Ubd Argument Writing
Ubd Argument Writing
Ubd Argument Writing
Argumentative Writing
SUBJECT AREA: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE LEVEL: 6
KEY WORDS: ARGUMENT, CLAIM, COUNTER-CLAIM, EVIDENCE,
CREDIBLE, SOURCE, EVIDENCE
TIME FRAME: 3-4 WEEKS
SUMMARY OF UNIT: THIS UNIT ALIGNS TO THE COMMON CORE STATE
STANDARDS. STUDENTS WILL READ AND ANALYZE ARGUMENTATIVE
ARTICLES AND SAMPLE ESSAYS TO IDENTIFY THE ELEMENTS OF A
STRONG ARGUMENT. THEY WILL PRACTICE ARGUMENTATIVE
STRATEGIES THROUGH DISCUSSION-BASED, CLASSROOM SESSIONS AS
THEY ARGUE FOR AND AGAINST HIGH-INTEREST TOPICS, AND THEY
WILL AND CRAFT AN ESSAY IN WHICH THEY PRESENT RELEVANT,
CREDIBLE EVIDENCE ON A CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC WHILE
DEMONSTRATING EMPATHY BY ADDRESSING THE OTHER SIDE. THIS
UNIT IS PRESENTED IN EARLY SPRING AFTER STUDENTS HAVE HAD
EXPERIENCE WITH THE WRITNG PROCESS AND CLASSROOM
COMMUNITY NORMS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED.
Content Standards:
W.6.1: Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
W.6.1a: Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly.
W.6.1b: Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and
demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text.
W.6.1c: Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons.
W.6.1d: Establish and maintain a formal style.
W.6.1e: Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the argument presented.
W.6.4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are
appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
With some guidance and support from peers and adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by
planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach.
W.6.7: Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and
refocusing the inquiry when appropriate.
W.6.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
● Effectively communicate for a variety of purposes
● Apply conventions of English grammar to writing
Knowledge: Skills:
● The Writing Process is recursive; ● Provide research-based evidence to support a
● Strategies for constructing an effective claim;
argument; ● Present and refute a counterclaim;
● Vocabulary related to argumentative writing; ● Evaluate sources of information;
● Components of an argumentative essay. ● Correctly use writing conventions.
Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence
Performance Tasks:
Students will participate in a Socratic Seminar, fishbowl style, in which they are presented with both
sides of a topic and must argue in support of an assigned side. Their performance will be observed by
an assigned peer, who will analyze strengths and weaknesses of their partner’s participation.
Students will compose an argument essay on a topic of their choice using the writing process.
Students will analyze their argument essay utilizing a checklist version of the assessment rubric.
Students will participate in an anonymous speed-revision activity where papers are passed around a
group. With each pass, students are prompted to find a specific requirement of the writing and provide
feedback.
Other Tasks:
Jigsaw reading and article analysis
Observations of student participation
Gallery walk analysis of effective/ineffective arguments
Reflection of peer feedback
● Effective arguments are constructed through ● How is argument writing different from
objective evidence. persuasion and opinion?
● Addressing other sides of an argument adds ● How does a writer know their argument is
to command of the topic. effective?
● Audience and purpose affect writers’ choices ● How do I choose credible, relevant sources
in terms of organization, style, and word for my writing?
choice. ● How can empathy affect the strength of my
● Thorough research is needed to broaden argument?
knowledge of a writer.
Students will apply their understanding of argument writing in a Socratic Seminar. Students will participate in
a jigsaw reading activity for the purpose of analyzing several different perspectives on a new topic. They will
be assigned a side on which to argue. Half of the class will participate in the seminar discussion while the
other half observes their partner, making observations of effective argument techniques. Then, partners will
switch roles. Two different topics can be utilized to ensure that arguments of the second Socratic group are not
based on arguments from the first group.
● Essay rubric
● Essay peer-revision form
● Socratic seminar observation checklist