1.4 International Business Environment
1.4 International Business Environment
1.4 International Business Environment
2. Do you think that study of international business environment is relevant for the
manager? If yes (or) No, Justify your views and Discuss the economic and financial
environment of international business.
Ans:
One of the most dramatic and significant world trends in the past two decades has been the
rapid, sustained growth of international business. Markets have become truly global for most
goods, many services, and especially for financial instruments of all types. World product
trade has expanded by more than 6 percent a year since 1950, which is more than 50 percent
faster than growth of output the most dramatic increase in globalization, has occurred in
financial markets. In the global forex markets, billions of dollars are transacted each day, of
which more than 90 percent represent financial transactions unrelated to trade or investment.
Much of this activity takes place in the so-called Euromarkets, markets outside the country
whose currency is used.
This pervasive growth in market interpenetration makes it increasingly difficult for any
country to avoid substantial external impacts on its economy. In particular massive capital
flows can push exchange rates away from levels that accurately reflect competitive
relationships among nations if national economic policies or performances diverse in short
run. The rapid dissemination rate of new technologies speeds the pace at which countries
must adjust to external
events. Smaller, more open countries, long ago gave up illusion of domestic policy
autonomy. But even the largest and most apparently self-contained economies, including the
US, are now significantly affected by the global economy. Global integration in trade,
investment, and factor flows, technology, and communication has been tying economies
together.
International business includes any type of business activity that crosses national borders.
Though a number of definitions in the business literature can be found but no simple or
universally accepted definition exists for the term international business. At one end of the
definitional spectrum, international business is defined as organization that buys and/or sells
goods and services across two or more national boundaries, even if management is located in
a single country. At the other end of the spectrum, international business is equated only with
those big enterprises, which have operating units outside their own country. In the middle are
institutional arrangements that provide for some managerial direction of economic activity
taking place abroad but stop short of controlling ownership of the business carrying on the
activity, for example joint ventures with locally owned business or with foreign governments.
In its traditional form of international trade and finance as well as its newest form of
multinational business operations, international business has become massive in scale and has
come to exercise a major influence over political, economic and social from many types of
comparative business studies and from a knowledge of many aspects of foreign business
operations. In fact, sometimes the foreign operations and the comparative business are used
as synonymous for international business. Foreign business refers to domestic operations
within a foreign country. Comparative business focuses on similarities and differences among
countries and business systems for focuses on similarities and differences among countries
and business operations and comparative business as fields of enquiry do not have as their
major point of interest the special problems that arise when business activities cross national
boundaries. For example, the vital question of potential conflicts between the nation-state and
the multinational firm, which receives major attention is international business, is not like to
be centered or even peripheral in foreign operations and comparative business.
The study of international business focus on the particular problems and opportunities that
emerge because a firm is operating in more than one country. In a very real sense,
international business involves the broadest and most generalized study of the field of
business, adapted to a fairly unique across the border environment. Many of the parameters
and environmental variables that are very important in international business (such as foreign
legal systems, foreign exchange markets, cultural differences, and different rates of inflation)
are either largely irrelevant to domestic business or are so reduced in range and complexity as
to be of greatly diminished significance. Thus, it might be said that domestic business is a
special limited case of international business.
The distinguishing feature of international business is that international firms operate in
environments that are highly uncertain and where the rules of the game are often ambiguous,
contradictory, and subject to rapid change, as compared to the domestic environment. In fact,
conducting international business is really not like playing a whole new ball game, however,
it is like playing in a different ballpark, where international managers have to learn the factors
unique to the playing field. Managers who are astute in identifying new ways of doing
business that satisfy the changing priorities of foreign governments have an obvious and
major competitive advantage over their competitors who cannot or will not adapt to these
changing priorities.
The guiding principles of a firm engaged in (or commencing) international business activities
should incorporate a global perspective. A firm‘s guiding principles can be defined in terms
of three board categories products offered/market served, capabilities, and results. However,
their perspective of the international business is critical to understand the full meaning of
international business. That is, the firm‘s senior management should explicitly define the
firm‘s guiding principles in terms of an international mandate rather than allow the firm‘s
guiding principles in terms as an incidental adjunct to its domestic activities. Incorporating an
international outlook into the firm‘s basic statement of purpose will help focus the attention
of managers (at all levels of the organization) on the opportunities (and hazards) outside the
domestic economy.
