A Synthetic Proof of Goormaghtigh's Generalization of Musselman's Theorem
A Synthetic Proof of Goormaghtigh's Generalization of Musselman's Theorem
A Synthetic Proof of Goormaghtigh's Generalization of Musselman's Theorem
Forum Geometricorum
Volume 5 (2005) 17–20. b b
FORUM GEOM
ISSN 1534-1178
Khoa Lu Nguyen
B∗
A
C∗
N∗ O
H N
Q
B C
A∗
Figure 1
is the isogonal conjugate of the point P on the Euler line dividing OH in the ratio
OP : P H = 1 : 2t. See Figure 1.
A1
O
B1 C1
P∗
P
H
X B C
Z
M
Y
Figure 2
Musselman’s Theorem is the case when t = 12 . Since the centers of the circles
OAA∗ , OBB ∗ , OCC ∗ are collinear, the three circles have a second common point
which is the reflection of O in the line of centers. This is the inversive image of the
isogonal conjugate of the nine-point center, the midpoint of OH.
By Desargues’ theorem [1, pp.230–231], statement (1) above is equivalent to
the perspectivity of ABC and the triangle bounded by the three perpendiculars in
question. We prove this as an immediate corollary of Theorem 3 below. In fact,
Goormaghtigh [2] remarked that (1) was well known, and was given in J. Neuberg’s
Mémoir sur le Tétraèdre, 1884, where it was also shown that the envelope of is
the inscribed parabola with the Euler line as directrix (Kiepert parabola). He has,
however, inadvertently omitted “the isogonal conjugate of ” in statement (2).
Theorem 3. Let A B C be the tangential triangle of ABC. Consider points X,
Y , Z dividing OA , OB , OC respectively in the ratio
OX OY OZ
=
= = t. (†)
OA OB OC
The lines AX, BY , CZ are concurrent at the isogonal conjugate of the point P
on the Euler line dividing OH in the ratio OP : P H = 1 : 2t.
Proof. Let the isogonal line of AX (with respect to angle A) intersect OA at X .
The triangles OAX and OX A are similar. It follows that OX · OX = OA2 , and
X, X are inverse in the circumcircle. Note also that A and M are inverse in the
Goormaghtigh’s generalization of Musselman’s theorem 19
O
P
H
M
B X C
A
Figure 3
A1
Z
C2
B2
A3 O
B1 C1
A2
X B C
Figure 4
Similarly, OB2 · OB2 = OC2 · OC2 = t · R2 . It follows that the inversion Ψ maps
X, Y , Z into A2 , B2 , C2 respectively.
Therefore, the image of X under Ψ is the second common point A3 of the
circles OB1 C1 and OB2 C2 . Likewise, the images of Y and Z are respectively the
second common points B3 of the circles OC1 A1 and OC2 A2 , and C3 of OA1 B1
and OA2 B2 . Since X , Y , Z are collinear on , the points O, A3 , B3 , C3 are
concyclic on a circle C.
Under Ψ, the image of the line AX is the circle OA1 A2 , which has diameter
OX and contains M , the projection of O on . Likewise, the images of BY and
CZ are the circles with diameters OY and OZ respectively, and they both contain
the same point M . It follows that the common point of the lines AX, BY , CZ is
the image of M under Ψ, which is the intersection of the line OM and C. This is
the antipode of O on C.
References
[1] R. A. Johnson, Advanced Euclidean Geometry, 1925, Dover reprint.
[2] J. R. Musselman and R. Goormaghtigh, Advanced Problem 3928, Amer. Math. Monthly, 46
(1939) 601; solution, 48 (1941) 281 – 283.
[3] D. Grinberg, On the Kosnita point and the reflection triangle, Forum Geom., 3 (2003) 105–111.