber & Super elevation

A camber adopted on this road section is given below. The maximum super elevation is 7.0% for Bituminous road &
5.0% for Cement concrete road.

Camber (%)
Surface type Annual Rainfall=( 1662.68 MM >1000 MM)
Earth Road 5.0
WBM Gravel Road 4.0
Thin Bituminous Road 3.5
Rigid Pavement 2.5

7.12 Vertical Alignment

The present road is in plain terrain and vertical alignment has been designed well with in ruling gradient.
Generally, minimum gradient of 0.3% for drainage purpose is considered for designing the vertical alignment of this
road. Vertical curves are not required when grade change is less than 1%, however a minimum vertical curve is
provided to avoid vertical kink.

7.13 Vertical Curves

There are no Vertical curves in the proposed road allignment.

7.14 Side slope

Side slope for this rural road where embankment height is less than 3.0m is given in the table below.

Condition Slope(H:V)
Embankment in silty/sandy/gravel soil 1:1.5

• Side Slope (Filling) = 1:1.5 • Side Slope (Cutting) = 1:1.5

7.15 Extra Widening of Pavement
The Extra Widening of Pavement at Curve as per IRC guideline is given below:
Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21 - 60 Above 60
 Extra Widening for ### wide single lane
carriageway, (m). 0.90 m 0.60 m Nil

8. Alignment Design
8.1 General
The basic aim of highway design is to identify technically sound, environment-friendly and economically feasible
highway alignment. The ensuing sections deals with obligatory points, which control highway alignment, design of
cross-section, highway geometric design & methodology, design of miscellaneous items.
The main components included in the highway design are:
Cross-sectional elements
Embankment
Horizontal alignment
Vertical profile
Junctions and/or Interchanges
Road furniture
Miscellaneous items

8.2 Horizontal alignment

Table 8.1 – Features of Horizontal Alignment (Example)

Chainage Length Reason for deviation from
Description existing alignment, if
From (km) To (km) (km) necessary
There is no major changes in the existing alignment.

Checklist
a). Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment coincide Yes
b). Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment deviate at certain sections No

The road is proposed to be improved over the existing allignment as there is no private lands encroched.

Table 8.2 – Horizontal Curve details

Curve Radius Ls Speed Def Angle Lc L total Hand of
IP Chainage S.E.`
No. (m) (m) (Kmph) D M S (m) (m) Curve
1 0.450 35 65 35 7.00 38º 0' 0' 38 168
2 3.800 45 50 30 7.00 30º 0' 0' 36 136
3 0 40 60 30 7.00 56º 0' 0' 39 159
4 0 35 60 40 6.50 52º 0' 0' 30 150
5 0 40 50 40 6.25 36º 0' 0' 30 130

8.3 Vertical alignment

{Insert a table (example given below) on the various vertical geometric improvement carried out and their details}
Table 8.3 – Vertical Curve Details
Chainage Level
Length Type of Grade in Grade out Grade
Sl. No. Chainage (m) Level of pvi
End of

End of
Curve
Curve

Curve

Curve
St. of

St. of

of Curve Curve (%) (%) Difference

1. There is no Vertical Curve
8.4 Design of Junctions
There is no intermidiate junctions however the starting of the road is widened for smooth plying of vehicles.
The proposed alignment intersects cross roads and forms junctions. The locations of junctions are given below: {Insert
location of important junctions, type and any major intersections improvement proposed.}

Table 8.4 – List intersections, type and proposed modifications

Sl. No. Type of intersection Location (km) Exiting condition Proposed modification
1. No Modification Required
9. Pavement Design
9.1 General
Considering the subgrade strength , projected traffic and the design life, the pavement design for low volume
PMGSY roads was carried out as per guidelines of IRC: SP: 72 – 2007. In built up area for hygienic and safety reasons,
C.C. pavement was used with a hard shoulder and appropriate line drain.

9.2 Pavement Design Approach

9.2.1 Design Life
A design life of 10 years was considered for the purpose of pavement design of flexible and granular pavements.

9.2.2 Design Traffic

The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total commercial vehicle per day (CVPD)
was presented in Table 5.2.

9.2.3 Determination of ESAL applications

Only commercial vehicles with a gross laden weight of 3 tonnes or more are considered. The design traffic was
considered in terms of cumulative number of standard axles is carried during the design life of the road. The numbers
of commercial vehicles of different axle loads are converted to number of standard axle repetitions by a multiplier
called the Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF). An indicative VDF value was considered as the traffic volume of rural road
does not warrant axle load survey.

For calculating the VDF, the following categories of vehicles was considered as suggested in paragraph 3.4.4 of IRC:
SP: 72 – 2007.
• Laden heavy/medium commercial vehicles
• Un-laden /partially loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
• Over loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles

Vehicle type Laden Un-Laden /Partially Laden

HCV 0 2.86
MCV 0 0.34

Lane distribution factor (L) for Single lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application = To x 4811 x L, where To =
ESAL application per day. The Cumulative ESAL application for the project road as per paragraph 3.5 of IRC: SP: 72 –
2007 is enclosed

9.2.4 Subgrade CBR

The subgrade CBR range of (4.0 to 5.0) was considered and the traffic falls in the T 4 Category.
Soil investigations done for borrow earth
Soil investigations done for existing ground
9.3 Design Alternatives
Design alternatives considered
Chainage in km Design alternatives considered
Pavement Shoulder Specify Design
Soil Stabilization
Hard shoulder Alternative Justification
From To Earthen Hard Full Selected
Flexible Rigid 1.988 each and use of locally
full width width available
side
as per IRC:SP:72-
0.000 2008

9.4 Pavement composition

Flexible Pavement The designed pavement thickness and composition was calculated by referring Figure 4 (Pavement
design catalogue) of IRC: SP: 72 – 2007. The ratio between heavy commercial vehicles and medium commercial
vehicles as given in Chapter 5 has been maintained .

Top Layer Premix Carpet with Type B Seal Coat 20 mm

Base Layer WBM Grading III & WBM Grading II 150 mm
Sub-Base Layer Granular Sub-base Grading II 175 mm
Modified Soil Drainage Layer 0 mm
Total Thickness 325 mm

Top layer of WBM will be treated with bituminous surface.

Rigid Pavement
C.C Pavement design is enclosed in separate sheet.

9.5 Embankment Design

No embankment of 6.0 m and above height is proposed in this road.
10. Design of Cross Drainage Works
10.1 General
On the basis of hydrological survey, 0 Nos. of new cross drainage structures are recommended for the project
road as listed in table 10.2.

10.2 Hydrological Design

The existing structures in poor condition that are proposed for replacement as listed below.

10.3 Design Feature

Design Standards for culverts has been prepared based on standard codes and guidelines of IRC: SP: 20: 2002 and
similar type of ongoing projects. General features of the designed cross drainage structures are given below:
For hume pipe culvert, road width is 7.5 m & the length of barrels of Hume Pipe is also taken 7.5mtrs due to restricted
land width aganist 10m as agreed by NRRDA.
Width of culvert : 7.50 m without Parapet.
Width of Bridge: 6.00 m with Parapet.
Top level of culverts will be 0.4mt high above the finished road level.

10.4 Justification for retaining/widening and replacement of culverts

The details of the justification of Retaining/ Widening and replacement of culvert is given in the table 2.1

10.5 Hydraulic calculation for Culvert

The design discharge was calculated by the rational method considering peak runoff from catchment using the formula,
Q = 0.028 x P x A xIc
Where P = Coefficient of Run Off for the catchments characteristics, A = Catchments Area in Hectares & Ic = Rainfall
Intensity.
Small bridge-site length of which exceeds 15 m to be jointly visited by STA and S.E. Design – as per SP-20 & SP-13
and relevant IRC Codes for Bridges.
Causeways and submersible bridges – Design to be done as per SP-20 and SP-28.
The detailed hydraulic calculation of all replaced and proposed new culverts and attached as Annexure-2 of this report
enclosed separately.

Table 10.2 Proposed Culverts

Sl. No. Chainage Type of Culvert Span/dia

1. 0 HPC 1x600

2. 0 HPC 2x600

3. 0 HPC 3x600

3. 0 HPC 1x1000

4. 0 HPC 2x1000
6. 0 HPC 3x1000

7. 0 HPC 4x1000

5. 0 RCC SLAB CULVERT (1x4x3)

5. 0 RCC SLAB CULVERT (1x6x5)
4. 0 RCC SLAB CULVERT (1x3x2)

5. 0 RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (1x3x2)

6. 0 RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (2x6x3)

6. 0 RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (2x6x3)

14. 0 RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (1x5x5)

15. 37,, RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (5x5x5)

16. 37,, RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (2x2x2)

17. 37,, RCC BOX CELL CULVERT (2x2x2)

11. Protective Works & Drainage
11.1 General
Protective works such as Toe wall & RR Stone Pitching of side slopes has been provided as per the para 11.3

11.2 Road side drain

There is Road side drain has been provided in this road.

11.3 Protective Works

Necessary protection works consisting CC wall have been provided near pond and water bodies & Narrow Width Road
falling within the proposed alignment.

Table 11.1 (the Chainage-Wise Protection Works Adopted)

Sl. No. Chainage Type of Protection works Comments

Narrow Formation of Road, To

1. 6 Toe Wall Protect Road Embankment in
the downstream of the Road
12. Land Acquisition
12.1 General
The existing road is generally an earthen track . Thus the project road is a new connectivity road. The existing Right of
Way (ROW) is varying from 8 m to 10 m.

12.2 Proposed ROW

The width of carriageway has been considered as 0.00 m in accordance with the IRC-SP 20: 2002. The total
roadway width is limited to 6.0m with 1.988 m GSB shoulder on either side of carriage way. The proposed ROW
generally varies from 8 m –10 m depending upon the embankment height and the proposed ROW is even less than 8 m
in some stretches of habitation area and in areas having agricultural Land.