It must be stressed that the impacts of the dynamic factors unique to the playing field for
international business are felt in all relevant stages of evolving and implementing business
plans. The first broad stage of the process is to formulate corporate guiding principles. As
outlined below the first step in formulating and implementing a set of business plans is to
define the firm‘s guiding principles in the market place. The guiding principles should,
among other things, provide a long-term view of what the firm is striving to become and
provide direction to divisional and subsidiary managers vehicle, some firms use ―the
decision circle‖ which is simply an interrelated set of strategic choices forced upon any firm
faced with the internationalization of its markets. These choices have to do with marketing,
sourcing, labor, management, ownership, finance, law, control, and public affairs. Here the
first two marketing and sourcing-constitute the basic strategies that encompass a firm‘s initial
considerations. Essentially, management is answering two questions: to whom are we going
to sell what, and from where and how will we supply that market? We then have a series of
input strategies-labor, management, ownership, and financial. They are in their efforts to
develop their own business plans. As an obligation addressed essentially to the query, with
what resources are we going to implement the basic strategies? That is, where will we find
the right people, willingness to carry the risk, and the necessary funds? A third set of
strategies-legal and control-respond to the problem of how the firm is to structure itself of
implement the basic strategies, given the resources it can muster. A final strategic area, public
affairs, is shown as a basic strategy simply because it places a restraint on all other strategy
choices.
Each strategy area contains a number of subsidiary strategy options. The decision process that
normally starts in the marketing strategy area is an iterative one. As the decision maker
proceeds around the decision circle, previous selected strategies must be readjusted. Only a
portion of the possible feedback adjustment loops is shown here.
Although these strategy areas are shown separately but they obviously do not stand-alone.
There must be constant reiteration as one moves around the decision circle. The sourcing
obviously influences marketing strategy, as well as the reverse. The target market may enjoy
certain preferential relationships with other markets. That is, everything influences everything
else. Inasmuch as the number of options a firm faces is multiplied as it moves into
international market, decision-making becomes increasingly complex the deeper the firm
becomes involved internationally. One is dealing with multiple currency, legal, marketing,
economic, political, and cultural systems. Geographic and demographic factors differ widely.
In fact, as one moves geographically, virtually everything becomes a variable: there are few
fixed factors.
For our purposes here, a strategy is defined as an element in a consciously devised overall
plan of corporate development that, once made and implemented, is difficult (i.e. costly) to
change in the short run. By way of contrast, an operational or tactical decision is one that sets
up little or no institutionalized resistance to making a different decision in the near future.
Some theorists have differentiated among strategic, tactical, and operational, with the first
being defined as those decisions, that imply multi-year commitments; a tactical decision, one
that can be shifted in roughly a year‘s time; an operational decision, one subject to change in
less that a year. In the international context, we suggest that the tactical decision, as the
phrase is used here, is elevated to the strategic level because of the rigidities in the
international environment not present in the purely domestic-for example, work force
planning and overall distribution decisions. Changes may be implemented domestically in a
few months, but if one is operating internationally, law, contract, and custom may intervene
to render change difficult unless implemented over several years.
International business is a necessity in today‘s world. The gains for greater awareness and
knowledge of international business fare immense for nations, multi-national enterprises,
trading companies, exporters and even individuals. To go global, the first step would be to
understand the international business environment. International business in nothing but
extending the areas of activities of business across the boundaries.
ECONOMIC & FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT
Economic conditions, economic policies and the economic system are the important external
factors that constitute the economic environment of a business. The economic conditions of a
country-for example, the nature of the economy, the stage of development of the economy,
economic resources, the level of income, the distribution of income and assets, etc- are
among the very important determinants of business strategies.