12.3 Additional Land

Local administration and local panchayat have apprised the local villagers about requirement of minor areas in places
for development of the road. Villagers are generally highly enthusiastic during site visits for selection of the road as
well as during transact walk.
The villagers have expressed their willingness to donate the necessary encroached land voluntarily
13. Utility shifting/relocation
13.1 Existing utilities
Chainage Type Nos
0 Electric Pole 2

13.2 The Electric authority is to be moved for shifting of above utilities during execution of Road.

13.3 The local electric authority will be requested to shift the electric poles by depositing the required cost their of .

13.4 An Estimate for relocation of utlities is given below table.

Table 13.1
Estimated Estimated Cost in
Sl. No. Utility Type Qty
Rate in Rs. Rs.
1 Electric pole 2 0.00 0.00
Esimated Total Cost = 0.00
14. Traffic Management and Road Safety Measures
{"Read and delete: This DPR will be subjected to a road safety audit by an independent third party. The
recommendations of the road safety audit as approved by PIU shall be incorporated in the final DPR".}

14.1 Road Furniture

Road Furniture details include:
Road Markings
Cautionary, Mandatory and Informatory signs
KM stones and 200m stones
Delineators and object markers
Guard Posts and Crash Barriers
Speed breakers & Rumble Strips
Reflective Pavement Markers (RPM) and Chevron signs
Median & Footpath Barriers

14.1.1 Road Markings

Road markings perform the important function of guiding and controlling traffic on a highway. The markings serve as
psychological barriers and signify the delineation of traffic paths and their lateral clearance from traffic hazards for safe
movement of traffic. Road markings are therefore essential to ensure smooth and orderly flow of traffic and to promote
road safety. The Code of Practice for Road Markings, IRC: 35-1997 has been used in the study as the design basis.
Schedules of Road Markings are included in contract drawings.

14.1.2 Cautionary, Mandatory and Informatory Signs

Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs are provided depending on the situation and function they perform in
accordance with the IRC: 67-2001 guidelines for Road Signs.
Overhead signs are proposed in accordance with IRC: 67-2001

14.1.3 Kilometer Stone and Hectometer Stone

The details of kilometre stones are in accordance with IRC: 8-1980 guidelines. Both ordinary and fifth kilometre
stones are provided as per the schedule. Kilometre stones are located on both the side of the road.
The details of 200m stones conform to IRC: 26-1967. 200m stones are located on the same side of the road as the
kilometre stones. The inscription on the stones shall be the numerals 2,4,6 and 8 marked in an ascending order in the
direction of increasing kilometerage away from the starting station. Table 14.1 gives the details of Km. stone.5th km.
stone and boundary pillars provided. {Insert figures in the table below and this should be shown in the drawings also} .

Table 14.1
Details of Km. Stone.5th km. Stone and Boundary Pillars
5th Km. Km. 200m Boundary
Sl. No. Name of Road Chainage (km) stone stone stone stone
(nos.) . (nos.) (nos.) (nos.)

Badaolama to
1. 0.000 KM to 4.370 KM 0 0 0 ----
Pangalguda
14.1.4 Delineators and Object Markers
Roadway delineators are intended to mark the edges of the roadway to guide drivers on the alignment ahead. Object
markers are used to indicate hazards and obstructions within the vehicle flow path, for example, channelising islands
close to the intersections.
Delineators and object markers are provided in accordance with the provisions of IRC: 79-1981. They are driving aids
and should not be regarded as substitutes for warning signs, road markings or barriers.

14.1.5 Guard Posts, Crash Barriers and Speed Breakers

Guard posts are proposed on embankments of height more than 1.5m and bridge approaches. The spacing of guard post
shall be 1.5m c/c in these areas. Typical Guard post consists of pre-cast (M20) CC post of size 200mm x 200mm and a
height of 600mm above ground level. They are encased in M15 cement concrete to a depth of 450mm below ground
level. Guard posts are painted with alternate black and white reflective paint of 150mm wide bands. Table 14.2 gives
the details of guard posts, crash barrier and speed breakers.

Table 14.2
Details of guard posts, crash barrier and speed breakers
Guard Crash
Speed
Sl. No. Name of Road Chainage (km) post Barrier
breakers (nos)
(nos.) (m)

1. Badaolama to Pangalguda 0.000 KM to 4.370 KM 2

14.2 Temporary traffic control

The road under consideration has to be widened alongwith the bridges and culvert. The list below provides the c/d
structures to be widened/reconstructed and temporary traffic control measures to be implemented. Table 14.3 gives the
section-wise details of temporary traffic control measures to be adopted. {Insert table showing section/chainages where
temporary traffic control measures will be required and type of control like diversion etc.}

Table 14.3
Details of Temporary Traffic Control Measures to be Adopted
Temporary traffic control measures to be
Sl. No. Name of Road Chainage (km)
adopted
There is no temporary traffic control measures to be
1. Badaolama to Pangalguda adopted
14.3 Checklist for road Safety Measures
To improve road safety, it is recommended that the following counter ‐measures and mitigation measures are included
in all designs and shown on the DPR drawings.

Sl. Road Safety Checklist Yes No

a. A minimum 100 mm thickness of pavement sub‐base layer constructed to the full roadway width.
Yes No
b. The upper layer of all shoulders is gravel material of sub ‐base quality compacted to a minimum Yes No
thickness if 100 mm.
c. Shoulder side slopes are not be steeper than 2H:1V unless stone pitching of the slope is provided.
Yes No
d. Speed breakers comply with the requirements of IRC:99 ‐1988 for general traffic. Yes No
e. Speed breakers placed at the threshold of a habitation and at regular intervals (150 ‐ 200 m) through
the habitation. Yes No
f. Within densely populated habitations, a cement concrete (CC) pavement is constructed to the full
width of the available roadway. Yes No
g. Within habitations, wherever deep side drains are constructed either within or adjacent to the
roadway, is covered by slabs laid level with the adjacent pavement and capable of being manually Yes No
removed.

h. In habitations where child playing areas border the road, a low profile wall, raised kerb or similar
form of boundary marking (depending on the site conditions), is constructed to create a physical Yes No
boundary and act as a deterrent to the random movement of a child onto the road.

i. On roads where, because of the lack of dry land in the general area, the shoulder will be continually
occupied and only intermittently available for traffic, speed breakers are installed at regular intervals, Yes No
not more than 300 m apart, for the entire length of the road.
j. The drawings show all obstructions in the proposed road shoulder with a note that the obstruction is
to be removed. Yes No
k. If a shoulder obstruction cannot be removed, hazard markers are installed to mark the Obstruction
Yes No
l. Hazard markers are installed at all pipe culvert headwalls. Yes No
m. Hazard markers are installed at each end of all box culverts, river crossing causeways and similar CD
structures. Yes No
n. Hazard markers are installed at any discontinuity in the shoulder. Yes No
o. Directional sight boards are installed on all sharp curves and bends. Yes No
p. Speed breakers are provided at sharp curves and bends where the curve design speed is less than 40
km/h in plain and rolling terrain, and less than 25 km/h in mountainous and steep terrain. Yes No
q. Speed breakers are provided and directional sight boards installed at sites where reverse horizontal
curves are closely spaced and speed reduction is required. Yes No
r. At a main road intersection, signs and pavement markings for STOP control on the PMGSY village
road are installed, side road warning signs on the main road and intersection warning signs on the
village road are installed, and a speed breaker on the PMGSY village road at 100 ‐ 120 m from the Yes No
main road are to be provided.

Table 14.4
Details of Road Safety Issues and Mitigation Measures to be Adopted
Mitigation measures
Sl.No. Chainage Safety issues Remarks
adopted
1. All Road Safety issues and mitigation measures will be followed during Execution of Work
15. Specification
15.1 General
The “Specification for Rural Roads” published by IRC on behalf of the Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of
India has been followed.

15.2 Construction Equipment

Construction by manual means and simple tools has been considered for the project as per the guideline of
NRRDA. For handling of bulk materials like spreading of aggregates in sub-base & base courses by mix-in-place
method, use of motor grader & tractor-towed rotavator has been allowed in line with the schedule of rate for PMGSY
work. Compaction of all items shall be done by ordinary smooth wheeled roller if the thickness of the compacted layer
does not exceed 100 mm. It is also considered that, hot mix plant of medium type & capacity with separate dryer
arrangement for aggregate shall be used for bituminous surfacing work that can be easily shifted. A self-propelled or
towed bitumen pressure sprayer shall be used for spraying the materials in narrow strips with a pressure hand sprayer.
Now the vibratory rollers are also being used for rapid progress.

For structural works, concrete shall be mixed in a mechanical mixer fitted with water measuring device.
The excavation shall be done manually or mechanically using suitable medium size excavators.

15.3 Construction Methods

15.3.1 Preparation for Earthwork
After setting out existing ground shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 150 mm and leveled manually and
compacted with ordinary roller to receive the first layer of earthwork. In filling area, existing embankment will be
generally widened on both sides as per the alignment plan. Continuous horizontal bench, each at least 300 mm wide,
shall be cut on the existing slopes for bonding with the fresh embankment/ subgrade material as per Cl 301.7.

15.3.2 Embankment work

Material from borrow pits will be used for embankment construction as well as the approved material deposited
at site from roadway cutting and excavation of drain & foundation may be used. Layer of the earth shall be laid in not
more than 25 cm (loose) thick layers & compacted each layer of the soil up to 30 cm below the subgrade level at OMC
to meet 97% of Standard Proctor Density. Material for embankment and sub-grade shall satisfy the requirements of
Table 300-1 and 300-2 as per the Specification for Rural Roads.

15.3.3 Sub-Grade
Material from borrow pits will be used for construction of top 30 cm as sub-grade. Soil in these sections is quite
good for road construction. Top 30 cm upto the subgrade level and shoulder at OMC to meet 100 % of Standard
Proctor Density by proper control of moisture and by required compaction with a smooth wheeled roller.

15.3.4 Sub-Base
Sub base material in the form of stone aggregates and sand as available in the area to be used in GSB Grade II layer.

15.3.5 Base
Stone aggregates will be used in base course. 63 mm to 45 mm size (Grading 2) aggregate has been proposed for the
bottom layer and 53 mm to 22.4 mm (Grading 3) size has been proposed for the top layer.

15.3.6 Shoulder
Earthen shoulder shall be constructed in layers and compacted to 100% of Proctor’s Density. First layer of shoulder
shall be laid after the sub–base layer is laid. Thereafter earth layer shall be laid with base layer of pavement and
compacted.
Earthen shoulder shall be constructed in layers and compacted to 100% of Proctor’s Density. First layer of shoulder
shall be laid after the sub–base layer is laid. Thereafter earth layer shall be laid with base layer of pavement and
compacted.

15.3.7 Surfacing
Slow setting bitumen emulsion will be applied as primer on water bound layer. Emulsion shall be sprayed on surface
with pressure distributor. Rapid setting bituminous emulsion shall be used for Tack coat. Premixed carpet 20 mm thick
and mixed with penetration grade bitumen shall be laid as surfacing course. 6 mm thick Type B seal coat is considered
for sealing of the premixed carpet.

15.3.8 Structural Works

Following grades of concrete are proposed for Structural works and comply with MORD and IRC specifications:
• Concrete in superstructure of slab culvert – M-25 (RCC)
• Concrete in abutment cap, dirt wall of slab culverts – M-25 (RCC)
• Brickwork in abutment, return wall, headwall
• Concrete below abutment, return wall, headwall – M-10 (PCC)
16. Environmental Issues
16.1 Alignment
The proposed road has been designed considering the impact on environment. Proposed road alignment follows
existing pathway to the maximum extent so that huge land acquisition is not necessary for construction of the project
road. Proposed road, when completed, will be an addition to the aesthetics of this rural area.

16.2 Environment sensitive area (National park,wild life sanctuary, protected/Reserve forest, wet land etc)
There is no such environmental sensitive area such as National park,Wild life sanctuary,protected/reserve forest and
wet lands in the proposed road alignment.

16.3 Construction camp

Construction camps will be established away from forest area/water body. The minimum facilities such as water
supply, sanitation, storm water drainage, solid waste management and first aid box will be provided during the
construction period of the project.Necessary provision for rehabilitation or resoration after the completion of
construction phase will be done.The above guide lines will be followed during execution of work

16.4 Permit/clearance required prior to commending of civil work

No objection certificate- This will be taken by PIU from SPCB(state polllution control board)
Forest Department-if the project road passing thorough forest land and acquisition of the same is involved and it
will be taken byPIU from forest department.
Consent to establish (CFE) and consent to operate(CFO)-This is required for plant hot mix plant, WMM
plant,batching plant required for the project and the same will be taken by the contractor from SPCB.
Lease from mines& geology-The contractor will procure materials from the existing stone quarry as approved by
the revenue authority.
The above guide lines will be followed during execution of work.

16.5 Borrow area

The filling soil will have to be procured from borrow pit. Borrow area will be so excavated that the lands can be reused
as agricultural field. The depth of borrow pit will not exceed 450 mm (150 mm top soil included). The top soil will be
stripped and stacked and will be spread back on the land. As far as possible the borrow pits shall not be dug close to the
road embankment. The above guide line will be followed during execution of work.

16.6 Erosion Control

Turfing of the embankment slopes and earthen shoulder to prevent erosion of slopes of the embankment, rain cuts and
erosion of shoulder is being provided.

16.7 Drainage
Suitable cross drainage structures have been provided on the basis of hydrological survey of the area. So, there will be
no obstruction to the natural drainage of the area.
Road side drainage is also duly considered in a manner so that surface water is led to the low points and is drained
through the CD structures.

16.8 Use of Material

Cut back bitumen is not proposed in the project to avoid contamination with Kerosene. Bitumen emulsion is proposed
for primer coat and tack coat.
17. Analysis of Rates
17.1 General
Rates for various item of works of the project have been derived from the “Schedule of Rates 2013 for Road works,
Culvert works & Carriage etc.RRDA ORISSA and “Addendum & Corrigendum to Schedule of Rates” effective from
01.08.2013. However in general the basic rates of material have been taken from Orissa state schedule rate 2013 are
taken. The rates of different items have been worked out inclusive of all labour charges, hire charges of Tools & Plants,
Machineries and all other cost estimates for the item of work, overhead and contractor’s profit @ 12.5% on these.

17.2 Basic Rate of Material

The basic rates for stone materials & river bed materials have been taken from Orissa State schedule of rate 2013.
Basic rate for bituminous materials, like 60-70 penetration grade bitumen and emulsion has been considered at
Bhubaneswar.
Basic rate of other materials like coarse & fine sand, Stone products are as per the latest from Orissa State schedule of
rate 2010. However the cost of cement is taken as average price of 3 brands approved by Govt. of Orissa which are
available in the local market.

Basic rate of steel materials has been taken as per the rate of Orissa state Industrial corporation Bhubaneswar.
after adding cost of carriage, loading & unloading.

17.3 Lead for Materials

For stone aggregates and sand, lead from source to work site is calculated from the district map and block level map of
core network and finalized the same in discussion with PIU. The supply of different materials to worksite is by road.
Lead for bituminous & steel materials are similarly obtained using SOR.
18. Cost Estimate
18.1 General
Cost Estimate of project has been arrived on the following basis
• Selection of Items of work
• Estimation of item wise quantities
• Analysis of Rates

18.2 Estimation of Quantities

All the relevant road and structure work Items will be identified as per survey, design and drawings. Following major
item of works considered are given below:-
• Site clearance, dismantling and earthwork
• Pavement works (GSB, WBM, Bituminous layers)
• Cross drainage structure works
• Drainage and protective works
• Utility relocation
• Road safety and furniture
• Maintenance works
Quantity of earthwork will be derived from the proposed cross section drawings. Volume of cut and fill will be
obtained directly using the design package software. Quantity derived from software will be manually verified. There
are same stretches of the road in cut section. The details are provided chainage wise in Table-18.1 of total cut and fill
volume. The soil obtained from roadway excavation shall be used for construction of embankment and shall be paid as
per item no.4. All other quantities will be computed from the drawings of finished road, miscellaneous drawings &
drawings of CD Structures. Tables of Cut & Fill volume are furnishaed in annexure-3.

18.3 Abstract of Cost

Unit rates are derived by using the “Schedule of Rates for Road Works, Culvert works and Carriage etc. SRRDA,
Orissa”. The abstract of Cost estimate is given in the detailed estimate. The details of cost are furnished inFormat F6 &
Format F7.

18.4 Maintenance
Cost of Annual Maintenance for five years after completion of project are estimated as per the PMGSY Guidelines.
Different activities of ordinary repairs are done as and when.
Total cost of 5 year maintenance furnished in format F-6.
19. Construction Program
19.1 General
The Construction of the Batch – V roads are assumed to start from the month of December. This is a high rainfall area
and rainy season extends from April to September. However, the construction program is based for a total working
period of 12 months, considering the program set out by MoRD. Generally, dry working season of about 8 months are
required for construction of PMGSY roads. However, works will be affected for the monsoon during the month June to
September.

It is anticipated that some activity like collection of materials, CD works, Guard walls & Concrete road etc. will
continue in monsoon period also.

19.2 Realistic duration

Probably 12 Calender Months from April'2017 to next March'2018 is required to complete the
road including rainy season.Detail work programme can be finalised as per the commencement month of the work.

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

Soaked CBR (4days) of subgrade= 0.054 0.075672969617344
 REPORT
This Estimate amounting to Rs. 0.00 lakhs has been framed to
meet the probable cost of expenditure for construction of the road Under
PMGSY for the year 2018 - 19.

Sl No Name of the Road Block Length of Estimated

Road(km) cost

1 Sulia to Kantilo Khandapada 3.000 0.00

Total 3.000 0.00

2.NECESSITY OF THE PROJECT :-

The necessity of the project is to give connectivity to revenue village
Marichia,Tarabalio,Gobardgah prasad,Chakrdhar prasad having population 6756 which
is not in a trafficable condition. By constructing this road people of village
Marichia,Tarabalio,Gobardgah prasad,Chakrdhar prasad will get their shortest
connectivity to block head quarter Nayagarh as well as to the District head quater
.On completion of the project it will boost the Socio - economic growth of local tribal
people of the district residing in B37rural sector.

Provision of toe wall,retaining wall,concrete drain has ben proposd for a length of
700m,500m & 500m respectively .4 nos of HP culverts with ventage 1x1.0 has been
proposed for irrigation purpose. Raising for some portions has been kept in provision
due to submerged area.
5. RATE ANALYSIS :-

The detailed Mord standard specification will be followed during

execution of the work.

Assistant Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer

R. W. Section ,Bhapur R.W.Sub-Division, Khandapada R.W.Division, Nayagarh

Superintending Engineer Chief Engineer

Central Circle, Rural Works -I, Orissa
Bhubaneswar
 Athgarh
Athgarh
Khuntuni to Talagarh Road

5.79
Khuntuni
Talagarh Road

Khuntuni 60
2 Talagarh 70
The laboratory soaked CBR value ranges from (5.0% to 6.0%), Which is enclosed in a separate sheet. The soil labo

0/300
1 0/600
2 1/000
3 1/300
4 1/600
5 2/000
6 2/300
7 2/600
8 3/000
9 3/300
10 3/600
11 4/000
12 4/300
13 4/600
14 5/000
15 5/300
16 5/600

Bodalo
In the present scenario of new connectivity road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume count has been conducted on the alread

24.10.2018
4
59

Bus / Minibus/Pickupvan 4
4
6
4
5

120
5

Total commercial vehicle per day (CVPD) 37

7
359
 1587.4

Chainage in (km)

1. 0/240 Slab
0/420 Box 1.5x0.8
1/065 1x600
1/670 1x600
2/090 1x600
 2/420 2x600
2/520 2x600
2/770 Box 0.8x0.5
3/195 1x600
3/495 1x600
3/885
4/190
4/620 2x900
4/830
5/120 2x900
5/260
5/700 Bridge 40x7.5
7. Adopted Geometric Design Standards
7.1 General

7.5 m (Due to restricted lan

5.5 m

1m wide Moorum shoulder on both sides of the road.