In a developing country, the low income may be the reason for the very low demand for a
product. The sale of a product for which the demand is income-elastic naturally increases
with an increase in income. But a firm is unable to increase the purchasing power of the
people to generate a higher demand for its product. Hence, it may have to reduce the price of
the product to increase the sales. The reduction in the cost of production may have to be
effected to facilitate price reduction. It may even be necessary to invent or develop a new
low-cost product to suit the low-income market. Thus Colgate designed a simple, hand-
driven, inexpensive ($10) washing machine for low-income buyers in less developed
countries. Similarly, the National Cash Register Company took an innovative step backward
by developing a crank-operated cash register that would sell at half the cost of a modern cash
register and this was well received in a number of developing countries.
In countries where investment and income are steadily and rapidly rising, business prospects
are generally bright, and further investments are encouraged. There are a number of
economists and businessmen who feel that the developed countries are no longer worthwhile
propositions for investment because these economies have reached more or less saturation
levels in certain respects.
In developed economies, replacement demand accounts for a considerable part of the total
demand for many consumer durables whereas the replacement demand is negligible in the
developing economies.
The economic policy of the government, needless to say, has a very great impact on business.
Some types or categories of business are favorably affected by government policy, some
adversely affected, while it is neutral in respect of others. For example, a restrictive import
policy, or a policy of protecting the home industries, may greatly help the import-competing
industries.
Similarly, an industry that falls within the priority sector in terms of the government policy
may get a number of incentives and other positive support from the government, whereas
those industries which are regarded as inessential may have the odds against them.
In India, the government‘s concern about the concentration of economic power restricted the
role of the large industrial houses and foreign concerns to the core sector, the heavy
investment sector, the export sector and backward regions.
The monetary and fiscal policies, by the incentives and disincentives they offer and by their
neutrality, also affect the business in different ways.
An industrial undertaking may be able to take advantage of external economies by locating
itself in a large city; but the Government of India‘s policy was to discourage industrial
location in such places and constrain or persuade industries undertaking, a backward area
location may have many disadvantages. However, the incentives available for units located in
these backward areas many compensate them for these disadvantages, at least to some extent.
According to the industrial policy of the Government of India until July 1991, the
development of 17 of the most important industries were reserved for the state. In the
development of another 12 major industries, the state was to play a dominant role. In the
remaining industries, co-operative enterprises, joint sector enterprises and small scale units
were to get preferential treatment over large entrepreneurs in the private sector. The
government policy, thus limited the scope of private business. However, the new policy
ushered in since July 1991 has wide opened many of the industries for the private sector.
The scope of international business depends, to a large extent, on the economic system. At
one end, there are the free market economies or capitalist economies, and at the other end are
the centrally planned economies or communist countries. In between these two are the mixed
economies. Within the mixed economic system itself, there are wide variations.
The freedom of private enterprise is the greatest in the free market economy, which is
characterized by the following assumptions:
(i) The factors of production (labor, land, capital) are privately owned, and production occurs
at the initiative of the private enterprise.
(ii) Income is received in monetary form by the sale of services of the factors of production
and from the profits of the private enterprise.
(iii) Members of the free market economy have freedom of choice in so far as consumption,
occupation, savings and investment are concerned.
(iv) The free market economy is not planned controlled or regulated by the government. The
government satisfies community or collective wants, but does not compete with private firms,
nor does it tell the people where to work or what to produce.
The completely free market economy, however, is an abstract system rather than a real one.
Today, even the so-called market economies are subject to a number of government
regulations. Countries like the United States, Japan, Australia, Canada and member countries
of the EEC are regarded as market economies.
The communist countries have, by and large, a centrally planned economic system. Under the
rule of a communist or authoritarian socialist government, the state owns all the means of
production, determines the goals of production and controls the economy according to a
central master plan. There is hardly any consumer sovereignty in a centrally planned
economy, unlike in the free market economy. The consumption pattern in a centrally planned
economy is dictated by the state.
China, East Germany Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland etc., had centrally
planned economies. However, recently several of these countries have discarded communist
system and have moved towards the market economy.
In between the capitalist system and the centrally planned system falls the system of the
mixed economy, under which both the public and private sectors co-exist, as in India. The
extent of state participation varies widely between the mixed economies. However, in many
mixed economies, the strategic and other nationally very important industries are fully owned
or dominated by the state.
The economic system, thus, is a very important determinant of the scope of private business.
The economic system and policy are, therefore, very important external constraints on
business.