The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total commercial vehicle per day (CVP

The subgrade CBR range of (3.0 to 4.0) was considered and the traffic falls in the

Design alternatives considered

Hard (Moorum) shoulder

0/000 to 0/085
0/085 to 2/818
2/818 to 3/158
3/158 to 4/110
4/110 to 4/544
4/544 to 5/303
5/303 to 5/460
5/460 to 5/787
9.4 Pavement composition

SDBC

Gravel soil aggregate Sub-base

SDBC 25 MM

200 mm Gravel soil aggregate

375 mm

14 of new cross drainage structures are recommended for

Where P = Coefficient of Run Off for the catchments characteristics, A = Catchments Area in Hectares & Ic = Rain

Table 10.2 Proposed Culverts

Chainage

At RD:-0/240,2/770 HPC 1x600

At RD:-2/200,2/830,4/400 1X600
At RD:-2/300,2/920,4/510,3/400 1X1000

At RD:-0/300,1/420,1/800,1/900,5/320 2X600

Necessary protection works consisting CC wall have been provided near pond and water bodies & Narrow Width R

LHS
0/200 to 0/300,1/420 to 1/520,2/800 300 Toe wall
1/200 to 1/300,3/800 to 4/000 200 Retaining wall
500
 5.5
The total roadway width is limited to 7.5m with mMoorum shoulder on either side of carriage way. The
proposed ROW generally varies from 10 m –12 m depending upon the embankment height and the proposed ROW
12.3 Additional Land

Electric pole & Telephone poll

Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs are provided depending on the situation and function they perform in

14.1.3 Kilometer Stone and Hectometer Stone

The details of 200m stones conform to IRC: 26-1967. 200m stones are located on the same side of the road as the ki
 5/787

Delineators and object markers are provided in accordance with the provisions of IRC: 79-1981. They are driving a

0/000 to 5/787

Road Safety Checklist

6756
Indirect
n a separate sheet. The soil laboratory test results is summarized in Table 4.1

5.2
4.98
4..89
5.3
4.8
5.1
5.2
4.7
4.7
5.2
5.4
4.87
4.4
5.41
4.88
4.7
as been conducted on the already completed Khuntuni Talagarh road in the vicinity of project road.

24.10.2018 24.10.2018
8 10 7
126 128

6 10
8 8
8 8
8 10
10 8

282 232
10 8
 152942

Bad Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
 Good Condition
Good Condition
Bad Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition
Good Condition

7.5 m (Due to restricted land width)

mmercial vehicle per day (CVPD) was presented in Table 5.2. Cumulative ESAL is 159242.

T4
 25

200

225

tructures are recommended for the

ts Area in Hectares & Ic = Rainfall Intensity.

Replacement
New
New

New

water bodies & Narrow Width Road falling within the proposed alignment.

Toe wall
taining wall
either side of carriage way. The
height and the proposed ROW is even less than 8 m in some stretches of habitation area and in areas having agricultural Land.

60 5000
0

on and function they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-2001 guidelines for Road Signs.

e same side of the road as the kilometre stones. The inscription on the stones shall be the numerals 2,4,6 and 8 marked in an asce
 1 0 23

C: 79-1981. They are driving aids and should not be regarded as substitutes for warning signs, road markings or barriers.

15 0
 26
5.2
0.28287
 areas having agricultural Land.

als 2,4,6 and 8 marked in an ascending order in the direction of increasing kilometerage away from the starting station. Table 14.1 g
road markings or barriers.
m the starting station. Table 14.1 gives the details of Km. stone.5th km. stone and boundary pillars provided. {Insert figures in the table bel
ded. {Insert figures in the table below and this should be shown in the drawings also} .
 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
1. Introduction
The Core Network dose not represent the most convenient or economic route for all purposes. However, since
studies show 85-90% of rural trips are to market centres, the Core Network is a cost-effective conceptual frame work
for investment and management purposes, particularly in the context of scarce resources.

1.6 The Sub-ProjecCentral Circle,

The road passes through plain terrain. There is school at RD 0 point of this road. There are no
sub-station and no Water Lines within ROW . 0 Nos Electric poles within ROW. 0 Nos
of Existing Cross drainage Structures along the road & There is no private lands within the road alignment. However
the land owners of both the sides of the road alignment have been agreed to vacat the encroached government lands.

District:- Nayagarh
Block:- Odagaon
Road Name:- Nandighore to Saliajhari
Road Code:-
Package No:-
Road Length:- 6.000 Km.
Start point :- Nandighore Latiitude:- Longitude:-
End point:- Saliajhari Latiitude:- Longitude:-

Population Benefited Chainage

Sl. No. Habitation Benefited
Direct Indirect From To
Nandighara,Goudaputa,Bandhasahi,SALIAJHA
1 6,873
RI,Tikarpali
2
Total 6,873
2. Planning and Basic Design Consideration
2.1 Key maps
Block Maps of Odagaon showing all existing connectivity like District/block HQ, new townships,
National
State highway network, mandis, hospitals, andschools etc are furnished in fig-3.
colleges,

2.2 Preliminary alignment investigation

The strip plan of the proposed road alignment obtained from transact work isfurnished in fig-4.

2.3 Site Photographs

Photographs of the road alignment are taken at important critical pointrs such as narrow width, Existing CD structure,
Markets, Godowns, Educational,Health& Religious institutions at different chainages. (Photographs Enclosed.).

2.4 Road Design Brief

The detail description of design issues and solution in finalising the drawing, provision of CD structures, drainage
issues etc. is as follws in a tabular formate.

2.6 Checklist
Transect walk done Yes No
Transect walk summary table included Yes No
Photographs taken Yes No
Major changes in alignment perceived Yes No
Design brief provided Yes No
3. Topographic Survey
3.1 General
Topographic survey true to ground realties have been done using precision instruments like and auto levels. The in-
house standards, work procedures and quality plan prepared with reference to IRC: SP 19-2001, IRC: SP 20, IRC: SP
13 and current international practices have been followed during the above survey.

3.2 Traversing
Traverse has been done by Prismatic Compass having angular measurment accuracy of ± 30 sec. Bearing have been
taken up by WCB method.

3.3 Leveling
Levels were taken by auto level and having linear measurment accuracy of ± 5mm

3.4 Cross Section & Detailing

Cross sections were taken at 30 m interval. All physical features of the road were recorded. The cross section details
were taken for a further distance greater than half the formation width beyond the shoulders on either side of the road.

3.5 Data Processing

All data from topographic survey recorded by auto level & Prismatic compass and final alignment, plan, profile were
prepared and presented in Newgen Section Manager Software & AutoCAD Format.

3.6 List of TBM

TBMS RL LOCATION CHAINAGE
TBM 1 100.910 On RHS Culvert Side 0/000
TBM 2 97.998 On RHSTree side 0/350
TBM 3 97.716 On RHS Tree side 0/360
TBM 4 60.075 On RHS Road Side 2/700
TBM 5 66.075 On RHS Road Side 2/705

3.7 Check List

Reference pillars given Yes No
TBM with northing-easting given Yes No
Traverse survey carried out Yes No
Cross section and detailing carried out Yes No
4.0 Soil and Materials Survey
4.1 General
The soil and material investigations were done following the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2002 and IRC: SP: 72-2015
and other relevant IS codes. The potential sources of borrow areas for soil and quarry sites have been identified.

4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing

Soil samples have been collected along and around the road alignment at three (3) locations per km, from the adjoining
borrow areas, as well as one sample is collected from the existing road. Soil Classification tests like grain size analysis
and Atterberg’s limit were conducted for all the samples collected. Standard Proctor test and the corresponding 4 day
soaked CBR test were conducted either for a minimum of one test per km for soil samples of same group or more tests
due to variation of soil type. The following tests were conducted as detailed below:

• Grain size analysis as per IS : 2720 (Part 4) – 1985

• Atterberg’s limit as per IS : 2720 (Part 5) – 1985
• Standard Proctor density test as per IS : 2720 (Part 7) – 1980
• 4 day soaked CBR test as per IS : 2720 (Part 16) – 1985

The details of soil tests

The details of soil tests are attatched in annexure-1

4.3 Analysis of Test Results

The laboratory soaked CBR value ranges from (3.0% to 4.0%), Which is enclosed in a separate sheet. The soil
laboratory test results is summarized in Table 4.1

4.4 Coarse and Fine Aggregates

The stone aggregates shall be procured from 67 where as the locally available sand shall be used.
The source and the lead distance from the quarry to project site is in separate sheet in lead statement .The aggregates

and sand where available and acceptable shall be used for bituminous work, concrete works, other pavement works.
The stone aggregate shall be procured from 67 quarry & sand from Benagadia .
Figure -3 Quarry Map
The detail quarry map has been enclosed.
4.5 Sub-soil investigation for bridges
As there are no Major/Minor bridges in the road alignment sub soil Investigation, Bore log & Test results are not
required.
4.6 Checklist
Borrow pit suitable Yes No
SSI for existing ground Yes No
Investigation for coarse/fine aggregate Yes No
Quarry map Yes No
5.0 Traffic Survey
5.1 General
In the present scenario of new connectivity road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume count has been conducted on the already
completed Nnandighore to Saliajhari road in the vicinity of project road.
The classified volume count survey has been carried out in accordance with the requirements of the TOR and relevant
codes (IRC: SP: 19-2001, IRC: SP: 20, IRC: SP: 72-2015).The surveys have been carried out by trained enumerators
manually under the monitoring of Engineering Supervisor. Traffic count location with the similar road and project
road are enclosed.

5.2 Traffic Data and Analysis

The traffic count done was classified into different vehicle category as given below:
• Motorized vehicle comprising of light commercial vehicle, medium commercial vehicle, heavy commercial vehicle,
trucks, buses, agricultural tractors with trailers, car, jeep, two wheelers etc.
• Non- motorized vehicles comprising of cycle, rickshaw, cycle van, animal drawn vehicle etc.
The number of laden and un-laden commercial vehicles was recorded during the traffic counts. Traffic volume count
for this project road was done during peak season. The seasonal variation Once (for a period of 70 days from 1st
November to 15th January) is adopted based on local enquiry.
Average of 3 day traffic data is presented in Table 5.1.
Sl. No. Type of Vehicle Day-1 Day-2 Day-3 Average VDF
22.10.2018 22.10.2018 22.10.2018

1 Car, Jeep, Van,Auto 18 18 18 18

2 Scooters/Motorbikes 79 113 119 104
3 Bus / L
Minibus/Pickupvan 13 6 16 12 2.86
L 14 12 16 14 2.86
4 Trucks
UL 14 18 15 16 0.31
Tractors with L 14 13 16 14 0.34
5 trailers UL 13 16 12 14 0.02
Tractor without
6 Trailers UL 0 0 0 0 0.02
7 Cycles 120 144 116 127
8 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 14 10 14 13
9 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 0 0 0
10 Pedestrian 0 0 0
Total commercial vehicle per day (CVPD) 70
Total motorised vehicle per day 192
Total non-motorised vehicle per day 140

a). Traffic volume and mix do not vary along the Road Yes No
b). Traffic volume and mix vary along the Road Yes No
c). Traffic volume and mix will vary along the road in the Future Yes No
d). There is a potential for through traffic using the Road Yes No
e). Percentage of loaded Vehicle. Yes 30% No
5.3 Traffic Growth Rate and forecast
An average annual growth rate of 6% over the design life has been adopted.

Sl. No. Type of Vehicle ADT AADT VDF Growth Rate

1 Car, Jeep, Van 18 23 6%
3 Scooters/Motorbikes 104 130 6%
4 Bus / Minibus L 12 15 2.86 6%
L 14 18 2.86 6%
5 Trucks
UL 16 20 0.31 6%
L 14 18 0.34 6%
6 Tractors with Trailors
UL 14 18 0.02 6%
7 Tractor without Trailors UL 0 0 0.02 6%
8 Cycles 127 159 6%
9 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 13 16 6%
10 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 0 0 6%
11 Pedestrian 0 0 6%
12 Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd) 70 88 6%
13 Total motorised vehicle per day 192 240 6%
14 Total non-motorised vehicle per day 140 175 6%
ESAL 308674
6. Hydrological Survey
6.1 General
Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that the rain water can
pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on the following observations:
• Rainfall Data
• Catchments Area
• Time of Concentration
• Existing Cross Drainage Structures

6.2 Rainfall Data

Rainfall Data of Odagaon block as applicable for the project road were collected with maximum.

Average Rain fall = 1587.40 MM

6.3 Catchment Area
The Catchments area is calculated by gathering local information and topographical survey data in some cases where
it was not possible to calculate the same from the tropographical sheet.However, for Nallahs, streams etc the
catchment area was calculated from the tropographical sheet.

6.4 Time of Concentration

Time of concentration (tc) in hours is calculated from the formula of (0.87 x L³/H)0.385 where L is distance from the
critical point to the structure site in km and H is the difference in elevation between the critical point and the structure
site in meters.
6.5 Existing Cross Drainage Structures
There are 6 Nos number of cross drainage structures along the existing project road as listed
below:-
Table-6.1 List and condition of existing culverts
Description of Existing Structure
Sl. No. Chainage in (km)
Type Span/ Dia. (m) Condition
1. 0/840 Boxcell 1x1x2 Good Condition
2. 1/900 HPC 1x600 Good Condition
3. 1/940 HPC 1x600 Good Condition
4. 2/210 HPC 2x900 Good Condition
5 2/250 HPC 1x1000 Good Condition
6 2/270 Culvert 2x900 Good Condition
7 2/285 HPC 1x1000 Good Condition
8 2/397 HPC 1x1000 Good Condition
9 2/472 HPC 1x600 Good Condition
10 2/680 Box culvert 1x2x1 Good Condition
11 2/856 HPC 1x600 Good Condition
12 2/936 HPC 1c600 Good Condition
13 4/857 HPC 2x900 Damage Condition
7. Adopted Geometric Design Standards
7.1 General
The geometric design standards for this project conform to PMGSY guidelines and the guidelines as stated in IRC-SP
20:2002. Recommended design standards vis-à-vis the standards followed for this road are described below.

7.2 Terrain
For this road terrain is plain for which following criteria has been applied.
Terrain Classification Percentage of Cross Slope of the country
Plain 0-10% More than 1 in 10

7.3 Design Speed

The proposed design speed along this project road is as follows:

Plain Terrain
Road Classification
Ruling Min.
Rural Roads (ODR and VR) 50 40
At few places speed has been restricted to 20 km/hr where there are sharp existing turns.
7.4 Right of Way (ROW)
The requirement of ROW for this road is as follows (as specified in IRC-SP 20:2002):

Plain & Rolling Terrain (ROW in M)

Road Classification Open Area Built-up-Area
Normal Range Normal Range
Rural Roads (ODR and VR) 15 15-25 15 15-20

7.5 Roadway Width

Roadway width for this road is given below:

Terrain Classification Roadway Width (m)

Plain and Rolling 6.0 m (Due to restricted land width)

7.6 Carriageway Width

The width of carriageway for this project road is 3.75 m

7.7 Shoulders
It is proposed to have 1.125 m wide Moorum shoulder on both sides of the road.

7.8 Roadway width at cross-drainage structures

The roadway width at H.P culvert locations for this road is 7.50 m and at box culvert/slab culvert
location the roadway width is 6m.
7.9 Sight Distance
The safe stopping sight distance is applicable in the geometric design. The sight distance values for this road as per
IRC recommendations are presented below:-
Design Speed (km/hr) Safe Stopping Sight Distance (m)
40 45
50 60
7.10 Radius of Horizontal Curve
According to IRC recommendations/standards, the minimum radius of horizontal curve for this project road is given below:-
Radius of Horizontal Curve (m)
Terrain Category
Ruling Minimum Absolute Minimum
Plain 90 60

To minimize extra land arrangement, minimum radius used is 20 m and design speed in these curves are also restricted
to 20 km/hr.

7.11 Camber & Super elevation

A camber adopted on this road section is given below. The maximum super elevation is 7.0% for Bituminous road &
5.0% for Cement concrete road.

7.12 Vertical Alignment

The present road is in plain terrain and vertical alignment has been designed well with in ruling gradient.
Generally, minimum gradient of 0.3% for drainage purpose is considered for designing the vertical alignment of this
road. Vertical curves are not required when grade change is less than 1%, however a minimum vertical curve is
provided to avoid vertical kink.

7.13 Vertical Curves

There are no Vertical curves in the proposed road allignment.

7.14 Side slope

Side slope for this rural road where embankment height is less than 3.0m is given in the table below.

Condition Slope(H:V)
Embankment in silty/sandy/gravel soil 1:1.5

• Side Slope (Filling) = 1:1.5 • Side Slope (Cutting) = 1:1.5

7.15 Extra Widening of Pavement
The Extra Widening of Pavement at Curve as per IRC guideline is given below:
Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21 - 60 Above 60
Extra Widening for
3.75 m wide single lane 0.90 m 0.60 m Nil
carriageway
8. Alignment Design
8.1 General
The basic aim of highway design is to identify technically sound, environment-friendly and economically
feasible highway alignment. The ensuing sections deals with obligatory points, which control highway alignment,
design of cross-section, highway geometric design & methodology, design of miscellaneous items.

The main components included in the highway design are:

Cross-sectional elements
Embankment
Horizontal alignment
Vertical profile
Junctions and/or Interchanges
Road furniture
Miscellaneous items

8.2 Horizontal alignment

Table 8.1 – Features of Horizontal Alignment (Example)

Chainage Length Description Reason for deviation from existing
alignment, if necessary
From (km) To (km) (km)
There is no major changes in the existing alignment.

Checklist
a). Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment coincide Yes
b). Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment deviate at certain sections No

The road is proposed to be improved over the existing allignment as there is no private lands encroched.

Table 8.2 – Horizontal Curve details

Radius We Ls Speed Def Angle Lc Ls+Lc Extra
C No. IP Chainage S.E
(m) (m) (m) (Kmph) D M S (m) (m) Area
1 2/114 40 0.6 108 40 7% 40º 0' 0' 28.8 136.8 82

Extra Area for BT = 82.00 Sqm

Extra Area for CC = 0.00 Sqm
For bellmouth at junction =2*0.215*9 3.87 Sqm
8.3 Vertical alignment
{Insert a table (example given below) on the various vertical geometric improvement carried out and their details}
Table 8.3 – Vertical Curve Details
Chainage Level
Length of Type of Grade in Grade Grade
Sl. No. Chainage (m) Level of pvi Differenc
End of
Curve

Curve
Curve

Curve
St. of

St. of

St. of

Curve Curve (%) out (%) e

1. There is no Vertical Curve

8.4 Design of Junctions

There is no intermidiate junctions however the starting of the road is widened for smooth plying of vehicles.
The proposed alignment intersects cross roads and forms junctions. The locations of junctions are given below: {Insert
location of important junctions, type and any major intersections improvement proposed.}

Table 8.4 – List intersections, type and proposed modifications

Proposed
Sl. No. Type of intersection Location (km) Exiting condition
modification
1. Bellmouth at junction.
9. Pavement Design
9.1 General
Considering the subgrade strength , projected traffic and the design life, the pavement design for low volume
PMGSY roads was carried out as per guidelines of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015. In built up area for hygienic and safety
reasons, C.C. pavement was used with a hard shoulder and appropriate line drain.

9.2 Pavement Design Approach

9.2.1 Design Life

A design life of 10 years was considered for the purpose of pavement design of flexible and granular pavements.

9.2.2 Design Traffic

The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total commercial vehicle per day (CVPD)
was presented in Table 5.2. Cumulative ESAL is 308674.

9.2.3 Determination of ESAL applications

Only commercial vehicles with a gross laden weight of 3 tonnes or more are considered. The design traffic was
considered in terms of cumulative number of standard axles is carried during the design life of the road. The numbers
of commercial vehicles of different axle loads are converted to number of standard axle repetitions by a multiplier
called the Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF). An indicative VDF value was considered as the traffic volume of rural road
does not warrant axle load survey.

For calculating the VDF, the following categories of vehicles was considered as suggested in paragraph 3.4.4 of IRC:
SP: 72 – 2015.
• Laden heavy/medium commercial vehicles
• Un-laden /partially loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
• Over loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles

Un-Laden /Partially
Vehicle type Laden
Laden
HCV 2.86 2.86
MCV 0.34 0.34

Lane distribution factor (L) for Single lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application = To x 4811 x L, where To =
ESAL application per day. The Cumulative ESAL application for the project road as per paragraph 3.5 of IRC: SP: 72
– 2015 is enclosed

9.2.4 Subgrade CBR

The subgrade CBR range of (5.0 to 6.0) was considered and the traffic falls in the T6 Category.
Soil investigations done for borrow earth
Soil investigations done for existing ground

9.3 Design Alternatives

Design alternatives considered
Chainage in km Design alternatives considered
Pavement Shoulder Specify Design
Soil Stabilization Alternative Justification
From To Earthe Hard Full Hard and use of locally
Flexible Rigid (Moorum) Selected
n full width available
width shoulder
as per IRC:SP:62-
0/000 to 1/040 2014

as per IRC:SP:72-
1/040 to 2/340 2015

as per IRC:SP:62-
2/340 to 2/770 2014

as per IRC:SP:72-
2/770 to 3/270 2015

as per IRC:SP:62-
3/270 to 4/050 2014
 as per IRC:SP:72-
4/050 to 4/590 2015

as per IRC:SP:62-
4/590 to 5/800 2014

as per IRC:SP:72-
5/800 to 6/000 2015
9.4 Pavement composition
Flexible Pavement The designed pavement thickness and composition was calculated by referring Figure 4 (Pavement
design catalogue) of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015. The ratio between heavy commercial vehicles and medium commercial
vehicles as given in Chapter 5 has been maintained.

Top Layer PMC Seal coat

Base Layer WBM Grading III & WBM Grading II 150 mm
Sub-Base Layer GSB Gr-III 225 mm
Total Thickness 375 mm

Top layer of WBM will be treated with bituminous surface.

To be provided in crust

PMC Seal coat

75mm WBM Gr-III

Total provided =

Segment wise details of existing pavement and new provisions are as per table under article 1.6 in chapter No. 1.
9.5 Embankment Design
No embankment of 7.5 m and above height is proposed in this road.
10. Design of Cross Drainage Works
10.1 General
On the basis of hydrological survey, 4 Nos. of new cross drainage structures are recommended for the
project road as listed in table 10.2.

10.2 Hydrological Design

The existing structures in poor condition that are proposed for replacement as listed below.

10.3 Design Feature

Design Standards for culverts has been prepared based on standard codes and guidelines of IRC: SP: 20: 2002 and
similar type of ongoing projects. General features of the designed cross drainage structures are given below:

For hume pipe culvert, road width is 7.5 m & the length of barrels of Hume Pipe is also taken 7.5mtrs due to
restricted land width aganist 10m as agreed by NRRDA.
Width of culvert : 7.50 m without Parapet.
Width of Bridge: 6.00 m with Parapet.
Top level of culverts will be 0.4mt high above the finished road level.

10.4 Justification for retaining/widening and replacement of culverts

The details of the justification of Retaining/ Widening and replacement of culvert is given in the table 2.1

10.5 Hydraulic calculation for Culvert

The design discharge was calculated by the rational method considering peak runoff from catchment using the
formula,
Q = 0.028 x P x A xIc
Where P = Coefficient of Run Off for the catchments characteristics, A = Catchments Area in Hectares & Ic = Rainfall
Intensity.
Small bridge-site length of which exceeds 15 m to be jointly visited by STA and S.E. Design – as per SP-20 & SP-13
and relevant IRC Codes for Bridges.
Causeways and submersible bridges – Design to be done as per SP-20 and SP-28.
The detailed hydraulic calculation of all replaced and proposed new culverts and attached as Annexure-2 of this report
enclosed separately.

Table 10.2 Proposed Culverts

Sl. No. Chainage Type of Culvert Span/dia Condition

At RD-
1 4/857,5/338,5/618,,,,,
HPC 1x1000 New
11. Protective Works & Drainage
11.1 General
Protective works such as Toe wall & RR Stone Pitching of side slopes has been provided as per the para 11.3

11.2 Road side drain

There is Road side drain has been provided in this road.

11.3 Protective Works

Necessary protection works consisting CC wall have been provided near pond and water bodies & Narrow Width
Road falling within the proposed alignment.

Table 11.1 (the Chainage-Wise Protection Works Adopted)

Total Type of Protection works
Sl. No. Chainage Comments
length (m) LHS RHS

Narrow Formation of Road, To

2. 0 500 Retaining wall Protect Road Embankment in
the downstream of the Road

TOTAL = 500 Mtr

12. Land Acquisition
12.1 General
The existing road is generally an earthen track . Thus the project road is a new connectivity road. The existing Right of
Way (ROW) is varying from 8 m to 10 m.

12.2 Proposed ROW

The width of carriageway has been considered as 3.75 Mtr in accordance with the IRC-SP 20: 2002.
The total roadway width is limited to6.0m with 1.125 mMoorum shoulder on either side of carriage way. The
proposed ROW generally varies from 10 m –12 m depending upon the embankment height and the proposed ROW is
even less than 8 m in some stretches of habitation area and in areas having agricultural Land.
12.3 Additional Land
Local administration and local panchayat have apprised the local villagers about requirement of minor areas in places
for development of the road. Villagers are generally highly enthusiastic during site visits for selection of the road as
well as during transact walk.
The villagers have expressed their willingness to donate the necessary encroached land voluntarily

13. Utility shifting/relocation

13.1 Existing utilities
Chainage Type Nos

0 Electric Pole 0

13.2 The Electric authority is to be moved for shifting of above utilities during execution of Road.

13.3 The local electric authority will be requested to shift the electric poles by depositing the required cost their of .

13.4 An Estimate for relocation of utlities is given below table.

Table 13.1
Estimated Estimated Cost
Sl. No. Utility Type Qty
Rate in Rs. in Rs.
1 Electric pole & Telephone poll 0 5000.00 0.00
Esimated Total Cost = 0.00

14. Traffic Management and Road Safety Measures

{"Read and delete: This DPR will be subjected to a road safety audit by an independent third party. The
recommendations of the road safety audit as approved by PIU shall be incorporated in the final DPR".}

14.1 Road Furniture

Road Furniture details include:
Name of the Road:- Nandighore to Saliajhari
CH-2/114
Width of Carriage
3.75m.
Way=
e= Rate of superelevation
R= Radius of Curvature
v= Design Speed = 40Km/hr (For Rural Road)
θ= Angle of Deflection 40
f= Coefficient of friction = 0.15 (For Rural Road)

Curve 1
V= 40.000 Km/h R= 40 m.

i) e= v2/225R = 0.18 > 0.07 (go to next step)

ii) e+f= v2/127R
f= (v2/127R)-e = 0.24 < 0.15 OK

Lc = θ X 2∏R
360
= 28.10 m.

C= 80/(75+V)
0.6956522

Ls = 0.0215V3
CxR

= 49.45

Again Ls = 2.7xV3
R

= 108

Providing maximun Lentgh of Ls = 108

L total= (2 x Ls)+Lc
244.09778 m.

We = 0.9 if R<= 20m.

= 0.6 if 20m<R=>60m.
= 0 if R>60m.
= 0.6
Extra Area= (Ls + LC)x We

= 82
 Pavement Details

NAME OF THE WORK:- Nandighore to Saliajhari

Existing Description Proposed Description

SL From RD To RD Total Length
NO (M) Pavement Pavement
CW RW Compsition CW RW Compsition
Sand
GSB =100 mm, =100mm
M30 Panel ,PCC=75 MM,
1 0.00 1.04 1040.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr
concrete fully
3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
Panel concrete
damaged pavement =100
mm
WBM Gr-II-75MM
GSB = 150 WBM Gr-III = 75
2 1.04 2.34 1300.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr mm,WBM Gr-II- 3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
mm & PMC,Seal
75 MM
coat
Sand
GSB =100 mm, =100mm
M30 Panel ,PCC=75 MM,
3 2.34 2.77 430.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr
concrete fully
3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
Panel concrete
damaged pavement =100
mm
WBM Gr-II-75MM
GSB = 150 WBM Gr-III = 75
4 2.77 3.27 500.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr mm,WBM Gr-II- 3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
mm & PMC,Seal
75 MM
coat
Sand
GSB =100 mm, =100mm
M30 Panel ,PCC=75 MM,
5 3.27 4.05 780.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr
concrete fully
3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
Panel concrete
damaged pavement =100
mm
WBM Gr-II-75MM
GSB = 150 mm, WBM Gr-III = 75
6 4.05 4.59 540.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr PCC M30 Fully 3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
mm & PMC,Seal
damaged
coat
Sand
=100mm
GSB =150 mm, ,PCC=75 MM,
7 4.59 5.80 1210.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr WBM Gr-II 3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr
Panel concrete
=Damaged
pavement =100
mm

GSB = 150 mm, WBM Gr-II-75MM

8 5.80 6.00 200.00 3 Mtr 6 Mtr PCC M30 Fully 3.75 Mtr 6 Mtr WBM Gr-III = 75
damaged mm & PMC,Seal
coat

Total 6000.00
Junior Engineer Asst. Executive Engineer Executive Engineer
RW Section RW Sub Division RW division
Odagaon Nayagarh Nayagrah
 Existing Pavement Details

NAME OF THE WORK:- Kodigam to Kujaguda

Existing Description
SL Total Length Pavement
NO From RD To RD (M) Condition Pavement
CW RW Compsition
1 0.00 6.00 6000.00 Moorum 3 Mtr 6 Mtr GSB =100 mm,
Total 6000.00

Junior Engineer Asst. Executive Engineer Executive Engineer

RW Section RW Sub Division-I RW division
Kosagumuda Nabarangpur Nabarangpur
 PRADHANMANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (P.M.G.S.Y)
CONTENTS
Package No:-
Sl.
No.
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.

A. CHAPTERS
1. Introduction
2. Planning and Basic Design Consideration
3. Topographic Survey
4. Soil and Materials Survey
5. Traffic Survey
6. Hydrological Survey
7. Geometric Design Standards
8. Alignment Design
9. Pavement Design
10. Design of Cross Drainage
11. Protective Works & Drainage
12. Land Acquisition
13. Utility shifting/relocation
14. Road Safety and Traffic Management
15. Specification
16. Environmental Issues
17. Analysis of Rates
18. Cost Estimate
19. Construction Program

B. PROFORMA PAGE NO.

1. Proforma B Package Summary
2. Proforma C Check List for PIU & STA
3. Format F1 Package-wise Summary Sheet
4. Format F6 Cost estimate for Road Construction Works – Pavement Works

5. Format F7
Cost estimate for Cross Drainage Works – Slab Culvert
6. Format F8
Rate of Materials supplied at site – Rate Analysis
7. Format F9A Certificate of Ground Verification from Executive Engineer / Head
of PIU
8. Environmental Checklist
9. Checklist for community consultation on engineering

C. LIST OF FIGURES PAGE NO.

1. Figure-1 Road Map of India and state
2. Figure-2 District Map
3. Figure-3
Block Maps showing all existing connectivity like District/block
HQ, new townships, National and State highway network, mandis,
hospitals, colleges, schools etc.

4. Figure-4 Strip plan showing land and alignment details

5. Figure-5 Quarry Map

D. ANNEXURE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY IN VOL.II PAGE NO.

1. Annexure-1 Details of soil tests (Section 4.2)
Annexure-2
Detailed hydraulic calculation of all replaced and proposed new
2.
culverts (Section 6.7)
3. Annexure-3 Chainages-wise Cut/fill volume
4 Annexure-4 Transect Walk Report
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)
 Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer
R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
B.PROFORMA
C.LIST OF FIGURES
 CONTENTS
LIST OF ANNEXURES

Sl. No DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.

Annexure-1 Details of soil tests(section 4.2)

Detailed hydraulic calculation of all replaced and

Annexure-2
proposed new culverts (Section 6.7)

Annexure-3 Chainages-wise Cut/fill volume

Annexure-4 Transect Walk Report

ANNEXURE-I
ANNEXURE-II
ANNEXURE-III
ANNEXURE-IV
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PLANNING AND
BASIC DESIGN
CONSIDERATION
3. TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
 4. SOIL AND
MATERIALS SURVEY
5. TRAFFIC SURVEY
6. HYDROLOGICAL
SURVEY
7. GEOMETRIC DESIGN
STANDARDS
8. ALIGNMENT DESIGN
9. PAVEMENT DESIGN
10. DESIGN OF CROSS
DRAINAGE
 11. PROTECTIVE
WORKS & DRAINAGE
12. LAND ACQUISITION
13. UTILITY SHIFTING /
RELOCATION
14. ROAD SAFETY AND
TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
15. SPECIFICATION
16. ENVIRONMENTAL
ISSUES
17. ANALYSIS OF
RATES
18. COST ESTIMATE
19. CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME
Name of the Road:- Nandighore to Saliajhari
Package No:- 0
Block:- Odagaon District:- Nayagarh
Period of completion:- 12 Calander month
Period
Sl. Provision as
April'2017 May'2017 June'2017 July'2017 Aug'2017 Sept'2017 Oct'2017 Nov'2017 Dec'2017 Jan'2018 Feb'2018 March'2018
No. per estimate
Item
1 Earth Work 31615 Cum 8000 Cum 8000 Cum 8000 Cum 5000 Cum 2615 Cum

2 C.D. work 13 Nos. 5 nos 3 nos 3 nos 2 nos 1 nos 1 nos

3 GSB 2768 Cum 1000 Cum 1000 Cum 1000 Cum 500 Cum 483 Cum

4 WBM G-II 1705 Cum 500.0 Cum 500 Cum 500 Cum 205 Cum

5 WBM G-III 1705 Cum 500 Cum 500 Cum 500 Cum 205 Cum

6 BT 68196 Km 20000 m 20000 m 20000 m 5000 m 3201 m

Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Engineer

R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
 PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA
DISCHARGE CALCULATION FOR H.P. CULVERT 1X1000 MM Dia.
Design Calculation as per IRC SP-13 -2004

Road Name:-Nandighore to Saliajhari Name of Block:- Odagaon

Package No:-

(i). Discharge Q = C.A3/4

(Where A = Catchment Area in Sqkm.)
Assuming Catchment Area A = 11.00 hectre

i.e. = 0.11 sqkm

Q = 12 × 0.11 3/4
= 2.292 cum/sec
(ii). Discharge through pipe Q1 = l 2gh
(Where l = 0.573 (Conveyance Factor)
(Derived from IRC - 13 for 0.75m Dia and 1.0m Dia HPC of 7.5m long)
g = 9.81
h = 0.45 m (Head difference)

Hence , Q1 = 0.573 × 2 × 9.81 × 0.45

= 1.7026 Cum/sec
No of Vents required 2.292
=
1.7026
= 1.3462 Nos. Say= 2 Nos.
HencProvide Single Row of 1000mm. Dia H.P. Culvert
Hence provide Single Row of 1000 mm Dia HP Culvert
Sl. No. Chainage at Km Catchment Area Discharge

1 1 4.857 0.221 × 0.237 = 0.052 sqkm 1.3140 cum/sec

2 5.338 0.218 × 0.244 = 0.053 sqkm 1.3290 cum/sec
3 5.618 0.211 × 0.251 = 0.053 sqkm 1.3250 cum/sec

As the discharge in the above catchment areas are less than the discharge through CD structure,
hence number of pipe provide are adequate.

through CD structure, hence number of pipe provide are adequate.

Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer

R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
 PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA
DISCHARGE CALCULATION FOR H.P. CULVERT 2X1000 MM Dia.
Design Calculation as per IRC SP-13 -2004

Road Name:-Nandighore to Saliajhari Name of Block:- Odagaon

Package No:-

(i) Discharge Q = C.A3/4

(Where A = Catchment Area in Sqkm.)

Assuming Catchment Area A = 15.00 hectre

i.e. = 0.15 sqkm

Q = 12 × 0.15 3/4
= 2.892 cum/sec

(ii) Discharge through pipe Q1 = l 2gh

(Where l = 0.573 (Conveyance Factor)
(Derived from IRC - 13 for 0.75m Dia and 1.0m Dia HPC of 7.5m long)
g = 9.81
h = 0.45 m (Head difference)

Hence , Q1 = 0.573 × 2 × 9.81 × 0.45

= 1.70259 Cum/sec

No of Vents required 2.892

=
1.70259
= 1.69859 Nos.
Say 2 Nos.
Hence, Provide Doluble Row of 1000mm. Dia H.P. Culvert

Hence provide Double Row of 1000 mm Dia HP Culvert

Chainage at
Sl. No. Catchment Area Discharge
Km
0 1 5.710 0.421 × 0.294 = 0.12377 sqkm 2.504 cum/sec

As the dischare in the above catchment areas are less than the discharge
through CD structure, hence number of pipe provide are adequate.

Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer

R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
 PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA
DISCHARGE CALCULATION FOR H.P. CULVERT 1X600 MM Dia.
Design Calculation as per IRC SP-13 -2004

Road Name:-Nandighore to Saliajhari Name of Block:- Odagaon

Package No:-

i). Discharge Q=CM3/4 (As per Dicken's Formula)

(Where M = Catchment Area in Sqkm)
C= Constant = 11 -14 where, annual rainfall is 60 - 120 cm.
14 -19 where, annual rainfall is more than 120 cm.
22 in western ghats
Assuming Catchment Area M= 3 hectre
i.e. = 0.03 sqkm
Q=12x0.03 = 3/4
0.865
= 0.865cum/sec
ii). Discharge through pipe Q1 = lÖ2gh
(Where l=0.383 (Conveyance Factor)
(Derived from IRC – 13 for 0.75m Dia and 1.0m Dia HPC of 7.5m long)
g = 9.81
h= 0.3 m (Head difference)
Hence Q1 = 0.383 x Ö2 x 9.81 x 0.3
= 0.9292 cum/sec
No of Vents required= Q /Q1 = 0.865/0.929
= 0.931
Say 1 No

Hence provide Single Row of 600 mm Dia HP Culvert

Approximate Area Approximate Discharge by Dicken's Formula
Provision for 600mm from Field survey Catchment Area = Q = CM3/4
Sl.No. dia HPC at different
Chainages Width
Length in Km Sq KM Cum / Sec
in Km
1 1.020 0.1620 0.148 0.024 0.732
2 1.355 0.212 0.135 0.0286 0.835
3 1.770 0.205 0.134 0.0275 0.81
4 2.000 0.165 0.114 0.0188 0.609
5 0.000 0.185 0.164 0.0303 0.871
6 3.324 0.189 0.155 0.0293 0.850
7 3.570 0.145 0.168 0.0244 0.741
8 3.990 0.168 0.128 0.0215 0.674
9 4.590 0.138 0.124 0.0171 0.567
10 6.120 0.125 0.156 0.0195 0.626
11 6.390 0.200 0.138 0.0276 0.813

As the discharge in the above catchments areas are less than the discharge through CD structure,
hence number of pipe provide are adequate.

Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer

R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
 PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA
DISCHARGE CALCULATION FOR H.P. CULVERT 2X600 MM Dia.
Design Calculation as per IRC SP-13 -2004

Road Name:-Nandighore to Saliajhari Name of Block:- Odagaon

Package No:-

i). Discharge Q=CM3/4

(Where M = Catchment Area in Sqkm)
C= Constant = 11 -14 where, annual rainfall is 60 - 120 cm.
14 -19 where, annual rainfall is more than 120 cm.
22 in western ghats
Assuming Catchment Area M = 6.00 hectre
i.e. = 0.06 sqkm
Q= 12 x (0.06) ¾= 1.4548
= 1.455cum/sec
ii). Discharge through pip Q1 = lÖ2gh
(Where l=0.383 (Conveyance Factor)
(Derived from IRC – 13 for 0.75m Dia and 1.0m Dia HPC of 7.5m long)
g = 9.81
h = 0.3 m (Head difference)
Hence Q1 = 0.383 x Ö2 x 9.81 x 0.3
= 0.9292 cum/sec
No of Vents required = 1.455/0.929
1.5656 Nos
Say 2 Nos

Hence provide Double Row of 600 mm Dia HP Culvert

Approximate Area Approximate Discharge by Dicken's Formula
Provision for
from Field survey Catchment Area = Q = CM3/4
600mm dia HPC at
Sl.No.
different Chainages Length in Width
in km Sq KM Cum / Sec
Km in Km
1. 3.250 0.217 0.212 0.0460 1.192
2 8.150 0.143 0.245 0.0350 0.972

3 8.920 0.205 0.219 0.0449 1.17

As the discharge in the above catchments areas are less than the discharge through CD structure,
hence number of pipe provide are adequate.

Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer

R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
IRC:SP:-72-2007
 FORMAT F-6

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)

COST ESTIMATE FOR ROADS CONSTRUCTION

Name of the Road :- Nandighore to Saliajhari Package No. :

Length of Road(KM):- 6.000 km District:- Nayagarh

Block:- Odagaon

Sl. Rate Amount

Description of item No. L (m) B (m) D (m) Quantity Unit
No. (Rs) (Rs)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Junior Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer Executive Enginer

R. W. Section ,Odagaon R.W.Sub-Division, Nayagarh R.W.Division, Nayagarh
 FORMAT F-9B

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)

LIST OF DPRS VERIFIED ON GROUND.

Name of the Road :- Nandighore to Saliajhari Package No. :

District:- Nayagarh
Block:- Odagaon

Sl. No. DPRs Seen on Ground by DPR Nos. % of total Number

1. A.E

2. E.E

3. S.E

0
Head of PIU.
INDIA MAP
ODISHA MAP
 PMGSY DPR Review Checklist and Score sheet
Ranking
State: Odisha
Road Number: 0 0 Not Included
Road Name: Nandighore to Saliajhari 1 Poor Standard
District: Nayagarh 2 Fair Standard
Block: Odagaon 3 Good Standard
No Chapter Description Ranking Review 1 Review 2
1 Introduction: Name of work, its status vis-à-vis master plan, core
network, priority, terrain, geography, climatic conditions,
habitation(s) served, population of the habitation(s)
connected, population (direct + indirect) served by the
proposed road, land use, predominant type of agriculture.

2 Planning and Basic IT IS MANDATORY THAT THIS CHAPTER MUST INCLUDE

Design THE COMPLETE PHOTOGRAPH RECORD OF THE ROAD
Considerations: AND ALL EXISTING FEATURES AND DESCRIBE THE
FOLLOWING ASPECTS IN DETAIL. Key map including
district and block road hierarchy, through road or link
road, potential for future through road, traffic
destinations (eg markets, block centre), potential
developments and future traffic generators. Preliminary
alignment investigation strip plan including constrictions
on ROW, obligatory points including existing features and
fixed obstacles, existing tracks, intersections, schools and
government buildings. Existing road alignment and
proposed road alignment. Consideration of alternative
alignments, alignment improvements, bypasses. Site
photographs at maximum 100m intervals and all points of
interest. Road design brief. Transect walk summary.

3 Topographic Temporary bench marks, centre line, cross sections, digital

Survey: terrain model, setting out, actual road land width
available.

4 Soil and Materials Borrow area, quarry charts, availability of local materials,
Survey: subgrade testing, soil testing, test results.

5 Traffic Survey: IT IS MANDATORY THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING

ASPECTS (AS A MINIMUM) ARE ASSESSED.
Different types of rural vehicles plying
per day, network transport and traffic impacts, base year
traffic data of motorised and non-motorised vehicles,
consideration of through road potential, consideration of
specific traffic generators (eg rice mills, sand mining),
comparison with similar roads already in use, growth rate
adopted and projected traffic for the horizon year based
on the design life.

6 Hydrological Local drainage system plan for the area of the road,
Survey: catchment identification, data required for hydraulic
design of cross drainage works, agricultural irrigation
crossings.
 7 Geometric Design Roadway width, carriageway width, shoulders, design
Standards: speed, horizontal curves, vertical gradient, cross slopes,
etc.

8 Alignment Design: Horizontal profile, vertical profile, cross sections, utilities

and services, intersection layouts, road safety treatments.
Existing road alignment and proposed road alignment.
Consideration of alternative alignments, alignment
improvements, bypasses.

9 Pavement Design: Design life, design traffic and ESALs, subgrade CBR, design
alternatives, embankment design, type of pavement,
thickness design, use of local materials, type of surfacing
adopted, layer wise design of the pavement along with a
sketch of dimensioned cross section indicating the
pavement layers, carriageway, roadway and road land
width. Location of earth shoulders and hard shoulders.
Location of BT pavement and CC pavement.

10 Design of Cross Types of culverts, submersible bridges, paved dips, high

Drainage: level structures, bridges, irrigation crossings, catchment
and discharge calculations, high flood level estimates and
justification for selection.

11 Protective Works: Retaining walls, breast walls, check walls, stone pitching,
turfing and planting.

12 Land Acquisition: Obtain existing village plans from the revenue authorities,
determine requirement for land acquisition, prepare plans
showing the land acquisition.

13 Utility Shifting & IT IS MANDATORY THAT A COST ESTIMATE FOR

Relocation: RELOCATION OF UTILITIES IS PROVIDED.
Details of existing utilities and details
of new locations of utilities to be relocated, the
departments responsible for each utility, the rules
pertaining to the shifting/relocation of utilities and cost
estimates for relocation of utilities.

14 Road Safety and Details and locations of speed breakers, line markings and
Traffic edge lines, traffic advisory and warning signs, stone
Management: markers and guide posts. Audit the design at a stage when
the major conceptual and layout decisions have already
been made. Ensure that safety measures are incorporated
into design, especially when design is constrained, eg
narrow carriageway section, or speed needs to be
controlled.

15 Specifications: Choice of technology, specifications adopted.

16 Environmental Reinstatement of borrow areas, erosion control, filling of
Issues: ponds, vegetation and tree removal, forest areas, wildlife,
antiquities, historic and religious sites, environmentally
sensitive areas, construcion camps, permits and
clearances required, etc.

17 Analysis of Rates: Derivation of rates for all different items making up the
designed works.
 18 Cost Estimate: Estimate of quantities for all items of work, provision for
contingencies, provision for quality control, provision for
supervision, provision for logo and other road furniture,
total cost of the proposed road, bridges and drainage,
cost of land acquisition and cost per km for the same.

19 Construction Brief methodology statement describing construction

Program: activities and sequence, estimated duration of activities,
estimated overall time required for construction and
analysis of impact of monsoon season on construction
period.

No. Drawing Description

1 Key Map: Showing the state in relation to India, district in relation to
state, and a district map showing all the blocks, with the
names of each block marked.

2 Block Road Map: Showing the master plan and the core network and the
proposed road.
3 Index Road Map: Showing the full road to a suitable scale, topographical
features like rivers, canals, streams, railway lines, villages,
market centres, other roads and legend. Alternative
alignments, alignment improvements, bypasses.

4 Plan and IT IS MANDATORY THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING

Longitudinal INFORMATION (AS A MINIMUM) IS SHOWN ON THE
Sections: DRAWINGS. Drawings showing 1 km in each
sheet with chainage, level information, gradient details,
horizontal and vertical curve details. Utilities and services,
intersection layouts, road safety treatments, longitudinal
drainage and drainage in built up (village) areas. Existing
road alignment and proposed road alignment. Location of
earth shoulders and hard shoulders. Location of BT
pavement and CC pavement. Obligatory points including
existing features and fixed obstacles (eg bridges, ponds,
temples, etc), existing tracks, intersections, schools and
government buildings. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS WHERE
ALIGNMENT DEVIATES FROM EXISTING CENTRELINE AND
WHERE CLEARANCE IS TIGHT.

5 Typical Cross Drawings showing typical road cross sections, pavement

Sections: details including BT and CC, hard shoulder and soft
shoulder, batter slopes, longitudinal drainage. Typical
cross sections in built up village areas and typical sections
in normal rural areas.

6 Detailed Cross Drawings showing detailed cross sections with level

Sections: information, centre line offset details and so on.
7 Cross Drainage: Drawings of culverts, submersible bridges, paved dips and
high level bridges, giving general arrangement drawings
(GAD), structural details.
8 Protective Work: Drawings of protective works like retaining walls, breast
walls, check walls, drains.
9 Traffic and Drawings like kilometre stones, traffic signs, hazard signs,
Miscellaneous: advisory signs, speed breakers, line marking, stone
markers, guide posts, project sign boards.

Total Score (%)

0

Ranked By Name:
Position: Executive Engineer
Organisation: R.W. Division,Nayagarh
Date:

Reviewed -1 By
Name:
Position: STA, PMGSY, Odisha
Organisation: CET,BBSR
Date:

Reviewed -2 By
Name:
Position:
Organisation:
Date:
 CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ON SURVEY AND
INVESTIGATION

Name of Work: - Sulia to Kantilo

Certified that, I have visited site on ……………… & am fully satisfied

about the survey & investigation & also the plan & design for the work.

Executive Engineer

R.W.Division, Anandapur.

CERTIFICATE OF ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ON SURVEY AND

INVESTIGATION

Name of Work: - Sulia to Kantilo

Certified that, Sri. Tapas Ranjan lenka Assistant Executive Enginner, R.W. Sub-
division,Harichandanpur has reported that, he has personally visited the site and
prepared the estimate using sanctioned schedule of Rates and providing for the
most economical and safe way of executing the Work

Assistant Executive Engineer

Rural Works Sub Division,Harichandanpur